hey, remember that guy that found that velvet underground acetate for 75 cents...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (240 of them)
mmmm, record cakes...

scott seward (121212), Friday, 1 December 2006 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

it is my favourite store.

hank s1ockli (hanks1ockli), Friday, 1 December 2006 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Didn't the acetate already leak?

http://thepiratebay.org/details.php?id=3495078

Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 1 December 2006 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

the description on the item says the songs did, but they were much lower quality and perhaps made from a cassette that was made of this acetate or another one many many years ago

akm (akmonday), Friday, 1 December 2006 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

High quality VU acetate... DOES NOT COMPUTE

Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 1 December 2006 17:45 (seventeen years ago) link

ok sorry for the 'scum' bit i guess, but i hope he gives a piece to the dude he bought the record from just as a gesture. assuming he can track him down.

deep space nine (deep space nine), Friday, 1 December 2006 17:50 (seventeen years ago) link

he bought it from a ghost

hank s1ockli (hanks1ockli), Friday, 1 December 2006 17:52 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.magnetmagazine.com/interviews/ghost.jpg

Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 1 December 2006 17:53 (seventeen years ago) link

not THE ghost

hank s1ockli (hanks1ockli), Friday, 1 December 2006 18:56 (seventeen years ago) link

okay, now there is ANOTHER screamo dude who is high bidder. these dudes are just having fun like eyeball kicks i bet.

scott seward (121212), Friday, 1 December 2006 19:06 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't understand who else would bid with eight days to go.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 1 December 2006 19:15 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't think a rare VU acetate lures out all the accomplished eBay snipers.

Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 1 December 2006 19:16 (seventeen years ago) link

the junkie punx have already beat the beatles by a long shot:


http://www.popsike.com/php/detaildatar.php?itemnr=4874863840

scott seward (121212), Friday, 1 December 2006 19:20 (seventeen years ago) link

These people are dumb. They could make a LOT more money if they broke it up in little pieces and sold those, Berlin Wall style. Who wouldn't want a piece of the rarest record in rock & roll history?

StanM (StanM), Saturday, 2 December 2006 10:40 (seventeen years ago) link

"The computer does start. Seller Lied regarding condition of computer."

forksclovetofu (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 3 December 2006 03:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Nabisco is the highest bidder now!?

sgh (sgh), Sunday, 3 December 2006 05:55 (seventeen years ago) link

It's gone up past 50k.

Rodney Von Bushwickin The Barbarian Mother-Funky Stay High Dollar Billster (Rodn, Sunday, 3 December 2006 11:01 (seventeen years ago) link

so if a real person wins this, think they'll be pissed that so many of the bids are from fake accounts?

GAWD PVNCH (yournullfame), Sunday, 3 December 2006 12:01 (seventeen years ago) link

so if a real person wins this, think they'll be pissed that so many of the bids are from fake accounts?

Personally, I would be. I'm surprised this wasn't done through some big auction house or something that vets bidders....

jw (ex machina), Sunday, 3 December 2006 19:26 (seventeen years ago) link

the only thing the current high bidder has won in the last three months is a chicago house bootleg for $16.

grady (grady), Sunday, 3 December 2006 19:51 (seventeen years ago) link

strike that.

we're in six didgits now.

high bidder bought some home-gym and a violent femmes cd latley.

grady (grady), Sunday, 3 December 2006 19:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Something about this is sickening to me.

.... (50 Bourbon St), Sunday, 3 December 2006 19:56 (seventeen years ago) link

"To place a bid of US $15,000.00 or more, you'll need to provide a valid credit card or complete the ID Verify process ($5)."

grbchv! (gbx), Sunday, 3 December 2006 20:02 (seventeen years ago) link

My friend Eric is the dude who's brokering the record for his pal, the guy in Montreal who found the thing at the Chelsea market, I forget his name -- but they're selling it through the SF dude, as he's super well respected as a big eBay guy, and I think Eric used to work for him or soemthing/

My understanding is that Eric and his friend *wanted* it to sell to a record label and give it a good home. As they early articles about the acetate surfaced and interest mounted, they shopped it to several labels and I think they were in last minute negotiations with one excellent reissue label, when that fell apart due to the sudden appearance of that crummy sounding Japanese bootleg. The idea being that the material had hit the marketplace and was then not something the hardcore fans would never have heard, even if in inferior quality.

Eric doesn't have a computer; he has to go to the co-op bike shop down the block and use theirs. I was in his shop yesterday and he was clearly really bummed out by the whole "eBay chicken" thing -- he is one of the raddest people and has immaculate cred. in the record buying/ selling community (not to mention his vinyl only record label is fucking ACES -- and as a caveat or whatever, we're doing an Anglin Bros. reissue together and getting started on a of Tony Schwartz collection). Dude is old school but not ridiculous about it; he never checks popsike or gemm before pricing his records, as far as I know.

Anyway, I guess my point is that I'm sure that no one would have guessedd this thing would get so out of hand. I think they thought this would be the most fair way to sell this thing, to just let the market decide or whatever. Eric's getting bombarded with hate mail over this thing and he can't figure why -- he's just helping his friend sell this record that the dude found, you know?

Now it's over a hundred thousand?! I guess it's more eBay chicken? Fucking bummer.

Mike McGGGGGGGG (yetimike), Sunday, 3 December 2006 20:06 (seventeen years ago) link

Crazy. Five days, seven hours to go.

sleeve (sleeve), Sunday, 3 December 2006 21:09 (seventeen years ago) link

I think they thought this would be the most fair way to sell this thing, to just let the market decide or whatever.

fair would have been to approach libraries / colleges / other cultural institutions, if selling it to a record label didnt pan out! at the very least, the record could be properly preserved, archived and made available to the public for educational purposes. right now, that's certainly not the case.

where are you taking us on this godforsaken cruise? (theoreticalgirl), Sunday, 3 December 2006 23:52 (seventeen years ago) link

MTS, please get off the VU's dick and tell us what good a "cultural institution" would do by preserving said recording? What fucking educational purposes does this recording serve more than any of the other numerous VU recordings or recordings by any other artist? Don't you think that spending $10k on some assistant professor to study oh.... say mp3 mashup culture, rave keyboard or grime... be a better use of resources than more ass-kissing of your precious indie-canon bands?

PS- I found a picture of Maria blogging about this record:

http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0TAAlAOYYLQvbAtgNJJ7b4xkfKZhq*6gx*i0cF7VzIvFkvnonz17!j1!NReyP2vGP!lz8gvfrUhsA!xKhDwLk3qVyM80Vs6IhGstLPf0!3jX68LiDuC6qoA/idolgrab.jpg

jw (ex machina), Monday, 4 December 2006 00:06 (seventeen years ago) link

What weirds me out is that instead of getting this record, the winner could finance someone going through a college, masters, and PhD program.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 4 December 2006 00:59 (seventeen years ago) link

or buy a luxury car!

esoj@w3rk (esoj@w3rk), Monday, 4 December 2006 01:00 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm wondering if the sellers should donate some of the money to charity. I'm also hoping we get some kind of psuedo-justification from the winner on why someone would spend six figures for a single piece of vinyl. Also, plz link to the youtube video of the winner calling his parents/spouse to tell them what he/she just won.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 4 December 2006 01:05 (seventeen years ago) link

i find it strange that the andy warhol museum in pittsburgh didn't buy it, they have a lot of vu stuff. unfortunately most of it is not available to the public at all.

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Monday, 4 December 2006 01:12 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm wondering if the sellers should donate some of the money to charity.

What makes this money any different?

jw (ex machina), Monday, 4 December 2006 01:26 (seventeen years ago) link

MTS, please get off the VU's dick and tell us what good a "cultural institution" would do by preserving said recording? What fucking educational purposes does this recording serve more than any of the other numerous VU recordings or recordings by any other artist? Don't you think that spending $10k on some assistant professor to study oh.... say mp3 mashup culture, rave keyboard or grime... be a better use of resources than more ass-kissing of your precious indie-canon bands?

Dude, what kind of argument is this? Oh wait, it's not -- it's just you attacking me for the hell of it.

Do you want music to be researchable or not? 'Cause if you don't, there's no sense in universities spending the money on research about grime, mashups, rave or anything else. I never said that VU's recordings were any more or less important -- those are your implications/hangups. I think it would be great if artifacts from those genres/etc were preserved similarly.

where are you taking us on this godforsaken cruise? (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 4 December 2006 01:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Do you want music to be researchable or not?

what i meant was: if you wanted any music available for academic / scholarly use. unfortunately, i was interrupted by a phone call.

where are you taking us on this godforsaken cruise? (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 4 December 2006 01:36 (seventeen years ago) link

It doesn't make it any different Jon, I'd just feel guilty I were the seller.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 4 December 2006 04:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Don't you think that spending $10k on some assistant professor to study oh.... say mp3 mashup culture, rave keyboard or grime... be a better use of resources than more ass-kissing of your precious indie-canon bands?

if my university spent $10k on studying mp3 fucking mashup culture i would demand my tuition back. what the hell is wrong with you?

hm (modestmickey), Monday, 4 December 2006 05:14 (seventeen years ago) link

not that any university should spend $10k on a "precious indie-canon band" either.

hm (modestmickey), Monday, 4 December 2006 05:17 (seventeen years ago) link

why should you feel guilty about selling a record to someone? how is that different from selling someone an MRI machine or a yacht?

good thing you're not a yacht salesman. the guilt would be terrible :-/

also, wtf: What weirds me out is that instead of getting this record, the winner could finance someone going through a college, masters, and PhD program.

have you even been to college before??

grbchv! (gbx), Monday, 4 December 2006 05:55 (seventeen years ago) link

otm on both points

forksclovetofu (forksclovetofu), Monday, 4 December 2006 06:41 (seventeen years ago) link

US $105,600.74

US $105,600 and 75 cents was too much, was it?


So when is this going to stop? It can't be for real anymore, right?

StanM (StanM), Monday, 4 December 2006 07:43 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost: double agreed, thanks for saying that stuff, gorbachev -- i really do not get the rancor this sale has produced at all.

legislating what other people 'should' do with stuff they are lucky enough to find, and to know what it is when they do, seems a tad crazy to me, and reeks to me of jealousy/ sour grapes.

sound quality issues aside, it's not like you can't hear these version if you want to, on the japanese bootleg.

Mike McGonigal (yetimike), Monday, 4 December 2006 08:02 (seventeen years ago) link

c'mon, let a hater hate!

GAWD PVNCH (yournullfame), Monday, 4 December 2006 08:27 (seventeen years ago) link

They are cancelling bids from people who have low feedback scores, apparently (scroll down) : http://offer.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewBids&item=300054910309

So... this is really happening? I still think it's some kind of board invasion thing, but I haven't found the originating forum yet. (googling a couple of bidder names did lead to a forum the last time something big like this went down, but now, not yet)

StanM (StanM), Monday, 4 December 2006 12:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I would have thought that having to give credit card details might be something of a detterent, though?

toby (tsg20), Monday, 4 December 2006 12:32 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.gigwise.com/news.asp?contentid=25547

"the only one of its kind"

What's the story of that Japanese bootleg, by the way? I know there's a leaked recording out there, with lots of hiss and vinyl crackles, so is that from another copy of this "one of its kind" album?

StanM (StanM), Monday, 4 December 2006 12:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, me too, but still, none of the high bidders look like the kind of people you'd expect. No rarealbumcollectorsdotcom or largecompanyCEOagency.com , all these people ever bought were fitness machines and camera filters and cheap cds and a shoe and a bike.

StanM (StanM), Monday, 4 December 2006 12:38 (seventeen years ago) link

(er, that was an xpost to toby)

StanM (StanM), Monday, 4 December 2006 12:39 (seventeen years ago) link

"sound quality issues aside" bahahaha

it just seems weird that they wouldn't even grab the audio from the record first, in a mastering studio or whatever. and THEN sell it. would that be "illegal" maybe? i mean there's nothing stopping the weiner winner from using it as a coaster for his collection of rare german beer steins.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 4 December 2006 12:43 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm just surprised reed didn't buy it from the guy. was he approached? I know when artists get this stuff half the time you never hear it again (mccartney and those quarrymen tapes) but I'd trust reed with it more than joe schmo

although, actually, I don't really care

akm (akmonday), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:23 (seventeen years ago) link

Anyway, this reminded me that I had a great album with some cool covers cued up on spotify Count's Rock Band: Do Not Listen If You Hate Coltrane or Maggot Brain

P-Moose (Wants To Get Moosed Up) (James Redd), Saturday, 31 December 2011 03:52 (twelve years ago) link

doug yule's tide

t. silaviver, Saturday, 31 December 2011 03:56 (twelve years ago) link

i don't think there's anything else i once liked that looking back brings me more shame than that dave navarro album. ta be fair to me i was 16 and a slow developer. can't remember if i liked the venus in furs cover in particular, but i did think it was cool he was covering the vu.

m. yeux, Saturday, 31 December 2011 06:10 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.