Chicago: The Eponymous Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3255 of them)
I can understand that, though personally I have too much trouble getting past the things I hate about it (which are the standard typical things to hate about awards shows) to enjoy it.

n/a (n/a), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:03 (seventeen years ago) link

When is it, John? (too lazy to look)

3.5 hours left of this dumbaroo work day...

Calico (calico), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:05 (seventeen years ago) link

So... Does anyone have a rather nice bike they have abandoned temporarily which would like to come live with me for 3 months? I'm thinking - just thinking, mind you - of training for a triathalon.

Calico (calico), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:07 (seventeen years ago) link

HAY JORDAN:

In New Orleans, Bands Struggle to Regain Footing

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, unlike the Grammys, I do think that they "get it right" once in a while. (And actually, it's not that the Grammys are "wrong," it's more like they're an exercise in futility, since thousands of albums come out each year and you can only hear so many.) Obv. they're going to be disproportionately tilted toward star-studded blockbusters, and there are some major embarrassments every year, but it's also awesome to see someone like Ryan Gosling nominated for a movie that's made under $5 million, and for which was probably my favorite single cinematic performance last year.

Oscars are Sunday night.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:11 (seventeen years ago) link

hey can someone fill me in on tasering story

Del Monte Young (ex machina), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Did they ever figure out why Shavers was shot? (I guess Jordan is out for the day....)

Whatsay some of us organize a little road trip? I have a hankering for New Orleans!

I say with conviction that I WILL be in NO for Carnival next year. The only thing that can keep me away is being a FT student, or perhaps death.

Metrosexual Healing (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:16 (seventeen years ago) link

What tasering story? In Chicago? Google search found only pretty old stories.

Metrosexual Healing (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:17 (seventeen years ago) link

i know what tasering of which he speaks but do not know details. i do not believe the gentleman in question was actually tasered. though he was obviously threatened with it.

chicago kevin cleaned a lot of plates in memphis (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Errr, John, now you've lost me. By saying they sometimes get it right, you're conceding that it's even possible to pick a "BEST PICTURE" or whatever, which to me is something that's stupid to even try to do. But this is probably a discussion that we don't want to get into. We've probably even had this discussion before.

n/a (n/a), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:22 (seventeen years ago) link

"Best film" may not actually mean best film, but the competition is still interesting, or would be to me if it wasn't for whatever it is that is turning me off.

Anyway, is the winner of a sports competition really the best team? Sure, they scored their way to the top, but if you replayed any game they were in, they could often just as easily have won, so the empirical reason for calling them "the best" is not unquestionable, and there is room for subjectivity. Right?

Metrosexual Healing (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:29 (seventeen years ago) link

By saying they sometimes get it right, you're conceding that it's even possible to pick a "BEST PICTURE" or whatever, which to me is something that's stupid to even try to do.

Stupid because it's relative? I mean, obv. there's no way to prove that such-and-such film is the "best" of the year, but I guess I like the idea of history recording what many people's consensus favorite is. When I say "get it right," partially I'm talking about agreeing with ME (which is admittedly silly) -- but I'm also talking about the Oscars reiterating what seems to be the overall critical/public opinion. Last year, I was disappointed by Crash winning, on one hand because *I* thought that Brokeback Mountain was the superior film, but mostly because Brokeback was a fascinating cultural phenomenon and a Best Picture win would've capped off its narrative in a really satisfying way.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:32 (seventeen years ago) link

And not JUST a fascinating cultural phenomenon, either. I mean, Snakes on a Plane was a fascinating cultural phenomenon. But one that LOTS of people, both film critics and the public alike, all seemed to genuinely love.

Oh wait, I just remembered, you didn't like it.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:36 (seventeen years ago) link

And because Crash was AWFFFFFFFUL.

I don't think "get it right" necessarily means "agree with me," only since one's reasons for believing a movie is The Best would have to extend beyond your own particular opinion. Right?

Metrosexual Healing (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:36 (seventeen years ago) link

"Best film" may not actually mean best film, but the competition is still interesting, or would be to me if it wasn't for whatever it is that is turning me off.

I agree with this.

Anyway, is the winner of a sports competition really the best team? Sure, they scored their way to the top, but if you replayed any game they were in, they could often just as easily have won, so the empirical reason for calling them "the best" is not unquestionable, and there is room for subjectivity. Right?

The difference is that the whole purpose of a baseball team is to win the World Series, the whole purpose of a football team is to win the Super Bowl, etc. Few movies are created with the primary purpose of winning an Oscar.

n/a (n/a), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:38 (seventeen years ago) link

But one that LOTS of people, both film critics and the public alike, all seemed to genuinely love.

I meant BBM. If it wasn't clear.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:38 (seventeen years ago) link


For example, my very favorite book is not the book I would nominate for Best Book, though the book I did nominate would be one I like.

Few movies are created with the primary purpose of winning an Oscar.

Maybe the way they get it really wrong is by nominating mostly/only films that are made for this purpose.

Little kernel of salty honey (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:40 (seventeen years ago) link

I thought Brokeback was very overrated but I was definitely rooting for it over Crash, which was one of the worst movies I watched last year. But I didn't particularly like any of the three Best Picture nominees that I saw last year (the two above and Capote. Nothing I really like is ever nominated. I think this is related to me mainly liking comedies.

n/a (n/a), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:41 (seventeen years ago) link

But one that LOTS of people, both film critics and the public alike, all seemed to genuinely love.

so lowest common denomenator wins here? i dunno, i have lousy taste in films especially.

chicago kevin cleaned a lot of plates in memphis (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:42 (seventeen years ago) link

test

Venus born of the sea with this little kernel of salty honey in her, which only , Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:43 (seventeen years ago) link

nevermind.

Little kernel of salty honey (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:43 (seventeen years ago) link

I have nothing to say about any of today's conversation.
Today I had my students get into groups and each group wrote -- or re-wrote -- a portion of The Anna Nicole Smith Story. They were upset that the Newsweek article we read treated her with disrespect, so we rewrote with a more compassionate tone. It was pretty fun.

As for Oscars, I could not possibly care less about who wins what and whose performance was best. I find actors talking about acting to be boring. That does not mean that it IS boring, just that I, Armando, find it to be boring.

Armando Grouse (Armando ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:44 (seventeen years ago) link

OK. My main problems with the Oscars:

1. General concept of art being a competition.
2. Terrible movies always nominated.
3. People acting like they are actually a measure of quality.

n/a (n/a), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:44 (seventeen years ago) link

However, I will say that if the only reason I watched the Oscars was to see what I thought were the "best" movies win, I would be pretty cranky about the whole thing. I think you sort of have to divorce yourself a little bit and just get into fun celebrity-fite aspect of it (or if you're geeky like me, the handicapping). I mean, Dr. Morbs and Eric H. are big Oscar dorks, and they're also huge snobs that hardly ever like any of the movies that are in competition.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:44 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm pretty sure Morbs likes them because only one movie can win in every category which means that EVERY OTHER FILM LOSES which means schadenfreude galore.

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:46 (seventeen years ago) link

The thing is, I hate most movies.

n/a (n/a), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:46 (seventeen years ago) link

The thing is, I hate most movies.

YES

danno martinez (danno martinez), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:49 (seventeen years ago) link

This is what I'm listening to right now:

http://www.cdzone.co.uk/scans/S/p/Sparks/351847f.jpg

n/a (n/a), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:50 (seventeen years ago) link

The thing is, I hate most movies.
YES

Srsly

Armando Grouse (Armando ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe the way they get it really wrong is by nominating mostly/only films that are made for this purpose.

Yes.

so lowest common denomenator wins here?

I'm not sure that's the best way to describe it, since in the context of film, that term is too redolent of big gross-out comedies or whatever. I mean, yes, it's a consensus, but it's a consensus of what's considered quality.

I find actors talking about acting to be boring.

Hmmm, yeah, I actually find it pretty interesting. But I don't think you find any actors talking about acting on the Oscars. In fact, about the only place you'll actually find actors talking about acting -- I mean, really going into depth about the craft -- is on Charlie Rose or Inside the Actors Studio.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Agree with Nick, but with some changes


1. LotR winning!
2. Terrible movies always nominated.
3. People acting like they are actually a measure of quality.
4. Too much fuss.
5. General concept of art being a competition--only sort of, since this is usually the way of the world except maybe in the case theraputic or healing art.

How can you hate most movies? Really?

Little kernel of salty honey (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:53 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, they're MOVIES!

Little kernel of salty honey (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Hating movies would require seeing them.

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:55 (seventeen years ago) link

The thing is, I hate most movies.

fixed.

chicago kevin cleaned a lot of plates in memphis (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I feel like I hate most movies other people spooge themselves over, the movies I'm supposed to like or think are "important" or whatever. Maybe I'm just being contrary.

HOWEVER I think that "Half Nelson" was pretty good, as it actually succeeds at being naturalistic, and was subtle, which is a quality you rarely see in movies.

n/a (n/a), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:56 (seventeen years ago) link

hee hee xpost to kevin.

Little kernel of salty honey (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Hating movies would require seeing them.

Very true. Perhaps I should change my opinon to "I don't care about most movies".

danno martinez (danno martinez), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:57 (seventeen years ago) link

In fact, about the only place you'll actually find actors talking about acting -- I mean, really going into depth about the craft -- is on Charlie Rose or Inside the Actors Studio.
BLEEECCCH to the craft. Sorry. I have simple needs: entertain me and if you can, make me laugh or cry.

Armando Grouse (Armando ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Talking about it ruins it for me.

Armando Grouse (Armando ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I need to get back on Netflix. (Why did they delete my account?? One minute it's there, the next it's gone! I paid my bill, honest!) I want to see

Half Nelson
The Animation Show
Brick
Marie Antoinette
Many others WHICH WERE IN MY QUEUE AND I'VE SINCE FORGOTTEN!

Little kernel of salty honey (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost ^^^^Why I stay the fuck out of ILM.

danno martinez (danno martinez), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I like meta-anything, but James Lipton bugs the living shit out of me, and there is inevitably too heavy a dose of pretention on that show/out of the mouths of actors, generally. Lipton eggs them on, though.

Little kernel of salty honey (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I think I tend to dislike the meta.

Armando Grouse (Armando ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 20:00 (seventeen years ago) link

I like most movies I see, to varying degrees of course. There are usually only a couple of movies a year that I outright hate -- and then even those aren't necessarily horrible to sit through (my hatred of Little Miss Sunshine expands the more I think about it, but I'm not going to pretend that I didn't laugh a few times). But then I don't usually see movies that I know I'm going to dislike, either.

I guess the thing to remember is that the Oscars is what it is. I've never really liked when music critics say things like "In a perfect world, this song would be #1." If all your favorite songs were on top of the charts, and all your favorite movies won Oscars, would that really be a "perfect world"? It seems like it would be kind of weird, actually. I like having stuff that I like, and sometimes it's fun when it syncs up with what other people like, but even when it doesn't, it's still interesting to me to see who likes what and why.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 20:01 (seventeen years ago) link

brick was ok, i didn't dig it as much as most. the dialog was rediculous, reminded me of heathers. i'm sure 14 year old girls across the country thought it was the best movie ever.

chicago kevin cleaned a lot of plates in memphis (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 20:01 (seventeen years ago) link

In other news, I'm reading The Sun Also Rises for the first time, and it is good. Next I will try to read "House of Incest" again. It's only 72 pages, with pictures, and while it's lovely, it's HARD!

Little kernel of salty honey (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 20:01 (seventeen years ago) link

road to hell is paved with unbought stuffed dogs

danno martinez (danno martinez), Tuesday, 20 February 2007 20:02 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.