Temporary Pynchon Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm jonesing for some conversation on ATD (almost thru it now -- up to pp. 750 or so). I even resubscribed to the dreaded pynchon-list to try to get my fix. Maybe things will look up when the group-read starts next Jan but in the meantime its all codes this and that and ooh a "symbol" that appeared in a previous p novel, and complaining about bad reviews (and not particularly well either) and etc.

Its not a code, its not a cypher, its not a mystic text, and there's no "secret" book inside it. Its a novel. A long, good, novel. Not a long, fancy, pomo trendsetter meta-puzzle clever-clever encyclopedic reflection on the authoral process, but an actual long good novel in the tradition of long good novels past. It has characters, a plot, development, moments of humor and suspense, lots of things that ring fairly historically true, and lots of little moments both touching and profound about the way people act, relate to one another, and relate to big scary things in the world that they're thrust into dealing with.

Just had to get that off my chest, because it feels like a terribly minority viewpoint these days. And, I suspect, its why most critics are having such a terrible time with it.

sterl clover, Tuesday, 28 November 2006 03:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Fucking hell - I'm only to 170!

Time to log off and do some real reading, I guess!

austin#$@#@!, Tuesday, 28 November 2006 04:01 (seventeen years ago) link

lol @ cap'n-save-a-has-been

M I C H I K O K A K U T A N I, Tuesday, 28 November 2006 04:07 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm only 100 pages in! but i was on holiday and was only able to buy a copy on sunday, though. i've been carefully avoiding reviews and will prob avoid this thread until i'm done, i guess - and i'm not really sure that'll be before xmas.

anyway, really enjoying it so far, especially for the relative accessibility, which is allowing me to enjoy the details without worrying about getting totally lost.

toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 28 November 2006 06:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm about 150 pages in now - there's a bit of maths talk in the Arctic section that lost me completely but I'm thoroughly enjoying it. Toby, if you could enlighten me as to the relevance of it once you've got there it'd be greatly appreciated.

I don't understand the initial criticisms of the novel at all - if anything it feels more generous and 'human' than any of his other books (disclaimer, not read Vineland). Anyone who can read the Merle and Dally section and still feel Pynchon can't do 'proper characterisation' is mad.

Still - army of Arctic subterranean gnomes with laser crossbows = r0x0r.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Also did anyone else notice the Russian rivals to the Chums of Chance dropping four-block pieces of masonary from their ship = THEY ARE PLAYING TETRIS!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:26 (seventeen years ago) link

the name of the captain is actually the name of the dude who invented tetris too!

i read up some on the maths and quaternions in particular to help me thru those sections, tho strictly speaking they're not necessary plotwise or even themewise but more for the sake of gags. there's some pretty absurd multilingual puns around too.

just finished the book -- the european politics/balkans section around p. 800 with british spies etc felt like it really dragged -- really the roughest spot in the book. but there's a great momentum towards the end following it, particularly when it hits california and all of a sudden there's a whole new pynchon register for his writing that just rushes out of nowhere and you've felt the whole world shift beneath yr. feet and the strange curls of postwar progress.

it seems to me at this point that the underlying theme is really arrivals and departures and a growing sort of mood more than anything else that's hard to capture in simple language, but just of coming to find one's place in a world that as one ages becomes increasingly both scary and sprawling but also with mercy and deliverance in the oddest moments. a secular wakeful dream of a life in grace.

sterlclover, Tuesday, 28 November 2006 22:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Also striking is how pornographic it is. The sex is tamer than, say, GR, and that's why it feels different -- not all the sex scenes (which really do start to accumulate faster in the later sections of the novel) are particularly set-pieces of symbolic fetishistic whatever -- they're more naturalistic and almost shockingly casually integrated into the narrative where they make sense -- not in any depth, but just with a bit less offstage than what we're used to, and sometimes even portions of sweet moments between loving couples. Which makes it somehow all the more jarring, not in the context of the novel, but in the context of how we expect novels to work.

sterlclover, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 03:36 (seventeen years ago) link

What Pynchon would you guys recommend to a Pynchon skeptic? I had to read Vineland for a class and I felt like it was mostly a lot of forced silliness and absurdity.

Hurting (A-Ron Hubbard), Wednesday, 29 November 2006 03:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Vineland is NOT a good place to start.

grbchv! (gbx), Wednesday, 29 November 2006 03:41 (seventeen years ago) link

The Crying of Lot 49 is good, and short. V is very good, not (quite) as mostrous or intimidating as GR or ATD or M&D, but pretty monstrous.

austin!@$#, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 03:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Start with V.

letmebackin!, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 03:46 (seventeen years ago) link

I reread Vineland after urging in the ILB Pynchon thread. I still don't really like it, too much cutesy and not in the charming creepy way of usual Pynchon cutesy. All that fucking ninja shit was way too William Gibson.

Picked up the new one but am saving it for Christmastime.

adam., Wednesday, 29 November 2006 03:50 (seventeen years ago) link

i'll echo the V recommendation, my first and still my favorite. then i read GR which i also loved but it's a little too..... in places. After that i read Lot49 which is fine, and his most accessible, but it honestly didn't make much of an impact compared to the other 2. I HATE M&D, so much that I'm not currently thinking about the new one, but i'll come around eventually.

bliss (blass), Wednesday, 29 November 2006 03:55 (seventeen years ago) link

FWIW, M&D improved by about 500% on my reread.

austin#$@#@!, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 03:57 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm really enjoying M&D, actually. And I really loved 49

grbchv! (gbx), Wednesday, 29 November 2006 04:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Gotta say that the one problem I had was keeping the rotating cast of roughly eight "main" characters in this one straight. Had to keep flipping back to doublecheck who had been paired with whom, which one was in Vienna at the moment and which in Mexico, etc. The book's long enough that they all get plenty of play, but there are also sometimes HUGE gaps between sections dealing with any one of them.

sterlclover, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 04:13 (seventeen years ago) link

After that i read Lot49 which is fine, and his most accessible, but it honestly didn't make much of an impact compared to the other 2

Gotta disagree on both counts. Easiest to finish, yes, but deceptive. Like Lake Inverarity, there's a lot hidden underneath the surface.

V is in many ways the most straightforward, and offers a good primer in How To Read Pynchon. In addition to being great fun in its own right.

Name Not Found, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 06:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Fools! Vineland is awesome!

Dan I., Wednesday, 29 November 2006 07:50 (seventeen years ago) link

so, is this good? I asked for it on me christmas list

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Wednesday, 29 November 2006 08:03 (seventeen years ago) link

it's great, so far.

hstencil not logged in, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 08:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha Sterling - one of the things I was enjoying about this one is that it seemed relatively straightforward to keep track of the characters. But then I only recently reread Gravity's Rainbow so maybe that's not the best reference point.

A friend of mine is using ATD as a 'way into' the bigger Pynchon novels. He read Lot 49 recently and is finding this easier going - I'm find it very accessible.

That said the last 800 or so pages could be complete crap for all I know ;)

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 29 November 2006 09:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Also did anyone else notice the Russian rivals to the Chums of Chance dropping four-block pieces of masonary from their ship = THEY ARE PLAYING TETRIS!
-- Matt DC (runmd...), November 28th, 2006.

You just blew my mind.

Party With Me Punker, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 14:46 (seventeen years ago) link

A few other thoughts that hit me -- a central theme of the novel seems to be what P makes explicit as the bisexual threesome starts to come unglued -- how to distinguish the "freedom" brought on by incapacity in the face of impending catastrophe from a different, more genuine sort buoyed by the a sense of limitless possibility? Also, there seems to be a genuine autobiographical strand in capturing the realization that formulas of all sorts (vectoral, electromagnetic, kabbalistic and pythagorean) are as often or not splints and projections, deflections of aims and dawnings much less ambitious and more human.

sterlclover, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 18:31 (seventeen years ago) link

say... he brought back Rabbi of Prague "long life and prosperity" gag...

Name Not Found (rogermexico), Friday, 8 December 2006 23:04 (seventeen years ago) link

um, not much to add. but 200 pages in and loving this.

ryan (ryan), Friday, 8 December 2006 23:34 (seventeen years ago) link

the p-list ppl. have found crazy numerous little refs to the other books in this. which i sorta find cute and sorta irritating coz it feeds this fanboy tendency to read it for continuity like a comic book or something.

sterl clover (s_clover), Saturday, 9 December 2006 01:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Is there a Bodine that turns up at any point in the book?

I've kind of lost momentum on this due to a few other things going on so I'm only maybe 300 pages into it. Still nothing has outweirded the undergound gnomes with laser crossbows/fastforwarded Odyssey bit yet.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 9 December 2006 13:03 (seventeen years ago) link

"That is that of which I speak."

LOL

Name Not Found (rogermexico), Saturday, 16 December 2006 21:07 (seventeen years ago) link

almost finished my reread of M&D -- everything feels so natural this time around -- sure it'll feel that way when i get back to ATD too. by which i mean, M&D's percolated in my head fr years and so now when i read it everthing rushes back and makes sense whereas like with p generally, the first few reads are rilly vertigo-inducing (for some reason, ATD was less so than any other except COL49 for me tho -- the plot was more conventional and substantial in most ways)

also the way that the captive tail in M&D parallels the CoC stuff in ATD started me thinking about the delicate and generous way p uses metafictional devices as compared to most. Also struck by how ATD *didn't* have the accel. of episodic movement and flights of fancy that most P novels have in their rush to the end (granted, M&D had a denouement following, but still...)

sterl clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 19 December 2006 18:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Somewhere halfway through the second section, beginning to become overwhelmed. For a while I had a handle on the symbolic recurrence of mirrors, explosions, and bursts of light ... but no longer. I've been distracted by Occultancy, quaternions, bilocality, and exactly what the hell Merle and his ball of lightning have to do with anything.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/b/a/bbaa9197e741970193c784b29d00c890.png


Pynchon Wiki is sort of helpful, but is there anybody wanting to offer spoiler-free chat about any of these confusions?

remy bean (bean), Wednesday, 20 December 2006 14:55 (seventeen years ago) link

the codes don't add up -- if you try to fit them all together y'll fail -- thery're not supposed to add up either (they're other people's codes, or attempts at codes, or stabs at knowledge, or alternate foreclosed answers to a physics in becoming).

quaternions are easy tho -- wikipedia's section on them is pretty good. they're just a now superceded form of multidimensional vector calculation.

sterl clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 20 December 2006 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

best bilocation joke I've read so far (just this morning):

"Kit was put to work sorting the catch....soon developing a sense of nuance among turbot and brill, cod and hake sole, plaice, and bream."

a bulldog fed a cookie shaped like a kitten (austin), Wednesday, 20 December 2006 17:51 (seventeen years ago) link

But not entirely superseded, yes? The quaternion's continued value in descriptions of rotational space still has applications in e.g. signal processing (a Pynchonian trope or, at this point, tic par excellence that takes us all the way back to the Mondaugen's Story section of V, cf. Shambhala/Vheissu) and possible implications wrt the theme of double refraction.

xpost

Name Not Found (rogermexico), Wednesday, 20 December 2006 17:59 (seventeen years ago) link

ATD is lined up as my read for January, when I'm on maternity leave. However, given the less-than-focused state of my pregnant brain, I'm wondering if I shouldn't have gone for some Robert Harris or something instead...

Meg Busset (Meg Busset), Wednesday, 20 December 2006 18:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm on 725...just rolling with it. Some sections pull me in and I'm lost for an hour, others are a struggle just to see some relevence to an overall structure.
Fave characterization: 'mini' Cooper p.202
fave name: Mia Culpepper
fave passage that's too long to type out: p. 651, last para.

dave pacey (docpacey), Wednesday, 20 December 2006 21:10 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm about 450 pages in, and enjoying it a great deal.

I'm liking the way it oscilates between the relatively naturalistic bits, mostly but not entirely set in Colorado, and sheer lunacy mostly (entirely?) set outside the USA.

It's clear to me that Pynchon is consciously doing pastiches of different kinds of modern fantastic writing. I haven't tried to match everything up, but the ill-fated Arctic expedition is clearly H.P. Lovecraft, the sand fleas in the Go Desert is pure William Burroughs, the living Tarot is G.K.Chesterton/Charles Williams-style metaphysical fantasy, the peyote trip is Carlos Castoneda (presumably: I've never read him), there's all the Tom Sawyer/Boys Own Adventure stuff with the Chums of Chance of course, not to mention the explicit riffs on The Time Machine and Lost Horizon.

(I've been doing my best to avoid reading the reviews until after I finish, but I get the impression that the conventional wisdom is that the book is wildly inconsistent. I suspect that most reviewers are wishing he'd written a nice straightforward conventionally liberal historical narrative about the mine-workers unions in the early 1900's. To which I say, phooey! If that is in fact the case...)

PFS (pfs), Thursday, 21 December 2006 00:01 (seventeen years ago) link

And the best name (so far) is clearly the Uckenfay family.

PFS (pfs), Thursday, 21 December 2006 00:02 (seventeen years ago) link

My impression was actually that Michiko Kakutani, at least, would have been happier if he's written The Curious Case of The Time Traveler's Wife in the Nighttime or something.

And he'll be hard-pressed ever to top Joaquin Stick or Geli Tripping.

Name Not Found (rogermexico), Thursday, 21 December 2006 00:23 (seventeen years ago) link

yah looking back at M&D too it was clear to me how much p had taken to writing through a mess of other voices. with gr it seemed more like he was writing thru film, telegraph, etc. and other less literary genres, which was a v. difft feel (& of course vineland is all about the omnipresent toob)

sterl clover (s_clover), Thursday, 21 December 2006 01:50 (seventeen years ago) link

And the best name (so far) is clearly the Uckenfay family.

-- PFS (s_f_peterse...), December 21st, 2006.

I so debated posting this, but I thought I'd look like I was too easily amused. I agree, tho.

remy bean (bean), Thursday, 21 December 2006 05:27 (seventeen years ago) link

I'd never deny it.

(And it hardly seems like any kind of flaw when talking about a Pynchon novel. Ficht nicht mit der Rockettenmensch and all that...)

PFS (pfs), Thursday, 21 December 2006 06:04 (seventeen years ago) link

Spongiatosta, people.

Name Not Found (rogermexico), Thursday, 21 December 2006 18:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Mouthorganman Apprentice Bing Spooninger, the Band Mascotte.

remy bean (bean), Monday, 25 December 2006 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link

I got the new one for Christmas this morning -- can't wait.

Joe Isuzu's Petals (Rock Hardy), Monday, 25 December 2006 19:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Okay, so what the hell is going on with Candlebrow U.?

Also, somebody wanna speculate about the weird cryptography talk directed Cyprian's way (IIRC) somewhere between 700 - 850, the discussion of errata and texts overlaid with texts? I had a Neal Stephenson moment, almost, and then I got suspicious that Tommy-P was screwin' around with me, trying to imply a secret novel of some sort. Plz to discuss!

remy bean (bean), Thursday, 28 December 2006 19:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Used Amazon gift cert to buy (also Mark Bittman's Best Recipes in the World on remy bean's rec), should be here Friday!

jaq (jaq), Thursday, 28 December 2006 19:50 (seventeen years ago) link

man, i'm jealous. i wish i were restarting AtD. (the first 150 pages of confused me in a fantastic way, more even than most other Pynchon).

remy bean (bean), Thursday, 28 December 2006 19:57 (seventeen years ago) link

also got the new one for Christmas(along with zombie books, hooray!). Will be starting as soon as I finish up another historical multi-threaded tome, Neal Stephenson's Quicksilver.

kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Thursday, 28 December 2006 20:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Bumper sticker seen this weekend: MY OTHER CAR IS A PYNCHON NOVEL

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 28 December 2006 20:15 (seventeen years ago) link

gawd, I wish i owned that.

remy bean (bean), Thursday, 28 December 2006 20:41 (seventeen years ago) link

for a while there 600-700, i was thinking the Y-R-C menage was analagous to the triple entente??? but the pieces never quite fit. somehow i keep thinking the main characters map to the countries involved in the great game and the great war, but then...

dave pacey (docpacey), Thursday, 28 December 2006 22:17 (seventeen years ago) link

"Gawd, I wish I owned that."
- Remy

What, the car or the novel? Anyway, sticker oughtta read: MY OTHER CAR IS THOMAS PYNCHON

adam beales (pye poudre), Thursday, 28 December 2006 22:21 (seventeen years ago) link

for a while there 600-700, i was thinking the Y-R-C menage was analagous to the triple entente??? but the pieces never quite fit. somehow i keep thinking the main characters map to the countries involved in the great game and the great war, but then...

...but then Pynchon is typically only interested in politics as an epiphenomenon of elite cruelty, cynicism, greed, lust, and self-preservation. It's the wake left behind the good ship Anubis.

In this, his worldview doesn't actually stray too far from Homer, only the gods ein sich aren't there to command, provoke, or, ultimately provide rationale. But he certainly wouldn't blink at the Greek/Ilian casus belli. He'd just make it less noble and more sad, and avoid anything more than a rueful sentence or two suggesting the elevation of tragedy.

So since he's generally more concerned with the consequences of world-historical events for the schlemiels stuck inside them without hope of escape (hope of escape serving as one of the key axes separating preterite from elite) than he is with The March Of History, the only way he'd draw that kind of analogy would be to make it SO OBVIOUS EVEN THE CHARACTERS COULD SEE IT. And thus cartoon it away.

But of course, the US isn't even in the casino of the Great Game yet, let alone at the table. It's the Vibe robber baron capital formation that will end up serving as the ante. And the diminished fortunes of a shell-shocked Continent.

Name Not Found (rogermexico), Friday, 29 December 2006 03:44 (seventeen years ago) link

now in progress: pynchonwiki. Soon to include GR and M&D as well.

remy bean (bean), Friday, 29 December 2006 04:18 (seventeen years ago) link

to answa matt dc way up there, yes seaman bodine turns up around the half way point in the ship that divides into two

BounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounceBounce (bounce), Saturday, 30 December 2006 14:07 (seventeen years ago) link

done, and ... hmmm... I feel like I could write a 600 page refutation of Kakutani's crapass review. The ending is beautiful, irreducible, strange, and seems to resist tattooing easy dramatic closure over individual plot-bodies, all while bringing them, collectively to a handsome point of departure. This strikes me as right: for a book obsessed with process and progress and tunneled-perspective, to tidily suture shut the individual souls' paths would be a travesty. Pynchon seems to, hah, imply an individual vector for each protagonist, not necessarily the one we'd like to choose, but the right one (cf. Corporatized Chums of Chance), and one that doesn't flatten the character's perspective journey into a line with digressions but (as said during one of Kit's dreams) that zigzagging around through four-dimensional space-time might be expressed as a vector in five dimensions. Whatever the number of n dimensions it inhabited, an observer would need one extra, n + 1, to see it and connect the end points to make a single result". Anti-teleological.

Uhgh, I got more to type, but I've got to go to the bank.

remy bean (bean), Saturday, 30 December 2006 15:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I finished yesterday. Long and ultimately very rewarding. I agree with Remy that the ending was satisfying, in fact, I found the last hundred and fifty or so pages to be some of the most enjoyable of the entire work. Gilligan's Island!! and Merle's 3D photo viewer (so cool an entire book could have been born of it).
In a book about Time, I found it interesting that the characters seem 'in' the time but not 'of' the time (probable that this was a theme), and save for the various narrative pastiches, the same could be said of the storylines.
I wonder if much will be made of the fact that most of the interpersonal relationships had three 'dimensions' (Lake-Deuce-Sloat, Y-R-C, Stray-Frank-Ewball, Frank-Wren-Dr, etc.)?
Just some random thoughts.

dave pacey (docpacey), Saturday, 30 December 2006 19:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Also Cyprian became my favorite character by the end of his presence. I was hoping he'd come back for a curtain call, but ... sadly ...

remy bean (bean), Saturday, 30 December 2006 20:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Guys, ssh with the sorta-not-really-but-kinda spoilers for a bit? I'm trying to make the last couple hundred pages last...

Name Not Found (rogermexico), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 17:39 (seventeen years ago) link

edrants.com is having an Against The Day Roundtable, and Part Two, which is up today, is hysterical and worth a look

http://www.edrants.com/?p=5231

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:26 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.