Dektol in the Sandbox: I <3 Photography

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (263 of them)

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7015/6436709227_69c0d0b806_z.jpg
Untitled by celluloidpropaganda, on Flickr

milo z, Friday, 2 December 2011 01:14 (twelve years ago) link

found a negative that was unquestionably sharp (which is what happens when you use 400 ISO film midday at the Grand Canyon). boring picture, but it scans well (so much Tri-X grain!)
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7010/6439186909_18e719c9fa_z.jpg
Grand Canyon, Tri-X, 2002-3 by celluloidpropaganda, on Flickr

milo z, Friday, 2 December 2011 01:17 (twelve years ago) link

i dunno, if you cropped below the horizon it could be a cool ambient/noize LP cover

river wolf, Friday, 2 December 2011 01:34 (twelve years ago) link

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7004/6443719557_599b94ff69_z.jpg
Cabless by celluloidpropaganda, on Flickr

milo z, Friday, 2 December 2011 22:35 (twelve years ago) link

http://www.retronaut.co/2011/11/new-york-1940s-by-stanley-kubrick/

dayo, Sunday, 4 December 2011 19:58 (twelve years ago) link

damn, although i wish they'd left us with a sweeter shot to carry home

Never translate German (schlump), Sunday, 4 December 2011 21:10 (twelve years ago) link

he hung out w/ a lot of bangin chicks

judith, Sunday, 4 December 2011 21:17 (twelve years ago) link

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7019/6469640077_e86f147079_z.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7175/6463613999_f8a573e3d0_z.jpg

Second one is from high school... picked up old negatives when in CA.

btw, by dirty secret is that I *do* actually read the rest of ilx

chinavision, Thursday, 8 December 2011 01:38 (twelve years ago) link

"my"

chinavision, Thursday, 8 December 2011 01:41 (twelve years ago) link

damn! CV, they're both awesome. second one is so interesting. what was the aftermath of you shooting the first, the guy just crankily looking at you for invading his personal zone? (i am not a v in-yr-face photographer but the times i am i find i can usually get away with seeming to just be fucking with my camera or photographing something else).

really psyched to go back to my folks' place for the holidays because imma scan some old photos, everything i've looked at since i've been scanning stuff being from the past three, four years. that high school landscape is dope tho.

Never translate German (schlump), Thursday, 8 December 2011 11:23 (twelve years ago) link

this also booming btw: http://www.flickr.com/photos/altairnouveau/6373831907/sizes/l/in/photostream/

Never translate German (schlump), Thursday, 8 December 2011 11:45 (twelve years ago) link

the aftermath was just that I kept walking and so did he. I hardly ever have any trouble at all. if people even notice they just kinda look momentarily confused but rarely even slow down aside from some notable times that I could count on two hands. dunno if I'd have similar reactions in other cities or what...
the thing about the high school photo is I dunno if it would even look so good if I shot it now! like the framing was probably even accidental! the point and shoot I was using is so imprecise that there's no way I was really intentionally lining up the sign like that.

chinavision, Thursday, 8 December 2011 12:09 (twelve years ago) link

ha, sure. there are ten zillion things that go into why a photo is good so it isn't like all the credit goes to your framing expertise anyway. it's great.

looking at those, the first one especially (which seems so like 'contemporary new york', to me, & which you would kinda hope will richen w/age), i just wondered about going back to the idea of presenting photos, do you-all ever think of collecting your stuff? i just mean broadly, what your thoughts are; it was inspiring to me to see grady's book/pamphlet (online, i haven't bought one yet, it'll happen), & part of me thought i should make some kind of something full of mine (i think i eventually decided against this because they look good enough online & i don't think are neatly cohesive enough to necessarily form a book or w/e). & none of this necessarily relates to like kickstarted attempts to raise $20000 for printing at Peru's finest press or anything; i just mean on any scale. do you guys, ILP in exile, consider it?

Never translate German (schlump), Thursday, 8 December 2011 12:19 (twelve years ago) link

I have been really impressed with (and inspired by) the photography of Missy Prince of late

http://lpvmagazine.com/2011/07/missy-prince/

Came across her quite randomly and wonder what you photography types think!

OCCUPY DEPRESSION (Fotherington Thomas), Thursday, 8 December 2011 13:12 (twelve years ago) link

Funnily enough, that first photo reminds me of Lelant Saltings in Hale, Cornwall.

Jilted John and Marsha (MarkG oo la showaddywaddy), Thursday, 8 December 2011 13:16 (twelve years ago) link

yeah they're real nice, FT. & interesting. obv the colours are very good but the angles seem kinda unusual too.

interesting that she mentions wenders' photography; I can only think of one WW photo i've seen, which I liked a bunch & hadn't ever followed up on

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-smbhN1h_fFg/Tkr1QR3peYI/AAAAAAAACR4/Zh8DhLInVBk/s1600/wenders.coke.jpg, fwiw)

Never translate German (schlump), Thursday, 8 December 2011 14:06 (twelve years ago) link

also just skipping the interim detailing of how i looked up wenders and found nice photos he took, does anyone have any experience w/HORIZON CAMERAS?, the panoramic originally russian now maybe lomo-fied (lomotomised?, lol) ones? they look fun

Never translate German (schlump), Thursday, 8 December 2011 14:17 (twelve years ago) link

& none of this necessarily relates to like kickstarted attempts to raise $20000 for printing at Peru's finest press or anything; i just mean on any scale. do you guys, ILP in exile, consider it?

I threw together a blurb book of the photos I took of my friends over the course of the last year, was going to give them out as Christmas presents, but with the nice ProLine paper it's ~$38/book, which is a bit more than I can afford right now for 10+ people.

http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/2689556

milo z, Thursday, 8 December 2011 14:42 (twelve years ago) link

oh that's neat; lol at some of the photos also. that's a nice idea. i mean, you know when you get ex-libris titles in which plates have been stuck or glued? i kinda wonder whether that's an option, too; i mean there's a line between crumply photo album & ~book~ but i feel like even hand-making an edition of one w/photographic prints would be neat in a lot of ways

Never translate German (schlump), Thursday, 8 December 2011 15:05 (twelve years ago) link

the idea of putting together some sort of book is appealing, but I just don't know how I'd have the time?
I don't even have any meaningful prints really. if I put in most of my editing work on the computer, then I don't know what makes sense... dig out the negatives and get them enlarged someplace? print from the digital scans? somehow that feels wrong.

chinavision, Friday, 9 December 2011 02:23 (twelve years ago) link

ctein over at top is an advocate of printing from scans for negatives - you have much more control over the printing process and editing than you would in a traditional darkroom

dayo, Friday, 9 December 2011 02:25 (twelve years ago) link

huh.. guess I figured I'd be losing out on "the magic" or something. nice to know that it isn't considered a dead end!

chinavision, Friday, 9 December 2011 02:57 (twelve years ago) link

well you get much more precise control over stuff like tonality and gradation and color shifts etc. you control more variables

and since you have a dedicated 35mm I imagine it's no slouch!

dayo, Friday, 9 December 2011 03:05 (twelve years ago) link

it's not bad, although prob not the best in the world. I need to get my hands on a decent printer so I can sink further into the photography time hole.

chinavision, Friday, 9 December 2011 03:09 (twelve years ago) link

Stephen Shore has also gone entirely to digital output. I liked printing color in a darkroom, but it's hard to beat the control and archival qualities of a good inkjet print.

milo z, Friday, 9 December 2011 05:50 (twelve years ago) link

xp yeah, I gotta think that digital printing works best with color prints

dayo, Friday, 9 December 2011 12:41 (twelve years ago) link

Those Alex Webb pictures are stellar.

chinavision, Friday, 9 December 2011 14:10 (twelve years ago) link

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7004/6457815743_fa0f685285.jpg
miners by dysign, on Flickr

sir thermo of thinwall, Friday, 9 December 2011 15:25 (twelve years ago) link

woot!

sir thermo of thinwall, Friday, 9 December 2011 15:25 (twelve years ago) link

oh - it did work. disregard previous woot.

sir thermo of thinwall, Friday, 9 December 2011 15:25 (twelve years ago) link

huh. sorry that is so big.

sir thermo of thinwall, Friday, 9 December 2011 15:26 (twelve years ago) link

dayo, is there actually such a pervasive sense of quiet, anomic despair on the streets in HK, or do you shelve the photos of people going about not seemingly contemplating their insignificance? yr photz are so good & they have such a strong feeling to them. sorta like tsai ming-liang's taiwan

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 10 December 2011 10:46 (twelve years ago) link

aw thanks schlump! no there are tons of happy people in HK I just don't take pictures of them :< I keep thinking about this idea that I read in a gerry badger book that he got from somebody else prob that photography is a medium best suited for melancholy and I wonder how true that is

dayo, Saturday, 10 December 2011 11:50 (twelve years ago) link

ha that's interesting. i saw Geoff Dyer give a talk about photography recently & he was maybe slightly mythically talking about the photographers in the '60s & '70s loving the empty streets, or the "built environment" "haunted" by "lone figures", which you can obv bring a lot of evidence for (i'm not good w/names but obv there are a few of those classic NY guys shooting outta their windows). all of which seems to feed an idea of melancholia - the people faceless & far away & made Keaton-ishly small by the dominance of the city &c&c&c. i think it is def a poignant thing - a kinda break or paradox or something - to be able to get on film, cf Frank's elevator girl maybe.

the idea of putting together some sort of book is appealing, but I just don't know how I'd have the time?

but china you LOVE SCANNING, c'mon throw yourself into it. i know what you mean. i have been so pleased w/how things have looked on screen that the impetus to do much with physical prints has become smaller, but i can see the kind of 'cohesive' / 'physical object' appeal of a book. i think i have less of a priority of things looking their best than you guys (i guess bc my photography is so much better?, & i am sorta a more original visual thinker?, & bad facsimiles of my photos are still superior to well-rendered representations of allay'all's? no idk i just mean i don't go that extra mile re: good scans), but just making an object even if it were sorta hand-made would still mean something to me, i think.

here is another tangent: has anyone ever really fucked w/their negatives, much? the violence of it can be so striking & disarming, seeing it in (again) Frank's later work, it is a wild thing to me. i wish there were more crossover between a couple of the ilx filmmakers & the ilp cru bc i feel like i've read some super-eighters talk about the physicality of celluloid interestingly before

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 10 December 2011 15:56 (twelve years ago) link

lol I was going to post about how frank's elevator girl is maybe my most favorite photograph ever but I see you got there first!

dayo, Saturday, 10 December 2011 16:04 (twelve years ago) link

ha. i can't even choose that way. i know i posted this maybe a while ago, re: discussion of crowds vs emptiness, but my reflex pick for fav photo is this b/w eggleston, which actually sorta seems relevant to the same point of like, 'dislocation in built environments', &c. for frank jeez who could choose, i always liked the guy hugging the girl but it could be one of a million. & yeah the elevator girl is allllll time.

also fond of this photo of christina carter by Benoit Chaput ("after bagels & coffee, 2004")

http://www.manybreaths.com/images/photos/45.jpg

& a photo of my grandparents that i don't have a scan of.

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 10 December 2011 16:28 (twelve years ago) link

aw that eggleston is a seriously great photo. the shadow on the lawn, some kind of split. wish I could see it bigger.

dayo, Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:14 (twelve years ago) link

ah, frustrating i can't find it any bigger; was so psyched at his whitney show to see it, a slightly damaged print, not so big. the guy in it is holding his spectacles in his right hand & looks sorta dazed, which w/o being too prescriptive is just perfect, what w/it being such almost cartoonish "the american suburbs" in the backdrop. HOW DID I GET HERE?.

all this egglestoning reminds me, i've still never seen either of the documentaries about him, but i watched this clip a couple of days ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R8wQ7YFSxs

which would only persuaded me to watch it for the lols. it's like that great saul leiter interview from a while back. documentarians bringing too much to the table.

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:22 (twelve years ago) link

I love that Christina Carter photo, her sleepiness and the messy, domestic scene

lebateauivre, Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:24 (twelve years ago) link

yeah it just propaganda for breakfast that photo, you want to inhabit it. she is a totally radiant subject anyway but that photo has so much going for it.

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:30 (twelve years ago) link

I saw a film about eggleston once, can't remember what it was called. I like the stories about him driving around in a cadillac, wearing white cotton gloves.

dayo, Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:32 (twelve years ago) link

he is so cool in every photo i have ever seen of him. that sounds dumb & teenagishly impressed but i just mean i guess they all contribute to my idea of him as exactly what you expect/hope, this southern guy packing a camera & crouching to shoot a few times a day.

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:36 (twelve years ago) link

posting this again

http://www.shanelavalette.com/images/journal/egglestonandlynch.jpg

dayo, Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:40 (twelve years ago) link

oh hey btw

did you ever get to your copy of for now, btw? everytime i see things from it online i get closer to buying it, & i am not a buy-photo-books kinda guy, really

xp lol yes
actually trying to find a couple of others from i think an essay i read a while ago by a friend of his, w/some candid shots of him hanging out/shooting on a porch, on the street, &c, hm.

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:41 (twelve years ago) link

yeah I have for now at home, haven't looked at it, along with a billion other books. I think all my discretionary spending goes towards booze and photography stuff. will look at over break

dayo, Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:45 (twelve years ago) link

ha, okay. i have a couple eggleston books which i guess i don't just pick up & look through often enough, so maybe it's that that is dissuading me. spending on photography stuff = p good plan i think. going places is the most meritous thing i can think to do with money & that's a good fit w/taking photos also.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lbgmzbdigt1qbiq3oo1_500.jpg

Never translate German (schlump), Saturday, 10 December 2011 17:47 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.