2012 GOP Presidential Campaign -- "This individual's going to accuse me of an affair for an extended period of time."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2147 of them)

jfk/lbj is a good example but not only was this pre-southern strategy but it was also an era that didn't have the ultra-partisan voting demographic we have right now. there aren't *that many* peoples' votes in play and who's really like "oh, if that guy becomes president and then gets shot, the person who will then be president is from a state that is 5 hours away from me. I think I'm voting for him."

edwards did *nothing* for kerry iirc

iatee, Saturday, 10 December 2011 21:51 (twelve years ago) link

Also: a Dem prez nominee could reasonably assume he could carry the Solid South, despite Eisenhower's inroads.

Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 10 December 2011 21:57 (twelve years ago) link

Joseph "Hot Lips" Biden as secretary of state? Doubtful.

Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 10 December 2011 21:59 (twelve years ago) link

yeah he would be pretty horrible, wouldn't he? maybe some other position then. but regardless a clinton as vp seems like a reasonable stunt esp if he's consistently trailing in the polls by a few points. I doubt it will happen if and/or when he's ahead.

iatee, Saturday, 10 December 2011 22:03 (twelve years ago) link

That picture was from when LBJ was playing fiddle for Wet Willie, right near the end.

Stevenson carried the South fairly solidly in '52/'56 (except Texas and Florida...and the rest of the country), so I don't know how Kennedy would have fared with, say, another Northerner on the ticket. Had the identity of the parties re Civil Rights already started to shift by that point?

clemenza, Saturday, 10 December 2011 22:04 (twelve years ago) link

I'm confident and at ease that Newt will survive tonight stronger than ever. Serenity now. Serenity now.

http://unionresourcecenter.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/train+derailment1.jpg

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 01:39 (twelve years ago) link

oh yeah! there's a debate tonight. hm.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 01:44 (twelve years ago) link

mitt not getting it done, so far

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:25 (twelve years ago) link

ohhhhhhhh . . . may have to watch.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:29 (twelve years ago) link

i read tweets saying gingrich is nicely deflecting the attacks (seems to be enjoying them).

(sigh) is there a live feed of this?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:33 (twelve years ago) link

challenging someone to a $10K bet onstage is nagl for a nominee

Z S, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:37 (twelve years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kC1i9qLUgPY

Z S, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:41 (twelve years ago) link

Shoulda pulled the ten grand out of his pocket to drive home the point. "See? I've got it right here! Ten grand! Let's do it!"

Tarfumes the Escape Goat, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:41 (twelve years ago) link

Bizarre: Newt-Romney outflanked on all sides. Except for his roundly booed line about losing to Teddy Kennedy--which is true!--Newt's doing okay.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:44 (twelve years ago) link

Don't you get ABC, Daniel? It's as national as it gets (unless I'm just lucky that Buffalo's carrying it).

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:45 (twelve years ago) link

Bizarre: Newt-Romney outflanked on all sides. Except for his roundly booed line about losing to Teddy Kennedy--which is true!--Newt's doing okay.

― clemenza, Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:44 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Permalink

I didn't think it was booing I think it was more like "ohhhhhhhhhh no you didn't!"

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:47 (twelve years ago) link

Agree with Sullivan on how annoying Diane Sawyer is. Stephanopoulos, meanwhile, is as much of an agitator as we was during the 2008 Democratic debate in Philadelphia...except tonight I'm enjoying it.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:48 (twelve years ago) link

lol Perry is so pathetic

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 December 2011 02:49 (twelve years ago) link

hey looks like i turned this on at the right time

Mordy, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:03 (twelve years ago) link

oh, now they're fighting about who is bigger friends w/ bibi. these guys are more hardcore on israel than i am

Mordy, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:08 (twelve years ago) link

crowd doesn't know what to think about an issue that's not about taxes or Obama

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:10 (twelve years ago) link

i wonder if this is frustrating for the republicans -- they can climb over each other arguing about who loves israel the most and i'm still not going to vote for them

Mordy, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:11 (twelve years ago) link

romney/rubio will only carry 40 states

States Obama is almost certain to win (with his 2008 margin therein):
Hawaii (45)
Vermont (37)
Rhode Island (28)
New York (27)
Illinois (25)
Massachusetts (25)
California (24)
Connecticut (22)
Washington (17)
Maine (17)
New Jersey (16) - Christie could put it in play, but is unlikely to win it; he didn't even beat his opponents (collectively)
Oregon (16)
Michigan (16) - Romney's birth here might substantially reduce the margin, aided by high unemployment, but it will be mitigated by his expressed desire to let the auto industry die
Wisconsin (14)
Minnesota (10)
^none of these States have voted for a Republican for President since Clinton came on the scene, and all except Oregon gave Obama a 50% or better approval rating in September. Romney may be a more attractive Republican to them than any since Poppy Bush/Reagan (Rubio not necessarily), but that isn't enough to win them.

States Obama will probably win:
Iowa (10) - it really belongs in the above category, having only gone for Bush over Kerry by 10K votes in a year in which Nader+other got 13K, and given Obama a 49% approval rating and reasonably solid head-to-head polling performances; still, its small size does make it a slight wild card
New Mexico (15) - like IA, it really belongs in the above category with such a wide margin and strong demographic moves in favor of the Democrats (neighbor McCain lost badly), but its small size and only a 46% approval rating make it just slightly unpredictable, and Bush beat Kerry here by 6K votes (in a year in which Nader+other got 8K), I think after at least one net had prematurely called the election; still, probably pretty safe for Obama, who is polling very well head-to-head (and benefits from low unemployment)
Pennsylvania (10) - Democrats never win by a lot here (it's Alabama in the middle, as they say), but they do always win, and while Obama has been tied or behind in many polls of the state, none of the Republicans have risen above the lower 40s and Obama outperformed his polls (and most Democrats) last time on strong black turnout; Christie could potentially really put the State in play (mitigated by Biden's roots), but I'm not sure he'd do that much that Romney cannot
Colorado (9) - a little closer than more hispanic New Mexico, with a little more Mormon influence, but Obama has continued to poll reasonably well here head-to-head
Nevada (14) - another small state, where Obama's margin may be dangerously reduced due to a long border with Utah/Mormon influence and some hispanic/general disillusionment (plus very high unemployment), and indeed Romney has often been tied in polling here, but also another state where Obama is aided by continuing demographic advantages that may be insurmountable and he substantially outperformed those polls in 2008, when again neighbor McCain got badly beat

Obama 2008 States that are Tossups:
New Hampshire (10) - Romney's media exposure from Massachusetts and 2008 is already helping here (where Bush won by 7K votes in 2000, while Nader got 22K, and where Obama enjoys unusually low approval ratings for a state he carried last time) - he now solidly leads in the polls. Whether the anti-Obama sentiment (racism?) that was prevalent in the 2008 primary will again evaporate by election day remains to be seen - the State's small numbers and flintiness make it hard to forecast.
Ohio (5) - the (perenially) truest tossup and perhaps keyest state in the race; Obama is tied in the polls, facing an unhappy but unpredictable electorate, but probably has a slight incumbency edge nevertheless
Virginia (6) - Romney, who probably eats away at some of Obama's tech community support, has at least a slight lead in polling, some of which Obama outperformed late, and a McDonnell pick might help put the State away
Florida (3) - Romney is well ahead in polling here, where unemployment is high, and the State looks gone for Obama, especially if Rubio is on the ticket, though the economic situation and demographics make it difficult to predict
North Carolina (-) - with a very slim 2008 margin, one might have to say it's gone, except continuing hispanic (and black? white educated male?) demographic trends may mitigate against that, reflected in polling in which Obama remains within the margin with Mitt as well as more popular than he is in some safer states

States Obama will probably lose but could theoretically win (especially if there's a third-party candidate):
Indiana (-) - Obama's neighborly advantage was good for just a 0.03% victory margin, and he lives in Washington now; still, some decent demographic trends in his favor
Missouri (-) - margin was close enough last time (just -0.13%) that with depressed conservative turnout, theoretically Obama could pull it off like (fellow) neighbor Clinton did twice; unlikely, though
Montana (-2) - trend is strongly away from Obama, who is unlikely to pull off Clinton's '92 feat
Georgia (-5) - like NC, demographic trends in favor and relatively high Obama popularity (48%, higher than FL/NC/VA, not to mention AZ/CO/NV/NM) combined with a Northeastern Republican (this State did pick Clinton over Poppy Bush); not enough, though
Arizona (-8) - without McCain in the race, perhaps the second-most hispanic state in the Southwest will look a bit more like CO or NV? with an older population, that probably isn't enough, even if it went for Clinton over Dole

If Romney wins all of the tossups and GOP leaners, he wins the election (by 1 electoral vote). but I don't regard that as likely - I think Obama is the favorite to carry at least one of Ohio, New Hampshire, and Virginia (or one of the other Southern states).

C.K. Dexter Holland, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:11 (twelve years ago) link

Did you know that Newt Gingrich is an historian (and that Michelle Bachmann is a tax lawyer)?

C.K. Dexter Holland, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:13 (twelve years ago) link

I'm sure you lead from the rear, Rick.

C.K. Dexter Holland, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:13 (twelve years ago) link

I was really hoping that Perry would talk about his lifetime friendship with Bibi Netanyahu.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:16 (twelve years ago) link

Haha

C.K. Dexter Holland, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:17 (twelve years ago) link

santorum: "the so-called... 'west bank.'"

he must've been about to say 'occupied territories' and thought better of it bc idk anyone who doesn't call the 'west bank' the west bank.

Mordy, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:17 (twelve years ago) link

Didn't you think that was booing directed at Gingrich over the Teddy Kennedy remark, Matt? I was sure that's what it was.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:19 (twelve years ago) link

nah man I really think it was more of a "dayyyuummm" reaction than booing, though I'm sure there were some boos in there. Maybe I'm just biased though, because it was my reaction.

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:32 (twelve years ago) link

I'm not watching but I keep reading tweets saying newt's doing well, better than romney, and perry isn't doing enough to really help himself.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:35 (twelve years ago) link

so: I approve!

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:36 (twelve years ago) link

So the Governor of Iowa wins his shouted ad lib...It's all been kind of anti-climactic. Gingrich and Romney have been on defense the whole way, and they've more or less done okay. Santorum has probably done the most to help himself, but that probably just means he'll finish fourth in Iowa.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:39 (twelve years ago) link

"wins with"...

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:39 (twelve years ago) link

So you're saying we'll soon have a santorum "surge"?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:42 (twelve years ago) link

Ewww

C.K. Dexter Holland, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:48 (twelve years ago) link

No Santorum surge--possibly (my new cliche of the moment) a Santorum boomlet.

Weirdest moment of the night for me was when Perry was in the middle of an immigration answer, you heard a piece paper rustle loudly, and he seemed to zone out for two or three seconds.

The worst moment was probably Romney's silly $10,000 bet.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:54 (twelve years ago) link

What was the bet?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:55 (twelve years ago) link

Gingrich's "If we do survive" was...troubling.

Romney and Perry were arguing about the line that got deleted from subsequent editions of Romney's book.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:56 (twelve years ago) link

perry said romney wrote in his book that the massachusetts plan could be a "model" for the country and romney said perry was misquoting him

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:57 (twelve years ago) link

if perry wasn't an idiot he would just read mitt the direct quote.

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 December 2011 03:57 (twelve years ago) link

Perry might be a little off with that characterization, but basically yeah, he's got it right. romney is stupid to challenge him on that point! it's a memorable challenge! people will write about it tomorrow!

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 04:00 (twelve years ago) link

I love this line from a Sullivan reader: "Sometimes I think Rick Perry gets halfway through an answer and sees a Frisbee." The Oprah-like last five minutes wasn't bad--I mean, it could have been a lot worse. I think Newt said "fundamental"/"fundamentally" twice tonight.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 04:04 (twelve years ago) link

josh marshall says democrats can barely contain their glee with romney's 10k bet, but romney's strategists think mitt "nailed it."

guess we'll are who is right.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 04:12 (twelve years ago) link

"see," not "are." damn auto-spell.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 04:14 (twelve years ago) link

I don't regard the Biden-Clinton switcheroo as a serious concept. He is a trusted right-hand man/Congressional liaison who arguably cannot be replaced as a working-class white male surrogate. She is very tired from flying all over the world as Secretary of State, and apparently looking forward to a break after election day (during which it's not impossible she might gear up for a 2016 run).

Personally, however, I do confess to secretly desiring a ticket of Obama/Huntsman's hair.

"Sometimes I think Rick Perry gets halfway through an answer and sees a Frisbee."

That's great. He really seems fundamentally incapable of thinking in any complex way, and only makes a poor attempt at memorization with some folksy talk layered on top. Even his big initiative written about in the New York Times today came from his college friend.

C.K. Dexter Holland, Sunday, 11 December 2011 04:17 (twelve years ago) link

Good line from the Kos guy:

Mitt Romney says: "I didn't grow up poor." And if you want to vote for someone who grew up poor, he's not your guy. But his dad did grow up poor. So if you want a guy whose dad grew up poor, then he's your guy.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 04:18 (twelve years ago) link

Besides the horrible symbolism/optics of Romney's bet, I remember seeing the line that was deleted from his book on some news report, and I'm pretty sure Perry was more or less right.

clemenza, Sunday, 11 December 2011 04:21 (twelve years ago) link

romney can credibly claim that he always advocated for states to be able to enact their own health-care plans, but he absolutely touted the individual mandate as a good plan that worked great and should be strongly considered by other states. Remember that the original romney book came out when romney thought obama was pushing for a public option, so a mandate could still be touted as a conservative alternative. but obama switched to a mandate, and so -- voila -- romney's position no longer looked so good, and he removed that line from his book.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 11 December 2011 04:30 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.