american apparel sells out

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
December 18, 2006
American Apparel to Be Sold to Investment Firm
By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN and MICHAEL BARBARO

American Apparel, the casual clothing chain whose socially-conscious manufacturing, sexually-charged advertising and snug-fitting T-shirts have generated a cult-like following, will be sold to a little-known investment firm for $382.5 million, according to people briefed on the matter.

The decision to sell the privately held company, expected to be announced tomorrow, is a surprise move by the company’s eccentric founder, Dov Charney, who is known for exercising strict, and at times controversial, control over the retailer’s operations.

Mr. Charney has personally photographed many of the semi-naked women featured in American Apparel advertising and is known for hiring employees, most of them female, on the spot during phone calls or at parties.

American Apparel’s buyer, Endeavor Acquisition Corporation, is a small, publicly traded investment group created last year, with less than $125 million in assets. American Apparel is the firm’s first acquisition.. Endeavor Acquisition was founded as a specified purpose acquisition company by Jonathan J. Ledecky, a serial acquirer who started U.S. Office Products in 1994 and turned it into a Fortune 500 company.

Mr. Charney, 37, will remain chief executive after the sale, according to people with direct knowledge of the deal, who discussed the transaction on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

American Apparel, founded three years ago in Los Angeles, has become an overnight retail sensation, with 145 stores in the United States and Gap-like ubiquity in Los Angeles and in New York City, where its has outlets in 23 neighborhoods.

But its sales growth has slowed significantly in the past year. Revenue at stores open at least a year — a crucial measure in retailing — rose only 7 percent in 2006, compared with 74 percent in 2004 and 45 percent in 2005, according to documents prepared by Endeavor and obtained by The New York Times.

Still, Endeavor predicted in those documents that American Apparel could reach 800 stores worldwide, which would make it as large as established retail brands like Abercrombie & Fitch and American Eagle Outfitters.

Under the terms of the deal, Endeavor is valuing American Apparel at $382.5 million, people involved in the deal said. Endeavor will pay about $250 million in restricted stock; assume $110 million debt; and pay out $23 million in bonuses, restricted stock and stock options to key employees. Endeavor will be paying about 12.7 times earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation, known as ebitda, on American Apparel’s $30 million in earnings. The company’s earnings are expected to grow to $50 million next year.

At the heart of American Apparel are two threads: a high-minded business model that requires clothes to be made in the United States at double the minimum wage, and a retro-chic that glamorizes the T-shirt-and-jeans simplicity of the 1970s and ’80s.

All of the clothing sold at the chain is manufactured at a factory in downtown Los Angeles, rather than in Asia, where the vast majority of its competitors’ goods are churned out. American Apparel provides its employees with subsidized health care and meals and with free English classes.

The company’s progressive message has won over thousands of young urbanites — Mr. Charney refers to them as “Young Metropolitan Adults” — who flock to the chain for bright-colored T-shirts, leggings and underwear. American Apparel is expected to sell $275 million worth of them in 2006.

But as American Apparel has expanded, its founder, Mr. Charney, has been dogged by accusations of sexual harassment and a bizarre management style that could make it harder for him to operate within the traditional boundaries of a publicly traded company.

Mr. Charney has gained a reputation as the Hugh Hefner of retailing, decorating his stores with covers of Penthouse magazine and acknowledging in interviews that he sleeps with employees. In lawsuits filed in 2005, several employees accused Mr. Charney of creating a work environment in which women did not feel safe.

They asserted, for example, that Mr. Charney conducted job interviews in his underwear, and that he gave vibrators to at least one female worker.

Mr. Charney has denied any wrongdoing.

Still, as a result of the lawsuits, American Apparel employees must now sign a document that declares: “American Apparel is in the business of designing and manufacturing sexually charged T-shirts and intimate apparel, and uses sexually charged visual and oral communications in its marketing and sales activity.”

In an interview with The New York Times Magazine earlier this year, Mr. Charney said of himself: “It’s fun to say, ‘He’s wild and crazy,’ but I’m not wild and crazy. This is the way the adult generation is going to live. They’re not preoccupied by monogamy. Exciting things can happen.”

He continued: “They’re mobile; they can travel; they’re willing to take chances; they’re open-minded and ready for change. That’s what the boomers presented for America, and that’s what this new generation presents for us. I want to be in business with them.”

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:00 (seventeen years ago) link

lemme guess -- did he sell to the dudes who own "vice" magazine?!?

Eisbär (Eisbär), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:02 (seventeen years ago) link

why don't you read the damn article, dummy?

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:04 (seventeen years ago) link

Latin American Apparel

Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:14 (seventeen years ago) link

ugh, i predicted that it would be another year before they sold out to the Gap or something because AA has absolutely no money.

C4rey (Carey), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:17 (seventeen years ago) link

They're getting no more money from me, at any rate.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Not for any reason other than that there are these Lebanese guys down the street that sell the same shit for about 1/4 of the price.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:38 (seventeen years ago) link

but
"same shit" @ 1/4 the price == made by chinese kids
no?

walterkranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:52 (seventeen years ago) link

I know that and it saddens me. At the same time, I ain't rich, and I tend to act like any other consumer.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:58 (seventeen years ago) link

ESPECIALLY when it comes to buying a $60 hoodie.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:59 (seventeen years ago) link

That guy sounds like an infected choad.

a bulldog fed a cookie shaped like a kitten (austin), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:03 (seventeen years ago) link

At least try to be a responsible consumer though. I mean, those hot indie models aren't going to sexually harass themselves now are they? Surely you can spare a few extra dollars to support Dov's house of "exciting things."

walterkranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:05 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, those hot indie models aren't going to sexually harass themselves now are they?

lolz

All of my extra dollars tend to go toward more expensive, more responsible food. You have to pick yer battles.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:06 (seventeen years ago) link

$60 leg of grass-fed lamb -- no problem.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:09 (seventeen years ago) link

I'd sort of rather buy socially irresponsible clothes than give Dov Charney money.

31g (31g), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:24 (seventeen years ago) link

That's some kind of meta-liberal-guilt talking.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah cuz I'm sure in the fields of fashion design, photography and garment manufacturing there are none sleazier than Dov Charney.

walterkranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:33 (seventeen years ago) link

what makes AA socially responsible?

nuneb (nuneb), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:37 (seventeen years ago) link

Question that deserves its own thread.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Read the article.

crunkleJ (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:44 (seventeen years ago) link

I did. What's your point?

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:48 (seventeen years ago) link

about as deep as you can get:

http://www.knowmore.org/index.php/American_Apparel%2C_LLC

grady (grady), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:52 (seventeen years ago) link

if you want a cheap shitty hoody just go to a salvation army

deej (deej), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, you answered nuneb's question, anyway.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:55 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:55 (seventeen years ago) link

My point was only that the article answers questions about what makes people think of AA as socially responsible. That was an xpost. xpost.

crunkleJ (crunkleJ), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 03:56 (seventeen years ago) link

"Women initiate most domestic violence."

lol, what a douchetard. makes klosterfuck look like a goddamn nobel prize winner.

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:03 (seventeen years ago) link

I understand very well "what makes people think of AA as socially responsible." But that wasn't the question I asked, which was "what makes AA socially responsible?"

nuneb (nuneb), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:20 (seventeen years ago) link

My point was only that the article answers questions about what makes people think of AA as socially responsible.

Yeah, but that's something that none of us really believe, so I'm confused about how you thought that etc etc

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:20 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost exactly

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:20 (seventeen years ago) link

i really hope this guy (on the right) ends up in an ad campaign

http://www.washingtonlife.com/backissues/archives/01oct/photos/opera06.jpg

nuneb (nuneb), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:25 (seventeen years ago) link

hey, he dated Ann Coulter!

nuneb (nuneb), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:27 (seventeen years ago) link

Pitchfork loses 25% of advertising revenue; Film at 11.

editio princeps (pato.g27), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:44 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.clamormagazine.org/issues/38/aa/straub.php

nuneb (nuneb), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:44 (seventeen years ago) link

about as deep as you can get:

http://www.knowmore.org/index.php/American_Apparel%2C_LLC

Thank you very much for posting that -- it's an extremely interesting and, from what I can tell, fairly even-handed read. Anyone posting on this thread would do well to go read it first.

lurker #2421 (lurker #2421.1), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 05:18 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost - I think I like the Knowmore article better, the editorializing in the Clamor article comes off very poorly in the wake of having read the first one.

lurker #2421 (lurker #2421.1), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 05:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Thank God for you.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 05:21 (seventeen years ago) link

?

lurker #2421 (lurker #2421.1), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 05:22 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm sorry. Did you sense sarcasm in my post? I didn't mean it at all.

whoop de doodle (kenan), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 05:25 (seventeen years ago) link

This thread is like the movie Lost Highway.

AA did well to sell since they were so close to going under anyway.

C4rey (Carey), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 07:33 (seventeen years ago) link

this thread has a promising mundanity:civility ratio

step hen faps (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 07:50 (seventeen years ago) link

and its approved:

Endeavor to buy American Apparel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Endeavor Acquisition Corp.
said Tuesday it planned to acquire American Apparel
Inc., the largest T-shirt manufacturer in the United States, in
a deal valued at about $244 million.
American will get 32.3 million Endeavor shares, and
Endeavor will assume up to $110 million in debt.
The combined company will operate as American Apparel.
Plans call for it to trade publicly on the American Stock
Exchange or another national stock exchange.
American Chief Executive Dov Charney, who founded the
company, will remain in that position.

Confounded (Confounded), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 12:24 (seventeen years ago) link

will they continue to operate out of LA the way they have been? If they go back on their stated purpose, won't the backlash kill them?

akm (akmonday), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 13:56 (seventeen years ago) link

er uh i guess the answer to your question depends on if there's anybody left in the world that thinks dov charney is "credible," and i'd guess that'd be a big resounding "no." they've already backed off the "sweatshop free" slogan for some time.

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 16:20 (seventeen years ago) link

I assume this "selling out" will not involve throwing away what the capital just paid for

TOM. BOT. (trm), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 16:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Sarah Dahnke to thread.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 16:28 (seventeen years ago) link

The next logical move is vertically integrated pornography

sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

they've backed off on the "slogan", but according to linked sources above...the factory is far from a sweatshop.

dan selzer (dan selzer), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 16:32 (seventeen years ago) link

ok though seriously do people still believe shit like this? From the Straub article:

"On the other hand, high-wage skilled workers have frequently been at the forefront of the unionization of their industries."

Immediately after this he throws out a comparison to FORD EMPLOYEES IN THE 1920s. HOW APT, HOW RELEVANT.

I really don't give a flying fuck about Charney, as someone pointed out, he's not exactly the first sleazebag in the fashion business and he's definitely not the first sleazebag to have his business bailed out by crazy venture capital sluts.

TOM. BOT. (trm), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 16:32 (seventeen years ago) link

sexyDancer, wouldn't that be more, uh, "horizontal" dude?

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 16:33 (seventeen years ago) link

not judging by their recent round of print ads

sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 16:42 (seventeen years ago) link

not sure you got my joke there, dude.

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

laffs, etc

sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 17:25 (seventeen years ago) link

well, that knowmore.org article was long, but a really great read. i haven't bothered reading any of the press on AA before, and that was a great catching up.

hm (modestmickey), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

was that joke about actual horizontal integration, layout, or the position of models? who nose!

jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 17:54 (seventeen years ago) link

WHO NOSE:
http://www.votejoegarden.com/PeteTownshend.jpg

jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 17:54 (seventeen years ago) link

IT WAS ABOUT HORIZONTAL PUSHUPS, DUH

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 17:55 (seventeen years ago) link

anyone see the dateline (or 60 mins or whatev) about AA/charney? his voice is like ps hoffman's capote. really really jarring.

urghonomic (gcannon), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 18:08 (seventeen years ago) link

did he masturbate in front of Barbara Walters?

grady (grady), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 18:16 (seventeen years ago) link

KUDOS

jw (ex machina), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 22:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Jesus, for a guy who makes a big deal out of approving the physical appearance of all of his employees ("even stock room workers"!), he is one ugly motherfucker. Take away the schticky Rollie Fingers 'stache and you've got an elderly simian rape hobo staring at you.

Tiki Theater Xymposium (Tiki Theater Xymposium), Thursday, 21 December 2006 00:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I think the 'stache adds to the creep factor. Like the only way I'd want to see him in his undies was: if he had a Burt Ward non-package, to observe that it was comically small. Only briefly, followed by an eyeball douche, then never again.

Abbott (Abbott), Thursday, 21 December 2006 02:31 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.