Dear ILE - a plea

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (685 of them)
self-discipline is a lost art.

I never had it to lose.

The PEW Research Center for Panty-Twisting (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

The "Oatibix" thread is about food allergies and a recommendation. It's not too stupid.

M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Well...frivolous!

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:45 (seventeen years ago) link

What if people who love books or cooking or whatever just start posting their threads on ILE? Why does it need to be so official?

I think partly for the reasons I described above (also because ILB used to be a pretty robust separate site). If I start a thread about a specific book on ILB, I can be fairly confident that no-one's going to image flood it or start a row on it, because those things don't happen there.

Sadly, posting doesn't seem to happen there anymore either, so maybe it should be chopped. I don't know. It's not my board.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:48 (seventeen years ago) link

i think i love film should be knocked on the head

Never gotten any sort of explanation on this one. If it's "populist"-related, forget it.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Well I thought it was strange for you to be taking a moral stance on anything

I don't really see it as a 'moral' stance, I'm just trying to offer logical/practical solutions as I see it.

"this is happening, so we should do this more", but missing the clause about whether it's working

i'm saying it's not working because it's a halfway house solution and i'd rather have all or 'nothing', then it would work.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:50 (seventeen years ago) link

hey guys D.C. will make you all a mixtape, that should cheer you up. it'll be mostly creedence, probably, and this great song we wrote at ally's yesterday while drinking hot toddys and playing wii called "cats playing baseball," you'll like it, we promise.

ZR (teenagequiet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I can be fairly confident that no-one's going to image flood it or start a row on it, because those things don't happen there.

I think the intention should be that this should be mostly true of ILE/ILM as well!

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I would think this thread would be a textbook example of how people in general cannot ignore someone who annoys them 100% of the time, so expecting that from ILE posters as a general rule is an exercise in setting yourself up for disappointment.

Yeh, I guess. But look at it this way. Can you ignore someone who annoys you most of the time? (Not YOU specifically Dan, I mean YOU the reader) Let's assume you can. Well done, you've just stopped ALL personal attacks on you. Just by ignoring them!

Oh, it's their opinions that you dislike? Attack their opinions to shit, really attack them, show the world how they are wrong. But don't attack them personally, or they'll probably ignore you.

Johnney B's got a system (stigoftdumpilx), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Well done, you've just stopped ALL personal attacks on you. Just by ignoring them!

This is not true. I've been attacked/insulted crudely by someone just because I posted a view that differed from theirs. I could keep on trying to ignore them but not if they're going to continue sniping at my posts regardless of whether I 'encourage' it or not. Once or twice is fine whatever but the same shit over years is not.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:54 (seventeen years ago) link

since the Poptimists went to the other place.

Who are the Poptimists and where did they go?

including one purely for ball-breaking where people can be as nasty as they wanna be

Hi, we did this in 2004, it was called Noise Board.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I think stressing about people posting to sub-boards/regional threads misses the point of a messageboard somewhat (ie, a message board is a place where people go to talk about shit, not so much a place where people go to entertain you).

xpost: JB, I did precisely that yesterday and was told on this thread that I was being ad hominem and borderline homophobic, so vigorously attacking someone's opinions isn't really going to discourage annoying bullshit behavior.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:56 (seventeen years ago) link

http://darwin.bio.uci.edu/neurobio/Faculty/McGaugh/rat_maze.jpg

Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:57 (seventeen years ago) link

the Poptimists thing is baloney. you're talking about 6 or 7 people max, all of whom still post on ILM occasionally.

Noise Board is far beyond just ball-breaking in terms of scope tho.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

The "Oatibix" thread is about food allergies and a recommendation. It's not too stupid.

It's interesting (to me, anyway) because part of me wishes there was some way that you could retain a kind of ownership on threads you start on ILE, and appeal to the mods when people are going off-topic, and so protect the thread and hopefully have it be the kind of conversation you wanted to have, but then Ronan could have been a dick and said "hey, I want all these people talking about their food allergies to start their own thread, this is a thread for Oatibix and nothing else".

I think the intention should be that this should be mostly true of ILE/ILM as well!

Well, that's how we feel, but clearly the people who think that kind of behaviour is funny don't feel that way.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

all of whom still post on ILM occasionally.

or in one or two cases, frequently.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Well done, you've just stopped ALL personal attacks on you. Just by ignoring them!

UH

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I think stressing about people posting to sub-boards/regional threads misses the point of a messageboard somewhat

(just cos ILX wasn't erally like that when i got dragged in kicking and screaming yo)

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:00 (seventeen years ago) link

This is not true. I've been attacked/insulted crudely by someone just because I posted a view that differed from theirs. I could keep on trying to ignore them but not if they're going to continue sniping at my posts regardless of whether I 'encourage' it or not. Once or twice is fine whatever but the same shit over years is not.

indeed, and then they'll deny they ever made a personal attack at all despite the evidence being RIGHT FUCKING THERE (see: 7 posts up)

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:02 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm mildly shocked that jaymc.xls didn't know about poptimists!

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:03 (seventeen years ago) link

he does really, it's a scamola

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:04 (seventeen years ago) link

I could keep on trying to ignore them but not if they're going to continue sniping at my posts regardless of whether I 'encourage' it or not.

If it was just you, then fair enough. But if everyone ignored them (kinda what I meant anyway, sorry) then they'd soon stop, and either start being nice or go away. After all, the worst thing to do to an attention seeker is to give them no attention. But maybe I've got an optimistic view of the world, and I assume that everyone on this thread is a nice person who really can just rise above any sniping and be a grown-up. Sorry guys.

Johnney B's got a system (stigoftdumpilx), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:05 (seventeen years ago) link

The problem is that lots of people don't count on public acclaim to keep them going, if zinging (to whatever degree) amuses them sufficiently. And if everyone ignores them with the best of intentions, the beleaguered noob or whoever is still left feeling attacked and unsupported and doesn't know that there's actually widespread disapproval of the behavior. Leads to "woe is me" threads and self-pity and bitterness and reprisal etc etc.

If only more people were, like, "hi dere it is the internets" and didn't really connect it to life, maybe we could all shrug it off...? But then, what good would online/written/anything communication be at all?

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:09 (seventeen years ago) link

But if everyone ignored them (kinda what I meant anyway, sorry) then they'd soon stop, and either start being nice or go away.

he's talking about marcello who gives a radically different version of himself to different people on different days and you can't expect people to just ignore him cos he's a dick to steve, especially because a fair number of people know him offline and don't notice him being a dick. in fact his better friends do seem to step in and say stop being a cunt when he's trolling. so i think yr strategy is the opposite of right.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:10 (seventeen years ago) link

I've heard the term "poptimism," but I didn't realize it was actually a cabal. I suspect it's because I don't read Freaky Trigger that much. (Might I add that I think the turning point for ILX was when the number of posters who didn't know or care about Freaky Trigger exceeded the number of posters who did?)

Steve, I know that Noise Board is more than just "ball-breaking," but I thought it was worth pointing out that previous instances of "why don't you start your own board?" haven't exactly diminished the level of bullying and zing culture. Since lots of people, like myself, tend to jump around from ILM to ILE to NB, the mentality of one board is often going to seep into that of another.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:12 (seventeen years ago) link

If only more people were, like, "hi dere it is the internets" and didn't really connect it to life, maybe we could all shrug it off...?

You could argue that if more people did connect it to real life, then maybe they wouldn't be so dickish.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:15 (seventeen years ago) link

that previous instances of "why don't you start your own board?" haven't exactly diminished the level of bullying and zing culture.

Speaking subjectively, they have, but they've also allowed it to get a lot of local positive reinforcement going on, so when they spill back over here it's more toxic than before.

I think the problem is that Everyone has a Posse, so no-one's that bothered about what other gangs think of them.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:18 (seventeen years ago) link

i think the Noise Board created a dynamic that propelled bullying/zing culture further into ILM and ILE. this may seem unfair to some. and there are some aspects of NB i do like at the same time which causes internal conflicts galore.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:18 (seventeen years ago) link

I have met approx 60 ILXers IRL and liked all but one. Some of the 60 occasionally act dickish online but were far from dickish IRL.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:19 (seventeen years ago) link

can someone please name any of the intelligent, enriching, worthwhile posters who left because ilx was 'too mean' were ever on ilx?


fixed.

chicago kevin is back in a new york groove (chicago kevin), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:21 (seventeen years ago) link

It's interesting (to me, anyway) because part of me wishes there was some way that you could retain a kind of ownership on threads you start on ILE, and appeal to the mods when people are going off-topic, and so protect the thread and hopefully have it be the kind of conversation you wanted to have,

see I hate this kind of thing. To me the idea of thread "ownership" and making things stick to one person's idea of on-topic seems really non-organic and against the spirit of board like this altogether. I know it's a matter of opinion/perceoption but I hate it when people start acting like spoiled only children when it comes to "their" threads. (not saying that you're doing this accentmonkey)

Ms Misery (MsMisery), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:22 (seventeen years ago) link

i mean it IS unfair because of previous instances such as Calum (who obnoxiously trolled relentlessly and was trolled relentlessly back) and non-NB dudes like Marcello and i suppose Buttez. i'm NOT saying that ILE and ILM didn't already feature petty sniping and vendettas before NB. it's just the difference between having people vs people and what feels like boards vs boards that has changed imo dramatically.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:23 (seventeen years ago) link

The noise board is like 2% mean zings (except when there's a fit of outrage) while ILE is at least 5% mean zings

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:23 (seventeen years ago) link

To me the idea of thread "ownership" and making things stick to one person's idea of on-topic seems really non-organic and against the spirit of board like this altogether. I know it's a matter of opinion/perceoption but I hate it when people start acting like spoiled only children when it comes to "their" threads. (not saying that you're doing this accentmonkey)

-- Ms Misery (missmisery7...), February 14th, 2007.

OTM

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I guess the mean sniping on the noise board is kept in threads devoted to being mean, rather than allowing it to spill over into UK Watercooler, Poptimism, WDYLL, etc.

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Everybody on ILX has always had a posse! The big difference is that for about 6 months, everyone was in the same posse.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Aw, I wish I was here for that!

g000blar (g00blar), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:27 (seventeen years ago) link

threads devoted to being mean

did NB introduce this concept?

was it just an honest approach? taking what already happened on ILE and ILM to a logical conclusion?

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:27 (seventeen years ago) link

did NB introduce this concept?

was it just an honest approach? taking what already happened on ILE and ILM to a logical conclusion?

-- resumo impetus (n...), February 14th, 2007.

It was right is everyone's face, Tyler and I just made it visible. It was on the tip of everyone's tongue, Tyler and I just gave it a name.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:29 (seventeen years ago) link

xp Yes, I think so.

Also Sam OTM about ownership.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I know, Miss M, I wasn't really advocating it. As I say, I really like the organic way that threads grow and develop, except when they grow and develop in a way that drives off anyone who actually had anything to say.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:30 (seventeen years ago) link

You know, I once knew a web community where the moderator threw a hissy fit and threatened to ban a poster just for MENTIONING MY NAME in their .sig (shortly after I had left).

Some people will find a way to perpetuate feuds and things no matter how much others ignore them or remove themselves. Almost anyone can occasionally act dickish. Usually it says more about what is going on in their own lives, than in the life of ILX - until it takes a major blowup to set ILX acquivvering.

This thread itself has revealed just what different views different people on ILX have about ILX. It's certainly been illuminating in that way. I've generally been feeling relentlessly "OTM" to Accentmonkey.

I suppose you're right about the flameculture of NB infecting ILE, Stevem.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

I think ILE should be ditched for nu-ILX. It's run it's course. Have 50 different boards for the subjects that get talked about including one purely for ball-breaking where people can be as nasty as they wanna be. Continuing to try and accommodate all these different attitudes in one place ain't working however noble it may seem on paper. There's already considerable fragmentation on ILE so let's just go the whole hog and be done with it.

this is steve from forever ago and i don't know if it's entirely serious, but, no! to it all.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

what Trish said.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:33 (seventeen years ago) link

WRT ownership, Sam otm. And before you accuse the NB of being held to a different standard, we offer everyone a chance to be an argumentative buttheaded asshole.

xpost

Kate, you're probably the most likely to fit in on the noise board of all the people who dislike it!!!

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:33 (seventeen years ago) link

You know, I once knew a web community where the moderator threw a hissy fit and threatened to ban a poster just for MENTIONING MY NAME in their .sig (shortly after I had left).

There was a board where my name was verboten to the point where accounts were deleted for mentioning me offhand. Funny, after I left (4 years ago?), the community decayed to nothing.

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:34 (seventeen years ago) link

i've been close to starting a "on this thread we just fucking swear at each other" thread many times, but haven't cos i'm not sure it's not lame and all my threads tank somehow anyway!

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Funny, after I left (4 years ago?), the community decayed to nothing.

Yeah, ditto.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago) link

YOU TWO WERE MEANT TO BE TOGETHER

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago) link

which proves what exactly?


and i don't know if it's entirely serious,

of course it was serious

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:36 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.