Dear ILE - a plea

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (685 of them)
Funny, after I left (4 years ago?), the community decayed to nothing.

Yeah, ditto.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago) link

YOU TWO WERE MEANT TO BE TOGETHER

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago) link

which proves what exactly?


and i don't know if it's entirely serious,

of course it was serious

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I have started "call each other out on this thread" threads and no one has ever wanted to use them (except for the general "sand in vagina" thread).

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:36 (seventeen years ago) link

It's back to the difference between "being the person you are" and "acting the character that you have assumed for yourself here"

M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:38 (seventeen years ago) link

of course it was serious

ok, well, again, i think it's a terrible idea. the all-in-together messiness and the friction of ile is its strength, maybe its ONLY strength. thread balkanization is one thing; more and more board balkanization will be the heat-death of the whole enterprise, i'm sure of it.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Take that hill on the orders of general sand invagina! (sorry)

M Grout so OTM!

kv_nol (kv_nol), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:39 (seventeen years ago) link

WRT "ownership" it's a tricky subject.

I do think that if a thread has started to discuss (or avoid) a certain specific subject, people should stick to the topic for the most part. If other subjects arise, new threads can come up. (the way that the "Self" thread evolved out of the "dating non-vegetarians" thread, to me, was a very good example of that.)

In a perfect world, one wouldn't need the concept of "ownership" over threads, because people would be reasonable and polite and not drag threads off topic unduly (Something I used to do myself terribly, before I had the 'Cooler thread to corral all my current obsessions into.) or degenerate into personalness. But the world is not perfect, and threads *do* get prematurely atrophied - or unreasonably blown up into hellish conflicts - when it would have been a lot more interesting if they had stuck to their original remit.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link

oh god not that again.

people, here, are exactly like how they are, "for real." i think a lot of times they don't even know how, but they are.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:41 (seventeen years ago) link

less zings, more zazz

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:43 (seventeen years ago) link

more and more board balkanization will be the heat-death of the whole enterprise, i'm sure of it.

what so there is some sort of ceiling to balkanisation? anymore and the engines cannae take it cap'n? doubt this myself

again all i am advocating is a quicker move towards what started happening 2/3 years ago. logical progression and conclusion. because i don't think this thing has a reverse gear.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:43 (seventeen years ago) link


I think I can be more myself right here than IRL sometimes.

I'm often more charming, witty, and better looking here.

(Take no notice, I have no Idea what I mean by that, I think)

M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Lex can you please stop right-wing agenda-seeking with Dan please, it's making you look paranoid and petty. In any case there was probably FAR more casual homophobia in what Ethan and Dom wrote than anything Dan said.

This whole spectacle hasn't really been edifying for anyone especially Lex and Dom. FWIW the post Lex linked to wasn't about Dom getting dumped nor was it about a suicide attempt, but it did paint Dom in a very poor light indeed which is probably why a) he got so enormously pissed off and b) he made up that suicide stuff as an appeal to sympathy and a way of winning a fight.

Many xposts - using the noise board as a scapegoat for everything that's wrong with ILX is disingenous considering the real bitter rivalries stretch back way before that and the noise board was actually set up in the first place to keep this stuff OFF the rest of ILE.

The point is that the people going "ooh you are all being nasty and bullying" and the people going "ooh you people are just being oversensitive" are NEVER going to agree so there's no point in even having this argument.

The problem with zing culture is its BORING. You open any thread and then there's the same four or five posters all zinging each other and you can tell THEY'RE not even finding it particularly entertaining, they're just doing it because they're bored and they can't stop posting. Enrique did it about four posts into this thread with that knackered old Mark C/Pringles meme that surely only the most easily amused can still find funny. It's fucking annoying for the rest of us to have to trawl though as well.

Might I add that I think the turning point for ILX was when the number of posters who didn't know or care about Freaky Trigger exceeded the number of posters who did?)

This is OTM I think, the moment when the sense of cohesive community sort of evaporated and as did any claim to some sort of universal 'ethos' of the boards. And although Ethan asks can someone please name any of the intelligent, enriching, worthwhile posters who left because ilx was 'too mean'? it's pretty clear that the likes of Tom E, Mark S, John D and so forth stopped posting as much (if not left) because the overall atmosphere was something they didn't really want to be involved in.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:44 (seventeen years ago) link

the noise board was actually set up in the first place

so I could edit messages and embed audio after ILE banned me from doing it!

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:46 (seventeen years ago) link

using the noise board as a scapegoat for everything that's wrong with ILX is disingenous considering the real bitter rivalries stretch back way before that and the noise board was actually set up in the first place to keep this stuff OFF the rest of ILE.

yeah no-one is really saying this. see my post re 'boards vs boards' mentality.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:46 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost yeah matt otm all around

But the world is not perfect, and threads *do* get prematurely atrophied - or unreasonably blown up into hellish conflicts - when it would have been a lot more interesting if they had stuck to their original remit.

they got exactly as interesting, or not, or atrophied, or blown up, based on what the people participating in them wanted at the time. look, this is a market, not a project. you have to take the occasional shitty outcomes with a little zen grimace and just get on to the next thing, srsly.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:47 (seventeen years ago) link

In any case there was probably FAR more casual homophobia in what Ethan and Dom wrote than anything Dan said.

as i SAID, but i expect nothing less from them so it had less impact.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:49 (seventeen years ago) link

the mark c pringles zing is a classic and i stand behind it but also it was worth doing because 1) that was the whole point: lol irony DYS using a knackered zing on a(nother pointless thread complaining) about how uncivilized and filled with old zings ilx is nowadays 2) matt you don't like *any* threads on ilx so far as i can tell these days, you're enjoying it possibly even less than me, 3) same goes for mark who's here so little it seems really weird he'd start a thread leaping to the defence of mickey; in fact the only reason he would do so is he doesn't know mickey's whole deal.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:49 (seventeen years ago) link

http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/6007/valentinest8.jpg

a_p (a_p), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:50 (seventeen years ago) link

This is not a market. I mean, that's another fundamental difference in opinion. The weight of posting on a topic is not indicative of worth or interest.

There are some subjects on which I'd rather have one post an hour, which was on topic and thought out - than 100 posts in a row of meaningless chatter and nastiness.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:50 (seventeen years ago) link

it wasn't worth doing at all. unfunny for at least a year now.

not a week seems to go by on watercooler threads without some massive argument about what can and can't be talked about on them.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:50 (seventeen years ago) link

the pringles is a zing? I thought it was just a kitten in a can

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Enrique - I actually enjoy most of the threads I regularly read, which is why I resent them being littered with all this bollocks.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

But yeah defending Mickey is just plain weird, he's one of the people I genuinely would like to see banned.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago) link

i don't understand your 'Cooler threads at all Kate. When you first started them I was under the impression they were all about discussing all walks of life (like people supposedly do at office watercoolers) and they were honestly a good read, but over the past year you've morphed them into an unfriendly damp cave where people are only allowed to talk about what you want them to talk about - or they get shouted out.

It reminds me of that Twilight Zone movie where the kid had special powers and turned his house into a cartoon world, and nobody dared say anything against him.

i *might* be exaggerating a little there tho

Ste (fuzzy), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago) link

the pringles is a zing? I thought it was just a kitten in a can

Sometimes I like to take a kitten in a can, chew it up, and use the resulting paste as a sandwich spread between two intact kittens in cans.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago) link

people not enjoying ILX who insist on sticking around = the real enemy

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago) link

you can't chew cans!

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago) link

those pringle cans are just cardboard with some foil on them. sure you can.

Ms Misery (MsMisery), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:55 (seventeen years ago) link

i would just like to say that alex, i appreciate yr attempt to introduce some bromance into the proceedings here

ZR (teenagequiet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:55 (seventeen years ago) link

It reminds me of that Twilight Zone movie where the kid had special powers and turned his house into a cartoon world, and nobody dared say anything against him.

I get this with Jon too, but it's probably 50% projection (and he must surely expect it if not enjoy it).

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:55 (seventeen years ago) link

i would just like to say that alex, i appreciate yr attempt to introduce some bromance into the proceedings here

Yeah, I forgot to say, that's brilliant.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:56 (seventeen years ago) link

So you are basically saying you are the problem here, enrique?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:57 (seventeen years ago) link

no, sorry, it IS a market, and i don't think that's a difference of opinion, i think it's just an accurate description of what happens. that doesn't mean "weight of posting" (huh?). it means: undirected outcomes, lots of people each with different interests and competencies self-selecting their own participation.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Wow, all this happened while I was having my leisurely breakfast!
Happy Walentine's Day, kids!
Since I succeeded in raising two boys to adulthood despite their regular efforts to kill each other, I hereby volunteer for the position of Thread Peacekeeper, using my awesome horse-whispering talents to bring the nasty aggression down to witty-repartee level.
I'll need to draw a small stipend.
Paypal info to follow.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link

No, things that cannot be talked about on the Cooler are constant:

-Football/sport
-Big Brother/reality TV shows

That's the point of them. If a person wishes to talk about those things, there are dozens of other threads on ILX on those subjects.

People may say that it's random that I picked those two specific subjects to ban, but it's not. Those are the things that people chatter about when they've got nothing else to talk about. The rest of the world - well, my bloody office, people in the pub and on the bus - I have to put up with it there, I want to just draw a line in the sand where I do not have to listen to it.

The early pre-cooler thread was an experiment to find out that if those "substitute for conversation" topics were banned, what would people talk about? Would they feel freer to talk about themselves and their own lives/concerns? What other things would people chat about? Now, obviously, it turned out to be a success, and there is a culture there which a lot of people enjoy and stay for - EVEN WHEN THEY DON'T LIKE ME. Funny, that.

As ILX has got nastier, I've got more defensive on them, yes.

And people have joined in the conversation/atmosphere who don't understand the principles of why those certain things are banned, and then go off and start massive rows when asked not to talk about sport and/or reality TV programmes. Which again, makes me defensive that the 'Cooler is getting ... *infected* with the whole culture it was trying to avoid.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost ...which implies conflict, and some people not getting exactly what they wanted, cos other people present didn't give it to them.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I get this with Jon too, but it's probably 50% projection (and he must surely expect it if not enjoy it).

Upset about locking bummers thread?

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Jon used to RULE TEH WORLD more, but then we started posting lots of things like this:

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/LokiSulk.jpg

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago) link

So you are basically saying you are the problem here, enrique?
-- Andrew Farrell (afarrel...), February 14th, 2007.

so much so i don't even see the problem... jokes, but yeah i am a bit, but less than OTHERS I COULD NAME. i have no respect for this thread and the tired zingle i came up with was all it really deserved. note steve thought it'd be deleted, and i kinda did too.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago) link

-Football/sport
-Big Brother/reality TV shows

+
other people's programming
computer games
other people having sex
etc.

basically anything that doesn't interest you right? i mean why not just admit it?

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually I'm kidding, I just wanted to use loki.jpg.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Can I re-state my call for powers to exile a coupla certain users into a Negative Zone?

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

plz show me where mark, tom or john stated they left ilx (oh wait mark & john still post, theyre just busy writing/touring respectively) cuz of zings?? tom has praised & loled at some of the most mean-spirited zings ever seen on ilx!!! with all three it was a either a more general decline in ilx or just a desire to break the addiction that led them away, not any intense moral outrage at jokes about ian-riese moraine banging his mom

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Hey, I know I'm late to all this, but it's a bit patronizing for all these people to keep bringing up Louis J as an example, because the truth of the matter is that (with the exception of the specific googlebait thread), he's rolled with the punches just fine. In fact, I think he's gotten to the point where he doesn't mind the ribbing, and as one of the people that went after him in the beginning, I respect that, and actually like the guy at this point.

Which makes me think that all the hand-wringing about how poor LJ is a great example of the nasty dickishness of ILX not only bullshit, but insulting. It seems that he needs your hand-holding about as much as he needs serious advice on how to lead his love-life from you people. So, perhaps we can drop that trope, yes?

John Justen, surrounded by frail, wispy people. (John Justen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link

The early pre-cooler thread was an experiment to find out that if those "substitute for conversation" topics were banned, what would people talk about? Would they feel freer to talk about themselves and their own lives/concerns?

It's not like ILE was wall to wall threads about sport and Big Brother ever. There must be more to it than this.

It seems fair enough to want to carve out little niches for ourselves and our friends/anyone who'll play along, but when this happens I dislike the pretence that ILE has any real meaning still. It's lost a lot of it's value conceptually as a result.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link

May all being be happy.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:09 (seventeen years ago) link

It seems fair enough to want to carve out little niches for ourselves and our friends/anyone who'll play along, but when this happens I dislike the pretence that ILE has any real meaning still. It's lost a lot of it's value conceptually as a result.

isn't this what i just said re balkanization??

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

other people's programming
computer games
other people having sex
etc.

Suggesting that there are other threads where people could get more helpful advice on programming is not the same as shouting at people.

Computer games come under sport, as far as I'm concerned.

Shouting at other people for having sex is so clearly a joke that I wouldn't have thought even you would take it seriously, Stevem!

There are many times that I've suggested and/or "shouted" that people take a subject elsewhere, usually if I think it's going to be a long and involved conversation. I do the same thing myself if I'm on a tear about Tiffany Lamps or Am I A Hott Scot Or Not (recent threads I have started so as not to bore the 'Cooler with whatever has caught mine eye) and don't think the general regulars are interested.

basically anything that doesn't interest you right? i mean why not just admit it?

I do admite it! All the time! I've never been anything other than honest about them being threads FOR MY PLEASURE, INTEREST AND ENTERTAINMENT. It's a wonder to me that other people post to them at all sometimes.

if people don't like the atmosphere of the 'Cooler, then there is a whole interweb of other threads out there that they could be enjoying and contributing to! This is not said with nastiness or elitism or anything else, but in the original ILX spirit of DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE US. Is that really so hard?

I know that I am unlikely to like the atmosphere or spirit of the Noize Board. Guess what? I don't read it! Ditto football threads, big brother threads and threads about knitting!

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

the sandbox has come of age

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce (bounce), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:11 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.