Dear ILE - a plea

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (685 of them)
it wasn't worth doing at all. unfunny for at least a year now.

not a week seems to go by on watercooler threads without some massive argument about what can and can't be talked about on them.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:50 (seventeen years ago) link

the pringles is a zing? I thought it was just a kitten in a can

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Enrique - I actually enjoy most of the threads I regularly read, which is why I resent them being littered with all this bollocks.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

But yeah defending Mickey is just plain weird, he's one of the people I genuinely would like to see banned.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago) link

i don't understand your 'Cooler threads at all Kate. When you first started them I was under the impression they were all about discussing all walks of life (like people supposedly do at office watercoolers) and they were honestly a good read, but over the past year you've morphed them into an unfriendly damp cave where people are only allowed to talk about what you want them to talk about - or they get shouted out.

It reminds me of that Twilight Zone movie where the kid had special powers and turned his house into a cartoon world, and nobody dared say anything against him.

i *might* be exaggerating a little there tho

Ste (fuzzy), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago) link

the pringles is a zing? I thought it was just a kitten in a can

Sometimes I like to take a kitten in a can, chew it up, and use the resulting paste as a sandwich spread between two intact kittens in cans.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago) link

people not enjoying ILX who insist on sticking around = the real enemy

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago) link

you can't chew cans!

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago) link

those pringle cans are just cardboard with some foil on them. sure you can.

Ms Misery (MsMisery), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:55 (seventeen years ago) link

i would just like to say that alex, i appreciate yr attempt to introduce some bromance into the proceedings here

ZR (teenagequiet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:55 (seventeen years ago) link

It reminds me of that Twilight Zone movie where the kid had special powers and turned his house into a cartoon world, and nobody dared say anything against him.

I get this with Jon too, but it's probably 50% projection (and he must surely expect it if not enjoy it).

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:55 (seventeen years ago) link

i would just like to say that alex, i appreciate yr attempt to introduce some bromance into the proceedings here

Yeah, I forgot to say, that's brilliant.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:56 (seventeen years ago) link

So you are basically saying you are the problem here, enrique?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:57 (seventeen years ago) link

no, sorry, it IS a market, and i don't think that's a difference of opinion, i think it's just an accurate description of what happens. that doesn't mean "weight of posting" (huh?). it means: undirected outcomes, lots of people each with different interests and competencies self-selecting their own participation.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Wow, all this happened while I was having my leisurely breakfast!
Happy Walentine's Day, kids!
Since I succeeded in raising two boys to adulthood despite their regular efforts to kill each other, I hereby volunteer for the position of Thread Peacekeeper, using my awesome horse-whispering talents to bring the nasty aggression down to witty-repartee level.
I'll need to draw a small stipend.
Paypal info to follow.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link

No, things that cannot be talked about on the Cooler are constant:

-Football/sport
-Big Brother/reality TV shows

That's the point of them. If a person wishes to talk about those things, there are dozens of other threads on ILX on those subjects.

People may say that it's random that I picked those two specific subjects to ban, but it's not. Those are the things that people chatter about when they've got nothing else to talk about. The rest of the world - well, my bloody office, people in the pub and on the bus - I have to put up with it there, I want to just draw a line in the sand where I do not have to listen to it.

The early pre-cooler thread was an experiment to find out that if those "substitute for conversation" topics were banned, what would people talk about? Would they feel freer to talk about themselves and their own lives/concerns? What other things would people chat about? Now, obviously, it turned out to be a success, and there is a culture there which a lot of people enjoy and stay for - EVEN WHEN THEY DON'T LIKE ME. Funny, that.

As ILX has got nastier, I've got more defensive on them, yes.

And people have joined in the conversation/atmosphere who don't understand the principles of why those certain things are banned, and then go off and start massive rows when asked not to talk about sport and/or reality TV programmes. Which again, makes me defensive that the 'Cooler is getting ... *infected* with the whole culture it was trying to avoid.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost ...which implies conflict, and some people not getting exactly what they wanted, cos other people present didn't give it to them.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I get this with Jon too, but it's probably 50% projection (and he must surely expect it if not enjoy it).

Upset about locking bummers thread?

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Jon used to RULE TEH WORLD more, but then we started posting lots of things like this:

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/LokiSulk.jpg

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago) link

So you are basically saying you are the problem here, enrique?
-- Andrew Farrell (afarrel...), February 14th, 2007.

so much so i don't even see the problem... jokes, but yeah i am a bit, but less than OTHERS I COULD NAME. i have no respect for this thread and the tired zingle i came up with was all it really deserved. note steve thought it'd be deleted, and i kinda did too.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago) link

-Football/sport
-Big Brother/reality TV shows

+
other people's programming
computer games
other people having sex
etc.

basically anything that doesn't interest you right? i mean why not just admit it?

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually I'm kidding, I just wanted to use loki.jpg.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Can I re-state my call for powers to exile a coupla certain users into a Negative Zone?

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

plz show me where mark, tom or john stated they left ilx (oh wait mark & john still post, theyre just busy writing/touring respectively) cuz of zings?? tom has praised & loled at some of the most mean-spirited zings ever seen on ilx!!! with all three it was a either a more general decline in ilx or just a desire to break the addiction that led them away, not any intense moral outrage at jokes about ian-riese moraine banging his mom

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Hey, I know I'm late to all this, but it's a bit patronizing for all these people to keep bringing up Louis J as an example, because the truth of the matter is that (with the exception of the specific googlebait thread), he's rolled with the punches just fine. In fact, I think he's gotten to the point where he doesn't mind the ribbing, and as one of the people that went after him in the beginning, I respect that, and actually like the guy at this point.

Which makes me think that all the hand-wringing about how poor LJ is a great example of the nasty dickishness of ILX not only bullshit, but insulting. It seems that he needs your hand-holding about as much as he needs serious advice on how to lead his love-life from you people. So, perhaps we can drop that trope, yes?

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link

The early pre-cooler thread was an experiment to find out that if those "substitute for conversation" topics were banned, what would people talk about? Would they feel freer to talk about themselves and their own lives/concerns?

It's not like ILE was wall to wall threads about sport and Big Brother ever. There must be more to it than this.

It seems fair enough to want to carve out little niches for ourselves and our friends/anyone who'll play along, but when this happens I dislike the pretence that ILE has any real meaning still. It's lost a lot of it's value conceptually as a result.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link

May all being be happy.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:09 (seventeen years ago) link

It seems fair enough to want to carve out little niches for ourselves and our friends/anyone who'll play along, but when this happens I dislike the pretence that ILE has any real meaning still. It's lost a lot of it's value conceptually as a result.

isn't this what i just said re balkanization??

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

other people's programming
computer games
other people having sex
etc.

Suggesting that there are other threads where people could get more helpful advice on programming is not the same as shouting at people.

Computer games come under sport, as far as I'm concerned.

Shouting at other people for having sex is so clearly a joke that I wouldn't have thought even you would take it seriously, Stevem!

There are many times that I've suggested and/or "shouted" that people take a subject elsewhere, usually if I think it's going to be a long and involved conversation. I do the same thing myself if I'm on a tear about Tiffany Lamps or Am I A Hott Scot Or Not (recent threads I have started so as not to bore the 'Cooler with whatever has caught mine eye) and don't think the general regulars are interested.

basically anything that doesn't interest you right? i mean why not just admit it?

I do admite it! All the time! I've never been anything other than honest about them being threads FOR MY PLEASURE, INTEREST AND ENTERTAINMENT. It's a wonder to me that other people post to them at all sometimes.

if people don't like the atmosphere of the 'Cooler, then there is a whole interweb of other threads out there that they could be enjoying and contributing to! This is not said with nastiness or elitism or anything else, but in the original ILX spirit of DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE US. Is that really so hard?

I know that I am unlikely to like the atmosphere or spirit of the Noize Board. Guess what? I don't read it! Ditto football threads, big brother threads and threads about knitting!

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

the sandbox has come of age

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce (bounce), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:11 (seventeen years ago) link

....a long time ago prolly.

g000blar (g00blar), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

It was less the peaks than the constant rising background zing, Ethan. While we're talking on behalf of other people, like.

And people have joined in the conversation/atmosphere who don't understand the principles of why those certain things are banned

This is in fairness a retroactive application of (a quite interesting) principle - the only reason given until now was "Kate Said No".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

In fact, I think he's gotten to the point where he doesn't mind the ribbing

erm did you miss the whole googlebait episode then?

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:13 (seventeen years ago) link

Knobheads. I forgot knobheads.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

It's not retroactive at all, Andrew. If Real ILX were up, I would link to "A thread which is not about football or about big brother..." or whatever it was called, from 2004 or thereabouts.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

if people don't like the atmosphere of the 'Cooler, then there is a whole interweb of other threads out there that they could be enjoying and contributing to! This is not said with nastiness or elitism or anything else, but in the original ILX spirit of DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE US. Is that really so hard?
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f154/theevilqueen/Evil-Queen.jpg

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Which makes me think that all the hand-wringing about how poor LJ is a great example of the nasty dickishness of ILX not only bullshit, but insulting. It seems that he needs your hand-holding about as much as he needs serious advice on how to lead his love-life from you people. So, perhaps we can drop that trope, yes?

No, because for every Louis Jagger who makes a stand and fights on through all the bullshit and stays, there must be loads who read that sort of stuff and don't ever post at all. I mean, sometimes 60% of traffic is from googlers, and they aint all stayin.

This is not said with nastiness or elitism or anything else, but in the original ILX spirit of DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE US. Is that really so hard?
DO NOT HATE IF THEY READ YOU, though!

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago) link

'do not read if you hate us' was always a red rag to a colour blind bull.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago) link

i hope the guardian is getting all this down

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce (bounce), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Jon, take a good look at me. Then take a good look in that evil mirror, because I am exactly what you are going to look like in 10 or 20 years.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

60% of traffic is from googlers, and they aint all stayin.

Because the coders and mods aren't man enough to fight off spammers and locked unreg users.

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

And good people who leave almost immediately.

x-post to Stet.

KeefW (KeefW), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

because I am exactly what you are going to look like in 10 or 20 years.

Better hair and tits, but more pudge.

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

so why is sandbox ILM much less thready than ILE?

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce (bounce), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Because the coders and mods aren't man enough to fight off spammers and locked unreg users.
Not 60% of posters, 60% of googlers. People who come to visit, take one look and run away again. Maybe pausing to beg for a guess paper, but.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

HAAAAY WAY TO KEEP IT NOT PERSONAL. Both of you. XP

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

It was less the peaks than the constant rising background zing, Ethan. While we're talking on behalf of other people, like.

oh, was it? when did any of those three people say this?

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:18 (seventeen years ago) link

oh boy

xp

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Because the coders and mods aren't man enough to fight off spammers and locked unreg users.

oh does ILX still get spam? i haven't seen any in months and months. and months. funny.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

(JW and I are play-fighting. I think? At least I was, I have no idea if he's being serious any more.)

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.