haha stence i already thought of the transgender metaphor
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:45 (seventeen years ago) link
(and then disconnect)
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:46 (seventeen years ago) link
to their credit it was not shown
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:47 (seventeen years ago) link
So, there it is. It's confirmed.
― M Grout (Mark Grout), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:49 (seventeen years ago) link
― drunk Friendster massage (nklshs), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:50 (seventeen years ago) link
That shit could've been off the chain like her mac n cheese, tho!
― David RER (Frank Fiore), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jesus Dan (dan perry), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:54 (seventeen years ago) link
xp: yeah, i go with dan's answer. let your super come up with responses to these people.
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jesus Dan (dan perry), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link
StanM is on the money. Shit like this is just too depressing.
― Norman Phay (Pashmina), Monday, 4 December 2006 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link
Simply put, they lived concurrent with man down through the thousands of years of our existence, and they appear to have gone mostly extinct prior to our modern era. Remember that the word "dinosaur" is only about 160 years old. Legends of dangerous reptilian creatures (a.k.a. dragons) have been passed down to us from our ancestors across Europe, from China and the rest of Asia, all over the Americas (North, South & Central), and they're remembered in Africa too. Why should all of these legends/histories (spanning all inhabited continents, mind you!) be trivialized and discounted just to give credence to the temporary theory of evolution? It is important in science to separate the evidence from the interpretation. The evidence is that there have been these large dangerous reptilian creatures. We have bones, recorded history and footprints; we have strong evidence. The interpretation (or belief) that they all died off millions and millions of years ago is in dispute between creationists and evolutionists. And numerous stories in recorded human history of being killed by dragons/dinosaurs and of us banding together to kill them in return (among other important evidence) is clearly on our side ... as creation theory grows stronger each year.
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link
There is good evidence that the Earth is only thousands of years old. In BOOKS, see Dr. Ackerman's It's a Young World After All. The "65 million years" is a recent mental invention. Evolution provides a mental hiding place from our powerful Creator. Evolution claims (theologically) that our God is weak or non-existent. Right? Think about what evolution claims about our origins. Dragons (per the previous FAQ answer) were seen and sometimes fought by our ancestors on all inhabited continents. Our ancestors were honest in recording sightings of large dangerous reptilian creatures. They lived concurrent with man. Humans saw dinosaurs. Sure, stories later became embellished, but the germ of truth that humans and dinosaurs (dragons) lived at the same time remains accurate. They lived in different places ... but at the same time - until the dinosaurs were mostly driven to extinction. (There are still a few living dinos out there, by the way.)
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link
gosh, you know, he's right! someone get the OED on the phone!
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:05 (seventeen years ago) link
― Kenneth Branagh (gcannon), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:06 (seventeen years ago) link
― Kenneth Branagh (gcannon), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link
Wait, they just say this and then move on?
― Feargal Hixxy (DJ Mencap), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link
See, I told you in the previous FAQ there were dragons, there is no way that cannot have convinced you!
― jibe (jibe), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― whoop de doodle (kenan), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― Allyzay is cool: with Blue n White, with Eli Manning, with NY Giants (Allyzay Ei, Monday, 4 December 2006 17:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link
The largest dragon (i.e. dinosaur) eggs that we've found to date are about the size of a football. One could fit, for example, a dozen brachiosaurus eggs in the trunk of a car, with room to spare! This also means that recently hatched dragons were not very large. Noah's mission was to preserve each kind of animal. You don't need to find the biggest of each kind. And you don't need each sub-divided species either. Did you know that most modern dog breeds are less than 100 years old? 2 healthy young mutts could preserve the genome of the entire "dog kind" of animals. The Bible uses the word "kind" for the different types of life forms. Horses and zebras can (and have) physically mated producing viable offspring; so have tigers and lions, indicating that they (according to creation theory) probably respectively diverged from the same original stock. Dogs and wolves (though considered quite different by humans today) probably originated from their same "kind" too. There are a few large animals (when fully grown) of course: giraffes, elephants, and T-rexes among them. But the average animal size is about sheep size, i.e. the 3-story Ark was plenty large enough to handle the variety of animal kinds plus lots of food for them. Speciation could descend again from original healthy "mutt" stock to start with. Thinking scientifically about this, it shows incredible variable design, huh?
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link
Dinosaur Adventure Land started as a dream of Dr. Kent Hovind's. Tired of the constant propaganda being spread about evolution through nearly all public state-funded science centers and museums, as though it is a fact, Dr. Hovind decided that it was time to start a Creation Museum, Science Center, and Theme Park that glorified God. Dinosaur Adventure Land opened its doors in October of 2001 bringing in over 4,000 visitors that year. The next year the number of visitors grew to over 10,000 visitors, and then 13,000, and finally in 2004 there were over 17,000 visitors that had toured the park. Dinosaur Adventure Land offers over 80 Activities with both scientific and spiritual lessons.
Our goal is for your visit to leave you tired, smarter and closer to the Lord. There are activities for all ages from 2 to 92. There is a 3 story hands-on Science center in the middle of the park with tons of activities that will keep you busy all day long. The Creation Museum has hundreds of amazing artifacts, that show evidence for creation. Such as, the Ica stones from Peru, showing pictures of men and dinosaurs on them. As well as, a fossilized pickle, charcoal, coconut, and crayon proving that it does not take millions of years to form fossils. About 250 people have their birthdays at Dinosaur Adventure Land each year. You can schedule your next birthday party at Dinosaur Adventure Land, by contacting the bookstore.
Visit Dinosaur Adventure Land online to learn more about our amazing Science Center, Museum, and Theme Park. Play games online and view our gallery of images!
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:18 (seventeen years ago) link
You never even looked in the bottom of that Ark! Have you looked down there? No? Who's gonna clean up that mess down there? That's me! I tell you I've had enough of this stuff. I tell you what I'm gonna do: I'm letting all these animals out, and I'm gonna burn down this Ark, and I'm going to Florida somewhere...
xp: didn't Dinosaur Adventure Land lose its funding or something? One of those fundie young earth creationist parks went under, i think.
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― Kenneth Branagh (gcannon), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:23 (seventeen years ago) link
fun fact: 'dr' dino got his phd in christian science from a non-accredited christian university
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― Kenneth Branagh (gcannon), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link
The resulting "super-cold snow" fell near the poles, burying the Mammoths standing up. Ice on the North and South pole cracked the crust of the earth releasing the fountains of the deep, which in turn caused certain ice age effects, namely the glacier effects. Also this made "the earth wobble around for a few thousand years" and it made the canopy collapse that used to protect the earth and opened up the fountains of the deep.
During the first few months of the flood, the dead animals and plants got buried, and became coal if they were plants and oil if they were animals. The last few months of the flood included geological instability, when the plates shifted. This period saw the formation of both ocean basins and mountain ranges and the resulting water run-off caused incredible erosion — Hovind claims that the Grand Canyon was formed in a couple of weeks during this time. After a few hundred years, the ice caps slowly melted back retreating to their current size and the ocean levels increased, creating the continental shelves. The deeper oceans absorbed much of the carbon dioxide in earth’s atmosphere and thus allowed greater amounts of radiation to reach the earth's surface. As a result, human lifespans were shortened considerably in the days of Peleg.
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link
There are scenes of natives adorned with robes and high crowns, similar to the Incas, performing medical procedures on patients. Several depict heart and brain transplants.
The stones are clearly carved depicting people riding dinosaurs and flying reptiles.
There are stones with genetic codes, and the prolongation of life. Blood vessels are shown being reconnected via re-absorption tubes utilizing the natural regeneration of cells.
There are carvings of a cesarean section with acupuncture as a form of anesthesia. There are telescopes and ancient maps and star maps.
There is a series of four stones show the hemispheres of Earth pointing to the existence of unknown continent's that today remains a part of our collective myth.
― David RER (Frank Fiore), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― whoop de doodle (kenan), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― Allyzay is cool: with Blue n White, with Eli Manning, with NY Giants (Allyzay Ei, Monday, 4 December 2006 17:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― step hen faps (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link
God does not believe in atheistsHis presence from creation is quite clearGod does not believe in atheistsIt takes a fool to tell him he's not here
God believes atheists can get born againAnd become a new creation,But they'd best admit the world around them firstAnd ask for their salvationBut to only cry, "Recycle!" is the worst
God believes atheists do have certain rightsTo seek and search the scripturesIt says, "Come now, let us reason" that's for themBut it doesn't give them reason toMake up what God is sayingUntil it's no true benefit to them
Blee dop, sklee dop, sklee dilly dillyBah donna bee on a Saturday nightIf that sounded like nonsense to you too,Those schools have got some books for you
― and what (ooo), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link
I guess the non-bald Chick dude considers cancer an evolutionary advancement?
― David RER (Frank Fiore), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― step hen faps (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:46 (seventeen years ago) link
― whoop de doodle (kenan), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:54 (seventeen years ago) link
This is such terrific reading, for, well, two main reasons: (a) unlike illiterate 16th-century farmers, the scientific visionaries who put this together seriously don't know that equine hybrids are always sterile; plus (b) their grand theory to replace evolution winds up arguing that ... seemingly different species could "respectively diverge from the same original stock?" I mean, seriously:
Dogs humans and wolves apes (though considered quite different by humans today) probably originated from their same "kind" too.
(Also funny: they evidently reject everything science has allowed us to figure out about dinosaur bones except that they were reptilian? I mean, hell, once you're throwing everything else out the window, who's to say they didn't have feathers? Which: Francine is a bird who wants to be a dinosaur and then learns a little secret about herself: I could totally imagine an ugly-duckling kind of thing where someone's like "hey, you're more highly evolved and your species will be around longer, don't sweat it.")
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 4 December 2006 17:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― whoop de doodle (kenan), Monday, 4 December 2006 18:00 (seventeen years ago) link
― step hen faps (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 31 December 2006 00:39 (seventeen years ago) link
So the player uses their brain to respond to environmental stimuli in the form of questions and develops a bigger and better brain as a result? Sounds a bit like that scientific theory I can't quite recall right now.
― Maaarghk C (Maaarghk C), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:02 (seventeen years ago) link
how many kids raised in a strict literalist tradition with little coverage in high school of the factual, experimentally-proven aspects of evolution go to college and have their minds blown?
i knew several. once you have the educational background to read about or even reproduce some of the science proving selection and mutation and so on, it's a little impossible to argue against. throw in some bad life experiences ("why would a love God do this to me?"), some hypocrisy ("but that guy told me hot man sex was evil!"), etc etc and whallah, it's really easy to lose faith. it happened to several christian friends i had as a kid.
dawkins's brood and the literalist christians pit creation as the full on opposite of evolution. accept one or the other.
in that game, dawkins wins.
unfortunately for his religious movement, literalist creationism will probably go away except for fringe groups. more and more future christians will get the mutation.
to quote one of our 4th century church fathers, St. Augustine:
Usually, even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and the other elements of this world, about the motion and orbit of the stars and even their size and relative positions, about the predictable eclipses of the sun and moon, the cycles of the years and the seasons, about the kinds of animals, shrubs, stones, and so forth, and this knowledge he hold to as being certain from reason and experience. Now, it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh it to scorn. The shame is not so much that an ignorant individual is derided, but that people outside the household of faith think our sacred writers held such opinions, and, to the great loss of those for whose salvation we toil, the writers of our Scripture are criticized and rejected as unlearned men. If they find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods and on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason? Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions and are taken to task by those who are not bound by the authority of our sacred books. For then, to defend their utterly foolish and obviously untrue statements, they will try to call upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages which they think support their position, although they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertion.
i know it's infuriating that our own president could legislate his religious beliefs, but given who we're talking about, is it shocking?m.
― msp (msp), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 14:03 (seventeen years ago) link
So for years I was a kind of outside-the-box- christian.Then I realised many fundamental beleifs of xhristianity that AREN'T contradicted in other parts of the book(why is Song of Solomon in there? it's a porno!) contradicted mine to a great deal.So I quit it.For the longest time I was pro christianity, but not for me.
Then I figured out that the majority of the book doesn't sit well with me as a basis of one's life. On top of that, it's hard for me to meet a christian without their beliefs interfering with me conversing comfortably(alot of my friends are athiests, gay, Japanese and so religious but not christian). Well, one of us ends up uncomfortable.
There are exceptions to that last bit.
― Geza T iz tha Rainy G. Toronado (The GZeus), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link
A Republican member of the Texas House wants to ban the teaching of evolution, claiming that the Big Bang Theory is actually from the Pharisee Religion, and they really shouldn't be teaching religion in school.
Oh yeah, and Einstein and Carl Sagan were Kabbalists. Really.
"You ought to teach creation as well as the fact of evolution," Mr. Chisum said, though he said "all of those kinds of sciences have holes in them. ... But I'm not about teaching religion in schools."
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:24 (seventeen years ago) link
http://fixedearth.com/
The non-moving Earth
& anti-evolution web page of
The Fair Education Foundation, Inc.
Exposing the False Science Idol of Evolutionism,and Proving the Truthfulness of the Bible from Creation to Heaven...
- since 1973 -
Marshall Hall, Pres.
***
EXTRA! EXTRA!
Read all about the Copernican and Darwinian Myths
(and their many ramifications going all the way to Kabbala-based Big Bangism!)
IN OVER NINETY LINKS BELOW....
Attacking Darwin is pretty standard for these people, but going after Copernicus is a new one. I do hope they target the 2nd law of thermodynamics next.
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― Chap (chap), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:05 (seventeen years ago) link
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― max (maxreax), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― ned trifle XIV (ned trifle XIV), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 23:29 (seventeen years ago) link
'Yvonne Anderson, High School Sophomore: "I have read the book which has totally and without a doubt disproved the theory of evolution for me."'
Gosh, you'd think it would be more well known.
― ned trifle XIV (ned trifle XIV), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 23:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 23:37 (seventeen years ago) link
oh wait! they did good. it's not all bad news here, people. sometimes the way people write about these things makes it seem like there's this inexorable encroaching tide of ignorance sweeping all in its path before it, but creationists have actually been handed a string of defeats over the past year.
Kansas education board repeals science guidelines questioning evolution
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 15 February 2007 16:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Thursday, 15 February 2007 16:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― they be stealin' kingfish's bucket (kingfish), Monday, 19 February 2007 17:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― and what (ooo), Monday, 19 February 2007 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link
― they be stealin' kingfish's bucket (kingfish), Monday, 19 February 2007 17:52 (seventeen years ago) link
― and what (ooo), Monday, 19 February 2007 17:55 (seventeen years ago) link
― they be stealin' kingfish's bucket (kingfish), Monday, 19 February 2007 20:51 (seventeen years ago) link
Christian Creationism is controlled by those who are doctrinally wedded to Zionist Dispensational goals. This marriage has blinded the Creationist leadership to the fact that both the Zionist and the Dispensational concepts come from that same 13th century anti-Christ Kabbalist source as did Relativism, Big Bangism, and the Expanding Universe concepts. Add it up!
and accompanying abuses of html.
― they be stealin' kingfish's bucket (kingfish), Monday, 19 February 2007 20:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 07:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― Frogm@n henry (Frogm@n henry), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 07:52 (seventeen years ago) link
― scary german latebloomer (clonefeed), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 21:16 (seventeen years ago) link
― they be stealin' kingfish's bucket (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 21:28 (seventeen years ago) link