― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― teh_kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:03 (seventeen years ago) link
But it's possible to not tell them.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:04 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:06 (seventeen years ago) link
spells TACT
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― teh_kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― ledge (ledge), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:10 (seventeen years ago) link
(this is the suggestion re 'how 2 win')
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― stet (stet), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:14 (seventeen years ago) link
― Norman Phay (Pashmina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:16 (seventeen years ago) link
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― It's Teatime in Buttercup Land (Maaarghk C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:18 (seventeen years ago) link
maybe.
For my part it's not a question of feeling 'safe'. I couldn't care less if someone I've never met & never will slags me off. I can ignore it quite easily. It's just where's more fun to be.
― Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― teh_kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:21 (seventeen years ago) link
other than i guess the general BLITZ SPIRIT that emerges in such disaporatic (a word now) situations. and there being a bit less traffic (tho all the regulars persist).
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― teh_kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:28 (seventeen years ago) link
I wouldn't like it. So I do tend to stay on threads where I know people will be civil to me and, by and large, to each other. I think if someone was actually rude to me I would leave and never come back.
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:28 (seventeen years ago) link
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:29 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― C J (C J), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― teh_kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:36 (seventeen years ago) link
tbqh i have FAR less problem with the back-and-forth mark is complaining about than attempts at actual character advice, eg
"Also, seriously man, burying everything in leetspeak and ILX in-jokes doesn't make you look adorable, it makes you look incomprehensible and defensive. -- Andrew Farrell (afarrel...), February 14th, 2007."
and something similar mark said to teh kit the other day. i thought teh kit was dead wrong wrt louis and dog latin preceisely because it was never really personal but based on comedy internet personas; it's when the 'you could be a better person' craps somes in that i start to worry.
― temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:40 (seventeen years ago) link
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:41 (seventeen years ago) link
― resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:44 (seventeen years ago) link
personae surely
this is correct but a lot of the stuff aimed at l jagger goes waaay beyond comedy banter (the clue is when it's not funny) or what he could reasonably have expected to have brought on himself. lots of people seem unable to tell when they're crossing the line from banter into vicious bullying - a lot of these people have fairly obvious psychological/emotional 'issues' though so it makes sense.
― lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:46 (seventeen years ago) link
― mark coleman (lovebug ), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:47 (seventeen years ago) link
I'm sorry, but "be excellent to each other" isn't such a big ask, is it?
― Johnney B's got a system (stigoftdumpilx), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:52 (seventeen years ago) link
1) nasty 90% of the time, or2) gets 2 posts a day.
― M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:53 (seventeen years ago) link
Enrique - this recent trend towards revisionism on ILX 'Oh it was always zings and cartoonishness' is quite bizarre, considering you've been around quite a while by this stage - not that it's all you by any stage. A lot of people have made friends through ILX, this is not an insignificant part of What It Means to many.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:58 (seventeen years ago) link
The Lex OTM.
Also, there are different cultures and age groups and lifestyles at work here, and what may seem like "playful kidding around" to one person is utterly offensive and unacceptible bullying to another.
― masonic boom (kate), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:59 (seventeen years ago) link
this is something i tend to try to factor in, ie there are several people who i expect little more from than lame attempts to bully others over the internet (am not sure which is lamer - when it's ineffectual because it's the internet and they're only hardmen in front of a computer; or when, as per the l jagger googlebait thread, when it actually becomes potentially harmful). but what mark said - the conversion of friendly, respectful people into part of the bullying hivemind is the most depressing - is probably the worst aspect of it, when people you know can and have been civil suddenly join in the bullying (cf dan perry's borderline-homophobic comments towards me yesterday, which were more of a nasty shock than dom and ethan's outright homophobic ones)
― lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:06 (seventeen years ago) link
― lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:10 (seventeen years ago) link
― temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:10 (seventeen years ago) link
This is an interesting point... Maybe the younger people who've grown up with the Internet have a different attitude towards this kind of stuff, whereas older and less net-experienced people expect the same sort of civility as in real life to work here.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:10 (seventeen years ago) link
― lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:14 (seventeen years ago) link