2012 GOP Presidential Campaign -- "This individual's going to accuse me of an affair for an extended period of time."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2147 of them)

the idea that the nation as a whole is not completely soured on the Bush family is hilarious

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 21:21 (twelve years ago) link

what about mark sanford? he only cheated on one wife

mookieproof, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 21:23 (twelve years ago) link

but Romney cheated on a movement!

Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 21:23 (twelve years ago) link

I dunno, Shakey. I think Neil might have fit in nicely with some of the recent Pres candidates.

M. White, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 21:28 (twelve years ago) link

the nation as a whole is soured on the Bush family

oh i know

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 7 December 2011 21:34 (twelve years ago) link

Maybe I'm wrong, but are they not past the point of no return as far as getting in now goes?

clemenza, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 21:56 (twelve years ago) link

Remember: the nation as a whole soured on the GOP in 2009, heralding a new rebirth of liberalism.

Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 21:58 (twelve years ago) link

that Snagglepuss image is the first decent thing on these GOPobsessive hen party threads.

Attacking Rev Wright (that was his name?) was not PERSONAL, cuz as Bill Maher pointed out Obama is too smart to REALLY be a Christian. /mattarmstrong

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:20 (twelve years ago) link

pfffff, u.s. is a hard-right nation in all but the broadest sense, and nothing in 2009 changed that. it's basically GOP-controlled except when there's a severe recession (bush I or II) or some huge nat'l disgrace (watergate)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:20 (twelve years ago) link

The U.S. isn't left, right, or anything nation other than what socioeconomic forces dictate at that moment.

Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:25 (twelve years ago) link

GOP has controlled the presidency for 20 of the last 30 years, with the only breaks being, as i say, post watergate and during recessions.

or, put it a different way: when times are good, we say "hands off, gov't." when times are bad, we say, "help us!, gov't."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:27 (twelve years ago) link

It's cyclical -- Democrats controlled every branch of government from 1932 through the eighties.

I won't take credit for this Burke quote: "Every political question I have ever known has had so much of the pro and con in it that nothing but the success could decide which proposition was to have been adopted."

Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:29 (twelve years ago) link

well, that's fair, but at 30 years now, i think we can say this has been a long rightward drift, with some bursts of progressivism along the way.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:30 (twelve years ago) link

Sully's all hard at the though of his wee Eddie Burke's apposite aphorism

M. White, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:30 (twelve years ago) link

but at 30 years now

I think it's fair to say that the WASPs have moved farther to the right as their predominance has waned but they're losing more and more battles and as they get older, they're more and more dogmatic though less in a principled way than a mostly nostalgic emotional one.

As to economics, we conceivably know more than we did 30 years ago but then so do the masters of the universe wrt to evading controls/exerting political influence

M. White, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:35 (twelve years ago) link

Our system is intrinsically conservative; it's designed to occlude all but the faintest of seismic shifts. That's how the Framers intended it.

"Conservative" in this sense has nothing to do with left- or right-wing.

Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:35 (twelve years ago) link

^^^ OTM

OH NOES, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:35 (twelve years ago) link

that's also true, but doesn't detract from my point.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:36 (twelve years ago) link

You know, for all the knob-slobbering this country engages in wrt the founding fathers and the way they rigged our republic up to not fall prey to the demagoguery and dictatorships of past republics, the conservative nature of our government (in Milord Sotosyn's sense) may have prevented the wild slides and coups of many other modern republics (Africa and the rest of the Americas come to mind) but perhaps the coup has just been a long, slow one. From a part Libertarian, part Liberal perspective, Eisenhower's military-industrial complex alongside some other important industries like high finance have essentially taken over. Is that different than the industrial barons and the slaveholding plantation owners of the 19th century? I'm not sure.

M. White, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:44 (twelve years ago) link

GOP has controlled the presidency for 20 of the last 30 years, with the only breaks being, as i say, post watergate and during recessions.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, December 7, 2011 4:27 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Permalink

Without the judicial coup in 2000 it could easily have been 16 of the last 30 for the Dems. Maybe 20.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 23:41 (twelve years ago) link

probably 20, actually.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 7 December 2011 23:42 (twelve years ago) link

CNN polls today:

Iowa -- 33-20, Gingrich
New Hampshire (Romney's bulwark) -- now 35-26, Romney
South Carolina -- 43-20, Gingrich
Florida -- 48-25, Gingrich

This is no dream, etc. (I hope--may as well enjoy the moment, in any event.)

http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lhrtxd2rdX1qhpsoyo1_400.jpg

clemenza, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:13 (twelve years ago) link

lol

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:17 (twelve years ago) link

i think the real debate now is whether it would be worth having president gingrich in return for how awesome it would be to have nominee gingrich, & to this i say yes, yes it would, for real it so would

Never translate German (schlump), Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:20 (twelve years ago) link

YES HE CAN

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:21 (twelve years ago) link

i want to hear gingrich general-election campaign slogans

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:22 (twelve years ago) link

"Fundamentally, Newt's the One!"

clemenza, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:25 (twelve years ago) link

David Frum had an interesting point tonight (when asked how he'd advise Romney at this point): ask Republican voters if they want 2012 to be a referendum on the Clinton presidency. A subtle point that probably wouldn't get Mitt very far.

clemenza, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:27 (twelve years ago) link

i want to hear gingrich general-election campaign slogans

GettINGRICH

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:33 (twelve years ago) link

Did Frum intend a defense of the Clinton presidency? About time -- it was the most successful Republican presidency of the last thirty years.

Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:38 (twelve years ago) link

newt today:

"On my first day in office," he said, "I will move our embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem." Massive applause. "And I will ask John Bolton to serve as secretary of state." Even bigger applause -- standing ovation, biggest applause he's gotten.

the whole john bolton thing is so weird

mookieproof, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:38 (twelve years ago) link

Blolton

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:40 (twelve years ago) link

heh, larison pointed out that its technically illegal to promise appointments

max max max max, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:44 (twelve years ago) link

gawker should demand that justice be served

mookieproof, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:45 (twelve years ago) link

I think Frum's point was simply that instead of the election being about Obama's fragile presidency, Newt would symbolically shift voter's thoughts to what is generally viewed as Clinton's successful one.

clemenza, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:47 (twelve years ago) link

I love how Newt's not even in office yet and he's already violating rules/breaking laws

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:48 (twelve years ago) link

It's Signal Sending, guys.

Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:55 (twelve years ago) link

more like Cunnilingus For Certain Interest Groups, amirite?

Aimless, Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:57 (twelve years ago) link

if newt really want to send signals, why doesn't he propose alberto gonzalez for attorney general; donald rumsfeld for sect. of defense; and dick cheney for sect. of state.

A RETURN TO SIMPLER, MORE SENSIBLE TIMES.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 8 December 2011 01:01 (twelve years ago) link

Because Bolton and his mustache encompass multitudes.

Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 8 December 2011 01:07 (twelve years ago) link

I want to post this EVERYWHERE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2fKmeFR_ko

Dranke, the German Drake Impersonator (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 8 December 2011 01:59 (twelve years ago) link

that's such a classic clip

Z S, Thursday, 8 December 2011 04:11 (twelve years ago) link

pls make that one gif

q: are we not bel biv men? a: we are bel biv devo (m bison), Thursday, 8 December 2011 05:39 (twelve years ago) link

it's not mine, it's a tumblr thing going around

Z S, Thursday, 8 December 2011 05:42 (twelve years ago) link

and unfortunately putting it together into one gif is way more of an effort than it should be (involves breaking each gif into it's individual frames, arranging them into a single consolidated image, lining up timing, etc), and i'm drunk

Z S, Thursday, 8 December 2011 05:43 (twelve years ago) link

fuck i thought u assembled them with like...magic

q: are we not bel biv men? a: we are bel biv devo (m bison), Thursday, 8 December 2011 05:44 (twelve years ago) link

i do, but i'm only lev 7. perry gif is like lev 17

Z S, Thursday, 8 December 2011 05:48 (twelve years ago) link

tumblr is killing the long-form gif with their stupid image size rules

reddening, Thursday, 8 December 2011 05:56 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.