J.R. Smith has literally been shanghaied away for the foreshortened 2011-2012 NBA season: rolling ILH sandbox thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4833 of them)

this p much proves its not fixed is the thing

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 07:59 (twelve years ago) link

also san antonio winning all those rings, and other events

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:00 (twelve years ago) link

this p much proves its not fixed is the thing

that's what stern wants u to think

clay, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:00 (twelve years ago) link

lol

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:02 (twelve years ago) link

If ds or etc nixes a perfectly legal trade under the CBa there is no other interpretation

Mr Jimmy Mod, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:02 (twelve years ago) link

dude the nba owns the new orleans hornets basketball team

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:03 (twelve years ago) link

btw our boy is writing for grantland, hope he finds some time for sleep

http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-triangle/post/_/id/11616/the-pros-and-cons-of-kentuckys-anthony-davis

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:03 (twelve years ago) link

dude the nba owns the new orleans hornets basketball team

― Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, December 9, 2011 2:03 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Permalink

Which is why their decision to not make the trade is ultra fishy, since the hornets were the big winners in the deal.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:06 (twelve years ago) link

lollllllllllllllll

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:07 (twelve years ago) link

not trading paul means losing him for nothing. The best sixth man in the league, 2 good starters, dragic and a first rounder >>>>>> nothing.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:09 (twelve years ago) link

it wasn't as good as the Carmelo deal but it was close.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:10 (twelve years ago) link

the vetoing of this trade had nothing to do with the best interests of the Hornets franchise.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:12 (twelve years ago) link

fyi they are going to trade paul, and get better than the bag of rancid shit they were offered, srsly look at what you just wrote, the first guy is the 'best sixth man' that doesnt even mean anything, chris paul is a top five player in the nab, had this trade gone through it wouldve been prob the all time most lopsided trade in nba history, w/the rockets somehow getting the good dudes from the lakers while giving up a steaming pile of crap to nola, i mean id be investing their gm right now for kickbacks

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:12 (twelve years ago) link

matt luv u dawg but you have no idea wtf youre talking abt at all

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:12 (twelve years ago) link

lol stop it

v-shasty, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:13 (twelve years ago) link

had this trade gone through it wouldve been prob the all time most lopsided trade in nba history

This is really silly.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:14 (twelve years ago) link

i did not read the thread but can someone explain to me why l.a.'s good players were going to houston who were then moving a bunch of dudes and picks no one in their right mind gives a fuck abt to nola, ITS BOGGLING

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:16 (twelve years ago) link

matt out off all the shit nola was getting where would you rate the best guy, is there even a top 30 player in there, for the best point guard in the game, you have to be fucking joking

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:17 (twelve years ago) link

"Good players"

Dude Houston was just getting Gasol.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:17 (twelve years ago) link

one player

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:17 (twelve years ago) link

that is the best non paul player in the trade, the only guy w/any real value just fyi

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:18 (twelve years ago) link

the hornets were clearly taking the nuggets approach of gathering a bunch of very good players

v-shasty, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:18 (twelve years ago) link

yeah but did you not realize houston wasn't getting Odom?

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:18 (twelve years ago) link

xp

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:19 (twelve years ago) link

its like: paul >> gasol >>>>>>>>>>> who gives fuck

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:19 (twelve years ago) link

I like that this is what's occupying neuilx@ 330 ET

Mr Jimmy Mod, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:19 (twelve years ago) link

i'd rather have scola, martin, odom and a first round pick than odom and gasol, which is what NOLA would be looking at

v-shasty, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:19 (twelve years ago) link

the hornets were clearly taking the nuggets approach of gathering a bunch of very good players

― v-shasty, Friday, December 9, 2011 3:18 AM (37 seconds ago) Bookmark Permalink

there were zero really good players going to nola, and just obvs paul is like 0x better than melo, AND denver got back better doods

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:20 (twelve years ago) link

A FIRST ROUND PICK wtf a meaningless term if there ever was one

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:20 (twelve years ago) link

10x better than melo obvs

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:21 (twelve years ago) link

i personally could move paul for a better package than nola got by tomorrow guaranteed

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:22 (twelve years ago) link

A FIRST ROUND PICK wtf a meaningless term if there ever was one

― Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, December 9, 2011 2:20 AM (54 seconds ago) Bookmark Permalink

what the hell

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:22 (twelve years ago) link

I keep trying to respond to you and then you say things like that

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:22 (twelve years ago) link

predict kickback scandal w/nolas gm whoever the fuck that guys is

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:22 (twelve years ago) link

A FIRST ROUND PICK wtf a meaningless term if there ever was one

― Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, December 9, 2011 2:20 AM (54 seconds ago) Bookmark Permalink

what the hell

― Matt Armstrong, Friday, December 9, 2011 3:22 AM (32 seconds ago) Bookmark Permalink

this is called knowing what pick its gonna be, first round is meaningless in the sense that a top 5 pick is very good, a bottom five pick isnt worth the rookie contract, now tell me which that pick is likely to land closer to

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:24 (twelve years ago) link

AND denver got back better doods

― Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, December 9, 2011 2:20 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Permalink

Danilo is a better asset in general (and they got those robusto unprotected FIRST ROUNDERS), so it was a better deal by far. But the players they got aren't better in the short term than Martin and Scola.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:24 (twelve years ago) link

this is called knowing what pick its gonna be, first round is meaningless in the sense that a top 5 pick is very good, a bottom five pick isnt worth the rookie contract, now tell me which that pick is likely to land closer to

― Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, December 9, 2011 2:24 AM (37 seconds ago) Bookmark Permalink

Probably smack in between.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:25 (twelve years ago) link

in one of the deepest drafts ever, btw.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:25 (twelve years ago) link

seriously dawg, you're realllly underrating scola and martin.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:26 (twelve years ago) link

like if you think wilson chandler > scola and martin I don't know what to say other than I imagine you didn't watch many rockets games last year.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:27 (twelve years ago) link

kevin martin is literally a shit player, worthless, a v efficient scorer and bottom 10% at everything else he suposed to do

scola could be useful if you were on the verge of winning a title and needed a spot filled, p sure nola isnt in that position, hes also 31 y/o

and lets keep in mind chris paul is a top 5 nba player

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:28 (twelve years ago) link

like if you think wilson chandler > scola and martin I don't know what to say other than I imagine you didn't watch many rockets games last year.

― Matt Armstrong, Friday, December 9, 2011 3:27 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Permalink

o rly was that what denver got for a player that v inferior to paul thats not really how i recall it

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:29 (twelve years ago) link

"i personally could move paul for a better package than nola got by tomorrow guaranteed"

keep hearing this in donald trump's voice

clay, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:30 (twelve years ago) link

you said they got "better doods"

danilo, mozgov, felton, chandler > odom, scola, martin?

xp

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:30 (twelve years ago) link

danilo is maybe as good as odom, scola's much better than chandler, martin's better than felton.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:31 (twelve years ago) link

you realize paul is on another plane than melo right

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:32 (twelve years ago) link

yes of course.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:33 (twelve years ago) link

also the draft pick is THE KNICKS, injuries barred a guaranteed playoff team, its not worth much, those go for abt $3m on the open market

Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:33 (twelve years ago) link

but denver didn't get better doods, come on man.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:34 (twelve years ago) link

also the draft pick is THE KNICKS, injuries barred a guaranteed playoff team, its not worth much, those go for abt $3m on the open market

― Cooper Chucklebutt, Friday, December 9, 2011 2:33 AM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark Permalink

injuries barred... when 2 of the 3 best players are Chandler and Stoudemire.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 December 2011 08:35 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.