Jane Dark Sugarhigh blog on Beyonce's "Irreplaceable" restoring "melodic range to pop"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (190 of them)
Haha isn't that basically Geir's touchstone division -- likes pop Beatles, hates all blues-based Beatles songs? I always thought of that as like the beautiful mind-boggling core of his dogmatism, the fact that there was a specific black-and-white line (ha) where he could love the Beatles' writing, but as soon as a 12-bar blues progression came into it, it was awful. (I seem to remember people asking him about Beatles songs that were kind of on the border, and he had them all neatly separated to one side or another.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:48 (seventeen years ago) link

She Loves You from that of Get Back

who are these by?

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

on one side, the way dance and hip-hop need to use tense, static structures, and on the other, the way pop ballads/country/teenpop are full of big chord changes, key changes, chromatic developments, etc

surely this is also about performance as much as actual melody - if yr aesthetic is to emphasise the big chord changes and so on you'll sing them with a lot more gusto than if you want to play it ice-cold. i suspect a lot of melody gets hidden beneath how various r&b ice queens choose to play it. people who know about music theory beyond grade 5 feel free to correct me.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:00 (seventeen years ago) link

That might be true in a few cases, Lex -- especially with r&b, which has the potential to go in either direction -- but by and large you just don't write those sorts of changes into most sorts of hip-hop, dance music, etc. They just don't fit with what the music does. That's true of (say) a steady James Brown vamp, where anything more than periodic blues-type changes (I-IV-V, right?) would kind of ruin the groove; it's true of (for instance) techno, where adding flowing pop chord changes instantly changes what you're doing into Euro-pop; it's true of hip-hop, where no matter what you sample, you want to be able to reduce it to a few chords in a steady loop. And that's because part of what makes all those genres compelling is the way they have a predictable groove -- as soon as you hear it, you know what the groove is, and the expectation is that it will repeat, and that you can sink into it that way.

The cool thing about r&b right now -- and the reason why a lot of it has been really interesting over the past decade or so -- is that it's poised right between those two things. It's borrowed that repeating-groove aspect back from hip-hop, as well as hip-hop's advancement into synthetic and electronic sounds. But the connection to singing ballads and gospel keeps the other foot in the singing-songs-with-chord-changes turf. It has the opportunity to do whatever it wants, really, and so it's not surprising that some of the big smashes of the past years have been expensive combinations of those camps -- Timbaland/Timberlake "Cry Me a River"/"My Love" stuff is suspended just about exactly halfway between chord-changing ballad and static hip-hop (or really it's kinda fully both, not a difference-splitting but a way of having both entirely).

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:19 (seventeen years ago) link

(Haha for evidence of that first paragraph, just imagine "Papa's Got a Brand New Bag" with everything as it's supposed to be except they're playing it in that C / Am / F / G doo-wop pattern, one chord per bar. The funk vanishes. It turns into an okay Stax/Motown backing track, but the funk definitely vanishes.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha Nabisco I was deliberately trying to avoid breaking it down into black and white (which was why I didn't pick Come Together), but I couldn't think of a non-bluesy Beatles song that quite fit.

Okay, a song like She Loves You is fluid melodically in the way that something like Losing My Religion isn't.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha you're cutting it close on that one, Matt! Plus someone might complain about using the word "fluid" in that comparison, because "She Loves You" is tightly regimented into blocks, whereas "Losing My Religion" flows through its melodies in a much more liquid way. But yeah, "She Loves You" makes a show of the vocal harmonies and guitar fills and chord changes in a way that, from today's standpoint, sounds as antique and stylized as Tin Pan Alley or music-hall, whereas "Losing My Religion"'s chord changes are spread far apart and meant to be anticipated and crash hard. (Actually I'm suddenly thinking you could draw odd connections between like "Losing My Religion" and "Cry Me a River" in these terms, apart from the singing.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:56 (seventeen years ago) link

'fluid' is subjective but 'losing my religion' would be quite a good example of it i think! something to do with the ease with which one melodic passage will go into another? i've never heard this 'she loves you'.

if we're talking fluidity, i don't think 'irreplaceable' is at all fluid - it seems awkward, gulpy, which of course is entirely fitting thematically - it's this which undercuts the "female empowerment" of the lyrics. 'we belong together' is totally fluid though.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 21:04 (seventeen years ago) link

i've never heard this 'she loves you'.

Jesus Christ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CGL4Wjg_0k

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 21:07 (seventeen years ago) link

oh god that song is vile!! i couldn't get all the way through it, ugh mccartney's face is so smackable, watching it bob up and down like that made my fingers itch. aaargh HATE HATE HATE. i hope i never hear that again!

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 21:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Hahaha I love this imaginary rock Lex lives under that somehow filters out commonplace musical information but still allows him to know the freezing point of water or who Margaret Thatcher is.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 21:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Someone had to explain that a radiator is full of water not so long ago, so don't get carried away with that theory.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 21:39 (seventeen years ago) link

It's a good song, not a great one; nobody thinks its within seven rungs of "Crazy in Love" on the ladder of the Ideal Pop Song.

wtf, "Crazy in Love" was mediocre and "Irrepaceable" is FANTASTIC. I don't think there's some great mystery at work here, it just has a really good melody.

Goodtime Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great Frisco Freakout (bernard snowy), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 21:50 (seventeen years ago) link

Andrew, no one is denying the melody of "Irreplaceable," some of us are just denying the significance Josh/Jane has given it in the context of popular music today...And yes, some of us, maybe for rhythm reasons more than melody, or for the vocals, do like "Crazy in Love," better.

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 22:56 (seventeen years ago) link

I think the implied significance is just a rhetorical flourish. I'm sure Joshua would admit if pressed that "Irreplaceable" is one among many.

It would have made more sense actually had he drawn attention to Ne-Yo's involvement - having also penned "So Sick" and "Unfaithful" he's the posterboy for Respectable Ballads in the 06, so he works as a figurehead for one end of the dialectic in a way that Beyonce doesn't really.

Perhaps where Joshua's article falls short is that by setting up this process as a pendulum swing he's simplyfing the dialectic. To some extent Beyonce's problem to date has been finding ways to make ballads which don't abandon the qualities which her uptempo singles formerly possessed in spades. "Irreplaceable" actually works because it's less "full of big chord changes, key changes, chromatic developments" than most of her previous ballads, so it retains some of the tension and tautness of, say, "Say My Name" or "Baby Boy". I'd have to listen to it again but I was under the impression that "Irreplaceable" doesn't even have a big key change, although the middle-eight packs an equivalent punch.

This is not to say that it isn't notable that the biggest single from Beyonce's new album is a ballad-of-sorts - but I think one reason it's big is that it's a ballad that people who have only liked Beyonce's uptempo work can click with.

Tim F (Tim F), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 23:21 (seventeen years ago) link

(xpost)

Well, right, that's what I'm saying: it doesn't have any great significance, it's just a really good song. Those do tend to come along every once in a while, and sometimes the temptation to read too much into them is overwhelming. Hell, I've been known in moments of argumentativeness to claim that it will singlehandedly save the album format.


RANDOM SIDENOTE: I know an inexplicably large number of women who completely hate this song and, by extension, any man who enjoys it. I've heard multiple suggestions that guys "only like it because of the video" (haven't seen it yet, but judging by tone of the song, I wouldn't exactly expect a Pussycat Dolls-style skank-o-rama -- am I way off base here?); one woman I work with actually said she "lost respect for [me]", and I got the feeling she was only half joking. Beyonce for Mariah of the oughties?

Goodtime Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great Frisco Freakout (bernard snowy), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 23:22 (seventeen years ago) link

one month passes...
So Beyonce sung "Listen" on the Grammys instead but....

02/02/07
http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2007/02/02/beyonce_still_irreplaceable_on_top_of_th

"Beyonce Knowles' Irreplaceable has notched up a ninth week at the top of the US singles chart.

The hit, which first hit number one in early December, has kept Fall Out Boy's This Ain't A Scene, It's An Arms Race at number two and Nelly Furtado's Say It Right at number three for a second successive week.

The highest debut on the new Billboard chart belongs to Brit Lily Allen, whose Smile enters the countdown at number 83."

curmudgeon (DC Steve), Monday, 12 February 2007 22:27 (seventeen years ago) link

"Irreplaceable" is a mind-bogglingly stupid, confused song that seems to conflate being able to buy someone a car with being able to keep them from cheating on you. Also, if this is an "empowerment song", why is she so hell-bent on picking up another meaningless boytoy whom she can disdain into cheating on her? Finally, exactly what is the point of telling someone "don't think you are irreplaceable" as you're kicking them out? Isn't it kind of obvious at that point that you think they're replaceable?

Basically all this song has shown me is that Beyonce sometimes says some stupid shit when she gets mad; "Ring The Alarm" is a much more coherent take in terms of narrative sense as well as being much more successful in making me identify with the protagonist. Also, the transition into the chorus of "Irreplaceable" is a big pile of unimaginative shit.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 04:08 (seventeen years ago) link

i cant even remember if i ever liked this I hate it so much now

deej (deej), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 06:00 (seventeen years ago) link

It's got the chord changes of Closing Time

Not For Use as Infant Nog (A-Ron Hubbard), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 06:20 (seventeen years ago) link

these are good points. (esp. dan's about the chorus, and i would add that the climax of the chorus -- the actual "irreplaceable" moment -- barely arrives at all. there's no resolution or anything, the melody seems to just dissipate like milk in water.)

still, in spite of or because of all that, a 100 percent pop classic. (which "ring the alarm" is not quite, despite being a better song.)

tipsy mothra (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 07:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Dan you are so wrong about this that little babies die every time your fingers hit the buttons on your keyboard.

Tim F (Tim F), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 10:19 (seventeen years ago) link

"Irreplaceable" is a mind-bogglingly stupid, confused song that seems to conflate being able to buy someone a car with being able to keep them from cheating on you.

this isn't what she says at all. she mentions the car because it's an insult-to-injury thing, like he's slept with another girl in HER BED.

Also, if this is an "empowerment song", why is she so hell-bent on picking up another meaningless boytoy whom she can disdain into cheating on her?

well it's not a straight-up empowerment song, is it? it's an expression of all the confusion/pride/conflict one feels when a relationship ends, and this totally includes meaningless casual sex as revenge on yr ex.

Finally, exactly what is the point of telling someone "don't think you are irreplaceable" as you're kicking them out? Isn't it kind of obvious at that point that you think they're replaceable?

well, no, not at all, not if you’ve been left no other option than to kick them out after you discovered that they were being unfaithful! beyonce is underlining, to him, that she’s not simply doing this to save her pride, but she really will get over him just like that. (of course, she’s lying to herself, which is what makes the song so effective.)

Basically all this song has shown me is that Beyonce sometimes says some stupid shit when she gets mad; "Ring The Alarm" is a much more coherent take in terms of narrative sense as well as being much more successful in making me identify with the protagonist.

this is true, and it’s exactly why ‘irreplaceable’ is the more emotionally affecting song (though ‘ring the alarm’ is fabulous’ as well). incoherent stupid shit when you’ve just been emotionally shattered? EXACTLY.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 10:34 (seventeen years ago) link

It's weird, I always assumed that everyone believed that in 'irreplaceable' Beyonce was lying to herself and to him, building up this image of herself as the breadwinner who could kick out her boytoy for any infraction and replace him any minute, and then the moment the song was over and his back turned she'd collapse. And then the video was so literal, and in interviews Beyonce herself seems to be taking the song straight, all this chat about how it's 'empowering'... I suppose it's kind of empowering that she's staking a claim for the kind of braggadocio identity some guys adopt in hip-hop, big pimping, economically and emotionally in control, never pussywhipped, and so on. But since it isn't all that convincing (& why is this - because it doesn't seem emotionally true? because women are demonstrably fools for wuv? because her delivery suggests otherwise?), how 'empowering' can it be?

'telling me / i ain't going to find another man like you'
man clearly does not think he's irreplacaeble! presumably he thinks she'll come crawling back, but she's never going to do that, she's too strong, she never needed him anyway, he was just some man, etc etc etc.

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 12:57 (seventeen years ago) link

I will admit that the rhetoric surrounding "Irreplaceable" irritates me more than the actual song itself (except for that fucking awful pre-chorus). Cis is totally OTM here; every time Beyonce opens her mouth to talk about this song, I think she gets dumber.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:04 (seventeen years ago) link

do you really think beyoncé's going to say outright in interviews "the song is a lie to myself"? that is not the sort of thing i've ever heard any pop star admit to, it would be...too revealing. i'm not sure it matters what beyoncé says about it.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link

(& why is this - because it doesn't seem emotionally true? because women are demonstrably fools for wuv? because her delivery suggests otherwise?)

keep trying to formulate response along the lines of - the fact that it's a ballad in the first place creates this fundamental disjoint between the words and the music, the independent-woman braggadocio fronting which comes out of beyoncé's mouth (inc the inevitable focus on the economics of it all) at complete odds with not just her overtly emotional delivery but also with the sappy acoustic guitar and predictable ballad chord changes. it hasn't come out right though.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:12 (seventeen years ago) link

I suppose it's kind of empowering that she's staking a claim for the kind of braggadocio identity some guys adopt in hip-hop, big pimping, economically and emotionally in control, never pussywhipped, and so on. But since it isn't all that convincing (& why is this

also: she has built up very effectively, that exact image many, many times before! it's virtually her default persona. so we know what beyoncé sounds like when she's being empowering, we know she's very good at it, and we know that this is not it.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:18 (seventeen years ago) link

She could say 'the song is about throwing your man out, telling yourself you'll get through it, cos you will eventually', though? 'myself' doesn't really come into it, I've not seen anything that suggests it's autobiographical.

It really makes me wonder, though: I think Beyonce puts in a really great performance on the song, she knows how to sing it - and then she goes around acting like she can't see any of the subtlety, and I start to think 'maybe she has to believe in its literal truth to sing it as well as she does...' so that, I don't know, every performance is at the emotional point before you realise you're lying to yourself, or something.

yes to recognisable signifiers of ballad form affecting perception etc.

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:21 (seventeen years ago) link

is the disjoint not between the idea of the strong woman casually tossing aside man who has done her wrong, with replacement ready, as though he were a nothing... and the idea that cheating on her is this crime that must be punishable by immediate cessation? ie, if he was that unimportant in first place, surely anything he might do is of no great consequence to B in the first place.

unless the song is about pride rather than enpowerment. perhaps you might say they are the same thing. but i'm not sure about that.

Subtractive Synthesis (Subtractive Synthesis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:24 (seventeen years ago) link

the song is definitely about pride.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Anyway if she's talking about/selling this as an 'empowerment anthem', does she want to undermine that by talking about how its a lie underneath?

Subtractive Synthesis (Subtractive Synthesis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Pride for B
Empowerment for....women (who's she selling the 'idea' to). B doesn't need empowerment (in her mind), but pride is all

?

Subtractive Synthesis (Subtractive Synthesis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:26 (seventeen years ago) link

'maybe she has to believe in its literal truth to sing it as well as she does...'

or maybe she is STILL lying to herself, and still in denial!

or: sometimes, even after you've admitted to yourself that you're lying to yourself, and have come to terms with that...you're still not going to give the other party the pleasure of seeing it, so you carry on with your public face at all times.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Anyway if she's talking about/selling this as an 'empowerment anthem', does she want to undermine that by talking about how its a lie underneath?

precisely! especially as it's the kind of song where you hope by repeating its words to yourself enough times, you will eventually believe them. any public concession to their untruth would SHATTER YR FRAGILE EMOTIONAL WORLD, etc.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:28 (seventeen years ago) link

pride more than empowerment, that's a good way of putting it. esp with the double-edgedness of pride.

it's virtually her default persona
but you can't mesh it with the buckwild crazy needy mad-eyes persona (cf deja vu etc), or the service-your-man one (cf cater 2 u, naughty girl, etc).


lex you sound like you're implying it's based in real life, watch it. :(

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:37 (seventeen years ago) link

and where is the rule that her persona in interviews and her persona in songs have to be the same?

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:37 (seventeen years ago) link

it is possible to take the 'new criticism' thing too far.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:42 (seventeen years ago) link

i mean basically what we are all saying was neatly summed up by Dan:

every time Beyonce opens her mouth to talk about this song, I think she gets dumber

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:42 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost I don't even know what a new criticism is. ^_^

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:43 (seventeen years ago) link

it was written in character after dreamgirls wasn't it? (which i still haven't seen, must rectify.) i do think that whether based on real life or not, it's not the kind of song which should have the curtain pulled back on it like that.

but you can't mesh it with the buckwild crazy needy mad-eyes persona (cf deja vu etc), or the service-your-man one (cf cater 2 u, naughty girl, etc).

indeed, though for whatever reason submissive/needy solo beyoncé hasn't stuck as a persona in the way that shark-eyed businesswoman DC beyoncé did. i guess until now she's backed it up with some pretty no-nonsense beats.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:43 (seventeen years ago) link

i mean basically what we are all saying was neatly summed up by Dan:

every time Beyonce opens her mouth to talk about this song, I think she gets dumber

no, dan's completely wrong, we have established exactly why it would be a bad idea for beyoncé (or any pop star doing a similar song) to openly talk about how it's a lie! it doesn't matter what she says in interviews, anyway.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:44 (seventeen years ago) link

maybe we just like shark-eyed businesswoman more than submissive&needy, and so pay more attention to it?

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:45 (seventeen years ago) link

ha, indeed

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:50 (seventeen years ago) link

it does matter what she says in interviews: it makes me think she's being dumb, whether intentionally (to sell her 'empowerment' angle on the song) or not. By thinking about it at all we're pulling the curtain back, why would it be any different if Beyonce were more eager to appear smrt in interviews?

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:51 (seventeen years ago) link

the problem with beyonce is, that is exactly how nuanced her stuff gets. you're either parody of old-style dependent woman or fucking nightmare materialist headcase.

xpost

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:52 (seventeen years ago) link

i tend to pay no attention to what any popstar says in interviews though! i mean, when i talked to pusha t he didn't know what a choir was, which is arguably dumber than beyoncé not bothering to go into the complexities of 'irreplaceable's narrative.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:55 (seventeen years ago) link

Now that I'm a little embarrassed by my ridiculous claims upthread, I'm closer to what Xgau said in his most recent Consumer Guide: something about how in this song "hook subsumes meaning."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 14:08 (seventeen years ago) link

doesn't the fact that someone other than Beyonce wrote the lyrics kinda mean that it's entirely possible that she doesn't totally understand the song herself and it doesn't really matter what she thinks about it?

Al (Alex In Baltimore), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 14:09 (seventeen years ago) link

surely what she thinks about it matters to her performance of the song?

cis boom bah (cis), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 14:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, well that's all about playing to the aspirational audience.

Shadowcat (A-Ron Hubbard), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:52 (seventeen years ago) link

well for sure, but i'm not going to use the end-product of that calculation as a stick to beat the allegedly "romantic, rose-coloured picture" provided by other artists. it is what it is.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:55 (seventeen years ago) link

In last month's GQ Beyonce says that as someone born into the middle classes, she's "more intelligent" than people from "the hood", and this makes it easy for her to cope with success.

She then didn't add a "Why you frontin' wigga?" style html mark-up box.

White Collar Boxer (DomPassantino), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

no, hurting, yr right--i don't want to take it (a bio. reading) too far, but i don't think it's a wrong-headed movement; especially not if a huge number of fans are hearing the song that way--but i can already see the danger of this angle, namely, that i sort of assumed that this was the song that everyone thot was abt hov but apparently none of you did, so either i hallucinated that reaction, or its v. specific to the ppl i interact w/.

max (maxreax), Thursday, 15 February 2007 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Way late but anyway:

Fair enough, but that doesn't really answer my question. I didn't ask how they are similiar, (and half of that is based on circumstance, rather than anything within the songs. the circle-of-fifths thing may be a good point, but my knowledge of music theory is rather rudimentary) I asked how one is a ripoff of the other. I don't see any reason to assume that Beyonce was consciously or even subconsciously setting out to make a song that sounds like "Unpretty".

I did not use the word "ripoff" to imply intent on the part of Beyonce. I used the word "ripoff" to imply similarity, chronology and how I view the relative quality of both (I am not a fan of "Unpretty" but I would rather listen to that any day over "Irreplaceable", despite Beyonce being a much better singer than anyone in TLC).

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Thursday, 15 February 2007 22:13 (seventeen years ago) link

aw c'mon her ridiculous bullshit dazzles any cultural theory etc etc...

da mystery of sandboxin' (fandango), Thursday, 15 February 2007 23:09 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.