POLYGAMY POLL

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (82 of them)

file under 'if a train leaves chicago at 4:45 PM heading towards cleveland at 85 mph and another train leaves cleveland heading towards chicago at 90 mph at 6:00 PM...'

dayo, Monday, 5 December 2011 19:21 (twelve years ago) link

this thread went from sex to word problems way too quickly

recently deposed application inspector for the (league of women voters), Monday, 5 December 2011 19:56 (twelve years ago) link

as sanpaku pointed out upthread: mitochondrial DNA is strictly matrilineal. that is, it has its very own DNA, outside the nucleus, and it only gets passed from mother-to-offspring. similarly, Y-chromosomes only come from dad (whereas X chromosomes can come from either parent).

if you evaluate the genetic variability of Y-chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA, it would seem that mitochondrial DNA exhibits more diversity than Y-chromosomes*. thus, we conclude that more women have been contributing their unique mitochondrial genes to the pool than have men and their unique Y-chromosomes. s

o basically most babies were made by one guy and a lotta chicks

*nb - i am just parroting sanpaku on this. i've never heard this stat, and have neither reason to doubt it, nor to believe it. that being said, it doesn't seem shocking to me at all to learn that back in civilization's small times, ~alpha males~ (or w/e) made more babies (via polygamy, harems, and/or rape). i should also point out that mitochondrial DNA is subject to different selective pressures than Y-chromosomes. that is: if 1000 couples have 1000 babies, 1000 of those babies will inherit their mom's mitochondrial DNA, and only half will inherit their dad's Y-chromosomes. kinda spit-balling here, but one could see how that might result in a diversity of maternal DNA, and a relative narrowing of the uniquely-male contribution. could be rong tho, I Am Not A Geneticist

river wolf, Monday, 5 December 2011 23:32 (twelve years ago) link

Still laffing at "OH GNOES" tbh.

Making like Melusine (Pyth), Monday, 5 December 2011 23:44 (twelve years ago) link

eh legalize it, what do I care

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 5 December 2011 23:49 (twelve years ago) link

otm

nuhnuhnuh, Tuesday, 6 December 2011 00:03 (twelve years ago) link

for one thing it would piss off the mormons and i am pro anything that does that automatically

nuhnuhnuh, Tuesday, 6 December 2011 00:04 (twelve years ago) link

idk I think they would find a way to deal with it.

not uplifting (Abbott), Tuesday, 6 December 2011 00:29 (twelve years ago) link

They would probably say "sweeeet this means the second coming is around the corner, now all that has to happen is the prophet gets shot in the middle east and that rock on the conference center breaks open, Jesus #1"

not uplifting (Abbott), Tuesday, 6 December 2011 00:30 (twelve years ago) link

then they would marry one thousand ladies

q: are we not bel biv men? a: we are bel biv devo (m bison), Tuesday, 6 December 2011 00:31 (twelve years ago) link

and eat jello

q: are we not bel biv men? a: we are bel biv devo (m bison), Tuesday, 6 December 2011 00:33 (twelve years ago) link

signs o the times

nuhnuhnuh, Tuesday, 6 December 2011 00:35 (twelve years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mxgq7xEtcTk

CaptainBurlapSax, Tuesday, 6 December 2011 03:37 (twelve years ago) link

Funny, yesterday I googled Polyamory, and every 2guys/1girl scenario starts out a fair description of the pros and cons, personal tales, individual situations, all of them ended up describing "doubel pen", let's call it that...

Bela Lugosi's Derrida (MarkG oo la showaddywaddy), Tuesday, 6 December 2011 11:47 (twelve years ago) link

I kind of think polyandry is cool NOT because I am interested in it, but because it is practiced by magpies. And magpies are probably the best creatures on earth!

not uplifting (Abbott), Tuesday, 6 December 2011 13:42 (twelve years ago) link

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

System, Saturday, 10 December 2011 00:01 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.