he's guilty. or sure seems it. and it's sad. i hate trials. i'm not interested in cops or the law or any of that boring bullshit. but i still read the sun-times blog every day (the kelly chronicles). and i can't help but post the weird details. because they're weird. and they tell us something. maybe. know though that this is a sad sordid terrible thing, this case, and though i don't post about that it's still the central point here.
― jergins, Monday, 2 June 2008 22:24 (fifteen years ago) link
onwards and downwards
today's witness: Van Allen said she went on tour with Kelly and was picked out of the crowd at the end of each show to perform simulated sex with him on stage at each show's finale.
― jergins, Monday, 2 June 2008 22:28 (fifteen years ago) link
i don't want him to be guilty, but i think he probably is. am i supposed to hate him? i don't know.
;_;
― lxy, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 05:38 (fifteen years ago) link
3 relatives said today that it's not the girl on the tape
― jergins, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 22:50 (fifteen years ago) link
NOT GUILTY said the jury just now
― jergins, Friday, 13 June 2008 19:28 (fifteen years ago) link