Thanks for implementing wide mode. I’ve found it only makes posts wide if the ‘Post metadata below post’ option is also enabled.

Gotta admit after trying it out for a while I kinda like the poster name to the left of the post. Should add I’m on Scrolling Mode 2, Work Mode and using the line divider between posts.

Glad to hear I’m not alone in missing ability to bookmark specific messages. Also useful when finding an interesting part of an old thread you want to read through.

Dislike the notifications and notification counter in tab title (or whatever that’s called).

I also prefer the poster name to the left of the post.

ditto (otm? thumbs up?)

Thanks for implementing wide mode. I’ve found it only makes posts wide if the ‘Post metadata below post’ option is also enabled.

Thanks for saying this. I went wide and it only moved everything to the left, but that next step fixed it.

I only quoted your post above and not your name, snoball, because I couldn’t highlight it all. It even skipped over your name and went straight to corrs’ post. Again, dealing with extra fancy stuff that makes simple processes more difficult.

Why didn’t I just reply to the post? Because it hides the post I’m replying to and just says “Replying to snoball” — which could be a post you made an hour ago or nearly twenty-one years ago.

It is modal I believe. So it will include the text of the post if it’s more than eight posts ago but just show “replying to snoball” if it’s more recent than that, to avoid too much duplication.

Ok, this one was from over 24 hours ago.

So it includes the text from some posts but not others. And you can’t just copy and paste the text and poster’s info.

Thanks for implementing wide mode. I’ve found it only makes posts wide if the ‘Post metadata below post’ option is also enabled.

No bother, and I did it way too quickly, so I’m not surprised there are things wrong with it. I’ll take a look. So hang on, are you the guy who lives in the old Luma factory? I’m probably gonna be wrong again here, but I asked someone else yesterday!

Yeah, I’m not sure what that’s about. That one should. A bug, I guess.

I will be doing the bookmark thing; in fact, I would’ve done it already as I looked at it this morning, but it turned out to be a bit more complicated than I initially thought, so it’ll take a bit longer.

Hey N, well no way to block them in a sense, strap yourself in... They make themselves look like normal web requests, because if there were some clear marker it were an AI bot, people would just block them. What a lot of work here has been to do is to at least cope with that situation as best I can.

Traffic is placed in different buckets:

• Anonymous traffic

• Logged in users

• The front page

• People trying to log in

• Also anonymous API requests (computer to computer messages)—these are just blocked

And within that there are two controls

• How many concurrent requests you are allowed (i.e. requests at pretty well exactly the same time), and

• How many requests in a thirty second period you are allowed

The numbers are unimportant and I don’t know what they’ll actually be yet; they’ll require tweaking, but:

• Anonymous users (AI etc.) get a certain amount of computer, but it’s capped at a certain point (based on the two aforementioned criteria)

• People trying to log in get certain amount of computer—quite small, as it doesn’t require much, but it’s ring-fenced from the anonymous user stuff so it’s not overwhelmed—it’s so real users are able to log in during an ‘attack’

• The front page also gets it’s own allowance to make sure people can find the site, even if it’s ‘under attack’

• Logged in users get unlimited access (i.e. the rest of the available compute)

So you can’t prevent this stuff happening, but if this works the way I intended, then it should mean that even under attack, logged in (and trying to log in / front page) users can still operate as if nothing is happening.

I have tested it at 5–10,000 transactions per second on my laptop, depending on the type of transaction. By way of comparison, the existing site managed 400 transactions per second when I last tested it, although that was years ago.

Thanks,

Lemmy.

Oh and if an AI thing tried to register as a user and do it that way, I haven’t done this yet, but it’s quite easy to deal with, because real users don’t throw thousands of requests per second at the machine, so I would just cap logged in users at something way above real users generate, but that would stop AI bots easily—basically at that point if they’re logged in, then you can identify them.

The live notifications of new posts makes me fantasize about a Keith is typing... sort of notification so you know who’s imminently about to post also.

Sorry, I draw the line about fantasizing about Keith.

Wide view seems to work! Thank you Keith