photography compatriots

Oh my. On what circa 1982 TRS-80 computer drawing program?

Polémicas intelectuales en América Latina

He does, but [VAGUE SPOILER] he’s kind of an opportunist about it.

Hau’oli Makahiki Hou

we’re gonna have to go out in style —

next week

She was also linked romantically with actresses Marlene Dietrich, Tallulah Bankhead, Eva Le Gallienne, Claudette Colbert, Joan Crawford, Louise Brooks, Ona Munson; with writer Salka Viertel, conductor Leopold Stokowski, and had a longterm and unstable affair with writer/poet Mercedes de Acosta from 1931 to 1944, which ended badly

1. Make people learn more about science.

2. Make scientists learn more about people who don’t know about science, so they can talk to them better.

At no point did they suggest a text poll.

How do you feel about science and politics?

Captain Greg Roehl, of the Brooklyn Park Police Department says

This user is studying for a GCSE in Economics.

On the same page is a list of the candidate’s central problems in bullet-point form: his private sector business; disgraced former aide Bernard Kerik; his third wife, Judith Nathan Giuliani; “social issues,” on which is he is more liberal than most Republicans, and his former wife Donna Hanover.

Belinea 22 W

All 7 Inches Plus 2 More

Aretha Franklin

The other thing about that ‘famous whatever’ line (the DJ is talking about how she had a short romance with ‘a famous...a famous whatever’) is that everyone reading or seeing the play gets to solve for themselves who that is, and

Well, I was rightly arsed over in my 2006 Dead Pool. Only one of them died, and he was what, 81? So that gives me 19 points.

RUBBISH!

Frankly, Team Monkey is going to have to come up with something better this year. I will be doing my research, I can tell you. The Economist will help me, I’m sure.

Who do you suggest?

Actually, three questions in and the question thing is already really annoying me, so I’ll stop.

I have been blogging.

¡

(guess which thread i’ve just been posting to.)

s[x] = sqrt(sum((x-mu[x])^2 * p(x)) for all x)

Yes I am a dork.

Get one: