All-Purpose NuILX thread for American Politics

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1189 of them)

Not that it's right, necessarily, to present it as an either-or, but I think that is in fact the case if this is your single issue on whether to vote for Obama, and one issue is unquestionably more important than the other imo.

I think it's def the more important issue - otoh Obama's been totally shitty w/regard to addressing energy policy and climate change too so uh, what's yr point

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 December 2011 17:05 (twelve years ago) link

and don't get me wrong I have no doubt the GOP crowd would be exponentially worse on this issue

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 December 2011 17:06 (twelve years ago) link

i've given up hope of any u.s. president doing the right thing on energy/climate policy. at this point i think only civil disobedience in the u.s. on a large scale will accomplish anything.

Z S, Friday, 16 December 2011 17:08 (twelve years ago) link

i think you'd have to see an american city seriously threatened by rising waters. i think even venice could disappear (let alone dhaka) and it would mean little here.

otoh if that happened, we'd be in a place where global crop yields would be haywire. if the food system gets threatened i think americans would definitely respond.

though again, as with all things in US governance, we would have had waxman's carbon bill be the law of the land if not for the current internal rules and practices of the US senate

slandblox goole, Friday, 16 December 2011 17:13 (twelve years ago) link

you'd have to see an american city seriously threatened by rising waters

too bad New Orleans wasn't really an American city. never calvinist enough for that.

Aimless, Friday, 16 December 2011 17:14 (twelve years ago) link

otoh if that happened, we'd be in a place where global crop yields would be haywire.

this is pretty much guaranteed to happen. of course, the right wing denialists will insist on some other unscientific explanation (END TIMES! probably lol)

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 December 2011 17:15 (twelve years ago) link

i think in that case it will turn into something like the memory of the civil rights movement -- conservatives will completely forget they were on the wrong side at the time. liberals will turn out to be the "real anti-conservationists" or something, by 2040

slandblox goole, Friday, 16 December 2011 17:18 (twelve years ago) link

Libertards, conservaturds, they're all sheep!

billy goat, Friday, 16 December 2011 17:44 (twelve years ago) link

don't you mean to say "sheeple"?

Aimless, Friday, 16 December 2011 18:00 (twelve years ago) link

btw as much as i was trying to troll upthread i promise i do not agree w/ c.k. dexter holland

max max max max, Friday, 16 December 2011 18:07 (twelve years ago) link

wow. no payroll tax agreement unless we agree to destroy our future

Regarding that legislation, Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell emails me with the following statement: “The Leader will not support any bill without the Keystone XL language as part of the agreement.”

it boggles the mind

Z S, Friday, 16 December 2011 19:30 (twelve years ago) link

a REPUBLICAN is refusing to lower taxes for people, that's crazy enough
unless we address our oil addiction by exploiting disgusting, last resort veins. fuck.

Z S, Friday, 16 December 2011 19:31 (twelve years ago) link

the weird thing that I don't get is that, paradoxically, if that amendment is approved it will essentially kill the project altogether - all the agencies involved have said they can't approve it in so short a timeframe, which means they will just reject it outright.

Boehner & McConnell must be aware of this, which would seem to indicate this is just a deeply cynical PR maneuver (ie "you can't make it look like we're against tax cuts unless we get to make it look like you are destroying jobs")

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 December 2011 19:39 (twelve years ago) link

I guess I do get it, really

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 December 2011 19:39 (twelve years ago) link

that being the case I guess I wouldn't be surprised if Obama retracts his veto threat and lets the bill go through as soon as he can receive guarantees that the pipeline project will be killed anyway

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 December 2011 19:40 (twelve years ago) link

Boehner & McConnell must be aware of this, which would seem to indicate this is just a deeply cynical PR maneuver

HAI DERE

Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 16 December 2011 19:41 (twelve years ago) link

my mom, who voted for palin (decidedly not for mccain) in 08, just overheard me say i wasn't gonna vote for O in '12. response: GOOD! IT'S ABOUT TIME YOU WOKE UP!

HOOS aka driver of steen, Friday, 16 December 2011 19:41 (twelve years ago) link

my condolences

Aimless, Friday, 16 December 2011 19:47 (twelve years ago) link

the ongoing agony of being multifacted in a binary world

OH NOES, Friday, 16 December 2011 19:49 (twelve years ago) link

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3645&utm_campaign=CBPPTwitter

Dem Ron Wyden teams up with Paul Ryan for Medicare plan. Why????

Another Suburbanite, Friday, 16 December 2011 20:42 (twelve years ago) link

Wyden really likes to cut bipartisan deals. It is part of his modus operandi as a senator. Wyden also has built his career on good constituent service for the aged, so I expect that his staff's analysis of the proposal's effects differed from that provided in the linked article.

Aimless, Friday, 16 December 2011 21:23 (twelve years ago) link

If you want a single issue to turn you against Obama, I don't know why you would pick the one that affects a small handful of individuals who in all likelihood are "combatants,"

sorry, i got off the Obama boat the second he started to seriously talk about "reforming" Social Security. everything since then has been noise, and i will only vote for Obama again in the increasingly unlikely scenario of Gingrich winning the GOP nomination (in which case it would really be a vote AGAINST Gingrich and yes if Romney or [God forbid} Ron Paul win i'm not voting for Obama again).

deine Mutter lutscht Schwänze in der Hölle (Eisbaer), Friday, 16 December 2011 22:26 (twelve years ago) link

sorry, i got off the Obama boat the second he started to seriously talk about "reforming" Social Security.

lol don't even remember this. SS has been basically untouched in his presidency, this seems like weird thing to get het up about.

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 December 2011 22:27 (twelve years ago) link

it was during the debt ceiling fiasco this summer.

deine Mutter lutscht Schwänze in der Hölle (Eisbaer), Friday, 16 December 2011 22:28 (twelve years ago) link

and it isn't so weird a thing to get het up about if (like me) you see fighting for SS (and Medicare and Medicaid) to be quintessentially progressive issues.

deine Mutter lutscht Schwänze in der Hölle (Eisbaer), Friday, 16 December 2011 22:30 (twelve years ago) link

well I think both programs are worth fighting for but a) neither party wants to fuck with either, and to-date neither has been able to and b) actual legislation/policy that Obama has implemented have been much worse

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 December 2011 22:34 (twelve years ago) link

(in which case it would really be a vote AGAINST Gingrich

i guess the only reason why this seems unusual - voting as voting against, isn't there a lincoln quote about that? - is that it did kinda seem like you could be voting for the right guy last time

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:19 (twelve years ago) link

Obama is def preferable to McCain come on now

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:20 (twelve years ago) link

McCain is senile AND bonkers

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:20 (twelve years ago) link

what would be different?

Dr Morbius, Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:35 (twelve years ago) link

we would MAYBE be at war with russia tbf

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:40 (twelve years ago) link

would've bombed Iran by now

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:42 (twelve years ago) link

Libya would have been an even bigger clusterfuck

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:42 (twelve years ago) link

don't ask/don't tell still in place

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:43 (twelve years ago) link

social security/medicare/medicaid totally gutted

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:44 (twelve years ago) link

7-3 majority of conservative assholes on the supreme court

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:44 (twelve years ago) link

no stimulus, no ARRA funding = even higher unemployment

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:45 (twelve years ago) link

probably would've fucked up the handling of the BP oil spill in the gulf somehow

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:46 (twelve years ago) link

EPA abolished

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:46 (twelve years ago) link

Bush tax cuts made permanent

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:47 (twelve years ago) link

Policy driven by intermittent rage.

Aimless, Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:47 (twelve years ago) link

war in Iraq still going on, probably even heavier presence in Afghanistan

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:49 (twelve years ago) link

Bin Laden still alive/Al Qaeda still functional

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:49 (twelve years ago) link

People everywhere prefacing everything they say with, "My friend..."

clemenza, Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:50 (twelve years ago) link

Sarah Palin in national office

aesthetic partisan (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:50 (twelve years ago) link

osama bin laden somehow a member of GOP administration

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:50 (twelve years ago) link

We would never have really gotten to know Herman Cain.

clemenza, Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:51 (twelve years ago) link

planes do a 180 after take off & before landing, fly upside down in sky, you spend the whole flight only held in your seat by the seatbelt, can't go to bathroom, no peanuts &c

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:51 (twelve years ago) link

haha, questions not to ask liberals Part 567

Dr Morbius, Saturday, 17 December 2011 00:51 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.