this is where I ask questions about my beautiful new macbook

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (36 of them)

View Previous Page...

this is all wrong. You do not fuck an off. You fuck a box.

― there to preserve disorder (kenan), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 01:14 (seventeen years ago) link

apple

― da mystery of sandboxin' (fandango), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 01:21 (seventeen years ago) link

192 AAC is good enough for me.

― dan selzer (dan selzer), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 05:01 (seventeen years ago) link

itunesLAME V0 for me.

― toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 08:33 (seventeen years ago) link

if u want to make mp3s, this is good: http://blacktree.com/apps/iTunes-LAME/

What the hell is up with nabisco??

― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 10:35 (seventeen years ago) link

i've changed it to AAC, 224 kbps. might change to 320 but scared that those files might be too massive.

alan mentioned something about working from a new non-admin log-in - don't understand how to do this, how necessary is it from a security point of view?

― lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:11 (seventeen years ago) link

It's not nearly as necessary on Mac OS X as it is in windows as you wil get prompted for a password when anything wants to do anything low level. I'd turn off auto-login (system Preferences/Accounts/Login Items).

― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:14 (seventeen years ago) link

i import music to MP3 256 or 320, tho AAC 192 is roughly the equivalent of this as i understand it. i want all my tunes in the same format so reluctant to use AAC on that basis.

new itunes update totally sucks btw. i couldn't work out how to actually look at my ipod contents as per the old version.

― resumo impetus (blueski), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:17 (seventeen years ago) link

What the hell is up with nabisco??

Jon's fault. He hacked into Nabisco and changed him. ;-)

― nathalie (stevienixed), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:18 (seventeen years ago) link

My old boss and I did a very nerdy test where we took Mp3 (Quicktime), AAC (Quicktime), Mp3 (LAME), ALAC, FLAC and uncompressed files, for control, of the same tracks and did a comparison. ALAC was the best but the difference when you dropped to AAC 320KBps was minimal (192 wasn't much below that but there was the tiniest hint of artefacting at the very high end and we needed so very high end headphones to hear it). LAME was better than QT for MP3 and Steve's equivalent rate is about right, except in cases with very high dynamic range.

― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:22 (seventeen years ago) link

i want all my tunes in the same format so reluctant to use AAC on that basis.

how come? does this make anything easier? at some point i'm going to get traktor and start using that, are all the various formats compatible with it?

― lexpretend (lexpretend), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:24 (seventeen years ago) link

AAC is fine in traKtor, IIRC.

― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:25 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.native-instruments.com:80/index.php?id=traktor32_us#

― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:28 (seventeen years ago) link

how come? does this make anything easier?

no it's just me being anally retentive.

given that AAC offers equivalent/greater quality but at lesser filesize it does make sense to use it.

― resumo impetus (blueski), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:03 (seventeen years ago) link

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.