GRAMMAR FIENDS

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (131 of them)
That's a common misconception.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 00:16 (seventeen years ago) link

how do you know he meant 'hit'?

Louis Jagger (Scourage), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 00:23 (seventeen years ago) link

GRIMLY VS THE PERTUISES

http://sparky.thehold.net/pix/061205pertuises.jpg

(note mädchen, in the yellow dress, looking disapproving)

grimly fiendish (simon), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 00:28 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't care about these Petruis(es), but:

"My students seemed to be much more captivated by the object that my family and I were standing by: my car."

That sentence is awkward as hell and I'd never write it. There are many better ways to say that. "Nothing seemed to captivate my students as much as the car we were standing in front of" or "The car we were standing in front of was more captivating to my students" or the first version you posted, or probably best of all, an entirely different construction. But that one above, no way.

steve schneeberg (steve go1dberg), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 00:51 (seventeen years ago) link

i think context is all here. i'd have agreed with you, steve, until i realised the point ZS was trying to make.

grimly fiendish (simon), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 00:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Eh, I still think it's a cringe-inducing sentence regardless of context. Like I said, I think the best way to write it would be something completely different rather than just a "remix" of the sentence, but I'd have to see the whole paragraph in order to come up with something better.

But come on, that sounds like choice D on some standardized test, the one that they throw in there just to give you something that's easy to eliminate and that you can't imagine anyone would ever really pick.

steve schneeberg (steve go1dberg), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 01:07 (seventeen years ago) link

That sentence is awkward as hell and I'd never write it.

Hey, Steve, how would you rewrite this sentence: "I'm a fanny"?

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 01:23 (seventeen years ago) link

I'd probably rewrite it as: "Kiss my ass"

steve schneeberg (steve go1dberg), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 01:29 (seventeen years ago) link

but you're a fanny

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 09:20 (seventeen years ago) link

"There are three Françoises in my class"

Now, according to Fiendish, this sentence could apply equally to three girls called Françoise, or three boys called François. But anyone looking at it would automatically assume the former, not the latter. To avoid confusion, if you mean boys called François the sentence would have to be: "There are three François in my class."

Hence Fiendish's solution fatally fails the comprehension test, and clarity is surely at the heart of all editing decisions. Which means that Fiendish is WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

G. Samsa (G. Samsa), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Now, according to Fiendish, this sentence could apply equally to three girls called Françoise

no it wouldn't. when did i say that? stop putting words in my mouth.

clarity, eh? how's this: "GIVE IT A REST, YOU TEDIOUS FUCKING PRICK."

grimly fiendish (simon), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:19 (seventeen years ago) link

no it wouldn't. when did i say that? stop putting words in my mouth.

Your solution to names that end in a silent 's' is to add "es" for plural. So for you, the plural of François is Françoises. And the plural of Françoise is Françoises.

clarity, eh? how's this: "GIVE IT A REST, YOU TEDIOUS FUCKING PRICK."

Christ. It's a thread entitled "grammar fiends". No need for gratuitous abuse.

G. Samsa (G. Samsa), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Your solution to names that end in a silent 's' is to add "es" for plural

no it isn't. my solution to "pertuis" is to add -es. it's a surname, where the pronunciation will not be obvious to many people. if you bother to read the thread, you'll see i've made this point at least twice. you might disagree. i appreciate that.

and, as i keep saying: it's a non-lexical item, therefore who's really to say how it should behave "gramatically"? not you, and not i. we've made our points - some more elegantly than others. as i've said so many times i'm bored shitless: the only people who really could give us a definitive answer are members of the pertuis family (and i bet there's division there too, heh).

No need for gratuitous abuse.

granted, that was a bit OTT and i apologise. but really, seriously: give it a fucking rest. eyeball kicks has made his decision, and it's based on his own intelligent reasoning. i disagree, but i respect his professional decision. for you to still be wittering on like a schoolboy some 18 hours after he said: "please, stop it now" is really, really fucking irritating.

and that's my final word on the matter.

grimly fiendish (simon), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:39 (seventeen years ago) link

:)

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:42 (seventeen years ago) link

no, really.

grimly fiendish (simon), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:46 (seventeen years ago) link

:)

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:49 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.80s.com/saveferris/images/cast/ruck.jpg

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:57 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.thebratpacksite.com/images/ferrisbueller.gif

grimly fiendish (simon), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 11:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Back to 'captivate', then. I'm not convinced that something can be more or less captivating. It either captivates you or it doesn't.

Grimly, FWIW, I would agree with you if it wasn't a silent s. But it is.

Madchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 12:52 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, were it pronounced pertwiss.

Madchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 12:54 (seventeen years ago) link

i like 'the family Pertuis'

sede vacante (blueski), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 13:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Blimey, Simon's gone fucking mental.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I think they're cunts

xpost

nu_onimo (nu_onimo), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 13:13 (seventeen years ago) link

i considered trying to find a pertuis family to e-mail and ask. but, worryingly, the top hit when you google "pertuis family" is, er, me wittering on this thread. fuck.

GRIMLY VERSUS EVERYBODE:

http://sparky.thehold.net/pix/061205pertuises.jpg

grimly fiendish (simon), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 13:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Average lifr expectancy of the Pertuis family

(in 1975, they were attacked in the grammar pogroms. Cries of "But we're a non-lexical item!" went unheeded)

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 14:55 (seventeen years ago) link

Average life expectancy of the Pertuis family

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 14:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Average life expectancy of the Pertuis family

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 14:57 (seventeen years ago) link

What happened in 1976? Did Great-Granny Pertuis serve bad vichyssoise at the family reunion?

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 15:25 (seventeen years ago) link

One way of avoiding making a plural of "Pertuis" is to have ONLY ONE PERTUIS. More Vichyssiose!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 15:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't trust those charts. The "General Population" line seems to always follow the median of the family in question.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 15:31 (seventeen years ago) link

When the Pertuises flourish, we all flourish. As they decline, we decline.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 15:33 (seventeen years ago) link

When the Pertuis sneeze, we all catch a cold.

stet (stet), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 15:38 (seventeen years ago) link

The Pertuis, you see,
is you and me.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 23:08 (seventeen years ago) link

The whole (offending) paragraph:

During my second month teaching English in China, I decided to show the students a picture of myself taken after my college graduation. I passed the photo around, expecting them to be interested in my mother and sister’s blonde hair, my cap and gown, and the American scenery in the background. Instead, they seemed to be much more captivated by the object that my family and I were standing in front of: my car. Soon, instead of learning words like graduation, tassel, and diploma, my students were saying Ford, driver’s license, and gas station. Although the class itself didn’t go as I had planned, I did learn something firsthand about the aspirations of China’s future.

I'm displaying the whole paragraph for context. Please feel free to evaluate, or reevaluate. And, thanks.

Zachary Scott (Zachary S), Wednesday, 6 December 2006 04:03 (seventeen years ago) link

I think that's fine.

Jesus Dan (dan perry), Wednesday, 6 December 2006 04:11 (seventeen years ago) link

much more captivated

or

much more interested

Madchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 6 December 2006 11:20 (seventeen years ago) link

'much more interested' is a boring way of putting it though.

Madchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 6 December 2006 11:21 (seventeen years ago) link

three weeks pass...
Is it "expressed permission" or "express permission"?

Alba (Alba), Friday, 29 December 2006 15:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, obv. the former makes sense, but is the latter some old idiomatic version of it. Actually the example is "express orders", I don't really know why I asked about permission.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 29 December 2006 15:47 (seventeen years ago) link

"express permission"

express [adj.]
1 a : directly, firmly, and explicitly stated b : EXACT, PRECISE
2 a : designed for or adapted to its purpose b : of a particular sort : SPECIFIC

Joe Isuzu's Petals (Rock Hardy), Friday, 29 December 2006 15:49 (seventeen years ago) link

Ta. I don't really know why I didn't look in a dictionary. One meaning of express is "definitely stated, not implied". End.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 29 December 2006 15:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I would think it was "express permission" but I have no real idea why other than that it's the way I pronounce it if saying it (which isn't often), and I tend to be of the opinion that I am right about these things.

Please note that I'm in the "another think coming" camp, and invented the word Pertuix, so am possibly not to be trusted.

(xpost, or perhaps I am!)

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Friday, 29 December 2006 15:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I thought "another think coming" turned out to be right.

Not For Use as Infant Nog (A-Ron Hubbard), Friday, 29 December 2006 15:57 (seventeen years ago) link

I think there was some controversy and the consensus was that both were acceptable (except that I disagree with consensus because "another thing coming" is completely fucking wrong and lots of people getting something wrong all the time doesn't make it right by default)

ailsa_xx (ailsa_xx), Friday, 29 December 2006 15:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Even if "another think coming" is technically right, it's really wrong.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 29 December 2006 16:02 (seventeen years ago) link

LET'S NOT, OKAY!?

Joe Isuzu's Petals (Rock Hardy), Friday, 29 December 2006 16:03 (seventeen years ago) link

OH GOD, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

(xpost, heh)

grimly fiendish (simon), Friday, 29 December 2006 16:04 (seventeen years ago) link

"Another thought coming" would be right but doesn't convey the angry-mumness of "another think coming." Tetchy verbal anger = grammar out the window.

suzy artskooldisko (suzy artskooldisko), Friday, 29 December 2006 16:12 (seventeen years ago) link

I WILL LOCK THIS FUCKER. I MEAN IT.

grimly fiendish (simon), Friday, 29 December 2006 17:50 (seventeen years ago) link

Roffle. (Maybe I would like to be an ILE mod, now that I think of it.)

Joe Isuzu's Petals (Rock Hardy), Friday, 29 December 2006 18:10 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.