http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19910
In particular, John Patrick Diggins, a well-regarded intellectual historian from the CUNY Graduate Center comes to the conclusion that Reagan, far from being a conservative, was actually an Emersonian radical optimist and "the great liberating spirit of modern American history". The review's author, Russell Baker, muses that, "Apparently Democrats and his old intellectual and liberal critics needed to experience the autocratic and bellicose Bush before they could see what a prize statesman the nation once had in Reagan." Will Reagan eventually rank with the top few widely acclaimed Presidents in American history?
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:15 (seventeen years ago) link
― akm (akmonday), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:15 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:16 (seventeen years ago) link
What next? "Actually, Margaret Thatcher wasn't so bad after all, no really..."
― masonic boom (kate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:16 (seventeen years ago) link
haha. "You know, based on that Caligula guy, you now have to admit that Nero was quite the astute and great leader"
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― TOMB07 (trm), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― TOMB07 (trm), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― Nu-Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:19 (seventeen years ago) link
That's true that he has always been very popular with the general public. However, respect from "historians" is a different thing - though perhaps not uncorrelated. That review discusses many original and interesting points that Diggins makes - such as contrasting Reagan's Emersonian spirituality with the Puritan sternness that had gone before him (and that continues on to some degree in Bush).
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:21 (seventeen years ago) link
Well, to be sure, Diggins goes a lot further than favorably comparing him to Bush. In fact he favorably compares him to just about every American 20th century President, save FDR and possibly Truman.
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:23 (seventeen years ago) link
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:25 (seventeen years ago) link
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:26 (seventeen years ago) link
Claimed it a wonderful way to take his mind off the war.
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:27 (seventeen years ago) link
Does anyone have a link to that chart showing logarithmic death tolls for various conflicts?
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:27 (seventeen years ago) link
http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/ICPSR-STUDY/05407.xml
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:28 (seventeen years ago) link
It's arguable whether or not the war against Japan was already won - what remained was possibly the most difficult part of all - the invasion of the mainland.
And the sleep habits of a President are neither here nor there in any serious evaluation of historical legacy.
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:29 (seventeen years ago) link
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― bliss (blass), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:31 (seventeen years ago) link
xpost
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:31 (seventeen years ago) link
- from the article
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:33 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.bhopal.net/opinions/archives/rumsfeld-hussein.jpghttp://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40610000/jpg/_40610506_050610hussein203b.jpg
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:37 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.colombiajournal.org/Para7%20copy.JPG
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:37 (seventeen years ago) link
Unclear but its clear that the pendulum is swinging back but with the control being less overt.
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:38 (seventeen years ago) link
Didn't the Reagan rehab start with the publication of his radio addresses and speeches a few years ago?
Actually, a recent New Yorker article argues that Putin ain't hidin' anything.
― Alfred Soto (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:39 (seventeen years ago) link
A carefully constructed myth.
http://www.counterpunch.org/mickey08042004.html
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:40 (seventeen years ago) link
― chicago kevin is back in a new york groove (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:41 (seventeen years ago) link
I read the New Yorker too.
― jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alfred Soto (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:43 (seventeen years ago) link