E-Readers (Kindle, Nook, using iPad for reading) yay or nay

i get the sneaking feeling that i will be getting one of these for christmas (kindle prob) and i dont know how i feel about that yet really. i buy almost all my books (and i buy lots of them) used so idk if there will really be any cost saving aspect. i guess we'll see.

The thing I love most about my Nook is that I can jump back and forth between reading on it and reading on the Nook application on my phone and the applications will sync to the last page I read if I am in a wi-fi location.

this is awesome

so which e-reader has the least ugly kerning

i don't know that books are any more linked form-to-content as a uh fetish i guess than eg music to vinyl sleeves or film to reel/vhs case. Maybe a little more so, but not to the extent that books won't nonetheless become a vintage statement accessory for future hipsters or w/e

they're significantly more linked form-to-content than are music and films, which themselves are significantly more linked f-to-c than software, say

wait i sort of skipped over 'as a fetish' there, though i probably still agree with myself (i always do)

I dunno. Based on the fact that books-as-fetish-objects have been around for 575 years (and even before Gutenberg, as rarer things), they're probably going to stick around in a way that cassettes/vinyl/film reels won't. There have been lots of challenges to the physical form of the book before, schisms and failures, and I doubt that a new form of distribution is going to kill them b/c it is currently in nascent vogue.

People thought vinyl was dying in the 90's, and it still hasn't.

for some reason ereaders are like the one piece of new-ish technology that seems tailor made for old ppl, like they feel really stodgy and middleaged to me.

re: gutenberg

http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/sacredtexts/images/gutenberg_lg.jpg

http://www.crossway.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/41.gif

for some reason ereaders are like the one piece of new-ish technology that seems tailor made for old ppl, like they feel really stodgy and middleaged to me.

― ice cræmde (є(٥_ ٥)э), Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:20 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Permalink

Because you can make the font bigger.

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

one my e-books I had on hold from the library is now available. i wonder how this will work....

it will only be a matter of time before the number of e-copies of titles will go from finite to infinity

After which, it will go to infinity plus one, then plus two...

interesting thoughts here on how primitive and perhaps wrong-headed the epub format is, don't necessarily agree with his conclusions but errrrrrr makes you think...
http://crookedtimber.org/2011/12/21/e-books-and-ipads-and-pdfs-some-thoughts/

I pretty much completely disagree with that article

ebooks becoming more like pdfs would be terrible

ha yeah that guy doesnt really get technology

"b b but why would you want to do it any other way?" = apple user.

I don't get the problems he's talking about. Websites might show up with problems on certain devices, but ebooks are usu just text, right? And it's pretty readable? Idgi. What is he getting at?

lol its funny he has a whole long update clearly inspired by people telling him hes an idiot where hes all yeah i know ebooks need to be readable on lots of different devices but what this blog post presupposes is what if they dont

Aye you're right, there's nothing wrong with text that flows to fit whatever device it's on. "Layout" beyond chapters and paragraphs just isn't an issue for 99% of books.

hes right that ebooks tend to lack the polish of printed matter, but his solution is just silly, and he doesnt even particularly identify the specific qualities of the problem, like there are a lot of people working really hard on this doggie, lol pdf

Well I don't know that things are that easy. I think there is a place for both a variable, scaleable, context-/device-dependent format and a locked-down, .pdfish model. (Although something a little more sturdy and robust than .pdf would be nice...). In other words, I can see, say, comic book geeks really liking to read things w/ certain well-defined dimensions and presentation standards, while most books/articles will be seved equally well by being read as 160 words on a b&w iphone screen as enlarged on a 27" monitor.

yeah obvs 'books' thatre primarily images have a whole nother set of demands

This issue is v. prominent in adaptive/assistive/instructional info techology, where the divide b/w 'image' and 'text' is pretty fuzzy.... somebody's gotta come up with something better than a .pdf to allow input and the preservation of precise, functional formatting that is somehow useable on more than one type of device. HTML5 isn't a bad option, frankly, but it'll need wider acceptance/support.

was just thinking abt ui design in adaptive/assistive technologies, not really something i know anything abt, but it seems p interesting

OK, so I guess I was understanding him to the extent that he was making sense.

But is flowing text "plug ugly"? It doesn't seem that way to me, a non-techy consumer.

its just 'people talkin abt fonts for no good reason' m/l

But is flowing text "plug ugly"? It doesn't seem that way to me, a non-techy consumer.

c/f images upthread

I meant, does it seem "plug ugly" to you, dear reader.

the problem with the crooked timber thing is that 'just use pdf!' is a ridiculously awful solution to the problem. but it's still a solution which would produce better looking results than the current paradigm

here's some text on the nook:

http://int64.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/badjustify.png

that's from an article which has the even better thesis at least if you have a nook you can dump your epubs into pdfs and redo the typesetting yourself and read that which i am guessing probably even more of a non-starter for most people

however i feel like this is right:

"My only real gripe is that, like al­most every other e-​read­er out there, it has such poor type­set­ting that you have to won­der if it was de­signed by soft­ware en­gi­neers who aren’t big read­ers"

which, you know, ding ding ding

xpost: yes.

I tried for like 5 minutes to be a typeface snob, but I realized that I don't detect any difference in value between similar typefaces. "Readability" is not an issue for me beyond actual illegibility.

Concur

it's not the typefaces so much as the spacing

http://www.hanselman.com/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/AmazonKindlevs.KindleDXTheFinalWord_CE5C/screen_shot-35927_thumb.gif

lookit the paragraph starting "'Fangtasia,' Pam said" -- there's places where the gaps between words are larger than the words themselves -- now admittedly i. a small subset of people will care and ii. this appears to be from one of those true blood novels so w/e

i don't know, i assume the normal response is "why in the hell would that bother you" and then i say "you don't know it but it's crippling your reading experience" and then i turn into that guy who starts the dynamic range compression threads and refuse to go outside because i might hear some music that's not on my perfectly magnetically balanced insulated and feng shui-ed hi fi system

I honestly don't notice stuff like that, and I read a lot. That paragraph looks fine to me.

xxxp

I get distracted by weird spacing. I can push through it, but it will take me out of the reading headspace, if that makes any sense. Like, it will remind me that I'm reading, and it takes a minute to get back to where I am no longer aware of the process of translating words into brain images.

the main offense of that formatting is the that text is justified rather than aligned, aka itd be more readable were it jagged along the right margin

its p unconscionable tbqh, is there a setting for that or something

i mean its like a super easy fix

I don't know why all these things use whatever random just-above-MS-Word-quality line-breaking algorithms when they could be using something closer to the TeX line-breaking algorithms, which are pretty much the gold standard of doing this sort of thing automatically.

xps the Sookie Stackhouse novels are in first person? ick

having just said that, though, reading it in my head, that "'Fangtasia,' Pam said" did come out slower than it should have. So maybe I guess I do notice this stuff.

xp to myself

I like the ability to change the font for each book I read. The more "formal" the book, the more likely I am to want a serif font, for some reason.

Kids book = sans serif
Classic lit = serif
Pop science/history = sans serif

I appreciate a typesetter advising me with which font to use*, but now the tech exists to change it, I would be mighty annoyed if it was taken away.

And justifying the paragraph so it fills up the entire line is some bullshit, dnw. I'm one of those who notice this and would really prefer it didn't happen.

*that first sentence's grammar got me confused, so apologies for the clumsiness.

years and years and years of publishing precedent argue against left justification, is the problem

I totally get why that spacing issue would bother some people, and sometimes when it's very obvious, it bothers me too. What did bother me about that text was that it was fully justified (which accounts for the spacing problem). I like ragged right edge.

I'm the same with audiophilia - I am usually OK with getting the "gist" of the music I'm hearing. Though I appreciate why it would be different for other people.

You know what irks me though? Is the way some "audiophiles" and "font snobs" seem to care about those things (and care very vocally) b/c it makes them seem refined and sensitive. Again, SOME of them.

many xps

years and years and years of publishing precedent argue against left justification, is the problem

― OH NOES, Thursday, December 22, 2011 1:23 PM (17 seconds ago) Bookmark Permalink

yeah idgi is that really the default setting on the nook

I mean justified text blocks pretty much empirically look better and read better when they are carefully tweaked by hand and hyphenated and whatnot. One of the big reasons that a lot of these justified blocks look bad is that they are averse to automatic hyphenation of words, whereas TeX is all about automatic hyphenation. You can't fill up lines in a pleasing fashion without being able to auto-hyphenate, since really all you're doing in that case is taking the ragged-right paragraph layout and stretching all the interword spaces until each line is justified.

as an example, in the Fangtasia excerpt, this paragraph:

"Fangtasia," Pam said, as if she were bored more
completely than anyone had ever been bored.

would look better if it were set like this:

"Fangtasia," Pam said, as if she were bored more complete-
ly than anyone had ever been bored.

because a lot of that extra interword space in the first line would go away.

yeah but then you have the hypen

yes but that's why hyphens were invented, so justified text blocks could have aesthetically pleasing amounts of interword space!