Inbreeding: still bad.

it's "polyandry" when there are multiple husbands, I believe. Personal experience only shows some overlap between pagans and polys.

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/4306/rr0040kissingcousinspostersdf1.jpg

ps the brunette was HAWWT

Allow 3 generations per century (generous that, I reckon), and keep working backwards. 10 centuries = 2 to the power 30 = 1,073,741,824 direct ancestors. Which I'm almost certain is a higher number than the total population of Earth in 1000 AD.

Which seems to lead to the conclusion that an ENORMOUS amount of inbreeding must have been going on, or there's a big hole in my logic that I haven't figured out yet.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2395516&page=1

Cousins who fall in love have a right to voice concerns. After all, marrying a cousin just isn't done, right?

At least that's what we're taught to believe. Only primitive people who live in isolated places marry cousins, and it's dangerous and leads to creating stupid children.

Or does it? A new study reveals the genetic risks associated with this type of pairing are not as great as once believed.

And consider this — Albert Einstein's parents were cousins, and he married his cousin, too.

FDR and Eleanor Roosevelt were second cousins, so were Prince Albert and Queen Victoria and former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was briefly married to a second cousin.

In America, marrying your cousin is legal in 25 states and every year about 200,000 cousins wed.

Worldwide, it's much more common. Twenty percent of all married couples are cousins. In some Middle Eastern countries, almost half of all marriages are to cousins...