In Twist on Tuition Game, Popularity Rises With Price

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
"The other students receive a bigger subsidy: on average, aid totaling more than $28,500, most of it from the college itself. (Swarthmore limits its aid to students with financial need, but that can mean those from families earning $150,000 a year if, for instance, there are circumstances like having multiple children in college.)"

Our national educational priorities are not fucked up at all.

milo (milo), Tuesday, 12 December 2006 06:00 (seventeen years ago) link

early in 2000 the board voted to raise tuition and fees 17.6 percent, to $23,460 (and to include a laptop for every incoming student to help soften the blow). Then it waited to see what would happen.

Ursinus received nearly 200 more applications than the year before. Within four years the size of the freshman class had risen 35 percent, to 454 students. Applicants had apparently concluded that if the college cost more, it must be better.

yeah, that doesn't exactly track the general swelling of the college applicant pool due to the baby boomers' kids coming of age or anything

With the race for rankings and choice students shaping college pricing, the University of Notre Dame, Bryn Mawr College, Rice University, the University of Richmond and Hendrix College, in Conway, Ark., are just a few that have sharply increased tuition to match colleges they consider their rivals, while also providing more financial assistance.

yes, and what they had in mind was bumping up their test scores a notch with a marginal increase in sticker price for the blingbling generation, not, you know, hiring better faculty or getting better food in the dining hall or anything. it's not like any of those schools are seriously underrated as compared to their peers.

and while i'm being pissy, is there a more annoying word in the entire universe than "academe"?

nuneb (nuneb), Tuesday, 12 December 2006 06:36 (seventeen years ago) link

So the more money we'd ask for guess papers, the more successful we'd be?

StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 12 December 2006 08:34 (seventeen years ago) link

As George Somerby so persuasively argues, there is no subject about which reporters routinely take leave of every scrap of logic they might possess that can compare with education, whether lower or higher or somewhere inbetween.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 12 December 2006 12:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I kind of can't believe this is a news story; I thought everyone knew this already?

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Tuesday, 12 December 2006 13:20 (seventeen years ago) link

It's like Piano Tuition, for example.

One teacher charges £18
The other charges £20

Who'd be tempted to go to T2, to see "why are you £2 better?"

M Grout (Mark Grout), Tuesday, 12 December 2006 13:25 (seventeen years ago) link

i think it's cyclical

friday on the porch (lfam), Wednesday, 13 December 2006 04:25 (seventeen years ago) link

like, people start applying to 15 schools, and thus don't have time to do adequate research, and so use tuition as a general indicator of quality, schools wise up, eventually applicants wise up, and schools start lowering tuition (or at least lowering the rate of tuition increases), and repeat

friday on the porch (lfam), Wednesday, 13 December 2006 04:27 (seventeen years ago) link

Well who the hell wants to go to school with poor kids when you could be getting drunk and knocking up rich ones

TOM. BOT. (trm), Wednesday, 13 December 2006 12:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Fuck going to a cheap college, then you can't complain as much when you get a D

TOM. BOT. (trm), Wednesday, 13 December 2006 12:57 (seventeen years ago) link

haha yesss the "i pay soooo much to go here, why can't i [get away with x]?" routine

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 13 December 2006 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.