asking rick perry to define strict constructionism. shameful, gotcha question.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:53 (twelve years ago) link
I hope they ask Mitt the favorite-founding-father question twice, right at the start and right at the end.
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:53 (twelve years ago) link
i hope for mitt, they bring out the props (e.g., video clips of his contrary prior positions, and copies of early editions of his books).
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:54 (twelve years ago) link
Mitt: "You already asked me that."Panelist: "Just checking in..."
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:54 (twelve years ago) link
"Fundamentally"? Hey, copyright infringement!
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 01:59 (twelve years ago) link
this is a crazy-off of the highest-order.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:00 (twelve years ago) link
"I can...I can come out in support of that." What a strange way to word that.
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:02 (twelve years ago) link
I do love when these people are forced to explain the logistics of something.
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:09 (twelve years ago) link
Paul now #2 in Iowa:
Newt Gingrich - 25% (+18) Ron Paul - 18% (+6) Mitt Romney - 16% (-6) Herman Cain - 8% (-15) Michele Bachmann - 8% (+0) Rick Perry - 6% (-1) Rick Santorum - 6% (+1) Jon Huntsman - 2% (+1)
― Mordy, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:12 (twelve years ago) link
if that riddler look-a-like would end his doomed campaign, newt would open an even bigger gap against robot-mitt romney.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:21 (twelve years ago) link
paul has a ceiling
― iatee, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:25 (twelve years ago) link
ron paul stumbling on the issue of how he'd actually implement his radical, crazy program.
but ultimately, he gave an intellectually coherent -- if unsatisfying -- answer.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:25 (twelve years ago) link
i used to believe that newt had a ceiling too...
― Mordy, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:26 (twelve years ago) link
Man, I hope this whole thing is just one big trap Huckabee's set for Mitt.
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:27 (twelve years ago) link
"RON PAUL, IF YOU WERE A TREE, WHAT KIND OF A TREE WOULD YOU BE?"
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:28 (twelve years ago) link
wtf, ron paul, what about ANN F----G RAND?
blown opportunity, IMO. atlas shrugged.
i figured he would recommend ann rand over the bible.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:29 (twelve years ago) link
"I'm a tree...not a person anymore, a tree...I just want to make sure I've got the question right"--forgot, he's out.
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:30 (twelve years ago) link
i am already ready to say mitt romney has collapsed in this forum.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:32 (twelve years ago) link
Mitt's eating up the clock!
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:32 (twelve years ago) link
that was a totally awkward opening by romney.
now back on longwinded message.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, December 3, 2011 9:29 PM (3 minutes ago)
haha idk if this was intentional on your part but if you ever want to troll a libertarian, refer to her as "ann rand"
"it's AYN!"
― k3vin k., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:34 (twelve years ago) link
ppl should just call her alisa rosenbaum
― Mordy, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:36 (twelve years ago) link
"i'm so sorry i didn't pronounce alisa's made up name correctly"
serious question, largely to alfred: what's happening to romney? something is different, and worse, about him lately. not sure if it's the forums he's been in, maybe he's rattled by gingrich, maybe he's tired, not sure. but he doesn't sound like the confident, resolute guy that he needs to be to win the GOP nomination.
i mean, the uneasiness in romney is on display tonight.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:37 (twelve years ago) link
(sorry, it's a question to anyone; i just know that alfred strongly believes it's a foregone conclusion that romney will win the GOP nomination).
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:38 (twelve years ago) link
I showed my students a Godard clip on Friday. We're very big on the cyber-learning up here.
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:38 (twelve years ago) link
There's this neediness to Romney that's quite unappealing. Newt's a blowhard completely comfortable with himself.
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:40 (twelve years ago) link
and there's your media moment for tomorrow.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:42 (twelve years ago) link
ha ha ha (nervously) "I DON'T MEAN TO BE INSULTING"
He got through it--clumsily, but I can't see that he hurt himself in any way. (Or helped, which is good.)
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:44 (twelve years ago) link
Perry's just so funny. "Back...in their home district thing."
― clemenza, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:48 (twelve years ago) link
Me and 500 GOP g-men. Besides, you guys are the only ones part of the claque that watched Romney's one less than semi-pro interview last week.
― Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:49 (twelve years ago) link
LOLGOP Pete Nicely -- Republicans, I'm so scared of this super smart Newt guy. PLEASE DON'T NOMINATE HIM.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 02:52 (twelve years ago) link
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
Romney's one less than semi-pro interview last week
now two, btw, if you combine interview and debate performances.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:06 (twelve years ago) link
continuing evidence of mitt's meltdown.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:09 (twelve years ago) link
Daniel, an honest question: why do you want Obama to win? Why are you so invested in a weak primary challenge?
― Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:22 (twelve years ago) link
sigh
― iatee, Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:23 (twelve years ago) link
that deserves a good answer, which i'll try to give a little later. for now, i'll say that, if we have to have a GOP president, i much prefer romney to others in the GOP field, but that's weak praise.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:25 (twelve years ago) link
yeah RAH RAH RAH GO MITT YES WE CAN
― Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:25 (twelve years ago) link
lol
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:26 (twelve years ago) link
http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/C/i/2/romney-clown.jpg
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:27 (twelve years ago) link
@Shoq -- The quality of these debates has really plunged since Herman Cain left the race.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 December 2011 03:47 (twelve years ago) link
Huh, I was basically assuming that everyone here apart from Morbius was Team Obama.
― Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 4 December 2011 11:44 (twelve years ago) link
Tongues are deeply piercing cheeks here.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 4 December 2011 16:11 (twelve years ago) link
You know the Groucho Marx line.
― Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 4 December 2011 16:16 (twelve years ago) link
"Once I shot a bunch of incompetent elephants in my pajamas."
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 4 December 2011 16:27 (twelve years ago) link
I think it was something like "A spectre is haunting Europe"
― JmC (step hen faps), Sunday, 4 December 2011 17:25 (twelve years ago) link
"Once I shot a bunch of incompetent elephants in my pajamas."― Ned Raggett, Sunday, December 4, 2011 8:27 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Permalink
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, December 4, 2011 8:27 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Permalink
hahahaha
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, 4 December 2011 18:04 (twelve years ago) link