Dear ILE - a plea

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (685 of them)
as much as i love robin carmody im not sure his participation is the most accurate barometer of a functioning society

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, for me the intellectualism and lack of meanness is what separated (and still does) ILX from other boards I've seen.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

(xx-post)

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

Surely there's a difference between a site that's too intellectual for people (oh noes) and one that's too vicious for people? I'm not expecting all or even a majority of random googlers to stay, but it's equally misleading to say "look! Louis got hounded and he stayed ergo nothing wrong with ILX online boxing club and gymnasium"

There is an inherent presumption here that people who can deal with environment X will behave like Y when introduced into it that I don't agree with. I also think it's incredibly disingenuous to expect that any community, whether it is online or in real life, will retain the same feel as time goes on unless said community features some level of brainwashing in its induction process.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't think random googlers are going to land in Loius J threads generally, though? I would assume that most googlers are just sticking their favourite band names into google, or some bizarre random text string, or 0ink 1nvites or whatever (the search logs are often entertaining reading) that happens to throw up an ILX thread about that. Most of the time, I'd put money on the search being not exactly what they're looking for, or too boring (to the outsider).

Robin C quit posting so much b/c there was a couple of regulars who were argumentative towards him in a way he didn't like. This isn't supposition, he told me this in an email. This was also a long, long time ago. I do miss Robin participating, I must admit.

Norman Phay (Pashmina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I think that random googlers are more likely to be chased off by the chummy inside-jokeyness of ILX than the sniping. Shall we try to get rid of that as well?

xposts

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:37 (seventeen years ago) link

BOXCAR BOXCAR BOXCAR

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I also think it's incredibly disingenuous to expect that any community, whether it is online or in real life, will retain the same feel as time goes on unless said community features some level of brainwashing in its induction process.

this is totally right and nothing else really needs to be said.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:38 (seventeen years ago) link

It's totally right but it completely neglects the fact that most communities will implode unless core members take active steps to keep things good.

It's Teatime in Buttercup Land (Maaarghk C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:41 (seventeen years ago) link

nothing else really

After two days in hospital I took a turn for the nurse. (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rain, Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Do the people bringing up the "random Googlers" argument actually want every random Googler to join ILX or is this more of a "I don't want to look bad on the Internet" argument? This is a serious question; the former stance doesn't make sense to me but the latter does (even though I disagree with it).

xpost: Define "implode".

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:41 (seventeen years ago) link

I also think it's incredibly disingenuous to expect that any community, whether it is online or in real life, will retain the same feel as time goes on unless said community features some level of brainwashing in its induction process.

Who's asking for that? There seems to be a feeling that the place we've arrived at currently is overly vicious, and this thread was started to ask people not to be like that. It has nothing (in my mind, at least) to do with ye glory Greenspun days in the slightest.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Define "implode".

Collapse. Whether it's everyone leaving, or most people leaving and a core remaining.

It's Teatime in Buttercup Land (Maaarghk C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Also: please define concept of "core members"

xposts

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago) link

also think it's incredibly disingenuous to expect that any community, whether it is online or in real life, will retain the same feel as time goes on unless said community features some level of brainwashing in its induction process.

You're right, but unless one's attitude is "nothing will ever change", there's some point in trying to bring up things people feel are making the community worse, and discuss whether or not something can or should be done about them. As we are doing now.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:44 (seventeen years ago) link

It has everything to do with "ye glory Greenspun days"! What are people comparing to if not that (or a period of time shortly after the initial migration, or some period of time after that; the exact period is not as important as the fact that people are comparing the way the board "used to be" with the way the board is "now")?

xpost: Collapse. Whether it's everyone leaving, or most people leaving and a core remaining.

What are you talking about??? ILE currently has well over 100 consistent, active posters every day; ditto ILM.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:45 (seventeen years ago) link

Do the people bringing up the "random Googlers" argument actually want every random Googler to join ILX or is this more of a "I don't want to look bad on the Internet" argument?

Neither: I certainly don't want every googler to join, or I'll spend all my time looking up MySpace passwords; nor do I mind looking bad. What I don't want is a forum that's so vicious in parts that reasonable, intelligent people arrive and go "jesus! fuck this noise", while a good portion of current members are hiding out in their "safe" threads. What is the point of that?

(Nor do I want the reverse, which is that it ends up attracting the type that are all "wayhey! get in, it's a big pagga over here, I'll join, HAY FUK U ALL")

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:46 (seventeen years ago) link

Core members - people who care about the community enough to be willing to contribute time/money/effort, whatever's required, to sort out the problems. Examples: all the mods and coders; everyone who gave in the donation drive; even people like Jon count here in the formation of the NB. In a less tangible way, the core members are the ones who contribute good content to the threads, are welcoming to newcomers, help out people who ask questions or need consoling.

It's Teatime in Buttercup Land (Maaarghk C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:47 (seventeen years ago) link

ILE currently has well over 100 consistent, active posters every day; ditto ILM.
Yeh, and there's over 20,000 readers every day. You'd expect more of them would want to say something

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:48 (seventeen years ago) link

We're probably lucky that they don't? Isn't that the point of googlers?

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post - that's the majority of people who post - it's self-determining as it essentially means the people who are bothered whether the place remains healthy and positive rather than those who don't give a fuck.

It's Teatime in Buttercup Land (Maaarghk C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link

It's good that we don't have 20,000 active posters, yes?

After two days in hospital I took a turn for the nurse. (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rain, Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:50 (seventeen years ago) link

this random googlers argument would only make sense if the new crop of posters latching onto ilx in the past year or so were vicious internet hatemongers instead of the most pussified herbs ive ever seen

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:50 (seventeen years ago) link

how many of them are spambots?

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:51 (seventeen years ago) link

What I don't want is a forum that's so vicious in parts that reasonable, intelligent people arrive and go "jesus! fuck this noise", while a good portion of current members are hiding out in their "safe" threads. What is the point of that?

The point is that people are finding spaces where they feel comfortable participating. I've always hated this argument because the not-so-subtle subtext is "I find all of you boring/unworthy, I wish some interesting people would show up/my real friends would come back." However, because no one wants to look bad, no one wants to come out and say that.

You can't have a forum that is wide open to anyone who wants to participate and then complain because it isn't attracting "the right people"; either the forum itself has to change so you can control who has access to it and how they post (or the forum has controls that let you filter the content to your liking, if you don't want to be draconian) or you take the good with the bad.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:51 (seventeen years ago) link

It has everything to do with "ye glory Greenspun days"! What are people comparing to if not that (or a period of time shortly after the initial migration, or some period of time after that; the exact period is not as important as the fact that people are comparing the way the board "used to be" with the way the board is "now")?

Because the arguments (well, some of them :) are equally good if you're comparing to "the way we think the board could be".

xpost to Laurel: Yes, we probably are! They would kill the HipHop in the 90s thread, for a start (over 30% of traffic on some days!)

how many of them are spambots?
Not terribly many, actually. They're quite a lot of traffic, but they aren't great in number.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeh, and there's over 20,000 readers every day. You'd expect more of them would want to say something

No you wouldn't! That's like expecting every person who reads a random online article/blog is going to fill out the comment form!

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeh, and there's over 20,000 readers every day. You'd expect more of them would want to say something.

I don't know if anything can be read into that, though, Stet. When the AHOT list was at its peak, there were 500+ ppl subscribed, about 30-40 of whom ever posted at all Likewise AH, that still has I believe over 1000 subscribers, I see the same names posting, def less that 50, TGS is down to ~10 regular posters, everytime I look at it I see loads of usernames in the "now online" (ie ppl who've actually taken the time to register in that case) box most of whom never post. I don't get the mentality myself, but the figure/ratio quoted does not surprise me at all.

Norman Phay (Pashmina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, "good content"? Who is the arbiter of "good content"?

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:54 (seventeen years ago) link

We are the worlds greatest dysfunctional soap opera. I think I should die and come back as my evil twin brother.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:55 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, "good content"? Who is the arbiter of "good content"?
google pagerank

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:55 (seventeen years ago) link

tv guide has over 9 million readers but only about 30 people writing for it

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:55 (seventeen years ago) link

> I've never been anything other than honest about them being threads FOR MY PLEASURE, INTEREST AND ENTERTAINMENT.

> x-post Kate has always made it clear about what the cooler is and isn't. There's definitely no hidden agenda.

Watercooler thread #1:

"You don't have to be from the UK, but it helps to be in this timezone.

So, erm... what did you get up to at the weekend? How's the weather where you are, bloody typical, eh? Any aches and pains to complain about? How are your local busses running? How does your garden grow?

And most importantly... is it time for our tea break yet?"

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:55 (seventeen years ago) link

"I find all of you boring/unworthy, I wish some interesting people would show up/my real friends would come back."

Hoo, this sure aint true of me. I only wish I was zingy enough to be part of Noise, or well-read enough for ILB. What I do find unworthy is bullying and trolling and downright vileness. It's not that the "wrong people" are here, it's that a small number are being dicks, which affects the whole.

xpost yeh, fair point. Maybe I shuold say "you'd expect more new members to arrive from a pool that size". Because it feels (and I might be wrong) that it's mostly regulars here with the odd newcomer.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:56 (seventeen years ago) link

noise is not all zings!

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:57 (seventeen years ago) link

No you wouldn't! That's like expecting every person who reads a random online article/blog is going to fill out the comment form!

I got my first hate blog comment today for bitching about Carrie Underwood.

"I find all of you boring/unworthy, I wish some interesting people would show up/my real friends would come back."
BYE LOSER!

Anyway, I say the new site gets reg-free trial if we get good spam protection.

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:57 (seventeen years ago) link

The site will remain self-policing. I can't imagine any way to change that. There is no way that the personalities on this board will tollerate anything else.

I really don't understand the balkanization complaint. People can come out of their clan threads and post elsewhere. This seems to be what happens. Clan thread just = ilx within ilx. Don't be a lurker on the regional threads, then. Visit London/DC/Chicago.

After two days in hospital I took a turn for the nurse. (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rain, Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:58 (seventeen years ago) link

The point made WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY upthread about how if people spent more time talking TO each other rather than talking ABOUT each other, we wouldn't have to have these threads is incredibly OTM.

Also Ed is OTM.

Because it feels (and I might be wrong) that it's mostly regulars here with the odd newcomer.

This is the way the boards have always felt to me, largely because I already knew a sizeable number of the original posters when it started. I call that feeling "being a regular on the board".

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:58 (seventeen years ago) link

The site won't get a reg free trial because I haven't written it like that.

KeefW (KeefW), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Don't worry, Jon will hack it.

Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Posters that have been supposedly on ILX in recent memory:

Mic@key
Louis J
Paul Edward Wagemann

The only on that list that doesn't post here anymore is the one WE KICKED OUT.

I'm still looking for a concrete example of how this behavior has affected someones willingness to post.

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Seconded, Noise is def. not all zings, though the zings that are there can be pretty fucking harsh! Music discussion there I find to be excellent.

I do have the feeling that the tone of the place has been a bit harsh generally recently, I must admit. I think Mark C's original post is OTM.

Norman Phay (Pashmina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link

("seconded" to mr que)

Norman Phay (Pashmina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, "good content"? Who is the arbiter of "good content"?

Everyone individually.

It's Teatime in Buttercup Land (Maaarghk C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, to make it reg free. Well, that's fine if he wants to do the work. Certainly an unorthodox way of programming computers.

xxx-post

KeefW (KeefW), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link

The point made WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY upthread about how if people spent more time talking TO each other rather than talking ABOUT each other, we wouldn't have to have these threads is incredibly OTM.

That was my point (I think) and it's about the only rule I'd want a mod to enact, apart from the obvious spam/hate speech stuff. That's how I'd change the "self policing" bit, too.

I'm still looking for a concrete example of how this behavior has affected someones willingness to post.
Kinda tricky to prove a negative, innit.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:02 (seventeen years ago) link

uh, that should say "supposedly bullied"

xpost: I think the funny thing is that despite what people think, NB is one of the nicest places on ILX, as a rule.

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:02 (seventeen years ago) link

The point made WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY upthread about how if people spent more time talking TO each other rather than talking ABOUT each other, we wouldn't have to have these threads is incredibly OTM.

Or talking about each other on at other interweb places.

The Many Faces of Gordon Jump (Leon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:03 (seventeen years ago) link

(Also zingy reference wasn't meant to mean Noise is all zings, just that I'm not zingy enough to be brave enough to post there!)

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Not asking anyone to prove a negative, I'm asking someone to find a thread where someone is bullied, and then search that username and show that they haven't posted since.

xpost

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:04 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.