Dear ILE - a plea

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (685 of them)
No, things that cannot be talked about on the Cooler are constant:

-Football/sport
-Big Brother/reality TV shows

That's the point of them. If a person wishes to talk about those things, there are dozens of other threads on ILX on those subjects.

People may say that it's random that I picked those two specific subjects to ban, but it's not. Those are the things that people chatter about when they've got nothing else to talk about. The rest of the world - well, my bloody office, people in the pub and on the bus - I have to put up with it there, I want to just draw a line in the sand where I do not have to listen to it.

The early pre-cooler thread was an experiment to find out that if those "substitute for conversation" topics were banned, what would people talk about? Would they feel freer to talk about themselves and their own lives/concerns? What other things would people chat about? Now, obviously, it turned out to be a success, and there is a culture there which a lot of people enjoy and stay for - EVEN WHEN THEY DON'T LIKE ME. Funny, that.

As ILX has got nastier, I've got more defensive on them, yes.

And people have joined in the conversation/atmosphere who don't understand the principles of why those certain things are banned, and then go off and start massive rows when asked not to talk about sport and/or reality TV programmes. Which again, makes me defensive that the 'Cooler is getting ... *infected* with the whole culture it was trying to avoid.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost ...which implies conflict, and some people not getting exactly what they wanted, cos other people present didn't give it to them.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I get this with Jon too, but it's probably 50% projection (and he must surely expect it if not enjoy it).

Upset about locking bummers thread?

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Jon used to RULE TEH WORLD more, but then we started posting lots of things like this:

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/LokiSulk.jpg

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago) link

So you are basically saying you are the problem here, enrique?
-- Andrew Farrell (afarrel...), February 14th, 2007.

so much so i don't even see the problem... jokes, but yeah i am a bit, but less than OTHERS I COULD NAME. i have no respect for this thread and the tired zingle i came up with was all it really deserved. note steve thought it'd be deleted, and i kinda did too.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago) link

-Football/sport
-Big Brother/reality TV shows

+
other people's programming
computer games
other people having sex
etc.

basically anything that doesn't interest you right? i mean why not just admit it?

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually I'm kidding, I just wanted to use loki.jpg.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Can I re-state my call for powers to exile a coupla certain users into a Negative Zone?

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

plz show me where mark, tom or john stated they left ilx (oh wait mark & john still post, theyre just busy writing/touring respectively) cuz of zings?? tom has praised & loled at some of the most mean-spirited zings ever seen on ilx!!! with all three it was a either a more general decline in ilx or just a desire to break the addiction that led them away, not any intense moral outrage at jokes about ian-riese moraine banging his mom

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Hey, I know I'm late to all this, but it's a bit patronizing for all these people to keep bringing up Louis J as an example, because the truth of the matter is that (with the exception of the specific googlebait thread), he's rolled with the punches just fine. In fact, I think he's gotten to the point where he doesn't mind the ribbing, and as one of the people that went after him in the beginning, I respect that, and actually like the guy at this point.

Which makes me think that all the hand-wringing about how poor LJ is a great example of the nasty dickishness of ILX not only bullshit, but insulting. It seems that he needs your hand-holding about as much as he needs serious advice on how to lead his love-life from you people. So, perhaps we can drop that trope, yes?

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link

The early pre-cooler thread was an experiment to find out that if those "substitute for conversation" topics were banned, what would people talk about? Would they feel freer to talk about themselves and their own lives/concerns?

It's not like ILE was wall to wall threads about sport and Big Brother ever. There must be more to it than this.

It seems fair enough to want to carve out little niches for ourselves and our friends/anyone who'll play along, but when this happens I dislike the pretence that ILE has any real meaning still. It's lost a lot of it's value conceptually as a result.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link

May all being be happy.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:09 (seventeen years ago) link

It seems fair enough to want to carve out little niches for ourselves and our friends/anyone who'll play along, but when this happens I dislike the pretence that ILE has any real meaning still. It's lost a lot of it's value conceptually as a result.

isn't this what i just said re balkanization??

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

other people's programming
computer games
other people having sex
etc.

Suggesting that there are other threads where people could get more helpful advice on programming is not the same as shouting at people.

Computer games come under sport, as far as I'm concerned.

Shouting at other people for having sex is so clearly a joke that I wouldn't have thought even you would take it seriously, Stevem!

There are many times that I've suggested and/or "shouted" that people take a subject elsewhere, usually if I think it's going to be a long and involved conversation. I do the same thing myself if I'm on a tear about Tiffany Lamps or Am I A Hott Scot Or Not (recent threads I have started so as not to bore the 'Cooler with whatever has caught mine eye) and don't think the general regulars are interested.

basically anything that doesn't interest you right? i mean why not just admit it?

I do admite it! All the time! I've never been anything other than honest about them being threads FOR MY PLEASURE, INTEREST AND ENTERTAINMENT. It's a wonder to me that other people post to them at all sometimes.

if people don't like the atmosphere of the 'Cooler, then there is a whole interweb of other threads out there that they could be enjoying and contributing to! This is not said with nastiness or elitism or anything else, but in the original ILX spirit of DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE US. Is that really so hard?

I know that I am unlikely to like the atmosphere or spirit of the Noize Board. Guess what? I don't read it! Ditto football threads, big brother threads and threads about knitting!

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

the sandbox has come of age

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce (bounce), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:11 (seventeen years ago) link

....a long time ago prolly.

g000blar (g00blar), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

It was less the peaks than the constant rising background zing, Ethan. While we're talking on behalf of other people, like.

And people have joined in the conversation/atmosphere who don't understand the principles of why those certain things are banned

This is in fairness a retroactive application of (a quite interesting) principle - the only reason given until now was "Kate Said No".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

In fact, I think he's gotten to the point where he doesn't mind the ribbing

erm did you miss the whole googlebait episode then?

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:13 (seventeen years ago) link

Knobheads. I forgot knobheads.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

It's not retroactive at all, Andrew. If Real ILX were up, I would link to "A thread which is not about football or about big brother..." or whatever it was called, from 2004 or thereabouts.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

if people don't like the atmosphere of the 'Cooler, then there is a whole interweb of other threads out there that they could be enjoying and contributing to! This is not said with nastiness or elitism or anything else, but in the original ILX spirit of DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE US. Is that really so hard?
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f154/theevilqueen/Evil-Queen.jpg

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Which makes me think that all the hand-wringing about how poor LJ is a great example of the nasty dickishness of ILX not only bullshit, but insulting. It seems that he needs your hand-holding about as much as he needs serious advice on how to lead his love-life from you people. So, perhaps we can drop that trope, yes?

No, because for every Louis Jagger who makes a stand and fights on through all the bullshit and stays, there must be loads who read that sort of stuff and don't ever post at all. I mean, sometimes 60% of traffic is from googlers, and they aint all stayin.

This is not said with nastiness or elitism or anything else, but in the original ILX spirit of DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE US. Is that really so hard?
DO NOT HATE IF THEY READ YOU, though!

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago) link

'do not read if you hate us' was always a red rag to a colour blind bull.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago) link

i hope the guardian is getting all this down

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce (bounce), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Jon, take a good look at me. Then take a good look in that evil mirror, because I am exactly what you are going to look like in 10 or 20 years.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

60% of traffic is from googlers, and they aint all stayin.

Because the coders and mods aren't man enough to fight off spammers and locked unreg users.

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

And good people who leave almost immediately.

x-post to Stet.

KeefW (KeefW), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

because I am exactly what you are going to look like in 10 or 20 years.

Better hair and tits, but more pudge.

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

so why is sandbox ILM much less thready than ILE?

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce (bounce), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Because the coders and mods aren't man enough to fight off spammers and locked unreg users.
Not 60% of posters, 60% of googlers. People who come to visit, take one look and run away again. Maybe pausing to beg for a guess paper, but.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

HAAAAY WAY TO KEEP IT NOT PERSONAL. Both of you. XP

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

It was less the peaks than the constant rising background zing, Ethan. While we're talking on behalf of other people, like.

oh, was it? when did any of those three people say this?

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:18 (seventeen years ago) link

oh boy

xp

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Because the coders and mods aren't man enough to fight off spammers and locked unreg users.

oh does ILX still get spam? i haven't seen any in months and months. and months. funny.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

(JW and I are play-fighting. I think? At least I was, I have no idea if he's being serious any more.)

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

"erm did you miss the whole googlebait episode then?"

Next time, try actually reading my whole post.

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

let's try an unlocked ile on the new site

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Ethan actually you're right to an extent, it's more a case of a getting tired of the thing for a variety of reasons but a constant level of meanspiritedness is certainly one of those in two out of the three cases. I'm bringing offboard conversations into this (in the pub for example) and bringing other people into this debate who wisely are staying out of it so I'll stop now.

There's a difference between laughing at the occasional well-timed zing (most people do this) and wanting to be in a place where it's like that more often than not. Pretending that no intelligent or valued posters have ever been put off by a consistent bad atmosphere in parts of the boards is ridiculous.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link

fuck an unlocked. boohoo random googlers who can't face the arudous process of logging in etc.

we shouldn't have that argument again tho

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post Kate has always made it clear about what the cooler is and isn't. There's definitely no hidden agenda.

But what you have got to get clear, Kate, is the difference between someone mentioning something verboten **in passing** and 'turning the thread into a thread about that topic'.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:22 (seventeen years ago) link

A bit like when Boris Johnson played that football game and the clip was quite funny (and short)...

(checks to see which thread we are on. OK am in clear)

M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe a lot of people are busy and check in now and again and find nothing to post about.

This is me, then every now and then I get lured in by a thread like this and have next to no idea what everyone's on about.

Teh HoBBx (HoBB), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:25 (seventeen years ago) link

No, because for every Louis Jagger who makes a stand and fights on through all the bullshit and stays, there must be loads who read that sort of stuff and don't ever post at all. I mean, sometimes 60% of traffic is from googlers, and they aint all stayin.

This has been true from day one. Whether the reason is "I can't post here, you're all too intellectual" or "I can't post here, you're all too mean" or "I can't post here, you all know each other", the end result is the same; most random Googlers don't post here. Unless you've been canvassing Googlers as to why they dip into ILX and don't stick around, this is a wholly specious and misleading argument.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link

JW & KATE IN SANDBOX MEET CUTE SHOCKAH!

Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link

http://carynsolly.com/apom/han&leia.jpg

Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link

yes ILX has always been intimidating, tho the reasons for/causes of that may have changed along the way.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Surely there's a difference between a site that's too intellectual for people (oh noes) and one that's too vicious for people? I'm not expecting all or even a majority of random googlers to stay, but it's equally misleading to say "look! Louis got hounded and he stayed ergo nothing wrong with ILX online boxing club and gymnasium"

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link

I was intimidated by ILX for years! This is why I didn't post from 2001 until like 2005. And look ats me now.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link

This has been true from day one. Whether the reason is "I can't post here, you're all too intellectual" or "I can't post here, you're all too mean" or "I can't post here, you all know each other", the end result is the same; most random Googlers don't post here.

This may sound elitist, but I'd rather have the googlers who can deal with the intellectualism or inside jokes than those who can deal with the meanness.

(x-post)

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:30 (seventeen years ago) link

why did Robin Carmody leave? i like his apperances in old threads.

acrobat (acrobat), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:31 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.