nice, that worked well! easy way to quote a post from another thread imo.

but, on the topic of polls, i’m sure there will be a lot of ilm people who may have strong feelings about this, but i realized tonight that maybe there’s not any point in waiting for poll results. maybe they should should just up there, like they are now in the default polls, where as votes come in they just show up. and you can change your own vote. and in that case, why ever “close” the poll? the only reason to close a poll is to have a final result/big reveal, but nothing’s ever final maaaan and who cares about big reveals. potentially.

anyway, sorry if there’s already been discussion on this, it’s just interesting and it changes the way a poll feels imo—in a good way.

how can I bookmark a specific message in a thread? say there are 100 new posts, I read 50 and want to bookmark my progress? maybe im missing smth obv in that case sry

Bookmarks only bookmark the latest one now... I know this is different, but there is a way to do what you’re looking for, which is to save the post... If you click the menu and click “Save” it will store it in your saved posts, and you can see that list as the Star icon in the main menu.

Z, forgive me if I don’t get to every point here, but actually I had exactly the same thought a few weeks ago.

I had considered the idea of re-running them, as it could be interesting to see how a group of individuals’ views on something has changed over time, but this is quite a big engineering job.

I think there’s some drama in having a point at which the detail on the results arrives, but it would be entirely possible to leave it open for voting / changing votes.

but actually I had exactly the same thought a few weeks ago.

I had considered the idea of re-running them, as it could be interesting to see how a group of individuals’ views on something has changed over time, but this is quite a big engineering job.

Did you aye? lol

Octo, thank you for your comments. One thing I would say is that twenty years ago, I did design and develop the existing ILX and everyone hated it! There’s a thread here about it somewhere! It is interesting to see that despite not really changing, it is now held up as some kind of pinnacle of web design. I knew literally nothing about design back then and only a minimum of CSS, so it’s difficult for me personally (although I understand it, if you’re not me, and you didn’t go through that) to believe it actually is really amazing vs. people are just used to it.

Your general rules are great, and they actually are what I focus on, but I can only assume you might not think that—or at least, not in all cases. When it comes to aesthetics, everyone always has their view, and everyone thinks that everyone else agrees with their view. so that makes it tricky. Also, things take time to settle in—over time I will make changes, provide options and take on people’s comments. I am already doing so, although responding here is taking up most of my time at the moment. Some of that is pretty easy (already done some) and some will take longer.

The tagging thing is something I have considered, but generally backed away because of its likelihood to be overused and get annoying. It’s a significant feature, with a variety of challenges (persistent notifications; lookup of usernames etc. etc.) but if people in general want it, then I can take a look.

only a minimum of CSS

This is a feature IMO. I really appreciate a site where there are not a lot of different fonts, different font sizes, backgrounds, boxes, rounded corners, icons, columns, animations ... even if it’s not as pretty as a site that’s got lots of design, I find it much more readable!

Sure, and I’m glad you like it. My point is that it’s not that way because I designed it as some kind of feature—it’s because I didn’t know what I was doing!

beautiful DIY fruit

Yeah, that would be awesome, and I’m pretty sure it wouldn’t just be me—as I say, I quite like having the visualisations available, but they just take up too much room on my screen, so if the size can’t be changed I’d probably have ‘just text’ as my default and then occasionally change my settings to look at some fun graphics.

I seem to get every notification twice.

Yes, I did that to make sure you noticed.

ONLY JOKING. That is odd... Not sure why that’s happening. I will look into it.

Actually, did you just go back to a tab you hadn’t been on for a bit? Because arstetzka and I both did post twice, and it does keep the notifications there until you re-open the tab.

No, I was just hanging out on the one tab.

Were you on another window and then move back to it?

No. I was steadily reading that one post you can glimpse in the screenshot when all four notifications popped up. It seems to happen about half the time.

Hmm, strange. I wonder it was maybe a network thing, i.e. you briefly disconnected, and then reconnected, and all the notifications came at once.

Is this an intentional design feature? All the posts (and usernames) in this thread before my post about duplicate notifications are in a smaller font than the posts after it.

Absolutely not. Has your computer got a virus? 🤣. Seriously, I don’t know what is going on there.

one of the things i love most about ILX is its web 1.0 feel (newold.css for life!)

threads are just text on a screen, unchanging as if they’ve been there forever. especially so with ILX’s deep archive, reading people’s live reactions to an album that came out 20 years ago

i must beg for the ability to turn off all the live update and social stuff.. it might sound a bit weird but it kinda triggers my social anxiety.. i didn’t even like the “x people are logged in” stuff on old-ILX.

THAT SAID. i love that the site has personality and whimsy with a lot of the new features and iconography. that’s something truly missing with modern web/software design. also from a tech perspective, it’s awesome! ...it just doesn’t feel like ilx0r to me

As I get used to this site I’m finding the old one harder to read, and harder to even look at!

And I was just now taking another screenshot of the same font phenomenon (notice how emily’s post is so much smaller than the ones below it) when you posted your virus post and I got another duplicate notification.

Heading offline for the rest of the day! Thanks for looking.

Thank you, I made newold many years ago. You might want to try “Book” here, which isn’t dissimilar. And you don’t need to bed to turn the live update stuff off, I will provide an option to do that.

I can see it, I just don’t understand it. Much more likely to be a browser thing than anything else—I’ve never see it anywhere else.

• Having to click on the “replying to ILXposter” posts in the first place to see what is being replied to is... well, I won’t say it’s difficult, but it’s certainly an extra step, but having an extra tab automatically get opened for each one is a more involved process.

I’m getting to the point where I’m not clicking on the “replying” links because it’s not worth the extra effort. “Is it really that important?” I ask myself.

• When “# of posts since you last read” appears on a thread on the front page(s), do those numbers just stay there forever, ticking up the new posts?

Sometimes, I’ll click on a thread to see what’s happening, go “Nope!” in my mind and move on. I’ll consider more carefully which thread to click on from now on if doing so means that it will be branded in pink on my front page forever.

• And more out of curiosity, at one point does ILX style move from using words for numbers to actual numbers for the numbers? AP Style uses words for only zero to nine (maybe ten) while ILX seems to be using words for everything from ninety-nine and lower.

On the other hand, there’s a chance that having a link to the post replied to will be extremely helpful when catching up in long threads... especially when pagination means it’ll be more complicated to go upwards and / or find text inside the page you have open.

That is exactly one of the challenges with replying, Tim... You might be replying on a page that doesn’t have the editor on it. It’s not easy—there are a lot of edge cases.

I’m getting the double-notification thing too now—DJP’s last post on a thread I was looking at came through twice

Yes, I have just figured it... And man was that obscure. It happens when:

• A notification arrives

• The notification is drawn on the screen, but at that point it works out if it’s visible on the screen or not, because if it’s visible, you just see the post; if it’s not, you see the notification

• BUT, if you also have a separator set, it inserts the separator, and then accidentally counts both of the insertions as a single post and notifies you of both of them

MESSY. Anyway, I think I have fixed it.

I can see how “a new version of the application has been installed” might be useful for the person building the site but for me, a mere user, it is not.

It’s not a long term thing, Lukas, it’s really there just because when I put a new one up in the short term, it’s going to download a new bundle and take longer. I know that’s not explained, but I wanted some way of making it clear that it wasn’t just because it was slow. I will be removing it.

Anyway, really got to run now...

I will say the new interface is fun. Live updates is probably controversial (haven’t read everything) but I like it.

Surprising to me that Recent Activity does not have live updating

I like it, but I think it can be turned off for users ?

In mobile the pie chart polls are clipping the text off. minor, but thought i’d raise it.

https://ibb.co/hJRVf20g

Edit: Ugh I couldn’t work out how to make this image show inline. The one frustrating thing I’ve always disliked about ILX is it is the only site where you cant just copypaste an image in from your clipboard. I assume because no one’s willing to pay for localised image storage?

Yes, Keith and Stet did say that.

imgur is also blocked now in the UK so can’t really be used.

I don’t know which is the best to use for ease of use but I find https://imgbb.com/ very good and once you upload it and click on the image you can right click and select copy image address and you paste that using the function on here.

I expect there may be better sites that are easier to use and that someone can let us all know.

ok, you did use that site. See the paper clip icon at the end? use that to embed and as I said right click on the image and select copy image address.

i really like that you can search by “most recently updated” thread!

Trayce, thanks for even understanding that some kind of outlay is involved! And I hope all is good with you. But yeah the outlay is already enough for me... Storage is one cost, bandwidth the larger and more unpredictable one, as in, if all of a sudden some thread I dunno ‘goes viral’ then me and stet wind up paying a load of cash. Plus we would have to deal with what kind of stuff people are uploading—it needs management to stop people uploading the wrong kind of stuff. It’s really rather messy, but something we take very seriously.

Kate, thank you, in the sense that it’s really rare that people tell me stuff they like, rather than stuff they don’t like.

Kate, thank you, in the sense that it’s really rare that people tell me stuff they like, rather than stuff they don’t like.

yeah, it’s one of the most frustrating things about working on any project... it’s a litany of “i don’t like this, i don’t like this, i don’t like this”, which is, i mean, it’s an important part of testing—there are things right now that i find confusing or disorienting, and after using the sandbox for a little bit, if i haven’t figured them out i’ll mention them. this genuinely is cool and i genuinely do like it.

oh! i also like the revised thread URL format! it’s much more elegant and succinct.

Above the text editor box it says “Posting as: sadbonx (change this)”. If I click “change this” it goes to the settings page where it auto fills in my email address as my nickname. Screenshot redacted.

Hey I’ve always been mindful that this site costs someone money to host and run. And I honestly feel like some people don’t think of that. You are going out of your way and I thank you.

I did all of that as you outlined and it didnt work :( all good I must have done something amiss.

Thanks, Trayce—hope all is good with you.

I made a bunch of options, based on your feedback. This is a real first draft and it’s quite possible some of them won’t work; they might even break existing things, because it’s been done quickly, but I thought you’d like to have a look.

If you look at the bottom of the settings page, there’s an experimental settings section, which has:

• Post metadata below post, i.e. similar to the mobile configuration, but for all sizes

• Hide images and embeds—a few people asked for this

• Place new threads below recent activity—on the board/recent activity pages

• Wide view—for those that want a wide page

• Disconnected mode—for those that don’t want live updates

I did try to make one to set the base font size, but it’s not going to be a quick thing that, as not all the font sizes are relative to the base size and they need to be for that.

See what you think.

Have to dash now... Hope nothing is broken too badly!

I’d like to say something positive about the reactions. I wasn’t in favour of them either, and indeed I was one of the first to say so, but I’ve just found a genuinely useful reason for having them.

I was able to acknowledge what Trayce said directly on her post rather than replying further down the thread and potentially breaking up the conversation. I feel it as a politeness thing.

I know it’s a very minor thing, but it’s a use I hadn’t considered. With further testing, we may discover other useful purposes for them, or we may not.

Either way, I think it’s worth trialling things like this on the Sandbox before Keith makes any permanent changes. That’s what the Sandbox is for, after all, and Keith has the far more important job of fixing bugs and getting everything working properly.

Wide View plus post metadata at the bottom of each post improves readability immensely. Thank you!

Now we just need Divider 2 (Line) to be across the width of the post.

more polite to acknowledge something with actual language

If we put reactions to a vote, “no reactions” would win by a landslide based on comments so far.

Yet I sense that we will have reactions with the ability to turn them off no matter how lopsided the comments. This seems deeply misguided.

Compromise: keep reactions on here for the 2ish posters who don’t actively hate them but don’t roll them out on ilx proper ever

haha I just realised that the thumbs up reaction is a nod to The Fonz.

re: “breaking up the conversation”—one of the things that’s magical about a message board is that you can verbally acknowledge or give a coherent shout-out or response to something from earlier in the conversation, and everyone can “hear” it, and yet it doesn’t break up the conversation!

Don’t want this stuff to be missed with it moving up thread, as a bunch of you asked for it:

I made a bunch of options, based on your feedback. This is a real first draft and it’s quite possible some of them won’t work; they might even break existing things, because it’s been done quickly, but I thought you’d like to have a look.

If you look at the bottom of the settings page, there’s an experimental settings section, which has:

• Post metadata below post, i.e. similar to the mobile configuration, but for all sizes

• Hide images and embeds—a few people asked for this

• Place new threads below recent activity—on the board/recent activity pages

• Wide view—for those that want a wide page

• Disconnected mode—for those that don’t want live updates

I did try to make one to set the base font size, but it’s not going to be a quick thing that, as not all the font sizes are relative to the base size and they need to be for that.

See what you think.

Place new threads below recent activity—on the board/recent activity pages

This does look better to me, mostly because as I as I said over in the other thread having two lists of threads side by side but with different layouts is quite hard to process. So with this option I only have one list to look at at a time.

Would still be interested in the viability of a single generic “list of threads” view where you can switch between recently updated/recently created/random.

PBKR, please see here, particularly paragraphs 3–5:

I Love Everything

I strongly suspect we are on the same page. A lot of what I did here was to encourage that discourse, not least the typography, respect the history (make it easier to look at!) and hopefully make it easier for people to use.

Again, I know you’re likely to disagree, but my reasoning (apart from some people suggesting over the years that they would be fun) was that it might free up threads from less information-heavy comments, if that makes sense. The absolute last thing I personally would like is that it turns into some kind of popularity contest or upvoting/downvoting.

People are perhaps interpreting me not immediately turning them off as some kind of dogged resistance. And it is, in a way, but only in as far as giving people a chance to see things and let them sink in. Right now, it is my view that your opinion will prevail, but I do think it’s reasonable to give people a chance. 147 people have looked at the Sandbox, out of around 1,000 active users, and maybe 20% of the 147 plus a… View message

Keith

The Future of Ilx

Also, I will draw you a line. I know that sounds like a joke, but I drew the existing line and it wasn’t easy! There’s also an offer if you want to draw your own line—it needs to be an SVG and you’ll need to try it out, but if not, I will draw one when I get enough time—as I say, it’s harder than it might seem to get it right (spacing; how browsers deal with images and aspect ratios etc.)

Metadata below post is a huge improvement, thank you! I’m trying it out without “wide view” to see if I do prefer a narrower column for readability.

Metadata below post, with no separator, reads really cleanly.

I’m glad you like it. The column width without that is based on Robert Bringhurst’s Elements of Typographic Style, which typically sets maximum readability between 45–75 characters, and ‘ideally’ 66 on a line—this varies with different fonts, as they have different metrics. The research in this space is odd, in that some people it seems can read longer lines well than that, although it also suggests that they typically do not prefer that.

But all that being said, whatever people feel comfortable with.

New settings are an improvement, thanks!

This was almost definitely my browser/password manager filling in my email address, so never mind it.

PS I’m doing the auto-quoted reply to myself here, and it’d be nice if I could edit/truncate the quoted text as I post (especially to make sure the screenshot doesn’t get quoted, which I fear it is about to).

Right... Still odd TBH, I’ve just checked in case I C&Pd an email input, but it’s not. Part of the problem is that browsers sometimes guess, based on heuristics. Not much I can do about that.

The reason I didn’t allow editing of quotes is because (a) it’s not obvious how to do and (b) if I could do it, there’s a possibility that people could look like they’re quoting someone, but actually just edit what they said to something completely different.

if I go to https://sandbox.ilxor.com/recentactivity and click on “New Thread” it gives me an error message saying “Please select a message board to post your thread on, and then click ‘New Thread’ on that page.”. Seems confusing to show a button that by design doesn’t work?

It’s because I’m told people regularly look for it there, so it’s to gently tell you that you need to do it from the board.

Is it hard to support posting a thread from there? Once you do get to the “New Thread” page you can select which board to post it on anyway.

It’s just that you’d have to select which board.

If you’re on a board, the board is already filled in for you.

A little bug I noticed. In dark mode if you quote reply to a post the editor with the quoted text is white on white

just a couple of observations after using the site a bit:

• the “you read up to here” arrow will cause the horizontal scroll bar to appear if your window isn’t wide enough to show it.

• i do a lot of clicking and highlighting of text as i’m reading any webpage, and this is constantly triggering the actions drawer. some way to expand this only with a button would be greatly appreciated

• i’m on the fence with the emoji-style reactions, but i do see the potential they may have for the community to express itself and play in new ways. the suggestions of “OTM” and “LOL” being the only two options is closer to that — we already express ourselves as a community in those ways with those words. i think the feature should be to enable play rather than to clean up or change discourse.. i mean it’s a part of ILX culture to necrobump a 20 year old thread to just say OTM

Keith, thank you for directing me to these thoughts on reactions. I can appreciate a trial period; it’s just that there seemed some contra indications that they might be here to stay with user-by-user disabling. I will shut up about them for a little while.

On the line, I am so technically disinclined that your reference to drawing my own sounds like magic. I’ve never heard of an SVG so I’m going to have to wait for you to work through your mountain of tasks. I’ve done a lot of complaining, so I will say thank you for your efforts.

In a poll with a delayed start, could new options be inserted into specific spots in the list? Right now they can only be added at the end, I believe. For example, in my British Invasion poll set to start tomorrow, I have the options in alphabetical order but can’t put a new option into the correct place without deleting some and re-adding. This is an extremely minor request so if it’s a lot of trouble, don’t worry with it.

Thanks for all the work you’re putting into this, Keith.

hi, I am also against reactions as a general principle and would prefer they not be coded in. Keith I do understand the points you are making in favor, but I am more sympathetic to the many eloquent arguments against them on the other thread(s). At the very least, I would want a way to disable them, and would also suggest that disabled be the default setting for all users :D

I am not seeing any other issues so far! I would also like a better delineation line between posts as well, I guess.

Woohoo, hide images and embeds! It’s on! :D

I mentioned it on another thread (was going to insert thread url but doesn’t seem to working as in old ilx? where the thread title is automatically displayed after you post the url? that’s going to break some jokes... anyway) but to my great surprise I’ve very quickly come to enjoy the two-column view with poster name on the left :O

Personally do not see any need for rich text editing, would prefer it were possible to just choose simple html/bbcode or smth.

I’m really warming up to this and confident that the reactions are not here to stay and that bookmarking specific messages will probably be introduced at some point.

there’s def a lot of white space on the sides but the overall length of post lines seems similar to “regular” olde ILX. If it could be widened a smidge I’d like that, but I suspect the majority of users are mobile? poll?

OK see it was hard for me to see where my post ended and corrs’ began

I am pro-tagging but anti-notifications so idk how that would work, if at all, and I am more anti-notifications. I have enough already!

seeing on the other thread that we’ve lost the ability to bookmark specific messages? among other things, this is important functionality for users to report buggy posts to the mods, as well as for specific linking.

and thanks for all your work Keith, I got cranky on the other thread about reacts but I do think this is cool and my initial posts on ILX were excited.

You can “save” them instead. What is currently lost is the ability to bookmark a thread at any point other than the final post when you last loaded it, which is valuable to those of us who use this function when we haven’t got time to read the whole thing but want to come back to the place we’ve … bookmarked.

ah got it, thanks

Yes, I’m not too surprised, Dark mode is hard and a pain in the arse, and also I can’t ever remember all the nooks and crannies to check. I’ll sort it.

Sleeve, don’t worry about getting cranky. As long as you don’t think I’m deliberately trying to piss in your cornflakes. Thanks for the helpful, constructive comments. I’m also glad you like most of it—it is you guys I do it for.

I’m not sure I have made some big defence of reactions, although I can understand why people might think that. I have made a defence of giving something a chance and making sure more than a few people get a chance to see stuff. The alternative is switching it off when only forty out of around a thousand active users have had a chance to even see it (it’s now about 160 people, but it was 40 or so at that point).

FWIW, I am also sympathetic to the arguments against them. As I’ve said before, although perhaps I will be a bit more. blunt now, the smart money is on me ‘removing’ them (most likely on a disable by board way, is my thinking, and please don’t anyone kick off, just disable them on the boards you want them disabled on, even if that’s all of them, I don’t care one way or another).

Perhaps people think because I put the time and effort into developing it that I’m keen on forcing it through—no I am not, and nor am I trying to ‘sneak’ them in by having an option to hide them—I also fully understand and have some sympathy with the view that even if you can’t see them, they alter the discourse. I once did an hour long talk about Marshall McLuhan to about a thousand bemused IT people (one person’s comment “yeah all very interesting, WTF does it have to do with us?”).

I’d like to think that because a bunch of us went through this twenty years ago, when I made something because the board was broken and because no-one else volunteered, and was swiftly followed by everyone hating me for it for some months, but I did work with people, and we made a bunch of changes, and it seems now everyone loves it. I like to think that at least those around at the time understand that I will do the same again, because I have that track record. The same goes for stet, and indeed the admins, who give their time freely to support the community.

What I would ask people to recognise, much as I fully understand it is hard to do so (I certainly didn’t 20 years ago), is that pretty well everyone thinks they know what ILX is and what everyone else wants. I learned the hard way back then that this is absolutely not the case—everyone has a different experience of it, because I, and Graham before me, developed a piece of kit that can be highly customised. That means that there is no one ILX, there are a lot of ‘versions’ of it, and everyone likes/dislikes different things about lots of bits of it.

Also, I’m kind of busy with various things in between trying to make things more the way people want them, but I did have a bit of a chat with Table about kind of existential ILX stuff, and I will get back to that. I think the most helpful thing for this is to understand what we want ILX to achieve, what we want it to encourage, what we don’t want it to be etc. etc. but that’s a longer term chat—it’d just be great if you and others would join in on that.

Okay, I fixed the bug with wide mode, where it didn’t really work unless you had the other setting about putting usernames below posts.