Jane Dark Sugarhigh blog on Beyonce's "Irreplaceable" restoring "melodic range to pop"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
"Sometime in the Nineties — say, after "Waterfalls" and well before "No Scrubs," to use the TLC calendar — mersh R&B narrowed its melodic range. It didn't necessarily use fewer notes (though this was often the case), but chose notes from within a narrower scope in any given song. Largely gone were the transcendent/ludicrous ascents and resolves, the struggle/release/euphorias of "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" or "Man in the Mirror"; the duotone themes of "No, No, No, No" and "Say My Name" carried the day.
This condensation was meant to convey coiled sensuality, tense menace, moral seriousness. In part it borrowed these sensibilities from hip-hop, the center of authority in popular culture. One might argue that the structures of tune in American pop float between forms where affect is largely conveyed by speech, and where it's indexed to variations of melody keyed to the Western scale: upper limit country, lower limit rap, as Louis Zukofsky surely meant to say.
In the event, R&B was successful enough in expressing its revised set of feelings that it had a dialectical effect on the entire Billboard Hot 100. On the one hand, a new genre arose immediately for the express purpose of rescuing melodic range: this got named teenpop, and its genius took up the explicit project of extending the melodic scope of the Top 40 through complex modulations, moments after R&B narrowed its own scope. But on the other hand, the new significations of R&B, every time someone in an adjacent genre was feeling, well, dippy, they could emulate the move to refashion themselves as mature, controlled, serious.
And so, for example, when Mariah Carey of the famous range, of "Dreamlover" and "Fantasy" and "Emotions," needed to indicate she was no longer Glitter-y and/or crazy, she stopped down to the minimal palette of "Shake It Off" and etc. And when Britney, who had become synonymous with teenpop, needed to "grow up," she just repeated history: the passage from "Oops..." to "Slave" tells the story of modern R&B again, offset by a few years, with the naked significatory intent that had always been her stock in trade. The genius of "Toxic" lies exactly in how much it manages to do within the late phase's restrictions, between the low ceiling and high floor.
Shifts, of course, never happen all at once: uneven development, three-steps-forward and two-steps-back, little gestures here and there, these turn out to have been key junctures in a story that the market is trying to tell. And this is the story that "Irreplaceable" begins to narrate. It's a good song, not a great one; nobody thinks its within seven rungs of "Crazy in Love" on the ladder of the Ideal Pop Song. That song had decent range as well, but it also had other things on its mind, and returned relentlessly to the three-note theme. "Irreplaceable" seems to have as its main purpose the restoration of melodic range to pop. That it found traction with an audience that had proved itself indifferent to the far-narrower B singles that preceded it is the most telling fact — not in the least in that it demonstrates how Beyonce had better dance to the tune of the times, having lost the imperious capacity to make the times dance to her own tune."

http://sugarhigh.abstractdynamics.org/

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 06:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Hmmmm, I think other r'n'b singers have used a wider melodic range on occasion than the norm of recent years but I do not know the sales charts well enough to make the argument. Mary J. Blige may not always hit the notes but she has always gone beyond the recent r'n'b/pop norm.

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 06:08 (seventeen years ago) link

For what it's worth, I count Britney's performance as the least impressive/convincing part of "Toxic."

A Radio Picture (Factory Sample Not For Sale), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 06:19 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm also curious about how conversant with music theory Joshua is; i.e., is he even right about his basic assumption here? (I don't know that he is or isn't, by the way. Just sayin'.)

A Radio Picture (Factory Sample Not For Sale), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 06:21 (seventeen years ago) link

'irreplaceable' is miles better than 'crazy in love' which is only like...the sixth best beyoncé song, or something

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 07:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Miles better? I'll stick with Joshua/Jane Dark on at least this point that "Crazy in Love" is superior.

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:56 (seventeen years ago) link

>"On the one hand, a new genre arose immediately for the express purpose of rescuing melodic range: this got named teenpop, and its genius took up the explicit project of extending the melodic scope of the Top 40 through complex modulations, moments after R&B narrowed its own scope."

Frank Kogan to thread. He can probably convey numerous reasons why teenpop arose (again).

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:58 (seventeen years ago) link

"Irreplaceable is a pop-RnB song written by American singer-songwriter Beyonce, Amund Bjorklund, Espen Lind, Mikkel S. Eriksen, Tor Erik Hermansen and Ne-Yo for Knowles sophomore studio album B'Day [2006]. Produced by Norwegian production team Stargate and Beyonce, the song was released as the album's third single and second single internationally in October 2006." http://www.mininova.org/tor/494949

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 13:13 (seventeen years ago) link

as usual I have no idea wtf "Jane" is talking about, a little theory really would be nice to back up this assertion but as is I have to assume he/she is basing this on the fact that "Irreplaceable" has fluttery acoustic guitars and Beyonce's other singles have brittle Swizz Beatz tracks with two-finger keyboard riffs.

Al (Alex In Baltimore), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:30 (seventeen years ago) link

I usually turn off her slow ones before the halfway mark, but hasn't Beyonce made big Whitney Houston ballads before?

m1cc1o (m1cc1o), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:36 (seventeen years ago) link

oh, definitely. "Dangerously In Love 2" and the new one from Dreamgirls, "Listen," just to name a couple that were singles. i'm not sure if that's what he's talking about, though. or is it?

Al (Alex In Baltimore), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I think he is, that r&b singles aren't as "melodic" now because of hip-hop, but that Beyonce (who helped usher that in with DC) is now backpedalling. I was under impression that "Irreplaceable" was just the first time that I liked her increased "melodic range" ballads, rather than her first (or even her first hit ballad).

m1cc1o (m1cc1o), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Does he mention "Crazy" with the same regard? (Personally I enjoy Dark Clover's movie reviews a lot more than his music ones).

m1cc1o (m1cc1o), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:45 (seventeen years ago) link

The above excerpt I posted from Josh/Jane comes from near the bottom of his December 31st posting on his blog (that Carl Wilson raved about on his Zoilus blog btw). Then he goes on to talk about Jo-jo.

Here's him talking about "Crazy in Love": >"And this is the story that "Irreplaceable" begins to narrate. It's a good song, not a great one; nobody thinks its within seven rungs of "Crazy in Love" on the ladder of the Ideal Pop Song. That song had decent range as well, but it also had other things on its mind, and returned relentlessly to the three-note theme. "Irreplaceable" seems to have as its main purpose the restoration of melodic range to pop. That it found traction with an audience that had proved itself indifferent to the far-narrower B singles that preceded it is the most telling fact — not in the least in that it demonstrates how Beyonce had better dance to the tune of the times, having lost the imperious capacity to make the times dance to her own tune."

Uh, Josh/Jane maybe the earlier singles from the latest album were not as good as "Crazy in Love," as opposed to being out of "tune with the times." In his theory, is he giving Beyonce all the credit for restoring "melodic range to pop" with "Irreplaceable" ? He does not even mention the other songwriters--Amund Bjorklund, Espen Lind, Mikkel S. Eriksen, Tor Erik Hermansen and Ne-Yo ...

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:12 (seventeen years ago) link

When I first listened to the album in August "Irreplaceable" was the immediate standout, not least because Beyoncé finally sunk her teeth into a ballad that (a) she was fully comfortable singing; (b) a ballad of above-average inteligence.

Alfred Soto (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:16 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't understand this argument at all. Selective listening.

deej (deej), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:21 (seventeen years ago) link

or possibly just not listening

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:23 (seventeen years ago) link

"b) a ballad of above-average inteligence. "

Only recently did I really pay close attention to all the lyrics (after hearing Beyonce talk about how the song was an empowerment anthem). The lyrics have now been appropriated for all kinds of uses--I heard a sports talk show host going "To the left, to the left" in an "Irreplaceable" style melody as a way of describing his feeling watching a missed NFL field goal not go in between the vertical cross bars

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:29 (seventeen years ago) link

"Beyonce finally sunk her teeth into a ballad that (a) she was fully comfortable singing;"

Alfred, she hasn't just dumped anybody in her own life, why do you think that this is the first ballad that she is fully comfortable singing? I think she's sung ballads convincingly before, as have other r'n'b singers (and gotten them on the radio) despite Josh/Jane's contention that "Irreplaceable" is the first one to restore a melodic range to r'n'b/pop hits.

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:34 (seventeen years ago) link

how about that boise state
bringing back melodicism to statue of liberty plays

deej (deej), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:34 (seventeen years ago) link

Only recently did I really pay close attention to all the lyrics (after hearing Beyonce talk about how the song was an empowerment anthem).

Except it's really downcast for an empowerment anthem, isn't it? She sounds like she's trying to half-convince herself that she can pack up all his shit in boxes.

On second thought I don't like the way "above-average intelligence" sounds. I'll just say that it's cool Beyonce can flesh out doubt and pain like the Diana Ross she wants to be.

Alfred Soto (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I think she's sung ballads convincingly before, as have other r'n'b singers (and gotten them on the radio) despite Josh/Jane's contention that "Irreplaceable" is the first one to restore a melodic range to r'n'b/pop hits.

Well, most of Beyonce's ballads have sucked, to my ears. There's any number of ballads by Blige, Ne-Yo, and Carey I've liked in the last couple of years, so I don't buy the Jane/Josh argument either.

Alfred Soto (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Alfred, Musically as opposed to lyrically why would she be more comfortable with the arrangements of this song versus any prior ballad-like pop songs she has sung? Or do you think this is that much better arranged and written by she and the other 5 credited with composing the song with her?

In the interview she suggested she was singing this for other women.

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Damn fine post/article. I'm not saying that I buy the argument in its entirety, but it's intellectually engaging, knowledgeable and well-written (i.e., fun to read). More important, he/she's putting forward a personal, incisive view of something that far to many people discuss solely in terms of received platitudes. Jane/Josh is actually listening, thinking and making unexpected connections.

And that isn't enough, of course. It isn't enough just to think about stuff in a complex and original manner. If the post was completely off-base, all the above criticisms would make sense. But it isn't completely off-base. It makes a great deal of sense on a number of levels.

The desire of many R&B artists over the past decade-plus to present a tougher, more serious public image seemingly has resulted in sleek, minimal, rap-inflected and melodically restrained performances. And teenpop really did step up into the resulting void to offer unrestrained melodic pop with all of its unserious/unsexy baggage. That's the central point (the Beyonce tune just being an intellectual hook), and it's completely valid.

But the most interesting thing about the article is the way it centers the locus of authority in the discourse. I mean, it's a truism that hip-hop is "the center of authority in popular culture." Sure, but I like the way Jane asserts that teenpop is (by implication) the center of non-authority and goes on to explore the consequences.

Hip-hop, a profoundly masculine expression, assumes cultural authority, but must dispense with anything that might symbolically feminize it: melody, (most) sentimentality, love, compassion, weakness, etc. Teenpop, on the other hand, accepts its own lack of (masculine) authority, and this frees it to express/explore a much wider musical and emotional scope. R&B is caught in the middle, stretched between the repressive authority of hip-hop and the naive freedom of teenpop.

Come on, that's a really fucking cool idea, and at least half convincing.

adam beales (pye poudre), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:48 (seventeen years ago) link

The discussion of teenpop solely in the context of r'n'b, leaves out any discussion of how teenpop could also be seen reacting to the rock and country out at the time (although Jane/Josh elsewhere asserts that the members of the Wreckers went from making teenpop to country)...

cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:57 (seventeen years ago) link

That's a good point, Corny, but it really just expands on what Jane said -- doesn't subvert it at all. Like hip-hop, rock and country assume authority from their ostensible authenticity - their "reallness." While pop country has become more willing to take risks over the past decade or two, rock was certainly compressing its range (at least emotionally) in pursuit of vaguely punk authority when teenpop came of age.

The Beyonce tune may not be the only successful, mature, melodically wide-ranging and powerfully sung R&B tune to chart in recent years while still maintaing a measure of adult authority, but it's one of only a few to do so. And worth noting as such.

P.S. I like the article's underlying implication that pop history can be looked at as a back-and-forth pendulum swing between serious, adult authority and childish, naive expression. Pop forms arise young and foolish, then attempt seriousness as they age, only to be reinvented again and again in bright cartoonish colors, 'cuz the essentially juvenile appeal of pop will not be denied. After the exploratory excesses of the late 60s and 70s, rock becomes childish in the 80s. So, grunge comes along with a more self-important (but, really, no less juvenile) vision of rock authority, and out go the hair bands. Punk becomes the new rock Bible, and bands are expected to be angry, dark, brooding, introverted. But kids figure out that punk can be fun, too, so tons of mallpunk bands spring up, holding on the new version of rock authority, but subverting it in favor of a less serious approach. And so on.

adam beales (pye poudre), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:45 (seventeen years ago) link

That it found traction with an audience that had proved itself indifferent to the far-narrower B singles that preceded it is the most telling fact — not in the least in that it demonstrates how Beyonce had better dance to the tune of the times, having lost the imperious capacity to make the times dance to her own tune.

There's a strong idea and argument here, but the writing is a goddam prepositional trainwreck.

Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago) link

That is an interesting tension, I think people are resisting to the idea that this tension isn't ongoing.

deej (deej), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago) link

yes; also that 'irreplaceable' specifically signifies any sort of pendulum swing, esp given how melody-averse the rest of b'day is!

if anything it's mainstream hip-hop which has been embracing melody more and more with its increasingly massive riffs (eg 'what you know'), catchy choruses (chamillionaire, fiddy &c &c), opulent arrangements (kanye) et al.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

also i'm not convinced that teenpop and r&b have so much overlap that the former felt the need to fill the gap the latter left - if anything stuff like hilary duff, ashlee simpson, lindsay lohan is filling the gap britney and xtina left when they grew up (and went r&b-ish), taking their cues from avril lavigne.

paris hilton is the only one who ties the two together! that one slightly rocky cassie album track which sounds like h duff notwithstanding.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

"...if anything, it's mainstream hip-hop which has been embracing melody more and more with its increasingly massive riffs, catchy choruses, opulent arrangements..."

Good point, Lex. OTM, of course. But that's really just the other side of the same coin.

adam beales (pye poudre), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

This whole thread is bonkers. Those who forget Gier Hongro are doomed to repeat him.

Al (Alex In Baltimore), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I was wondering when someone was going to say that.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Just for the record, I'd say the issue in question here is probably less about "melody" and more about chord structure -- on one side, the way dance and hip-hop need to use tense, static structures, and on the other, the way pop ballads/country/teenpop are full of big chord changes, key changes, chromatic developments, etc. That's pretty obviously linked to the vocal melodies, too, but it's worth being wary of just calling it "melody" -- there's a difference in there important enough that pointing it out isn't just pedantry.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:06 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah it just seems sort of arbitrary to pick this song, which isn't even as big as a song like "We Belong Together"

deej (deej), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:08 (seventeen years ago) link

We Belong Together affirming what Nabisco's saying too i think

deej (deej), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Nabisco OTM, and Deej, too.

It is arbitrary to pick this tune as thee single song that's gonna save R&B from itself, or whatever. We Belong Together is just as good a candidate, sure.

I just think that Jane's larger arguments are interesting and compelling completely independent of this particular song.

adam beales (pye poudre), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:29 (seventeen years ago) link

I want actual stats and charts. I've worked out that Cherish's "Do It To It" uses a range of an octave, and only two chords, and that "Irreplaceable" has a range of about an octave and a half, and five chords, but I'd like to see more.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:33 (seventeen years ago) link

You'd need a more flexible formula than that, though, J! I mean, you could have a narrow range and few chords, but if those chords are all like major-minor changes and the vocals are hitting them at weird harmonies, then ... well, it'd be interesting to see someone try to come up with a workable Geir Hongro Memorial Melodic/Harmonic Activity Index.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually, I suppose most combinations of few chords / narrow range / lots of Hongroid activity are going to come from exactly the kinds of guitar and synth acts G.H. likes, where there's the drive to write songs in those "melodic" terms and yet keep them simple and punchy and unshowy and all.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:24 (seventeen years ago) link

"Hongroid."

adam beales (pye poudre), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:26 (seventeen years ago) link

"crazy in love" = basically three chords = punk, obv

(unless i'm forgetting a bridge)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Nabisco is basically OTM about the difference being in big chord changes rather than solely melodic. Also I'd be wary of suggesting that 'melodic range' solely = difference between the highest and lowest note. A song can have a range of four octaves and still only use relatively few notes (not that this is in any way proportional to the quality of the song obv).

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:40 (seventeen years ago) link

I think what I'm getting at is a sense of melodic... fluidity? Its what separates the melody of She Loves You from that of Get Back (to use the most rockist example possible).

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha isn't that basically Geir's touchstone division -- likes pop Beatles, hates all blues-based Beatles songs? I always thought of that as like the beautiful mind-boggling core of his dogmatism, the fact that there was a specific black-and-white line (ha) where he could love the Beatles' writing, but as soon as a 12-bar blues progression came into it, it was awful. (I seem to remember people asking him about Beatles songs that were kind of on the border, and he had them all neatly separated to one side or another.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:48 (seventeen years ago) link

She Loves You from that of Get Back

who are these by?

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

on one side, the way dance and hip-hop need to use tense, static structures, and on the other, the way pop ballads/country/teenpop are full of big chord changes, key changes, chromatic developments, etc

surely this is also about performance as much as actual melody - if yr aesthetic is to emphasise the big chord changes and so on you'll sing them with a lot more gusto than if you want to play it ice-cold. i suspect a lot of melody gets hidden beneath how various r&b ice queens choose to play it. people who know about music theory beyond grade 5 feel free to correct me.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:00 (seventeen years ago) link

That might be true in a few cases, Lex -- especially with r&b, which has the potential to go in either direction -- but by and large you just don't write those sorts of changes into most sorts of hip-hop, dance music, etc. They just don't fit with what the music does. That's true of (say) a steady James Brown vamp, where anything more than periodic blues-type changes (I-IV-V, right?) would kind of ruin the groove; it's true of (for instance) techno, where adding flowing pop chord changes instantly changes what you're doing into Euro-pop; it's true of hip-hop, where no matter what you sample, you want to be able to reduce it to a few chords in a steady loop. And that's because part of what makes all those genres compelling is the way they have a predictable groove -- as soon as you hear it, you know what the groove is, and the expectation is that it will repeat, and that you can sink into it that way.

The cool thing about r&b right now -- and the reason why a lot of it has been really interesting over the past decade or so -- is that it's poised right between those two things. It's borrowed that repeating-groove aspect back from hip-hop, as well as hip-hop's advancement into synthetic and electronic sounds. But the connection to singing ballads and gospel keeps the other foot in the singing-songs-with-chord-changes turf. It has the opportunity to do whatever it wants, really, and so it's not surprising that some of the big smashes of the past years have been expensive combinations of those camps -- Timbaland/Timberlake "Cry Me a River"/"My Love" stuff is suspended just about exactly halfway between chord-changing ballad and static hip-hop (or really it's kinda fully both, not a difference-splitting but a way of having both entirely).

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:19 (seventeen years ago) link

(Haha for evidence of that first paragraph, just imagine "Papa's Got a Brand New Bag" with everything as it's supposed to be except they're playing it in that C / Am / F / G doo-wop pattern, one chord per bar. The funk vanishes. It turns into an okay Stax/Motown backing track, but the funk definitely vanishes.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha Nabisco I was deliberately trying to avoid breaking it down into black and white (which was why I didn't pick Come Together), but I couldn't think of a non-bluesy Beatles song that quite fit.

Okay, a song like She Loves You is fluid melodically in the way that something like Losing My Religion isn't.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 20:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Max is correct.

I don't know if "Irreplaceable" would be nearly so interesting if it was sung by a singer of whom we didn't already have a fairly detailed "image". It's precisely because it doesn't seem to accord with Beyonce's prior character that it's so startling (this sense of startlement has unfortunately begun to fade due to the song's ubiquity).

I'm not sure that Beyonce is more memorable for being shark eyes (god I hate that term though!) than for her submissive songs/ballads/etc. It's more the case that her ballads have never been as conflicted as they are here. As I think I've said before, Beyonce is usually very literal, esp. in her ballads and love songs. "Irreplaceable" is the first time she's introduced dramatic irony into that setting.

The song in her back-catalogue it's actually most like is "Survivor", which when you think about it has the exact same message and vulnerabilities - Beyonce espousing "you don't/can't affect me, I'm better than that" while the force of her performance convinces you otherwise.

It's actually Kelly who sings it (as if this matters: the Survivor era DC is swallowed up by Beyonce personality-wise), but the middle eight in "Survivor" is most on-point here: Kelly lists all the things she's too classy or morally superior to do, but it's clear that just by making the list she has thought about it, been mighty tempted, perhaps even wrote out a long diss on the internet which she deleted only after their mouse button had hovered over "submit" for a good five minutes.

I loved Beyonce singing "Listen" in Dreamgirls (a mostly patchy film, although I liked Jennifer Hudson too). Not sure how I feel about it as a single - hasn't been released here properly yet.

Tim F (Tim F), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 01:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Cis, Lex annoys the shit out of me and I let that get the better of me because work sucked ass today. I apologize for that. I still don't buy anything he's saying about the song.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 03:22 (seventeen years ago) link

you had a bad day

http://blog.streaming.jp/user/christomoko/blog/image/39.jpg

friday on the porch (lfam), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Now you've made it worse.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 05:19 (seventeen years ago) link

It's actually Kelly who sings it (as if this matters: the Survivor era DC is swallowed up by Beyonce personality-wise), but the middle eight in "Survivor" is most on-point here: Kelly lists all the things she's too classy or morally superior to do, but it's clear that just by making the list she has thought about it, been mighty tempted, perhaps even wrote out a long diss on the internet which she deleted only after their mouse button had hovered over "submit" for a good five minutes.

yeah this is completely on point, though again i think the music is key - the lyrics hint at kelly's inner conflict but the momentum of the beats and the massive, propulsive strings leaves us in no doubt that she's convinced herself she's "better than that", and ultimately reinforces the DC image as the strong, business-like survivors they say they are. i'm not sure what the same kind of treatment would do to 'irreplaceable' - though there's a cod-reggae remix which gives it a far lighter, breezier and less conflicted feel.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 09:21 (seventeen years ago) link

"It's actually Kelly who sings it (as if this matters: the Survivor era DC is swallowed up by Beyonce personality-wise), but the middle eight in "Survivor" is most on-point here: Kelly lists all the things she's too classy or morally superior to do, but it's clear that just by making the list she has thought about it, been mighty tempted, perhaps even wrote out a long diss on the internet which she deleted only after their mouse button had hovered over "submit" for a good five minutes."
yeah this is completely on point, though again i think the music is key - the lyrics hint at kelly's inner conflict but the momentum of the beats and the massive, propulsive strings leaves us in no doubt that she's convinced herself she's "better than that", and ultimately reinforces the DC image as the strong, business-like survivors they say they are. i'm not sure what the same kind of treatment would do to 'irreplaceable' - though there's a cod-reggae remix which gives it a far lighter, breezier and less conflicted feel.

-- lexpretend (lexusjee...), February 14th, 2007.

erm, no; the lyrics do not "hint at kelly's inner conflict"; tim is possibly right that "it's clear that just by making the list she has thought about it, been mighty tempted", but it's only clear from the delivery, not from the actual lyrics themselves. the lyrics are lock-step with the production.

likewise if 'irreplaceable' has an (entirely unremarkable in the context of this kind of song) inner conflict between the words and the feelings behind them, whether we think beyonce lands it or not is a) likely to be inflected by how beyonce talks about it herself, like it or not and b) will depend on how we hear her delivery.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 10:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't really care how Beyonce talks about the song, (or when artists talk about their works in general,) but her delivery on "Irreplacable" is fantastic. I definitely agree with the assured lyrics/emotive performance dichotomy.

The Reverend (Rodney J. Greene), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 10:43 (seventeen years ago) link

mind you, while the delivery/lyrics split is a standard nuff trope, in this case and partly because of beyonce's "persona" (read: character, read: who beyonce is) you have to wonder how appealing this iron-clad thing is, and how cloying she can be in her other mode. pushing it into full-blown schizophrenia is probably her best bet.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 10:48 (seventeen years ago) link

I dunno about that. If you push it to "full-blown schizophrenia", you get "Ring the Alarm", which annoys the hell out of me.

The Reverend (Rodney J. Greene), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 10:58 (seventeen years ago) link

good thread

resumo impetus (blueski), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:02 (seventeen years ago) link

is 'ring the alarm' so much schizo as just straight-ahead demented? i loved it.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:06 (seventeen years ago) link

At first I didn't like "ring the alarm" but I got caught recently by the quiet part towards the end "how can you look at me...". That's what makes all the craziness around work, for me. And although I never found her hot or anything, she's pretty cute in the video at that precise moment.

AleXTC (AleXTC), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:37 (seventeen years ago) link

not that there isn't a difference, but i don't know that it's so easily distinguished--ESPECIALLY w/r/t to a world-famous pop star and a song ostensibly about her relationship with her world-famous boyfriend

Um, I don't think that anyone really believes on any level that this song is about kicking Jay-Z to the curb.

Also I can't see why it's important that it's Beyonce-the-star singing it, my love for it is due to B's performance irrespective of anything around it - and also that it's a great song - all this different levels of emotion that Lex is peeling off the music in Survivor are present here in the lyrics - along with one that I'm surprised no-one has mentioned, the regret that she thought he was irreplacable for a while, but it turns out that he's another in a long line of scumbags, and here's the next along in a minute.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:58 (seventeen years ago) link

i kindof totally understand the melodic range theory thing.

these days, and not only in pop music, it seems like because jumping up and down scales has been such a big thing in the past, sticking to a few notes in an intriguing way is even more, like, captivating.

sorry it's early, and this has probably been said. meow.

Surmounter (Awn, R), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm not sure that Beyonce is more memorable for being shark eyes (god I hate that term though!) than for her submissive songs/ballads/etc. It's more the case that her ballads have never been as conflicted as they are here. As I think I've said before, Beyonce is usually very literal, esp. in her ballads and love songs. "Irreplaceable" is the first time she's introduced dramatic irony into that setting.

wtf is "shark eyes"

Al (Alex In Baltimore), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link

lol beyonce would flip if she knew this thread was happening. i think maybe we're giving her a little too much credit

homegirl prolly wasn't thinkin of any dramatic irony, she was just bustin out a few good hooks

Surmounter (Awn, R), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Beyonce has given much better performances in the past ("Say My Name", "Bills, Bills, Bills", "Bootylicious", "Lose My Breath", "Dangerously In Love", "Emotion", "So Good", "Crazy In Love"). The construction of the entire song is a shambles; it doesn't go anywhere musically or lyrically and the place it sits in is low-rent rip-off of TLC's "Unpretty".

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:21 (seventeen years ago) link

whaaaat! i LOVE this song dude. okay, BUT

i have to say that i did hear "rip off" the first time i heard it cuz that part in the middle reminds me of this christina aguilera song off the first album where she's like "a love for al lseaons a love for all time"

ANYWAY, what i think, about this song is that yes it's DIFFERENT from like say my name, bills bills bills - i think because it's way more cut and pastey

but i LIKE cut and pastey, i find it deft and clver, so i say goo girl.

Surmounter (Awn, R), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:24 (seventeen years ago) link

"goo girl" google image search TOTALLY nsfw

elmo albatross (allocryptic), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Great minds think alike.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link

=P

Surmounter (Awn, R), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:37 (seventeen years ago) link

is that the goo girl emoticon?

elmo albatross (allocryptic), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:47 (seventeen years ago) link

YEs duh!

Surmounter (Awn, R), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Um, I don't think that anyone really believes on any level that this song is about kicking Jay-Z to the curb.

beyonce girl u own this song i know jay z was embarresed when he heard this wit his big lip self u need to have this on radio its to good to have to search for it and u sho right u can have a nuther him in a minute u go girl tell yo man cuz sum people just be like oh its ok he wont do it again but u told him he must not know bout u lol

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:47 (seventeen years ago) link

Beyonce in Sports Illustrated (and others at the R n roll hall of fame) Beyonce in Bikini Is Swimsuit Cover Girl for music theme issue! Hah.
By Associated Press
3 hours ago

NEW YORK - Beyonce has hit another high note, claiming the coveted cover shot of this year's Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue in a yellow-and-pink bikini.

"The Dreamgirl As You've Never Seen Her," a cover headline teases. There's also a photo spread inside the magazine.

The 25-year-old singer-actress ("Dreamgirls") posed on a Florida beach in the bikini designed by House of Dereon, the fashion label she started with her mother, Tina Knowles.

The 2007 swimsuit edition continues with a music theme inside, featuring scantily clad models posing with Kanye West, Aerosmith, Kenny Chesney, Gnarls Barkley and Panic! At the Disco.

A five-page spread featuring Russian Anne Vyalitsyna was shot at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum in Cleveland in September.

"Once the decision was made to have a music hook, one of the first settings to come up was the Rock Hall, because it's such an iconic place," said Sports Illustrated spokesman Rick McCabe. "It was a natural fit."

Vyalitsyna posed with Jon Bon Jovi's motorcycle and other Rock Hall items.

The magazine portrayed the museum with respect, said Todd Mesek, Rock Hall spokesman.

"We felt it would've been an omission if we weren't included," he said.

___

curmudgeon (DC Steve), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link

Beyonce has given much better performances in the past ("Say My Name", "Bills, Bills, Bills", "Bootylicious", "Lose My Breath", "Dangerously In Love", "Emotion", "So Good", "Crazy In Love"). The construction of the entire song is a shambles; it doesn't go anywhere musically or lyrically and the place it sits in is low-rent rip-off of TLC's "Unpretty".

Well, I like "Irreplacable" more than most of those songs, including "Unpretty", and don't necessarily agree that she gives better performances on all of them, so taste is a bugger, etc.

And how is "Irreplacable" a ripoff of "Unpretty" other than that both are R&B songs built around an acoustic guitar?

The Reverend (Rodney J. Greene), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Both are mid-tempo "empowerment anthems" based on an acoustic guitar riff based very heavily on the circle of fifths sung by African-American women more known for their trendsetting/trendchasing (delete as applicable to the relative stage in each act's career) hip-hop/r&b work.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Thursday, 15 February 2007 01:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Fair enough, but that doesn't really answer my question. I didn't ask how they are similiar, (and half of that is based on circumstance, rather than anything within the songs. the circle-of-fifths thing may be a good point, but my knowledge of music theory is rather rudimentary) I asked how one is a ripoff of the other. I don't see any reason to assume that Beyonce was consciously or even subconsciously setting out to make a song that sounds like "Unpretty".

The Reverend shines like a lighthouse (Rodney J. Greene), Thursday, 15 February 2007 05:17 (seventeen years ago) link

not that there isn't a difference, but i don't know that it's so easily distinguished--ESPECIALLY w/r/t to a world-famous pop star and a song ostensibly about her relationship with her world-famous boyfriend--and i dont know that super-formalist readings of it (or really of any pop song) are going to be all that helpful or interesting.

-- max (mreadn...), February 13th, 2007.

WTF? When did singing a song that's not actually about one's own life become something only decipherable by "super formalist" readings??? Did Johnny Cash actually kill a man?

Shadowcat (A-Ron Hubbard), Thursday, 15 February 2007 05:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean in what sense is Irreplaceable "ostensibly" about Jay-Z???

Shadowcat (A-Ron Hubbard), Thursday, 15 February 2007 05:27 (seventeen years ago) link

"Both are mid-tempo "empowerment anthems" based on an acoustic guitar riff based very heavily on the circle of fifths sung by African-American women more known for their trendsetting/trendchasing (delete as applicable to the relative stage in each act's career) hip-hop/r&b work."

Dan, as long as Sugababes' "Ugly" it's hard for me to take this accusation seriously.

Tim F (Tim F), Thursday, 15 February 2007 06:03 (seventeen years ago) link

As long as Sugababes' "Ugly" exists, even.

Tim F (Tim F), Thursday, 15 February 2007 06:03 (seventeen years ago) link

hurting--maybe i misspoke? i meant that a formalist reading (by which i guess i really mean a new critical reading i.e. w/out extratextual information such as uh i dont know biographical context) is lacking b/c it takes the song to be objectively given, extant in a vacuum, separate from the mechanisms by which its produced and consumed. now i dont have a window into beyonces life but i thought (and i could be wrong but i couldve sworn i read this all over the place) that the song has been generally taken by the public (if not the critics who tend to be suspicious that a pop star might bring "real" life into what is thought of as a genre abt "image" and "surface") as being specifically referential to her relationship w/ jay-z. and EVEN if that reading of the PRODUCTION of the song itself is wrong (and i dont think its strictly true since apparently ne-yo wrote the lyrics but i dont think you can deny that giving a recently-jilted girl a song like that to sing wont bring her own attitude, exp., etc to it), the mechanisms of CONSUMPTION of the song are such that a huge number of ppl take it to be abt her and jay. (id maybe even argue that one meaning the song itself produces involves her relationship to jigga)

max (maxreax), Thursday, 15 February 2007 07:20 (seventeen years ago) link

"recently-jilted"? Did I miss something?

The Reverend shines like a lighthouse (Rodney J. Greene), Thursday, 15 February 2007 07:37 (seventeen years ago) link

i dont know; i should probably actually start reading hip hop weekly if im going to talk a big game abt biographical references.

max (maxreax), Thursday, 15 February 2007 07:49 (seventeen years ago) link

the mechanisms of CONSUMPTION of the song are such that a huge number of ppl take it to be abt her and jay

surely 'ring the alarm' rather than 'irreplaceable' though? the rihanna/teairra mari rumours, and so on. i basically agree that this tabloidy method of consumption is a worthwhile angle though.

lexpretend (lexpretend), Thursday, 15 February 2007 08:06 (seventeen years ago) link

Ok hang on, did they actually break up?

Shadowcat (A-Ron Hubbard), Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

i think they've tried to suggest it wasn't that kind of exclusive relationship anyway.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Well anyway, I know what a formalist reading is. I don't think one has to exactly "close read" this song to see that it's probably not literally about Jay-Z. But if you want to believe Beyonce is channelling her emotions about him into the song or something, fine. I just heard a Willie Nelson interview where he talked about writing this super pitiful heartbreak song (whose name I forget) and the whole inspiration for it was that his wife was sleeping on his arm and he had to get a cigarette, strike a match and light the cig all with his other hand.

----

If I bought it nigga please don't touch
And keep talking that mess, that's fine
But could you walk and talk at the same time
And It's my mine name that is on that Jag
So remove your bags let me call you a cab

Standing in the front yard telling me
How I'm such a fool - Talking about
How I'll never ever find a man like you
You got me twisted

You must not know about me
You must not know about me
I could have another you in a minute
matter fact he'll be here in a minute - baby

You must not know about me
You must not know about me
I can have another you by tomorrow
So don't you ever for a second get to thinking you're irreplaceable

So go ahead and get gone
And call up on that chick and see if she is home
Oops, I bet ya thought that I didn't know
What did you think I was putting you out for?
Cause you was untrue
Rolling her around in the car that I bought you
Baby you dropped them keys hurry up before your taxi leaves
Standing in the front yard telling me
How I am such a fool - Talking about
How I'll never ever find a man like you
You got me twisted

You must not know about me
You must not know about me
I could have another you in a minute
matter fact he'll be here in a minute - baby

You must not know about me
You must not know about me
I will have another you by tomorrow
So don't you ever for a second get to thinking you're irreplaceable

So since I’m not your everything
How about I'll be nothing
Nothing at all to you
Baby I wont shead a tear for you
I won't lose a wink of sleep
Cause the truth of the matter is
Replacing you is so easy

To the left
To the left
To the left
To the left
To the left
To the left
Everything you own in the box to the left

To the left
To the left

Don't you ever for a second get to thinking you're irreplaceable

Shadowcat (A-Ron Hubbard), Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:46 (seventeen years ago) link

If I bought it nigga please don't touch

I thought the album version was the same as the single edit but apparently not!

the part where I think most analysis of Beynoce's relationship songs being about Jay falls apart is when she seems to be singing from the perspective of a relationship where either she (in "Ring The Alarm") or he (in "Irreplaceable") is financially dependent on the other, that one would be broke if the other dumped them, which obviously isn't the case. but then maybe she's just trying to frame the songs in such a way that people who aren't extravagantly rich can identify with them (as opposed to, say, "Upgrade U," where I've never even heard of half the brands they're babbling on about).

Al (Alex In Baltimore), Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I thought the album version was the same as the single edit but apparently not!

no swearing on my copy of the album!

i think beyoncé's return, again and again, to the theme of economics is essential to both the persona she builds up of herself as popstar, and to enable her songs to ring true to 'normal' life. she's consistently used financial security/superiority to represent more than just what it is; and, far from rendering her heartless and cold, the way she constantly returns to it kind of proves that she's more in touch with the sometimes-unpleasant details of how real-life relationships (both within & without her income bracket) function than any number of singers who prefer to sing about the more romantic, rose-coloured picture. what's that statistic again, half of all relationships end because of financial disagreements/incompatibility?

lexpretend (lexpretend), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Even with a song like "Crazy In Love" it's a bad idea to go too far with biographical assumptions. I mean it's not like Jay-Z and Beyonce are just sitting on the couch spooning one day and then a light-bulb goes on and they rush into the studio to let their feelings pour forth.

Shadowcat (A-Ron Hubbard), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Though they and their handlers might like it if the buying public sees it that way.

Shadowcat (A-Ron Hubbard), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:16 (seventeen years ago) link

the way she constantly returns to it kind of proves that she's more in touch with the sometimes-unpleasant details of how real-life relationships (both within & without her income bracket) function

she doesn't offer any comment on how unpleasantly materialistic life can get, just affirms it; and by affirming it by talking about ridiculous fucking bullshit brands, sports cars, and war diamonds yay, she really isn't on the side of the poor lex.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, well that's all about playing to the aspirational audience.

Shadowcat (A-Ron Hubbard), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:52 (seventeen years ago) link

well for sure, but i'm not going to use the end-product of that calculation as a stick to beat the allegedly "romantic, rose-coloured picture" provided by other artists. it is what it is.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:55 (seventeen years ago) link

In last month's GQ Beyonce says that as someone born into the middle classes, she's "more intelligent" than people from "the hood", and this makes it easy for her to cope with success.

She then didn't add a "Why you frontin' wigga?" style html mark-up box.

White Collar Boxer (DomPassantino), Thursday, 15 February 2007 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

no, hurting, yr right--i don't want to take it (a bio. reading) too far, but i don't think it's a wrong-headed movement; especially not if a huge number of fans are hearing the song that way--but i can already see the danger of this angle, namely, that i sort of assumed that this was the song that everyone thot was abt hov but apparently none of you did, so either i hallucinated that reaction, or its v. specific to the ppl i interact w/.

max (maxreax), Thursday, 15 February 2007 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Way late but anyway:

Fair enough, but that doesn't really answer my question. I didn't ask how they are similiar, (and half of that is based on circumstance, rather than anything within the songs. the circle-of-fifths thing may be a good point, but my knowledge of music theory is rather rudimentary) I asked how one is a ripoff of the other. I don't see any reason to assume that Beyonce was consciously or even subconsciously setting out to make a song that sounds like "Unpretty".

I did not use the word "ripoff" to imply intent on the part of Beyonce. I used the word "ripoff" to imply similarity, chronology and how I view the relative quality of both (I am not a fan of "Unpretty" but I would rather listen to that any day over "Irreplaceable", despite Beyonce being a much better singer than anyone in TLC).

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Thursday, 15 February 2007 22:13 (seventeen years ago) link

aw c'mon her ridiculous bullshit dazzles any cultural theory etc etc...

da mystery of sandboxin' (fandango), Thursday, 15 February 2007 23:09 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.