Ban Gabbneb CK Dexter Holland from Girls Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (35 of them)

Oh dude, you're Gabbneb? Was it really "Ben B. Bag" or was it about something else?

another suggestbanite (rusty flathead screwdriver), Tuesday, 27 December 2011 22:51 (nine years ago) link

blended haircuts r back

if you ain't gonna wash it, i ain't gonna eat it, Tuesday, 27 December 2011 23:40 (nine years ago) link

rights for gabs oh yeah

― ~*~ (є(٥_ ٥)э), Tuesday, December 27, 2011 10:45 PM (Yesterday)

lol!

nebneb cherry's ruffalo stance (sarahel), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 01:02 (nine years ago) link

nebneb cherry's ruffalo stance

Don't you get fresh with me! (cute)

illegal crew member (C.K. Dexter Holland), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 01:06 (nine years ago) link

do you have opinions about John Maus?

nebneb cherry's ruffalo stance (sarahel), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 01:07 (nine years ago) link

fwiw i think everything neb said in those threads was idiotic but i think it'd be lame if he was banned from a thread just so you guys could throw shade without him being able to defend himself

k3vin k., Wednesday, 28 December 2011 01:15 (nine years ago) link

your opinion has been noted

judith, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 01:16 (nine years ago) link

k3vin you are not a true 1p3er; if you were a true 1p3er you would know that no boys are allowed in room in that thread!

nebneb cherry's ruffalo stance (sarahel), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 01:18 (nine years ago) link

gab on the girls thread might be trying to tell you something

elks thunder, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 01:32 (nine years ago) link

http://www.inetours.com/England/London/images/BgBn/Little_Ben_8214.jpg

amon, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 16:01 (nine years ago) link

does this mean we're allowing shooting kittens on the ground?

wrinklepause, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 16:10 (nine years ago) link

heyo

iirc gabbnebb was never permabanned, so he can def come back to sandbox if he wants. and i dont really feel like banning him from a thread if hes getting discussed on that thread in a sorta playhouse 77 way. so here is my modest proposal:

1. dont talk about him on that particular thread
2. neb, dont post on that thread as long as peeps stay up with point 1

if that works out, awesome. if not, idk, we'll go from there.

that cool?

PROVEN BY BOOZE SCIENCE, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 16:45 (nine years ago) link

i propose we have him put to death

judith, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 16:46 (nine years ago) link

didnt mean for it to be that specific to neb either - in general if dudes could stay off that thread as long as no one is talking to/about them, plz do. if you dont i might hand out some threadbans because thats always been the vibe of the thread in the past. thx

PROVEN BY BOOZE SCIENCE, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 16:48 (nine years ago) link

The thing is, we, the girls, often use that thread to talk about the behaviour of men that we find problematic or difficult to deal with, in order to find solutions if possible, or solidarity if not. This includes men that we interact with online. I know that we try not to make it about specific individuals, but the problem is, without examples it descends into generic man-bashing and generalisations which, believe it or not, most of us very strongly against.

There is now a whole nother thread where men, if they want to talk about the issues on the Girls Only thread, can do so, without invading our space.

But the thing is, in order for an individual man to get ~talked about~ on the Girls Only thread on the specific level that he was being talked, he has to be behaving in a pretty objectionable way (such as completely derailing the Mark Ruffalo thread for a couple of hundred posts) - in which case, the problem is not the Girl thread, but that behaviour in the first place.

this is what YULE get if you xMASS with us (Fotherington Thomas), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 16:57 (nine years ago) link

not making any assignations of blame here i am just kinda setting general groundrules which i think are pretty reasonable, so thats what im going with. presumably this wont be an issue because i think they're pretty easy to hold to.

PROVEN BY BOOZE SCIENCE, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:02 (nine years ago) link

they're too reasonable -- i prefer the old "no boys allowed in room" policy -- largely for lols

sarahel, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:04 (nine years ago) link

Yeah, me too. No Boys Allowed In The Room was the best policy. Not even Hoos.

his eyes suddenly filled with fierce sparkling (Fotherington Thomas), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:05 (nine years ago) link

I think those are reasonable rules, too.

wore glasses and said things (thejenny), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:07 (nine years ago) link

It means p much that we can discuss specific examples involving people who don't post here or general issues, but not ILXors specifically, which I think is okay. The latter is what exasperated emails are for.

wore glasses and said things (thejenny), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:10 (nine years ago) link

^^^ yep

PROVEN BY BOOZE SCIENCE, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:11 (nine years ago) link

rules is rules

Cooper Chucklebutt, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:11 (nine years ago) link

I don't think they're reasonable without a clause saying, essentially "if you act like a massive flaming sexist cock then girls WILL tell you off"

The thing is, it's not as if several people didn't try to have reasonable conversations with him, explaining why he was being problematic and he didn't just stick his fingers in his ears going "la la la, mansplain mansplain mansplain."

I do not think it's unreasonable, at that point, to say, in the girl thread, "massive mansplaining douche is, well, a mansplaining douche!" That's hardly "throwing shade" - it's discussing a problem that we have all encountered.

his eyes suddenly filled with fierce sparkling (Fotherington Thomas), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:11 (nine years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/ZPXL5.jpg

Cooper Chucklebutt, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:12 (nine years ago) link

sorry, but theres no way im giving a pass to talking about any poster in a place where they cant respond, thats kinda mod 101 for ilx.

PROVEN BY BOOZE SCIENCE, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:15 (nine years ago) link

no no boys allowed

judith, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:16 (nine years ago) link

no mansplaining.

another suggestbanite (rusty flathead screwdriver), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:31 (nine years ago) link

but its kewl when gabnebb mansplains how to visit u.s. cities :)

amon, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:37 (nine years ago) link

since when is that ok at all

macarena of time (step hen faps), Wednesday, 28 December 2011 17:39 (nine years ago) link

Plz feel free to talk about me on the other thread, not here.

― illegal crew member (C.K. Dexter Holland), Tuesday, December 27, 2011 10:29 PM

amon, Wednesday, 28 December 2011 18:08 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.