Before Vinyl Consumed Your Life (sandbox turntable geek thread)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This new year, I am selling off my CD's, maybe 80% of them. The motivations behind this have been touched on in some of the Tower thread, I think... basically market collapse. I can't justify owning soemthing that would be essentially the same with a burned WAV disc and a color xerox - which of course, is how they are all being backed up (plus data files as a secondary backup, burned to DVD). Nice booklets, on the other hand, I keep - e.g. all the Biota, all of The Ex.

I just bought a Music Hall MMF-5 turntable and a set of Paradigm Studio 20 speakers. My amp is the weak link now, and I also need a premap eventually. I am dumping the proceeds from the CDs into this project, and I am also ordering a Nitty Gritty. Hopefully I can do it all for under 2.5 grand. Since I have like 3000 albums and 1000 45s this seems like a long overdue investment.

I just got it all set up/hooked up and played side one of The Wall... I have no regrets, it was worth every penny. Fuck yeah. Bye bye, CDs. See you on eBay.

Has anybody else (besides Scott S, a given) gone this far, been seduced this much by the siren song of a good pressing?

sleeve (sleeve), Sunday, 31 December 2006 00:00 (seventeen years ago) link

I never listen to CDs anymore. Within the past two years I've probably sold about 50% of what I once had, keeping only the stuff that's hard to find on LP, CD only, good remasters/reissues etc. CDs are silly as an investment.

ian (orion), Sunday, 31 December 2006 00:49 (seventeen years ago) link

word.

Now I have listened to:

Alice Coltrane - Journey To Satchidananda side 1
Beatles - Help OST side 1
H.N.A.S. - Ach, Dieser Bart side 2
PGR - The Flickering Of Sowing Time side 2

currently on: Led Zeppelin - Physical Graffiti side 3

I am ecstatic.

sleeve (sleeve), Sunday, 31 December 2006 01:27 (seventeen years ago) link

CDs are silly as an investment.

D'oh! Er, I mean...

(The point about reissues is a good one -- especially since I think we're likely seeing the last reflexive kick of physical fancy-schmanz reissues in the CD realm in these recent years. So for me it's fun to pick up things like the Cure/Depeche/Siouxsie etc. reissues, and after all is said and done with a thorough ripping and selling back I'll be keeping those.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 01:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, one thing I've noticed -- everything I *have* sold back (hundreds upon hundreds of discs now, maybe a thousand plus at this point) after having ripped just to mp3 or AAC even I've never once been tempted to dig back out/call up on iTunes and relisten to. There's a lesson there.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 01:33 (seventeen years ago) link

now listening to Michael Hurley's Watertower and doing a b0ng hit for I@N!

Ned - yeah, there are some really nice CD packages that have come out recently. I'm definitely keeping box sets and such. And the stuff I find myself going back to is usually for historical interest or perspective as opposed to the "OMG I gotta hear this it's so great" impulse.

sleeve (sleeve), Sunday, 31 December 2006 01:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Understood, that. Perspective is as does, ultimately. I didn't need any more perspective on the Beatles or the Rolling Stones, which is why I don't have their discs around anymore, f'r instance.

There's also the explosion of limited edition/CDR runs, of course, and I do like hanging onto those when they warrant it (happily many do). In their case, they are intentional rarities, and the circulation of their music in the electronic realm is to be expected. I have no problem with that approach at all, I think it's a good recognition of the market.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 01:43 (seventeen years ago) link

CDs are silly as an investment

Music is silly as an investment. i learned this the hard way. now i never buy anything with an intention to resell it (giving it away is more fun)

electric sound of jim (electric sound of jim), Sunday, 31 December 2006 06:11 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm liking vinyl again after i bought a nice turntable, a nice preamp is coming in the next fortnight too..

electric sound of jim (electric sound of jim), Sunday, 31 December 2006 06:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Wow, dude, I was just considering buying a new turntable today, in fact. I mean I actually have the money to do it now whereas I wouldn't have before, and I'm in limbo at the moment cause the place that I took my turntable to in October to get fixed never called me back and I haven't called them back because my friend gave me a turntable he had and it works fine and I don't want to pay them if they did fix it. I'd rather get a real nice turntable of a kind I've never had before. Like I used to DJ with for years, but have never owned personally. That would be so nice.

Bimbler (Sourkraut), Sunday, 31 December 2006 06:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Also listening to Physical Graffiti on vinyl? I am jealous.

I find it hard to give up my CD's sometimes, although I have been selling quite a lot of late. I agree that a WAV file disc is about as good, but I get into these weird questions about some of the CD's I own. Like the ones that I own and have for years and will never let go of, but that I also know very well I have not played and will not play in the future. I don't understand why I can't get rid of Blur albums. I don't understand. Etc.

Bimbler (Sourkraut), Sunday, 31 December 2006 06:40 (seventeen years ago) link

wow I just listened to my Mobile Fidelity Sound Labs audiophile pressing of the S/T Fleetwood Mac album that I found in Goodwill for a dollar. "Over My Head" sounds just unbelievable, all those harmonic guitar things...

Bimble, unless you want to use the turntable to actually DJ out at clubs or parties or wherever you should get a belt-driven turntable. they are better for just listening, less motor noise bleeds through the center spindle.

sleeve (sleeve), Sunday, 31 December 2006 07:17 (seventeen years ago) link

also all of my MP3s sound like crap thru these speakers, even the ones at 320 :(

sleeve (sleeve), Sunday, 31 December 2006 07:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh god I know, I know...bless you. But the mp3 has its uses...there are certain things you just can't get any other way, which I'm sure you know. Although I always convert to WAV before burning. I think I had a belt-driven turntable to begin with, but I am not sure and will check into it. All I know is my good, good DJing friend said "get a Technics".
All I know is some part of my brain desperately wants to spell that "Techniques".

Anyway right now I'm playing a CD and am perfectly happy. Go figure.

Bimbler (Sourkraut), Sunday, 31 December 2006 09:28 (seventeen years ago) link

But yes I actually have the self titled Fleetwood Mac on vinyl, too. I inherited it from my own father, in fact.

Bimbler (Sourkraut), Sunday, 31 December 2006 09:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Rip to FLAC, if you're getting rid of the CD, and buy a Squeezebox!

A Graham Slee pre-amp, ESOJ? Very good choice!

Having kids has had the opposite effect on my listening - the Michell turntable barely gets used thesedays, it's practically all CDs. But CD sounds slightly better through my system (Copland/Audiolab/Heybrook), so that's OK (not that I get the chance to do much dedicated listening...I barely get the chance to do the bleedin' dishes).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 31 December 2006 12:28 (seventeen years ago) link

perversely I pulled out some cassettes the other week -- Blue Note jazz stuff I don't have on CD LP or stream on Rhapsody -- and played em on my kids boom box. vinyl > CD > mp3 etal > cassette I guess but truth be told I'm no audiophile so IT'S ALL GOOD.

when CDS first reared their ugly heads in the late 80s I went on a vinyl-buying spree, scarfing up cutouts befpre they disappeared. felt kinda dumb about this a few yrs later but in retrospect I was ahead of my time once again...oblivious is more like it.

m "hitech" coleman (lovebug ), Sunday, 31 December 2006 13:46 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm tempted to do this myself. The main things standing in the way:

1) Greatly enlarging my vinyl collection could become a burden vis a vis moving/storage

2) I know these external hard drives fail frequently, and even if I back them up I'm afraid I'll lose all my music

Not For Use as Infant Nog (A-Ron Hubbard), Sunday, 31 December 2006 16:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Re 2) -- burn to DVDR as backup, store in those CaseLogic deals. This is what I currently do in any event.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 16:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Yet another reason to buy a new iMac - need DVD-R drive.

Not For Use as Infant Nog (A-Ron Hubbard), Sunday, 31 December 2006 16:19 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm going all digital downloads soon. Or at least trying to. In discussion with a few other record labels, a lot of people are agreeing the way to go is Vinyl and download. For dance music labels, DJs get their vinyl while the rest get the download (while realizing more and more DJs are strictly digital and working from downloads, esp. better sounding ones from places like Bleep, though I suspect within a few years we'll all be downloading AIFF quality, soon as bandwith improves), and for non-dance, for the people who really fetishize the object, they get the limited-edition vinyl while the rest get the download.

Not that I'm going to do vinyl unless it's a dancey release. And we'll still release CDs, what we already have lined up and if we luck into something we think we can sell 5,000 copies of (fat chance...)

Bimble, conventional wisdom says that audiophile's hate Technics because they are direct drive, so the vibration of the motor directly touches the platter which touches the record which touches the needle, that's why not only the cheapest record players are belt-driven, but the most expensive ones are as well. Lately I've been reading about a third option called Idler Drives that some say are great and make for some really high quality turntables you can get used:

http://www.btinternet.com/~a.d.richarson/hifi/lenco/lenco_land.html

but I'm not made out of money and I'm a DJ and I already have 2 1200s so I'm not about to buy another turntable. When I'm rich maybe...

dan selzer (dan selzer), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:20 (seventeen years ago) link

though I suspect within a few years we'll all be downloading AIFF quality, soon as bandwith improves

See, that's ALL I ask. (Or even just doing it FLAC/SHN style, even.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:32 (seventeen years ago) link

This is from the Seattle Weekly. I thought it was interesting - and fun! - to read:



It Was Free Cuz I Stole It
The year in unfair shares.
By Chris Zeigler



Now is a bad time to be a giant music corporation, but ethically challenged music fans couldn't ask for better days. Bootlegging has always been about catering directly to the fans, and the Internet breeds the best bootleggers yet: bigger and stronger and faster than ever before, the better to handle the demands of 10 million file sharers trading a billion and a half songs daily.

It's clear now that the CD-R bent the CD over and the MP3 player finished it off, and although the industry is still in shock, smaller and more agile labels are already accepting the inevitable and locking in a vinyl/digital-only production schedule, then using merch like T-shirts—low production cost, high sale price, lots of options to ratchet up collectibility—to plug their revenue gaps.

Since file sharing is permanent enough now that you can buy $19-per-year lawsuit insurance, it's time to acknowledge the bright side. Out-of-print doesn't mean anything anymore. If you can learn about it, you can listen to it, and if the record company doesn't want to reissue it, you can probably find it without even having to stand up. The romance is gone but the music is cheap, accessible, and instant—that's the music industry of the future, brought to you now by Russian MP3 pirates, obsessive genre bloggers, and criminals selling albums off a blanket on the street. Highlights of a year of unfair shares:

PodTube and iTube: Once YouTube really got going, the video collectors blew open their vaults. This is footage no one ever saw from sources no one ever heard of—psychedelic small-town variety shows, supersaturated Scopitone camp-operas, unfinished punk-rock docs, and student films. Watching them was good enough, but now you can illegally own them through programs that copy those videos to your hard drive. PodTube and iTube get you screening items unseen since the day the station filmed them.

Street Meat: You don't even need a computer to play this one. If you live in one of the Recording Industry Association of America's 12 priority piracy cities (which include Dallas, Houston, L.A., Miami, N.Y.C., and San Francisco), you can get bootlegs hot off the sidewalk, out the trunk, or on the bus. "A disturbing trend," said RIAA executive VP Brad Buckles. "As the pirate music trade continues to evolve, criminals are enhancing their products." Thanks for the tip, Brad! On the menu now are knockoffs of chart hits bulked up with bonus tracks, chopped and screwed remixes ready right after the legit release hits stores, and the RIAA's dreaded "dream compilations,"—albums that mix tracks between competing labels into albums that are too good to be legit.

Zune: Microsoft's Zune—aka "the BetaPod"—seems destined to be a sure staple of the thrift stores of the future. And that's too bad because wireless file transfer without Microsoft's copyright hobbles is a seductive idea. Imagine the record conventions of 2016: a bunch of silent geeks pointing blinking black boxes at each other and going home with a billion and a half new songs, and . . . actually, that's a little pathetic. But the fact remains that instant player-to-player wireless transfer would (and probably eventually will) be the most efficient reiteration of the old going-over-to-your-friend's-house-with-a-bag-of-blank-tapes ritual. Maybe it will become reality by the time Zune 2.0 rolls out, when Microsoft gets desperate to dig out from under the iPhone.

Sharity Blogs: Much better than the sanctioned sites that give you one brand-new track smothered in a bunch of recycled reviews. Instead, sharity blogs resurrect full albums long lost or forgotten and post them in their entirety on overseas hosting sites. It'd be almost obscenely exploitative except for the obvious love and research put into the selections. This is a scholarly crowd on an admirable mission: rescuing suppressed Japanese terror-folk, Brazilian psych nuggets, and buried Golden Age hip-hop from graves where reissue labels fear to dig.

MySpaceGopher: Everyone with electricity and an instrument has a MySpace Music site, but the songs are still downloadable at the artist's discretion. Inevitably, hackers removed that discretion, and while it's disrespectful, it was an effective way to ransack exclusive prerelease streaming content. MySpace repeatedly repairs the code holes that allow these shenanigans, and the public responds by finding a new hole. At press time, the newly disabled MySpaceGopher was working on a fix, which will probably be ready by the time you read this.

Snob Torrents: Concentrated swapper sites are gonna strangle themselves with stinginess, the same way networks like Hotline and KDX sank into obscuro- lescence. Music freeboters don't like to follow rules about ratios—there's no homework among thieves—so sites like these will probably vanish as users move to free sharity blogs, friendlier message boards, and unstumpable file-share networks.

Premix Leaks: Lupe Fiasco may hate these—an unmixed version of his Food & Liquor came out months early—but premix leaks are becoming routine. TV on the Radio's Cookie Mountain also came out months prematurely, the Shins' Wincing the Night Away (due in January) has leaked at least twice in different versions, and Bloc Party's A Weekend in the City (due in February) hit the networks in November. The solution now belongs to the PR people—lucky Lupe got an early review calling him the future of hip-hop, and a correctly leveraged premix can garner a spike of welcome, unexpected publicity.

Virtual Release: If legendary 78 collector Joe Bussard could plug an iBook directly into his Victrola, he'd be making these. This is real ghostly stuff: sourced from unreleased sessions or radio broadcasts or repo'd master tapes. That's all time-honored bootleg chow, sure, but virtual releases go straight from the source to the file shares, skipping physical media entirely. For instance: WFMU recently popularized a Faust album that never made it past a few Virgin Records promo tapes until someone copied it up to MP3. Companion to this are homemade virtual compilations, issued direct from the collector's originals—a stack of uncomped funk 45s, say—to the file shares with some kind of searchbait name, like "MY HOT FUNK 45s." These albums are aimed at audiences so microscopic there's almost no profit in pressing up hard copies—and as such, they're usually pretty great.

Give It Away Now: Nobody can steal what you give away. A California band called Wooden Shjips put out their EP for free this year; all you had to do was ask and there was a real record in your actual hands. And it was really good, too—blown-out Les Rallizes homage with vocals Echoplexed to infinity. In fact, it was so good that I bought a copy with my own actual money, just for old times' sake.

scott seward (121212), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Not surprised that Chris Z. wrote that (and wrote that well), he's always had a good sense of where things are on that front.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:44 (seventeen years ago) link

The flipside of it all is the obvious point (which he'd agree with); if I spent all my time using all those resources, I would Have. No. Life. It's like the hothouse atmosphere of here multiplied by infinity. I think the secret is to stream rather than download and just ride the waves; forget about owning it in any format. Sanity demands it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:46 (seventeen years ago) link

i think that's why stuff like pandora and last fm have become so popular. cuz it's like radio! but good! and you don't have to worry about anything.

scott seward (121212), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Spot on, good sir. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link

sometimes i really envy TRUE genre obsessives. people who only listen to jazz or folk or whatever. must make life so much easier in some ways. you can just ignore so much stuff. i've kinda come to the conclusion that as far as NEW music goes, i'm really only gonna try and keep up with metal and the heavy stuff. it makes life a lot more manageable. i only buy other new stuff if the hype/acclaim is so deafening that i can't resist. like, i wanna get the new clipse album. and if i see it on vinyl i will. this year i bought espers and vetiver on vinyl and was glad i did. but as far as a cursory glance at ilm threads on new non-metal stuff, i'm not gonna be that active about seeking stuff out. youtube links are always encouraged though! definitely see stuff i would never ever buy in a million years that i end up liking on there.

scott seward (121212), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:15 (seventeen years ago) link

sometimes i really envy TRUE genre obsessives.

I can't say I do, though I see your point. I'd always rather have melange and collage rather than monochrome.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:17 (seventeen years ago) link

the rhapsody/stream thing is kinda corny but in a way it's like pandora/last fm. for $10/month I sample new stuff and trawl the archives w/o cluttering up the family computer. that said I'm gonna d/l yr latest mix scott. as the ojays sang I LUV MUZIK.

m coleman (lovebug ), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I love me the Scott mixes. :-) Stuff like that is a treat.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:23 (seventeen years ago) link

thanks! they are fun. and they are actually for a good cause too, so i feel my collection is useful beyond my own pleasure for once. (we are starting a radio station here, for those who don't know. and all my stuff will be a part of the station's on-line library)

and, yeah, obviously i believe in the whole variety = spice of life thing. i just wish i was a little, um, more "selective" sometimes. do i really need all ten old german mountain yodelling albums at the thrift store? wouldn't one or two be enough? that sort of thing. which is why just centering my attention on metal as far as new stuff goes is kind of a relief in some ways.

scott seward (121212), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:32 (seventeen years ago) link

and, you know, i'll GET to all the other new stuff eventually. just when it's a little less new and the cd is a dollar somewhere.

scott seward (121212), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I want to see an ad for a turntable that says "Our brand...it'll turn the tables on you!"

Bimbler (Sourkraut), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:45 (seventeen years ago) link

just when it's a little less new and the cd is a dollar somewhere.

Visit SF's Amoeba sometime. It's amazing what lurks in the dollar bin section -- stuff from this year, even.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Scott: Do you use a record cleaning machine? If so, what kind and how often?

sleeve (sleeve), Monday, 1 January 2007 09:18 (seventeen years ago) link

no. no machine. although i'm sure it would be nice to have one. they can get all kinds of invisible-to-the-naked-eye gunk off. if i find something somewhere that looks worth saving, but is really really dirty, i will just clean it by hand. for everyday dust i use the same thing i've been using forever:


http://www.needledoctor.com/core/media/media.nl?id=351&c=ACCT106601&h=6c76dd4315dd0016b311

scott seward (121212), Monday, 1 January 2007 15:09 (seventeen years ago) link

old faithful! i don't bother buying their cleaning fluid though. i just fill the empty bottles with isopropyl/water.


i'm FAIRLY picky about condition. and i have a good eye. i can tell how something will play by looking at it. i won't buy something less than VG+ unless it's a good deal/have to have it/etc. thrift store stuff i will make acceptions for cuz it's so cheap and i might just want to hear something. i can always just throw it out if its too beat. i'm VERY good with my stuff. i may not be an audiophile, but i can at least say that.

people who don't care about the condition of the used vinyl they buy...they should just listen to CDs. cuz as wonderful as a good record can sound, man, nothing sounds worse than a beat to shit record.

scott seward (121212), Monday, 1 January 2007 15:19 (seventeen years ago) link

I've been wondering about getting a cleaning machine this year if I can get the money together. I currently just clean them by hand with HMV record cleaning fluid (no idea what's in that, doesn't say on the bottle) but that doesn't do much good getting rid of all the crackling on some records. What I'm not sure about is whether that can ever be got rid of even with a machine! Anyone have a machine like to attest to how much more effective it is than a cloth and some fluid?

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Monday, 1 January 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't have a good eye for record condition unfortunately. I bought a copy of Ecstasy & Wine by MBV which looked great, really shiny and clean. Was totally fucked by needle wear though!

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Monday, 1 January 2007 16:57 (seventeen years ago) link

We've got a VPI cleaning machine at work, which is a GREAT thing to have access to. I can't imagine one having one in the home, though. Where would I put it?! At home for cleaning I just use one of those yellow LP cleaning rags with alcohol & water, and for dust I use a microcarbonfiber brush thing, made by Ixos.

ian (orion), Monday, 1 January 2007 17:06 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, I heard THEE MOST AWFUL version of After The Gold Rush, yesterday. By Nana Mouskari. Awful awful awful.

ian (orion), Monday, 1 January 2007 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link

one of the cheapest machines is the nitty gritty. have no idea how good it is. probably works fine:

http://www.needledoctor.com/Nitty-Gritty-Record-Master-Operates-like-Model-1-0-but-has-built-in-adapter-for-45s-78s-and-LP?sc=2&category=106

scott seward (121212), Monday, 1 January 2007 17:50 (seventeen years ago) link

those vpi machines are cool. philly record exchange had one. i would have them clean stuff that i bought there.

what everyone needs is one of these(!!):


http://www.zenn.com.sg/Zenn_RC_MKII2.JPG

scott seward (121212), Monday, 1 January 2007 17:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Before I moved a few months ago, I threw my old Dual turntable in the garbage. I got it used about 8 years ago, and it always gave me trouble. The second to last straw was when the tone arm pick up lever stopped working. The last was when the on switch became completely unreliable and had to be moved back and forth several times to get the table spinning. The thing was, I thought I still had an old Sony in a box in storage, but I was wrong.
Anyway, I still haven't gotten around to replacing it, but I'm looking to get a Pro-ject Debut in a week or two. Just need to decide on a color.

x-post: I saw instructions for a diy record cleaning vacuum you could make out of a Shop-Vac a while ago - looked like a disaster waiting to happen

Mike Dixn (Mike Dixon), Monday, 1 January 2007 18:05 (seventeen years ago) link

Dan,

Idler drive turntables are an interesting solution for playing records. But given that all players have their ups and downs, these are no exception. Low-end rumble. Bah. If people are DJs, they typically, though not always, have 1200s. If people aren't DJs, they use whatever record player was handed down to them or randomly invest in some audiophile quality home unit. Me? I personally like my mixer better than the turntables.

Cameron Octigan (cameron octigan), Monday, 1 January 2007 19:41 (seventeen years ago) link

what you got? I shelled out for a Rane TTM56i some years ago. Better then the cheap Gemini CrapMixer 2000 and the Stantom Mixer Break-a-lot I had previously.

dan selzer (dan selzer), Monday, 1 January 2007 20:28 (seventeen years ago) link

lol @ Dan's mixer descriptions.

Anybody here used this Last preservative coating stuff? Two different hifi stores have mentioned it to me recently, but I am generally wary of putting unknown substances on my records.

sleeve (sleeve), Monday, 1 January 2007 21:48 (seventeen years ago) link

I deal with most of the above issues by just being more picky and stingy about what I buy. But as a result I usually have less to say on ILM, which is why I don't post here all that much.

Not For Use as Infant Nog (A-Ron Hubbard), Monday, 1 January 2007 22:19 (seventeen years ago) link

(what I buy or download)

Not For Use as Infant Nog (A-Ron Hubbard), Monday, 1 January 2007 22:19 (seventeen years ago) link

i have a cleaning machine, the difference between using that and the cloth/fluid method is immense. obviously the dirtier the record the more stark the difference..

electric sound of jim (electric sound of jim), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 00:00 (seventeen years ago) link

I was at a party today, and the apartment had THREE FUNCTIONAL JUKEBOXES that played 45s. It was mindblowing.

ian (orion), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 00:33 (seventeen years ago) link

How *big* was this apartment, I have to ask? At a certain point I freely admit it's all about convenience in terms of space.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 00:37 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh, it was a nice big apartment. Plenty of space. 20-25 foot ceilings. They have a 45 collection that takes up an entire wall, more or less. thousands of them. maybe over 10 thousand? I didn't try to estimate, really. (

ian (orion), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 00:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I never listen to CDs anymore. Within the past two years I've probably sold about 50% of what I once had, keeping only the stuff that's hard to find on LP, CD only, good remasters/reissues etc. CDs are silly as an investment.

-- ian

word, son. i bought a bunch of shit at tower and figure i'll copy it to itunes, throw 'em all on an MP3 disc, and trade the stuff in for LPs. my cd player at home plays MP3s now, so i don't see much point in keeping a lot of them. i have about 450 CDs now, I can see having 1/3rd of that number at the end of '07.

bohren un der club of gear (bohren un der club of gear), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 00:45 (seventeen years ago) link

Nice job there, actually. Wish I could be as aggressive!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 00:49 (seventeen years ago) link

it's getting more and more difficult for me to justify the amount of cds i have, considering like many on this thread the only time they get used is when they're being ripped. it's depressing in a way

electric sound of jim (electric sound of jim), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 00:50 (seventeen years ago) link

An easy tip if you still find yourself buying CDs regularly -- sell back one for each one you get, at least. But sell back two for each if you can, or more. I'm not depressed by it because I always note most of what I do sell back I think I got for free or next to nothing over the moons.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 00:52 (seventeen years ago) link

it's not so much about the money, more about the wastefulness

i'm totally up for all music to be sold as flacs or whatever equivalent.. a few labels are already doing this and i love them for it

electric sound of jim (electric sound of jim), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 01:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah the point was recently made that the savvier labels are now doing digital/vinyl releases and making up their revenue in merch sales. Way of the future & shit.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver (hoosteen), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 01:22 (seventeen years ago) link

I also need to solve the problem of shitty sound quality going from my laptop's headphone jack to the RCA inputs on my receiver. I assume there must be some sort of USB device I could purchase, no?

Not For Use as Infant Nog (A-Ron Hubbard), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 01:29 (seventeen years ago) link

probably... the headphone jack is going to be insufficient for your receiver no matter what because of all the noise in the computer gumming up the digital to analog conversion.

friday on the porch (lfam), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 01:33 (seventeen years ago) link

this depends on what comp you have, actually. my macbook pro sounds pretty good from the headphone jack.

the table is the table (trees), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 02:18 (seventeen years ago) link

but does it sound better with an external sound card?

friday on the porch (lfam), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 02:39 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post

Slim Devices makes a few incredible products for this use. A rich friend's father schooled me on the Transporter ($2000):

http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_transporter.html

I dropped some cash for my pops and got him their significantly more affordable but equally cool Squeezebox ($299) and it's now his favorite thing on earth:

http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_squeezebox.html

I swear by this here ($50):

http://www.amazon.com/XITEL-HFL-A1-X1-HiFi-Link-PC-Mac/dp/B00006I601/sr=1-3/qid=1167702246/ref=pd_bbs_sr_3/002-1272197-7360832?ie=UTF8&s=electronics

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver (hoosteen), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 02:40 (seventeen years ago) link

I have, and love, my Squeezebox.

dan selzer (dan selzer), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 02:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Rip to FLAC, if you're getting rid of the CD, and buy a Squeezebox!

Yeah, when I said "data discs" at the top of the thread I really should have clarified that FLAC is the way to go for me at least. I have only heard about the Squeezebox through this thread and one other ILM audio geek thread, and I am now officially intrigued.

sleeve (sleeve), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 07:17 (seventeen years ago) link

>> i have a cleaning machine, the difference between using that and the cloth/fluid method is immense. obviously the dirtier the record the more stark the difference..

-- electric sound of jim (jame...), January 2nd, 2007 12:00 AM. (electric sound of jim) (later)

That's what I wanted to know, thanks! OK so maybe I will invest in one this year...

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 10:52 (seventeen years ago) link

i got given a AR EB 101 turntable with a decent cartridge. i only have a minisystem. should i get a cheap ass receiver that has a phono input or just buy a pre amp and hook this up to the mini so that i can play and hear the turntable? any thoughts on this?

postie23 (postie23), Sunday, 7 January 2007 18:19 (seventeen years ago) link

four years pass...

Quick, what's on the turntable RIGHT NOW?

(Chris & Cosey - Take Five EP)

sleeve sandbox, Monday, 28 November 2011 15:49 (twelve years ago) link

Last time of playing, it was "Station to Station" DavidBowie, followed by "The 900 number" Mark the 45 king.

Ou est la showaddywaddy (MarkG oo la showaddywaddy), Monday, 28 November 2011 15:56 (twelve years ago) link

hey this is actually a pretty interesting thread to read through, not all of our predictions played out in the intervening five years!

sleeve sandbox, Monday, 28 November 2011 16:01 (twelve years ago) link

Last vinyl I played was Brian Eno Music for Airports.

o. nate, Tuesday, 29 November 2011 22:01 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.