2012 GOP Presidential Campaign -- "This individual's going to accuse me of an affair for an extended period of time."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2147 of them)

I expect I will have to offer grief counseling to all my grade 6 students on Monday.

clemenza, Saturday, 3 December 2011 23:40 (twelve years ago) link

to me, too!

i am v sad about this.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 December 2011 23:41 (twelve years ago) link

I know this isn't easy. Anything worthwhile--President Newt--never is.

clemenza, Saturday, 3 December 2011 23:47 (twelve years ago) link

lol we're gonna have a president whose first name is newt.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 December 2011 23:50 (twelve years ago) link

HEY

December 3, 2011 Mike Huckabee Presidential Forum -- 8pm ET on Fox News
Location: Fox News Headquarters in New York City
Sponsor: Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee and Fox News
Participants: Romney, Perry, Bachmann, Gingrich, Santorum, Paul all confirmed. Cain, Huntsman unconfirmed.

http://www.postdiluvian.org/~gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/pix/inter.gif

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 00:25 (twelve years ago) link

man it would be so great if cain rushed the stage.

maybe mark block could pretend to hold him back as cain tried to reassert himself as the GOP's number-one-guy.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 00:27 (twelve years ago) link

No one's supposed to "mention or attack other candidates." What's the point?!

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:02 (twelve years ago) link

yeah this format will be terrible.

  • no direct engagement between candidates
  • questioners who are really relentlessly promoting themselves (n.1)
  • questioners who are not professional examiners.
____________________________
(n.1) and, as pam bondi's opening monologue shows, are also dummies.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:04 (twelve years ago) link

(sorry, they are professional examiners; not professional journalists.)

already, this is a disgusting orgy of self-promotion.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:05 (twelve years ago) link

wow i didn't know pam bondi was this awkwardly dense.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:08 (twelve years ago) link

I don't know what to make of this thing. That's a relatively (in this context) tough beginning for Gingrich; maybe, in light of how much Huckabee despised Romney in '08, they'll go really hard at Romney.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:13 (twelve years ago) link

newt's doing fine. two of these AG are bumbling and self-aggrandizing, and the other already unloaded his best question.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:15 (twelve years ago) link

actually gingrich is doing well, and hitting on themes that the base will love (and coming-off as electable).

but now . . . the crazy judicial issues arise.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:16 (twelve years ago) link

prediction: newt will do much better than romney in this format.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:18 (twelve years ago) link

My feed's terrible. I feel like I've got Grandmaster Flash cutting up the audio. Hearing Newt say "I want to put them in jail" is not good.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:19 (twelve years ago) link

i don't think that's what he said.

look, this format is awful, largely because of who is asking the questions. but for what it is, i think gingrich did very well. this plays to his strengths. he didn't say anything to disqualify him, he sounded conservative and coherent, and i think that will be the post-debate takeaway for him.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:21 (twelve years ago) link

but grab your popcorn, cause crazy and romney are coming up next!

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:22 (twelve years ago) link

I want them to draw blood from Romney. I want them to break his kneecaps.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:22 (twelve years ago) link

i understand why fox viewers think gingrich is intelligent bc compared to these examiners he is clearly much brighter. or as Sullivan said earlier today, he's what stupid people imagine smart people are like.

Mordy, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:23 (twelve years ago) link

eh, i think you're undercrediting him. but he clearly overcredits himself, so . . .

ANNNNNNND, here's ricky.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:23 (twelve years ago) link

the problem with santorum is that he comes off like a petulent teenager.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:24 (twelve years ago) link

LOLGOP Pete Nicely -- If this felt any less important, I'd think I was watching Glenn Beck TV. #HuckForum

haha.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:25 (twelve years ago) link

"The President was dealing with an insurrection." That's exactly like when Democrats tried the "The President was dealing with an erection" defense.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:26 (twelve years ago) link

eh, i think you're undercrediting him

??

Mordy, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:27 (twelve years ago) link

oh, i misread your post. sorry.

also, i'm itching for a gingrich/obama general election, so . . . i'm bias.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:29 (twelve years ago) link

"Values that undermine--excuse me, undergird our country..."--great!

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:29 (twelve years ago) link

why does ken whatshisnamevirginiaguy so anti-santorum?

why does pam bondi sound so dumb?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:29 (twelve years ago) link

why is ken whats...

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:30 (twelve years ago) link

santorum could gain some momentum if he could calm down and not bite into questions so badly. he's a missed opportunity for the GOP, but his moment is gone.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:31 (twelve years ago) link

LOLGOP Pete Nicely -- Rick Santorum is like your friend's friend you're interviewing for the job as a favor.

_______________________________

LOLGOP Pete Nicely -- Looking at these state Attorney Generals compared to Rick Santorum makes you realize that these candidates are the best the GOP can do. #sad

lol

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:32 (twelve years ago) link

Hey, Santorum just made reference to his opponents. I cry foul.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:35 (twelve years ago) link

sounds like they're saving mitt romney for last. lol.

at this point, no-one is taking perry serious. sad!

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:40 (twelve years ago) link

I came for the Newt, I stayed for the Mitt.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:42 (twelve years ago) link

"Boots on the ground"--think I hate that almost as much as "game-changer."

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:43 (twelve years ago) link

"at the end of the day" it's just a cliche.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:43 (twelve years ago) link

Josh Marshall agrees with you, Daniel: "Newt's campaign made sure to send 'Good Newt' tonight, pretty cool and polished, making good reference to his knowledge of the workings of the federal government without seeming pompous. I think if you're a Republican looking to be reassured that Newt's got his feet on the ground and himself under control, you probably think he's doing pretty well."

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:46 (twelve years ago) link

i actually am 70% of "newt's campaign." the remaining 30% are child-laborers who work for tiffany's.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:47 (twelve years ago) link

Uh-oh--Rick's talking about which departments he'd eliminate. Red flag, red flag.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:49 (twelve years ago) link

I love how he says "legisla-tors."

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:50 (twelve years ago) link

no one even believes he's still running for president, so . . .

the real issue here is which GOP candidate will scoop up perry's ad-maker (who is aces).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:51 (twelve years ago) link

http://guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/kang-and-kodos.jpg

xp

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:51 (twelve years ago) link

low blow mike huckabee!

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:52 (twelve years ago) link

asking rick perry to define strict constructionism. shameful, gotcha question.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:53 (twelve years ago) link

I hope they ask Mitt the favorite-founding-father question twice, right at the start and right at the end.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:53 (twelve years ago) link

i hope for mitt, they bring out the props (e.g., video clips of his contrary prior positions, and copies of early editions of his books).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:54 (twelve years ago) link

Mitt: "You already asked me that."
Panelist: "Just checking in..."

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:54 (twelve years ago) link

"Fundamentally"? Hey, copyright infringement!

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:59 (twelve years ago) link

this is a crazy-off of the highest-order.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:00 (twelve years ago) link

"I can...I can come out in support of that." What a strange way to word that.

clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:02 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.