― hoo got it for steen, vol. 3 (hoosteen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 05:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 05:52 (nineteen years ago)
― hoo got it for steen, vol. 3 (hoosteen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 06:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 06:06 (nineteen years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electric sound of jim), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 06:08 (nineteen years ago)
They've been on a roll for their last couple of albums too - The Code Is Red & Smear Campaign were both ace. Of course it's a different band, but then isn't side 1 of Scum a different band to side 2?
― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 09:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:14 (nineteen years ago)
― neil stewart (nstewart), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 12:19 (nineteen years ago)
aye! side 1 of scum = the band that wound up recording the first scorn album (broadrick as guest guitarist). side 2 = more or less the constant lee dorrian-fronted lineup.
― GAWD PVNCH (yournullfame), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:04 (nineteen years ago)
― GAWD PVNCH (yournullfame), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:05 (nineteen years ago)
― dan selzer (dan selzer), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Feargal Hixxy (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:51 (nineteen years ago)
So the recent records are worth picking up, then? What I've heard of the early 90s stuff just sounded like conventional death stuff, have they moved back to the grindy?
― hoo got it for steen, vol. 3 (hoosteen), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
― GAWD PVNCH (yournullfame), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:00 (nineteen years ago)
but yep scum blew me little dokken loving mind when i heard it.
― M@tt He1ges0n (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:42 (nineteen years ago)