"The days of libraries saying, 'We must have that, because it's good for people,' are beyond us."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (153 of them)
Our local library is popular, but I live in a town with two private colleges, therefore the local population has a lot of profs and their reading-obsessed kids. (Love this town).

Someone mentioned upthread working at B&N and being asked to photocopy pages. When I worked at a B&N (in the Twin Cities suburbs), I was astounded at the number of parents of kids doing book reports who didn't seem to know what a library even was or how to use it. The public library was right down the street!

Sara Robinson-Coolidge (Sara R-C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

I was feeling guilty about not returning the six books I checked out of the library in OCTOBER! But now I'm just going to keep them.

OK, not really. I'll return the books.
I missed the library amnesty week - it was Thanksgiving week at my local library, and all the other libraries do amnesty at Christmas. So I called them. "Hi, are you doing that amnesty thing?" "No, we did that at Thanksgiving."
Big discussion of fines ensued. And, basically, they don't go farther than $3.00 per book, no matter how long you neglect to return them. It's a very forgiving system.

aimurchie (aimurchie), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Do Americans generally say "beyond us" where we would say "behind us"?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:05 (seventeen years ago) link

We look the future while the UK looks to the past. Uh, yeah.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't think that works.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:09 (seventeen years ago) link

Beyond us = out of reach. Future or past it doesn't matter.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, but it sounds a but funny to me, cause it's not like the man in the quote is reaching for them.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

These other libraries should at least have sales and/or giveaways and not just trash the books. Sheesh.

In my experience, most of them do. I have picked up a lot of books that way.

The Many Faces of Gordon Jump (Leon), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Even UCI does it a bit, but most often with donated copies of items we already own. There's a big once a year sale in spring.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, they want their bookstores to be libraries! Witness the number of times someone asked me, when I worked at B&N, "Is there somewhere I can photocopy these pages?" Ans: NO U DUM FUCK YOU CAN BUY THE BOOK.

I had a guy do this to me when I worked in a charity bookshop. The bloody book was only about €6, and he just 'wanted a couple of articles' out of it. He was really insulted when I wouldn't let him 'borrow' it to take across the road to the copy shop. People are dicks.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link

LOCK EM UP GENTS

obi strip (sanskrit), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:38 (seventeen years ago) link

and now that we've allowed people to bring in food and drink

WTF??! (i work with rare books and have actually had nightmares about patrons drinking/eating at the tables)

jo ga11ucci electrix (joseph), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

I believe Special Collections still enforces the rule. But otherwise...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:41 (seventeen years ago) link

god that maplewood library article is depressing. then again, shutting out ALL patrons for a good chunk of the day...hmm.

jo ga11ucci electrix (joseph), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago) link

This comfortable Essex County suburb of 23,000 residents, still proud of its 2002 mention in Money magazine on a list of “Best Places to Live,µ is no seedy outpost of urban violence. But its library officials, like many across the country, have grown frustrated by middle schoolers’ mix of pent-up energy, hormones and nascent independence.

yay for suburbs

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:44 (seventeen years ago) link

UMASS has the tallest library in the world, I think. It's a statistical phenomenom for some reason - tallness?
There's a coffee shop in the lobby. "The Procrastination Station". maybe this is common, now?

I enjoy going to the tall library just because it's fun to wander through the stacks. I'm particularly fond of the "reserve" floor, because those librarians (often students) have a clock that ticks away the time you have to borrow a "reserved" book. it's a very stressful floor. Like, they actually time it to the minute - the two hours that you get to take something from the reserves. "9:47 a.m. GO!" And you best be getting that book back by 11:47 a.m., because they fine you $50.00 an hour, and the hour starts the minute you failed to return the book.
How do I know this? Well, you figure it out.

Anyway, I live in the "five college" area of Mass., so the local libraries are very good, and the borrowing system among the colleges/university is splendid.
The colleges are very nice about letting the libraries be open to anyone. Lots of crazy, failed PhD. candidates (or so I assume)sitting in the comfy chairs at the Smith library, for instance.
The private colleges have the most comfy areas for reading. I might have to write a field guide to comfy college libraries!
Mount Holyoke is beyond the pale - SO comfy.
I'm very fortunate to have the library wealth that I do.

And Beth Parker? I still have my CLAMS card. (Cape and Islands Library System).

aimurchie (aimurchie), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:46 (seventeen years ago) link

Do Americans generally say "beyond us" where we would say "behind us"?

they may say it, but not "generally"

This is the Audubon Field Guild to North American Wildflowers. I bought it from the Chilmark Library book sale. They must have had duplicates—no way they'd get rid of the only copy of such an essential book

More essential than the Newmark or the Petersons?

nuneb (nuneb), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:06 (seventeen years ago) link

er, Newcomb, rather?

nuneb (nuneb), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago) link

whoot whoot st louis! http://www.ccsu.edu/AMLC/Library/top10.htm

my local branch is always fantastic.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:18 (seventeen years ago) link

The man in the quote is mangling his phraseology because he doesn't read enough good books, clearly.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Do Americans generally say "beyond us" where we would say "behind us"?

Haha the official answer to this would be "no" -- the person quoted here is just slipping up and mixing stuff around. Leslie meant to say "we're beyond it," but had the "it" part of the subject at the beginning of the sentence.

(The main idiomatic use of "beyond" here will always be the exasperated "it's beyond me/us" for "I can't understand/imagine it!")

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:23 (seventeen years ago) link

PS Judging from the quotes in this article it sounds as if they've leaped on the idea of popularity-based collections with some kind of weird dogmatism -- "OMG, we must do what the computer tells us!" -- that's fairly dumb: surely they must have some understanding that there are, like, different lengths and terms to popularity? Or are they really dedicated to a model where branch libraries do nothing but buy and cycle through bestsellers for their brief lifespans, and then spend the rest of eternity having to transfer in all the long-term staples they've cast off?

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:27 (seventeen years ago) link

I think "beyond" works here though, giving a sense that being able to stock everything is moving out of our reach, as the amount of books increases while the funding is cut.

Which is a dodging answer - the question the article would seem to want to ask is "Yes, we know, but why aren't you getting rid of last year's Catherine Cookson novels, which are in a burst of popularity but will wane, instead of stuff that there will always be a steady but low demand for?"

(xpost beaten by nabisco!)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually, not so much "steady but low demand" as "this could be put back on a syllabus next year, and you will look like idiots"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:37 (seventeen years ago) link

c-word in t minus ten, nine...

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:39 (seventeen years ago) link

This is kind of a bummer because I used to love checking out books and noting that they hadn't been checked out since like 1964 and wondering who the previous reader was.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't think this is a trend that will affect all libraries -- probably some public libraries with short-sighted directors. I've been to plenty of great public libraries that are popular and well-funded by their city or township that have great collections. But I can see the libraries that have sketchy funding to begin with going this route.

The Many Faces of Gordon Jump (Leon), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:48 (seventeen years ago) link

It would be great if it was upon us.

aimurchie (aimurchie), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:49 (seventeen years ago) link

i wish the library near me was a little better. there's an LAPL branch about five blocks down the street from my place and it really does only seem to have mediocre mystery novels, anne mccaffrey, and leon uris.

bohren un der club of gear (bohren un der club of gear), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Sadly, this is becoming more of a trend amongst under-funded public libraries everywhere. About 2 years ago, Buffalo (and Erie County) threatened to close ALL their public libraries, due to lack of funding (and a heinously corrupt county government). They ended up laying off a HUGE amount of librarians and library workers, and closed a few branches (happily, not all). And, as Ned mentioned, there was major uproar over the closing of the Salinas PL.

As for "what do they do with these books?", a lot of liberries have books sales to help with the underfunding aspect.

From the horse's mouth:

http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=libraryfunding&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=139034

molly mummenschanz (molly d), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Now I feel guilty about the hundreds of books that I have referenced, read in the stacks, browsed through, or photocopied without actually checking them out.

walterkranz (walterkranz), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:58 (seventeen years ago) link

(Mockingbird is beloved by people who read it in their youth, though. which is pretty much every American.)
-- horseshoe (rosalind51...), Today. (horseshoe) (link)

except the zillions of americans that hate to read

friday on the porch (lfam), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:03 (seventeen years ago) link

i went on a horrible date once with a woman who 'jokingly' called me a nerd because i liked to read.

bohren un der club of gear (bohren un der club of gear), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:06 (seventeen years ago) link

there were other reasons for that epithet i would have accepted

bohren un der club of gear (bohren un der club of gear), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:06 (seventeen years ago) link

beyond works just fine where you and another object are both moving apart but it is unclear which of you is moving 'forward'

nuneb (nuneb), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:07 (seventeen years ago) link

We do seem to be moving towards a tldr culture.

The Many Faces of Gordon Jump (Leon), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I suppose I can understand that without enough funding it is one solution, but they are actively perpetuating older books being forgotten by having such things as "Hot Picks", which is what really disgusts me about this move. The librarian who is trying to remedy the situation by suggesting their own choices seems to be providing a much better service to the community.

emil.y (emil.y), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Not all "hot picks" in libraries are new releases. A sad fact of the matter is, you're going to get more circulation with Harry Potter than you would with Nathaniel Hawthorne. More circulation = more money from funding institutions.

molly mummenschanz (molly d), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:15 (seventeen years ago) link

It doesn't necessarily matter whether the "hot picks" are new or not, rather that the whole thing of 'this is popular, let's push it so it becomes even more popular' is a despicable way of thinking. It's giving help to those who need it least.

emil.y (emil.y), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:17 (seventeen years ago) link

I can't think of any way to get people to check out/be interested in The House of Seven Gables, though. I mean, it's a nice thought and all, but the sad fact is people don't really use the library for that sort of thing anymore. The books mentioned in the article are not that popular. . .? Or are they? The Emily Dickinson is a "best of" collection, and I would imagine most libraries will keep her Collected Works on the shelf.

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, sure, some libraries do that, but not all. Also, there's a whole can of funding worms that are causing the "pushing" of what's popular. I'm not condoning it at all, but it's just the sad state of affairs that our public libraries are left in. If a popular book can get a kid to read, who would normally head straight for the computers, then I'm all for it. I'm also all for young adult librarians, for example, to create sections of recommended books (classics, etc.), which a lot of them do already.

molly mummenschanz (molly d), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:24 (seventeen years ago) link

my library is working really hard at the balance b/w populist books people will read, reference material, and classics (mostly cheapie penguins) (and cds, dvds, computers, books on tape, material for the disabled, government forms, industrial saftey reports, et al)

it is an incredibly complicated balancing act and they are fucking saints

FUCKTHISSHIT (JACKLOVE), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:01 (seventeen years ago) link

People essentially want their libraries to be Starbucks with books.

There used to be an actual Starbucks in our main library when I first moved here. It is gone now.

I don't really mind it so much in a public library, but at a university library it's a bit ridiculous. I really think there's a difference between what a public library is supposed to do (keep people who can't or won't buy books reading and thus literate and thus better citizens; give them access to information) and what a university library should do (promote deep research; archive materials). The systems need to be connected, and all, but coffee is a public library doesn't seem to be the end of the world.

Casuistry (casuistry), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:29 (seventeen years ago) link

The university where I work wants to take the central library and make it an "information commons." What the hell is that? Essentially, it is going to be a giant Starbucks with plenty of computer terminals. You're totally OTM with a university library should do (promote deep research; archive materials. They, just like the publics, are worried about circulation statistics and getting people into the actual physical library as well. If the two can somehow be magically intertwined, well, then more power to them. What can you do? People aren't coming into libraries like they used to. While I think the idea of "print is dead" is completely absurd, numbers for circulation and library visitors is on teh decline.

molly mummenschanz (molly d), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:36 (seventeen years ago) link

It's a vibrant place popular with Latino and Middle Eastern immigrants, the elderly and young professionals.

Hmmm, maybe I should send a resume?

I'm not necessarily saying it's going to be nuclear (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Doesn't Barnes & Noble have a better selection than the average suburban public library at this point anyway?

walterkranz (walterkranz), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Their reference staff kind of suck.

Stephen Ex (Stephen Ex), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:47 (seventeen years ago) link

Certainly true of my hometown library, WK, but the nearest B&N is about 40 miles away & requires highway driving, while the library is within biking distance for jr high kids. (XP)

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Also I'll have you know I was excellent at the reference desk, but people WOULD come in and say things like, "I'm looking for a book about yay big, and it's sort of blueish-grey. Do you know what book I mean?"
SURE, NO PROBLEM, LET ME SHOW YOU TO OUR BLUE BOOK SECTION.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:50 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah people do that at the B&N, too.

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Rockist makes a good point by noting that the article cites librarians' discretion as far as keeping titles. The story also never says that "Mockingbird" is getting dumped, just that it falls under the criteria in at least one branch.

A Radio Picture (Factory Sample Not For Sale), Thursday, 4 January 2007 04:05 (seventeen years ago) link

There is no need to continually take up so much redundant space and time and kilowatts of climate control for anything out of copyright.

-- TOMB07


lmao, this thinking worked SOOOO well with microfilm

bill sackter (bill sackter), Thursday, 4 January 2007 04:25 (seventeen years ago) link

I think that ILL should be a last resort, for the rare item.

Obviously I check the local system (13 libraries including three university libraries) first when I want something, but if they don't have it, ILL isn't a first or last resort, it's the ONLY resort.

The PEW Research Center for Panty-Twisting (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 4 January 2007 04:39 (seventeen years ago) link

At this point, I visit the library in/near my hometown (Owings Mills, Md, the library's actually in Pikesville which is right down the road), and it's maybe 25% oldsters reading and scanning the shelves and getting online to do research and send emails; 5% tots riffling through the kids section or tagging along with thier parents; 10% 20/30 somethings doing the same thing; and 60% teens getting online to check out whatever porn they can get away with and myspace and play videogames, LOUDLY.

Ray Cummings (skateboardr), Thursday, 4 January 2007 12:53 (seventeen years ago) link

I have Horizon Syrsi Dynix:(

So do I! I feel your pain.

The Many Faces of Gordon Jump (Leon), Thursday, 4 January 2007 13:31 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.