sandbox philosophy thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (32 of them)

xp - yes

Robin Waterfield's The First Philosophers is a good anthology.

woof, Thursday, 29 December 2011 16:55 (twelve years ago) link

Yes, thomp. Actually I used to own a copy of the Monk bio, which went missing in a move. I liked what I read of it, maybe I should go back to that.

P-Moose (Wants To Get Moosed Up) (James Redd), Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:02 (twelve years ago) link

Cordoza = Cardozo?

yes typo

Mordy, Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:03 (twelve years ago) link

For a while I thought you meant Cordoba and I was wondering whether it was the one in Spain or Argentina :)

Re Wittgenstein: what about that Alexander Waugh book?

P-Moose (Wants To Get Moosed Up) (James Redd), Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:04 (twelve years ago) link

Only read it if you intend to think of his name as being pronounced 'waff'.

M. White, Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:07 (twelve years ago) link

I haven't read the Waterfield book but Jonathan Barnes' Early Greek Philosophy has been helpful to me. They seem to have the same basic layout of having all of the fragments tied together with context and exposition, so as introductions go I wouldn't imagine there'd be much to separate them. Beyond that kind of dry format Heidegger's obv v good on the pre-Socratics, and while offering ~unconventional~ readings he doesn't really do that major-thinker-writing-on-major-thinkers thing of completely assimilating them into his own thought.

m. yeux, Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:19 (twelve years ago) link

Really? I haven't read Heidegger on the Vorsokrater. I really enjoyed the pre-Socratics as much as anyone in Philosophy.

M. White, Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:23 (twelve years ago) link

iirc his essay 'The Anaximander Fragment' is particularly good. But looking at it again now I may have been lying terribly about the not-assimilating part...

m. yeux, Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:29 (twelve years ago) link

:( Is his prose as turgid as usual?

M. White, Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:33 (twelve years ago) link

ha, I dunno, scanning through and reading bits here and there it looks alright, but then I've spent the last three months reading The Phenomenology of Spirit so I'm sure I've lost all sense of what constitutes readable philosophical writing.

m. yeux, Thursday, 29 December 2011 17:49 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.