This Life +10 C/D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Much better than I thought it was going to be. Yourselves?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 22:34 (seventeen years ago) link

I gave up after 20 minutes.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 22:49 (seventeen years ago) link

I heard some of it from the kitchen. There was a lot of unsuitable language.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 22:55 (seventeen years ago) link

was that MEANT to be so rubbish?? surely intentional. if so: classic

rslvd (rslvd), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 23:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Terrible - such a waste of an opportunity.

Bob Six (Bob Six), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 23:46 (seventeen years ago) link

All that "oh no something really dramatically tragic has happened...oh wait no it hasn't" was like the baby turning up on the doorstep at the start of the Father Ted Xmas Special x 1,000,000,000.

Venga1 (Venga1), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 23:49 (seventeen years ago) link

I WANT SOME SPERM

rslvd (rslvd), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:13 (seventeen years ago) link

Some nice bits in it, but overall pretty unsatisfying. Needed more Kira.

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Wish I'd watched the Iannucci interview on BBC4 instead.

Venga1 (Venga1), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:20 (seventeen years ago) link

heh. i was totally expecting kira and joe to turn up in the very final scene (possibly) with a small baby in situ, and kira saying "wotcha - what've we missed then?" or something.

i had to watch the whole thing, even if it'd been awful - but i thought they actually made a decent fist of it. shite cop-out ending but still entirely believable in terms of what the characters would probably be doing now, and i'd completely forgotten what it was like to watch a tv show where people actually talk how people actually talk.

and then i watched the thick of it straight afterwards and remembered. and now, shaun of the dead. a great night's telly, surely!

CharlieNo4 (CharlieNo4), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago) link

Milly and Egg are still completely unconvincing as a couple. The ending was ridiculous. Actually the whole "fly-on-the-wall" thing was ridiculous. It remained reassuringly like This Life (in terms of the characters being as you would expect), but managed to still be a bit crap.

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:31 (seventeen years ago) link

(unlike Shaun of the Dead, which is still great)

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:32 (seventeen years ago) link

shocker in supposed successful miles being all broke and unhappy though, a pretty cliched story twist to say the least.
still i watched and enjoyed it.
shame re that BBQ scene with manics soundtracking, the alcohol induced throwing shapes was just a little too close to home for comfort...

mark e (mark e), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:50 (seventeen years ago) link

that was absolute drivel. and - curses, CURSES - because we taped it and have just finished watching now, i've missed "the thick of it".

heh. i was totally expecting kira and joe to turn up in the very final scene (possibly) with a small baby in situ, and kira saying "wotcha - what've we missed then?" or something

this is funnier, and a far better concept, than anything in that entire misfire of a drama.

i mean ... what actually HAPPENED in the intervening decade? miles made money, egg wrote a book, milly quit her job ... but nobody, nobody at all, changed? not even in the slightest? they all remained, at heart, the same fuck-ups they were in their mid/late twenties? ALL of them? talk about a cop-out; here was a chance to really have some fun with the characters, really develop them, and they just fell straight back in to the same old ruts. for the love of god, tell me nobody actually identified with these ... i dunno, ciphers.

and i mean ... what actually HAPPENED in the course of that entire 80 minutes? other than a series of poorly implemented set-pieces (the baby-alarm argument being fist-in-mouth, eye-popping contrivance of the cheesiest kind) and a whole lot of desperate clutching at false climaxes, so much so that by about halfway through i was desperate for it to end.

(and mrs fiendish has just reminded me about the iraq/4x4 argument, which looked like it had fallen in from another script entirely.)

i did watch it all, mind. just like i'll watch that sodding "green wing" special too. at least that might have the odd joke in it :)

drivel. spunk. a travesty. what a shame.

grimly fiendish (simon), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:55 (seventeen years ago) link

(and mrs fiendish has just reminded me about the iraq/4x4 argument, which looked like it had fallen in from another script entirely.)

yeah, i already forgot that part ( the brain is dumping this type of bad shit sooo quickly these days) that was indeed dreadful, really dreadful.

mark e (mark e), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 00:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh, God, yeah, I'd wiped that from my brain already too.

(Thick of It on again RIGHT NOW just starting on BBC4, Grimly)

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 01:04 (seventeen years ago) link

rats' cocks. missed the first 10 minutes (was busy on the "choose your own adventure" thread). fuck it, that's what torrntz are for, innit?

grimly fiendish (simon), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 01:12 (seventeen years ago) link

dire

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 08:57 (seventeen years ago) link

matt how low were yr expectations exactly??!!

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 08:59 (seventeen years ago) link

grimly fiendish describes it perfectly.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 09:11 (seventeen years ago) link

there were what? THREE "omg people gonna die" moments: milly, oscar, and warren, just to amp things up unnecessarily. the one solid laugh i had is when they put on 'protection'.

i didn't even understand the miles/anna bit at the end.

for an example of how it can be done, see 'before sunset'.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 09:22 (seventeen years ago) link

Or Perfect Day: The Funeral!

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 09:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I do think the problem is that the creator, Amy Jenkins, shouldn't be allowed to write scripts. This Life episodes were always better when someone else wrote them.

The whole idea of going to a ludicrous country house and 'fly on the wall' documentary was poor to begin with. What might have been more interesting would be to mix up the reunion with excepts of their separate lifes, so you'd get to see the difference between how they present themselves in a group and what really happened to them.

Worst moment: some many to choose from, but the bailiffs arriving was so cringeworthy. The ending was pathetic.

Ferdi did well to miss it. And what happened to Milly's looks?

Bob Six (Bob Six), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 09:49 (seventeen years ago) link

milly was looking the best of all of them.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 09:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Only important question: Was Mrs Dr C in it?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 09:51 (seventeen years ago) link

My expectations were very low indeed.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I thought Milly's face was somehow a lot less punchable than it used to be.

NB. I don't actually hit women. Or men.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:18 (seventeen years ago) link

It was crap really. The docu-device was ridiculous, as was Tony Garnett's explanation in the following 'That Life' that it was 'a nod to the developments in television in the past 10 years'. Great drama doesn't NEED to pay heed to the medium, it just IS.

Anyway - some of the individual performances were good. Warren was great as his new-age control freak facade cracked. Anna was great, but exactly in the same way that she was great originally - you might have hoped for a more complexity there. The 'I want a baby' thing didn't really cut it. Maybe that's what a career cloistered in the law does for you. Milly and Egg, I think, ARE believeable as a couple, but not all that interesting. (By the way, whoever said that Amita has lost her looks is nuts, she's still hot. Anna's hair was disappointing though).

Grimly said **all remained, at heart, the same fuck-ups they were in their mid/late twenties?**

I don't know many people who aren't. I mean we may accumulate money, have kids, travel, have 'careers', but we're still the same. Anyway, bringing them back together was always going to make them revert to type anyway. They all have their roles within the group, and the natural thing is for them to fall into this roles. Warren was interesting in that he seemed to be trying to establish himself as a 'new' Warren, but couldn't hack it.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:22 (seventeen years ago) link

Or Perfect Day: The Funeral!

-- Alba

OTM*. Perfect Day meant that This Life +10 was unnecessary.

*Perfect Day: The Millennium was maybe closer - group of 30 something former Uni pals reunite in remote rural house for a few days and old tensions and passions are resurrected yada yada.

Onimo drank ALL the wine! (nu_onimo), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Miles seemed notably more stupid/cut-off-from-reality than he used to be, in the bit I saw.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:25 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, he used to be a but of a privileged prick who knew he was a privileged prick and wound people up by not caring, but now, with all this "do any of you ride?" thing, he did seem totally self-unaware. So, I guess that's a change, I guess. It seemed bad and unrealistic to me, though, so I guess I agree with Dr C.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:27 (seventeen years ago) link

Come on, 'This Life' was always kind of naff and awkward to begin with.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:31 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post to PJM : no she wasn't, of course. But should have been, oh yes.

I forgot Miles - I like JD, he can act for sure. I thought the Anna-Miles moment were well acted, but v. badly scripted.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:33 (seventeen years ago) link

I was gonna draw a comic strip of the whole thing, but gave up on this idea after 10 minutes. I left out Warren, sorry Warren.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v210/jel2004/thislifeplusten.jpg

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:34 (seventeen years ago) link

it had comic potential with the miles thing but that would have been another show. i suppose it was a comment on JD being a big-shot, relatively speaking, now.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:38 (seventeen years ago) link

The 'I want a baby' thing didn't really cut it.

I laughed a lot at "I want sperm without strings!"

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 11:18 (seventeen years ago) link

The knee-jerk negativity on this thread is of course entirely predictable. What you all really want is your youth back! I thought in spite of everything it was pretty great, as good as we had any right to expect. There were some flaws (I thought the characters had become slight caricatures of themselves, especially Miles and Warren) and bits of the plot were rather implausible. Personally I’m glad it didn’t seek to tie up loose ends but merely suggested that people don’t really change and have the same problems as they grow older, just with less hope of ever resolving them. Both of the new characters (Miles’ Chinese wife and the film-maker) were a bit one-dimensional. But any lingering disappointment is purely down to absurdly inflated expectations over a decade which has witnessed countless pale and witless imitations, all failing to capture that elusive Zeitgeisty appeal.

Darren Lee (WRONG ANGLE), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 11:36 (seventeen years ago) link

This Life is one of those rare things where most imitations seem to be better than the original.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 11:39 (seventeen years ago) link

as good as we had any right to expect.

don't understand this formulation. you have a right to expect that, for example, the bbc won't greenlight a script as bad as this script was. that's not an 'absurdly inflated expectation'!

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 11:52 (seventeen years ago) link

But any lingering disappointment is purely down to absurdly inflated expectations over a decade which has witnessed countless pale and witless imitations, all failing to capture that elusive Zeitgeisty appeal.

Not true. It was a poor script.

Bob Six (Bob Six), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 11:55 (seventeen years ago) link

Excellent work, Jel. Who is the "zzzzzz" person?

BBC do loads of bad scripts all the time.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 11:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I lost interest due to lack of madly shaking, whizzing drunken camera moves, and turned over to watch Armando + Thick of It.

DavidM (DavidM), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:14 (seventeen years ago) link

i was sort of glad they kept to the mid-nineties shaky-cam, it was at least true to itself in that way.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:17 (seventeen years ago) link

It was deeply contrived and stupid for a lot of utterly transparent reasons, but come on, it's not supposed to the Rules of the Game, there were a few amusing lines and it was pefectly enjoyable telly. I mean, of course The Thick of It kicked its arse, but who would have expected otherwise?

(Also -- and you'll have to trust me on this -- having worked as a repertory theatre reviewer for the past half-decade, the script really wasn't that bad. I've seen a lot fucking worse.)

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:24 (seventeen years ago) link

probably because even the revived 'cracker' was less crass, the miles/egg 'it was about OIL' bit was when i mentally switched over.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Revived House of Eliot next please.

Dom Passantino (DomPassantino), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:33 (seventeen years ago) link

'on the up + 10'

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:35 (seventeen years ago) link

But that's the point -- it was always crass, and the dialogue always kinda half-sucked. In that sense, I was impressed by how much it seemed like business as usual, pat ending notwithstanding.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Whatever Happened To Ally Mc Beal?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 12:46 (seventeen years ago) link

On The Up +10 would be fucking ace - Mrs Wembley almost rebuilt, etc.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 13:06 (seventeen years ago) link

This Life is one of those rare things where most imitations seem to be better than the original.

such as? NyLon? C'mon now!

I'm not even sure my actual life is better than This Life was - not that I was imitating it, but...y'know.

House Of Elliot +100 please! Um, hold on, that might not work in exactly the way I meant it.

CharlieNo4 (CharlieNo4), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I think Secret Life Of Us, Perfect Day, even Cold Feet if that counts were all more entertaining than This Life. Metrosexuality, possibly, was not.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 13:17 (seventeen years ago) link

it was ace to have them back. didn't like the contrived fly-on-wall-reunion idea, would have much preferred an actual "window opening on their lives and then closing again" or whatever wotsit said it was meant to be. god though, i'd forgotten how unpleasant they can all be. milly + ten years of BITTERNESS, wow!

emsk ( emsk ), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 13:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh, and they should totally bring back NY-LON.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 13:24 (seventeen years ago) link

This Life is just a Get On Board With The Double Deckers rip-off anyway.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 13:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Double-Deckers! Peter Firth, Brinsley Forde and......Melvyn Hayes!

Did Matt DC say why he thought TL was 'better than expected'? I think we must be told.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:01 (seventeen years ago) link

it was GOOD because it was the SAME.

i also laffed at the "protection" bit...

CarsmileSteve (Carsmile Steve), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:08 (seventeen years ago) link

The Kaiser Cheese joke was cute.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:14 (seventeen years ago) link

wasn't egg saying he hadn't heard of them? he later played 'i predict a riot', i think.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:16 (seventeen years ago) link

i also laffed at the "protection" bit...

yes! and when anna was playing drugstore just before it, but on an I-POD ooh didn't 'ave them back in teh day eh?

emsk ( emsk ), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:17 (seventeen years ago) link

haha we commented on exactly that moment too, emsk! "ooh, Old Music on a New Machine, straddling the years, DO YOU SEE?" etc...

CharlieNo4 (CharlieNo4), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:52 (seventeen years ago) link

It was Miles who hadn't heard of teh Kaiser Cheeses, so I presume that Egg had brought his own music for "look, it's just like me in our old flat in 1996 but with NEW MUSIC, DO YOU SEE?" purposes. (also look, they're taking coke but they aren't lawyers any more, ho ho)

Why was Egg's name spelt Edgar Cooke on the book when it's been Edgar Cook elsewhere (including on the documentary afterwards). Also how can someone so ridiculously inarticulate and unable to comprehend any emotions past "I love you Milly, nearly as much as I love Man Utd" possibly have written such a successful and critically-acclaimed* novel?

* presume that shitey books don't often get launched at the British Library by Mark Lawson

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 14:57 (seventeen years ago) link

There has just been a discussion of it in my office. I won't bore you with the details. Glad I couldn't join in really.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:06 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes I noticed Cook/Cooke. Maybe a nom-de-plume?

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:09 (seventeen years ago) link

The improbability of a "me and my mates living in the mid-90s" novel (with that kind of cover) being launched at the British Library by Mark Lawson was an early warning signal, I think.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:11 (seventeen years ago) link

vying for likelihood with miles becoming a hotel millionaire with a (vile) country house (erm whose large and possibly multuinational business apparently puts his own private assets at risk of bailiffs who visit at two in the morning...).

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:13 (seventeen years ago) link

I wonder what the characters from Game On are doing now?

DavidM (DavidM), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Miles was left the vile house off his Dad, wasn't he?

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:15 (seventeen years ago) link

I wonder what happened to Francesca?

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, a shit rom-com novel could never get popular. The whole scenario was bascially science fiction, wasn't it?

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:23 (seventeen years ago) link

the british library isn't much of a 'popular rom-com' kind of gaff.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:24 (seventeen years ago) link

It was the level of popular (British Library / fly-on-the-wall documentary/ cover of every paper ever) that was ridiculous.

Egg = Amy Jenkins (in her dreams), yes?

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:27 (seventeen years ago) link

But it's a fictional show that was never remotely plausible in the first place, so does that -- you know -- matter?

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:31 (seventeen years ago) link

How was it "never remotely plausible in the first place"?

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:33 (seventeen years ago) link

But it sold itself on its plausibliity on being an uncensored, naturalistic slice of the lives of 20-somethings in modern Britain. It thrusting that in your face was what was so annoying about it in the first place, to anyone with a "don't tell me what my life is like" bone in their body.

x-post

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:37 (seventeen years ago) link

(It never told me what my life was like, it just made me bloody glad it wasn't like that)

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I dunno, Egg quitting law to run a cafe? Anna taking an E and shagging her flatmate's dad? If they burst into song occasionally, it could be Ally McBeal.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I've *never* chucked in a job to try and do something different. I've *never* shagged someone I shouldn't done. oh fuck, they *are* like me.

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

shagged someone I shouldn't done

Yes, but your flatmate's dad?

Onimo drank ALL the wine! (nu_onimo), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I don't really see how those two things are so odd either.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:44 (seventeen years ago) link

stranger things have happened. but miles' wealth was pushing it, partly because it was unexplained.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I thought he inherited it too.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:47 (seventeen years ago) link

Ha, once again, I guess everyone's life is much more exciting then mine.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:47 (seventeen years ago) link

miles inherited some money (i surmise) but he's also rich from being a hotel 'magnate' or something.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:51 (seventeen years ago) link

magnates don't have hair like that.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:19 (seventeen years ago) link

The knee-jerk negativity on this thread is of course entirely predictable. What you all really want is your youth back!

no, what we all wanted was a decent programme!

grimly fiendish (simon), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:23 (seventeen years ago) link

Surely inherited lots of money* then became very poor again by being a shit hotel magnate?

Didn't he say his hotel chain was called "Hobotel"? Who the fuck would want to stay in something called "Hobotel"?! (actually, I'm guessing no-one, hence appearance of rubbish night-time bailiffs with an eye for antique chairs)


* Rich Dad, plus rich ex-wife (the latter either big ol' divorce settlement or big ol' life insurance policy, depending on what happened to Francesca).

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:27 (seventeen years ago) link

Did no one, implausibilities aside, find it, y'know, fun?

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, it was.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Fly-on-the-wall camera chick pointing out that it was no fun watching a bunch of cunts was the highlight, and was OTM.

onimo (nu_onimo), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link

the whole anti-fly-on-the-wall thing was very early 00s and while an interesting theme the 'non-involvement/involvement' thing with the girl belonged elsewhere and wasn't well done anyway.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:46 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post But you still watched it?

Dr.C (Dr.C), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:46 (seventeen years ago) link

It was ridiculously This-Life-by-numbers

1) Egg is happiest when cooking, but still has no idea how to deal with his girlfriend (and now son)
2) Warren has "issues"
3) Anna is "complex"
4) Milly is neurotic
5) Miles is a twat

Give them all (Anna excepted) implausible careers, add an "edgy" (except it wasn't) "zeitgest-friendly" (except it wasn't) plot device (which didn't really work anyway since so much took place away from the reality TV lassie) and, hurrah, you have a cobbled-together-in-minutes TV show and Amy Jenkins is a bit more rich.

(I liked some of the nods to the old series, and some of the one-liners were nice, and the cast all fell back into character very quickly. But it was exceptionally unsatisfying)

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:47 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes sometimes people watch crap telly.

xpost

onimo (nu_onimo), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, no-one has roffled at Warren's website yet?

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 16:48 (seventeen years ago) link

i liked the two of them in the audience for book launch thing. had potential. the rest of it seemed to be pointless argument after pointless argument.

i also liked camera girl's accent. and the one scene where she started recording warren taking overdose and which relied on you knowing the significance of an out of focus red led.

how long has cocaine come in little glass bottles? i'm out of touch with my druglord friends obv.

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 18:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Phials.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 4 January 2007 08:40 (seventeen years ago) link

no, but thanks for caring.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Thursday, 4 January 2007 08:54 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.