"If You Lived Here You'd Be Cool By Now" - Jersey City is official, I guess

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (59 of them)
and let's face it, manhattan IS a rip-off for so many things. overpriced real estate, overpriced food, overpriced consumer goods, etc. getting a little more bang-for-your-buck AND being within spitting distance of manhattan (if one feels a need to go there for any reason) AND getting a manhattan paycheck whilst paying NJ prices* more than makes up for any snooty NYC attitudes.

(*though north jersey is also a rip-off not only in comparison to the rest of the country, but also in comparison to the rest of NJ.)

Eisbär (Eisbär), Monday, 4 December 2006 20:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I think one of the things the article captures really well is the madness of present-day New York's real estate boom-fueled mania for the next hot neighborhood.

I grew up hoping for the New York my parents always told me about - the New York of eccentrics and over psychoanalyzed "intellectuals" and wannabe actors and writers high on their starving artist fantasies - I mean all that's still there too but it's kind of depressing the way most of the "hip" neighborhoods now are the ones with the right brunch places and the "unhip" neighborhoods are nothing but big box retail and panini cafes. That's the NYMag version of things anyway.

Hurting (A-Ron Hubbard), Monday, 4 December 2006 20:47 (seventeen years ago) link

If it makes any of you feel better, I've spent the last three years being disdained for living in a student-housing apartment, and I'm sure that when I'm forced to move out I'll wind up having to find a place in Elizabeth.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 4 December 2006 20:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Or in Chicago.

I only hear the "Chicago is sooo provincial" line rarely, but it does make me want to kill.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 4 December 2006 21:01 (seventeen years ago) link

One of my favorite Brian Lehrer moments ever (during a "Manhattan versus Brooklyn" call-in a couple years ago):

Caller: "I live in Brooklyn, and I have a golden retriever, and I have to say I think Brooklyn is the best place in the U.S. to live with a dog. I live right by ____ park and..."

Brian Lehrer: "Wait a minute wait a minute. Are you honestly trying to tell me that of all the places in the U.S., BROOKLYN is the best place to have a dog?"

Caller: "No, really. I know a lot of people think it's better to live in rural areas with dogs, but it's really dangerous and you can't just let your dog roam free because it can go onto some farmer's land and then the farmer is allowed to shoot it."

Hurting (A-Ron Hubbard), Monday, 4 December 2006 21:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Home of Red's Tube Bar:

http://www.missioncreep.com/mw/tubebar/

PappaWheelie III (PappaWheelie III), Monday, 4 December 2006 21:13 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually in MI we didn't let our dogs outside all fall (hunting season) because a) collies don't look enough UNLIKE deer to be safe, and b) technically hunters are/were allowed to shoot dogs who are "running" (that is, chasing) deer. I have no idea why...? "Running" livestock animals stresses them out, makes them produce less milk/lose weight/become tough/etc but deer are hardly livestock!

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 4 December 2006 21:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Ah ok. Nonetheless, you wouldn't exactly say Brooklyn would be a better place for dogs, right? After all it's not like you can let them out in the Fall, or any other time, in Brooklyn either.

Hurting (A-Ron Hubbard), Tuesday, 5 December 2006 02:48 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.