Dear ILE - a plea

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (685 of them)
Thinking this should be like a boxing club is incredible to me. So incredible that i've just missed my stop on the train!

anyway, i think ilx is at its best when it sticks to ANSWERING tHE QUESTION (you know, the bit at the top) and goes off course when it becomes about talking about other posters. The good posts in this thread are about the topic. The bad ones are about poster x and whether or not they are y.

i've got half a mind to ask mods to remove any personally directed posts on the main boards, at least for a bit. Unless the thread is about a particular person, natch.

attack someone's ideas, not them.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha, maybe we need a meta ban, ie NO TALKING ABOUT THE BOARD ON THE BOARD. It's a little short-sighted but it did solve some problems.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Besides, it's fucking boring.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:19 (seventeen years ago) link

sorry you're bored.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Ach well, I'm still here, aren't I?

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:21 (seventeen years ago) link

i've got half a mind to ask mods to remove any personally directed posts on the main boards, at least for a bit.

-WDYLL?

-can't say

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Laurel OTM. And I'm here hoping that it'll stop being boring soon.

A ban on off-topic might be nice, but then, off-topic can be fun. Oh, I don't bloody know.

Johnney B's got a system (stigoftdumpilx), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:21 (seventeen years ago) link

um hello what is the "topic" of the local/clique threads exactly?

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:22 (seventeen years ago) link

as much as i've enjoyed this thread i would also support a 'no talking about the board on the board' experiment.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:23 (seventeen years ago) link

the first rule of fight club culture is...

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:23 (seventeen years ago) link

NO PISSING IN THE SHALLOW END

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:24 (seventeen years ago) link

When my kids were little, I used to make them go outside to play for a while whenever they got cranky. They were always in a much better mood after they'd had some fresh air.

C J (C J), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Things would be less boring if the code for trackbacks fucking worked. All of my trolling is to PROTEST the sorry shape of ILX code.

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe they'll write a new one!

Subtractive Synthesis (Subtractive Synthesis), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:26 (seventeen years ago) link

and we're TRULY GWATEFUl for it. twuly.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:26 (seventeen years ago) link

laurel OTM seconded.

Ms Misery (MsMisery), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:26 (seventeen years ago) link

because it's already happened with many subjects (that needn't have splintered...but now they have and there's no going back, others should follow suit)

Why is there no going back, particularly on the boards that could by now fit into one thread? What's the moral force behind 'should' there? I just don't get your viewpoint.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:26 (seventeen years ago) link

can someone please name any of the intelligent, enriching, worthwhile posters who left because ilx was 'too mean'?

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:27 (seventeen years ago) link

you

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:27 (seventeen years ago) link

Becky Lucas

White Collar Boxer (DomPassantino), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:28 (seventeen years ago) link

There have been threads about the various declines of ILX for about 3 years now. Does this mean it's in constant decline or not in decline at all? Who knows.

I haven't been posting much because I haven't noticed many threads that make me think or capture my attention or make me want to write a post longer than a few lines. I don't know if others feel the same.

I think the result of that is the shorter more smart assed post, which can be funny.

Some of the recent fights have been kind of insane I guess, but I'm not sure are they actually more ramped up than before, or, and this is crucial, are there just more layers to the onion that is the board now. What I mean is are people so disconnected from whatever idea they have of ILX in their heads, and are there so many posters now, that these huge fights appear even crazier because they don't know those engaging in them, or they seem distant.

Sometimes I think I get this, all of a sudden everyone is all "louis jagger wtf" or yesterday's row, and you think "right then...hmmm" and have no real idea what to contribute.

x-post some posters were so beautiful that god had to call them back to his arms

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Well now we're moving to code that, compared to this, is completely feature-free. No trackbacks, no RSS but (hopefully) no honking great holes.

-WDYLL?

-can't say
1. That's talking about yourself, which is surely OK. Posting on a WDYLL "you're an ugly shite" == not OK. And also, like I said, you can talk about someone when they're the subject of the thread (eg "What do I do about my X?")

um hello what is the "topic" of the local/clique threads exactly?
um, hi, part of the problem is that because people are too wary to use the open thread they're clustering into the fucking cliques! But, surely the topic of the DC thread is life as lived by the people in DC, no? I mean, the local threads (that I've read) are almost free of vicious attacks on other people in the thread. Which is presumably partly why they're so popular.


millions of xposts and Laurel OTM

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:31 (seventeen years ago) link

There have been threads about the various declines of ILX for about 3 years now. Does this mean it's in constant decline or not in decline at all? Who knows.

The Natural Life Cycle of Mailing Lists

ledge (ledge), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:31 (seventeen years ago) link

um hello what is the "topic" of the local/clique threads exactly?

Exactly, that's the flaw in the argument. And making them exempt wouldn't work cos a rule with exeptions is no rule at all.

I would be in favour of a "DON'T BE A DICK" rule, but one person's dickish behaviour is another person's valiant defender of truth and honour.

Maybe an "IGNORE THE DICK" rule. If someone's being a dick, ignore them. No-one likes being ignored, and so the horrible people would go away and the nice people would stay being nice. How's that?

Johnney B's got a system (stigoftdumpilx), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Why is there no going back, particularly on the boards that could by now fit into one thread?

Unless there is some kind of way a majority can register their support to have the under-subscribed boards ditched, and then Stet or whoever can act on that, it seems an irreversible process.

And why are you assuming that just because I wrote 'should' I feel I have the moral high ground?

What do you actually think should happen? Leave things as they are? If it is broke don't try and fix it as you'll only end up with a different kind of broken?

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:31 (seventeen years ago) link

(Unsurprsingly, Ronan OTM, esp. re: BL.)

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:32 (seventeen years ago) link

1. That's talking about yourself, which is surely OK. Posting on a WDYLL "you're an ugly shite" == not OK.

even if dom puts a pic up?

and what (ooo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:32 (seventeen years ago) link

So OTMed today! Gosh. I feel like...I should use my newfound powers for something good!

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe an "IGNORE THE DICK" rule. If someone's being a dick, ignore them. No-one likes being ignored, and so the horrible people would go away and the nice people would stay being nice. How's that?

Unenforceable, unworkable.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:33 (seventeen years ago) link

i think i love film should be knocked on the head, but otherwise, ech, let 'em be.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:34 (seventeen years ago) link

it worked on Bucky Lecas.

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:34 (seventeen years ago) link

maybe an "insert dick here" sign?

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I would think this thread would be a textbook example of how people in general cannot ignore someone who annoys them 100% of the time, so expecting that from ILE posters as a general rule is an exercise in setting yourself up for disappointment.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link

It worked on Becky because someone (Andrew? who has now abandoned ILX forever incidentally) put a warning msg on the ILX homepage which she couldn't see asking people to ignore specifically her.

You can't really do that but not direct it at somebody in particular.

And as OTM as Laurel may be, it's asking a lot of moderators to police the boards for anyone talking about ILX, tho i guess meta threads could be zapped easily enough.

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Unless there is some kind of way a majority can register their support to have the under-subscribed boards ditched

What if people who love books or cooking or whatever just start posting their threads on ILE? Why does it need to be so official?

ledge (ledge), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I would think this thread would be a textbook example of how people in general cannot ignore someone who annoys them 100% of the time, so expecting that from ILE posters as a general rule is an exercise in setting yourself up for disappointment.
Exactly. But they can restrain themselves from making personal attacks on those people. And should.

A personal attack on an annoying dick isn't going to make them shut up or stop, it's just going to increase the amount of bickering and insulting on the boards!

xpost
And as OTM as Laurel may be, it's asking a lot of moderators to police the boards for anyone talking about ILX, tho i guess meta threads could be zapped easily enough.
Yeh, talking about ILX is probably OK, if a bit dull. Talking (shit) about other posters isn't.

stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link

It would be a lot easier to ignore those people that one has permanent problems with if...

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/170/381843130_1b9c23ee39.jpg

(And don't say that there is one on Firefox, blah blah)

masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link

self-discipline is a lost art.

Ms Misery (MsMisery), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:40 (seventeen years ago) link

If somebody wants to appeal to them and say 'please post about this on ILE again' and then shut down their boards they can go right ahead.

xpostx2

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:40 (seventeen years ago) link

we do this thread about every fortnight, i think. fucking mentalists, us.

What if people who love books or cooking or whatever just start posting their threads on ILE? Why does it need to be so official?

-- ledge (tomdotledge...)

otm -- also i don't dislike ILF but that's exactly what's happened so it may as well not exist.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:40 (seventeen years ago) link

OTM.

I think the reason local threads are fight free is just familiarity. That's the same reason football threads are some of the most enjoyable, even though I'm no expert I find myself posting on them more because at least there is banter, and it's fairly constant (eg Liverpool always shit etc)

I also get this from ILM despite all the criticisms.

It's quite crazy really to think that ILE, a board which is so open ended in terms of topic, has managed to provide a sense of this familiarity or community in the past, and still does.

I think if people really want a change to the board then they have to give some of their brains to it, and start interesting threads, not attempt to regulate it.

Maybe a lot of people are busy and check in now and again and find nothing to post about. I don't know if it's a way back in but lately if I'm bored and want to have a chat on ILE I start a thread, something stupid, eg Oatibix. Selfish maybe to just use the board this way but it keeps links with people I suppose.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:41 (seventeen years ago) link

oops, my otm was for Dan

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:41 (seventeen years ago) link

no i was making a joke about ignoring nathalie.
-- temporary enrique

ROFL.

when did '133t' speak take off on ILE anyway?

Before you were here. wink wink I remember when Mark S and Starry would interact and I was like: WTF are they SAYING? Those were the days (that I found ILM very intellectually challenging hence my sporadic postings; it was just so daunting/interesting).

I don't think that ILX has gone down the dumpster really. There are much less intellectual (*cough* *cough*) threads but that has more to do with the evolution towards just knowing eachother and being pally. I can'yt imagine having intell. conversations with my husband all the time, really.

I dislike the fact that some things have splintered off, cooking, books and film belong here really. Cooking would get so much more traffic if it just kept it's threads on the main board.

VERY much OT(f)M.

nathalie (stevienixed), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:41 (seventeen years ago) link

all this talk about ILX threads being dull
but why/how? clearly you all care about ILX

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

can someone please name any of the intelligent, enriching, worthwhile posters who left because ilx was 'too mean'?

Ian Riese-Moraine is the first to come to mind. Of course, the bullys might say he wasn't enriching and worthwhile, which is the reason they were mean to him, but why is up to them to decide? Anyway, there are probably many other posters who have left because of this, it's just that people probably drift off gradually instead of posting a message saying "I'M LEAVING AND THE REASON IS THIS". And no doubt there are many posters (myself included) who post less these days because of the meanness.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Unless there is some kind of way a majority can register their support to have the under-subscribed boards ditched, and then Stet or whoever can act on that, it seems an irreversible process.

Or, y'know, people could stop talking about books on ILB and start a thread on ILE, as has happened.

And why are you assuming that just because I wrote 'should' I feel I have the moral high ground?

Well I thought it was strange for you to be taking a moral stance on anything, mostly you're just "This is what everyone does, why change it?"! And particularly on this, where you're going "this is happening, so we should do this more", but missing the clause about whether it's working. You're beginning to sound like you started from the Bold Step and worked backwards.

What do you actually think should happen? Leave things as they are? If it is broke don't try and fix it as you'll only end up with a different kind of broken?

Dude, I didn't say any of this. I just don't think there's any serious movement away from a core ILE. Or at least, none compared with 6 months ago.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

self-discipline is a lost art.

I never had it to lose.

The PEW Research Center for Panty-Twisting (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

The "Oatibix" thread is about food allergies and a recommendation. It's not too stupid.

M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Well...frivolous!

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:45 (seventeen years ago) link

What if people who love books or cooking or whatever just start posting their threads on ILE? Why does it need to be so official?

I think partly for the reasons I described above (also because ILB used to be a pretty robust separate site). If I start a thread about a specific book on ILB, I can be fairly confident that no-one's going to image flood it or start a row on it, because those things don't happen there.

Sadly, posting doesn't seem to happen there anymore either, so maybe it should be chopped. I don't know. It's not my board.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:48 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.