prison rape

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (130 of them)
...

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:13 (seventeen years ago) link

...

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:13 (seventeen years ago) link

do any of the people you narced on have to do time?

bell labs (bell_labs), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:15 (seventeen years ago) link

all of them

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:15 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah, mickey - it's like you're seeking out the most obvious baiting material. at least let people work a little harder for their zings

bill sackter (bill sackter), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:16 (seventeen years ago) link

fed or state?

bell labs (bell_labs), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:18 (seventeen years ago) link

[...]

amon (amon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:18 (seventeen years ago) link

fed

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:19 (seventeen years ago) link

bill sackter, i don't know you. don't act like you know me.

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:19 (seventeen years ago) link

[...][...][...][...]
[...][...][...][...]
[...][...][...][...]
[...][...][...][...]

amon (amon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:19 (seventeen years ago) link

"knowing" people on the internets lol

bill sackter (bill sackter), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:21 (seventeen years ago) link

god forbid anyone should care about preventable cruelty.

Maria e (Maria), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:22 (seventeen years ago) link

not as bad. supposedly. i hope, as i have a family member about to do ~10

mainly because he refused to sell out his coworkers and didnt take a plea. which i respect him for a lot.

bell labs (bell_labs), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:24 (seventeen years ago) link

it's a v. tough dilemma. i'm not happy with myself, not at all. it's not like tv.

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:25 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah, it's not.

bell labs (bell_labs), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Prison rape is very much a taboo topic. Although rape is a horrific crime, the media has no qualms about reporting on the topic, but when it involves inmates, considered the scum of society, suddenly no one is interested. “They deserve what they get. Let’s leave it at that.” This speaks volumes of the de-humanized way we view those individuals within our justice system. But let’s not forget that those individuals are people, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers. It is true that many have committed heinous crimes, but allowing rape to occur within the walls of an institution promotes chaos.

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:28 (seventeen years ago) link

here's a horrific pun:

http://www.deathrowrecords.com/images/covers_s/bone_thugs_war_is_on_L_T.gif

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:39 (seventeen years ago) link

one of the pics on GIS after typing in "thuggish ruggish bone":

http://ourworld.cs.com/msrocks01/glitter_pinups_myway/msmw002.gif

Eisbär (Eisbär), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:44 (seventeen years ago) link

sexy

step hen faps (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:46 (seventeen years ago) link

do any of the people you narced on have to do time?
-- bell labs (lindsay...), February 14th, 2007. (bell_labs) (link)

all of them
-- hm (mi...), February 14th, 2007. (modestmickey) (link)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemma

friday on the porch (lfam), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:48 (seventeen years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_efficiency

friday on the porch (lfam), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:54 (seventeen years ago) link

i, for one, would be delighted if mickey was raped! lol.

aidsy (aidsy), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 04:58 (seventeen years ago) link

lol torture is funny let's go watch "24"

Tyrone Slothrop (Tyrone Slothrop), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 05:05 (seventeen years ago) link

mickey, yes, a serious issue indeed. that first post of yours was...well...terrible to read.

but try a little tenderness yourself. suicide jokes = not funny.

the table is the table (trees), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 05:08 (seventeen years ago) link

trees, you are entirely, utterly correct. i was a hypocrite and i apologize.

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 05:10 (seventeen years ago) link

i find it hard not to become cynical and vile around here.

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 05:10 (seventeen years ago) link

"around here"?
meaning the internet?

i mean., you aren't in prison or anything.

bell labs (bell_labs), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 05:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Modest Mickey has another stage name now.
He is someone you will never find on the net.
You never him.
I write in different languages. The music you heard is not what I am all about.
It is very little.
I resent being analyzed.
alot of you and the people who are running Google are on a powertrip.
I just want to do music for people who don't analyze it, but just enjoy it.
I am moving right now.
I am moving to a nice house on a lake and awaiting my Avalon 747 which should be here soon. I am in a place where I can't record. It is very noisy. That is why I have to move.
People are just sitting back, smug and analyzing and correcting me...with no knowledge of what I know or what I am doing.
I am not here for people to judge. I am not a little boy. I do know that men enjoy picking on people like they are little boys who need to be corrected...but I am not interested in this game anymore. I don't care if some of you will never find me.
You don't post really nice comments and there always has to be some kind of negative stick.
YOU will never FIND MY NEW STAGE NAME.
YOU CAN'T JUST ABUSE ARTISTS..AND YOU ARE ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN IN THIS UNMODERATED ABUSE BOARD, CALLED "I LOVE MUSIC." WHAT A JOKE. HARDLY ANY OF YOU RESPECT ARTISTS.

mick@ey (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 06:36 (seventeen years ago) link

This subject deserves a better thread than mere Mickey baiting. The idea that anyone who ends up in jail for whatever stupid crime deserves the worse kind of treatment is terrible and depressing and seems to give no thought to the consequences of what happens when these same people leave prison. Where America seems to be now is where the UK is heading and the GBP seem happy to let it.

ned trifle XIV (ned trifle XIV), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 08:45 (seventeen years ago) link

Even if that is (as many experts believe) a conservative estimate, it translates into a stunning number of victims.

Particularly if you factor in (or out) that a portion of the remainder would be the perpretrators.

M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 09:51 (seventeen years ago) link

The way in which prisoners are treated in the U.S. is nothing short of frightening. I read an article last year in a journal called Class and Society which, okay, is a left-wing British journal, but they had what appeared to be a well-researched article about prisons in the U.S. It talked about the shock that the general public felt when it saw how the prisoners in Abu Ghraib were being treated, and pointed out that many of those guarding those prisoners work as prison officers in the States and have very bad reputations there too.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 10:25 (seventeen years ago) link

lThis subject deserves a better thread than mere Mickey baiting.

the only way to do this is to ban him.

temporary enrique (temporary enrique), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 10:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Or just talk about the subject without slagging him off?

ned trifle XIV (ned trifle XIV), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:41 (seventeen years ago) link

The idea that anyone who ends up in jail for whatever stupid crime deserves the worse kind of treatment is terrible and depressing and seems to give no thought to the consequences of what happens when these same people leave prison.

i think this implication is what is given the least thought. how can society reasonably expect anybody to be 'rehabilitated' in prison after traversing such horrendous circumstances? prison culture leads to a more violent, criminal society. EVERYBODY loses, and for some reason it's still a funny seinfeld joke.

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:15 (seventeen years ago) link

The way in which prisoners are treated in the U.S. is nothing short of frightening.

Good Frontline shows about US prisons: The New Asylums and Angel on Death Row. Their whole criminal justice series is pretty eye opening.

An Atlantic Article about the US Prison Industrial Complex

It's terrifying.

Handgun O. Mendocino (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:24 (seventeen years ago) link

how can society reasonably expect anybody to be 'rehabilitated' in prison after traversing such horrendous circumstances?

Or, you know, if they won't let them vote after they get out?

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:26 (seventeen years ago) link

well, just to be fair, there's a little more nuance to it than that. voting laws are different depending on the state, and in many places they can vote again after getting out.

i think prison rape needs to be addressed and radically changed in popular culture before it even has a possibility of being addressed in the political sphere.

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:34 (seventeen years ago) link

See, I disagree. It needs to be changed institutionally before it can change culturally. That is what I think.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:35 (seventeen years ago) link

and where will the impetus for politicians come from?

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:37 (seventeen years ago) link

what can politicians do about prison rape, really? if you can think of something, i'd love to hear it

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

And I think prison rape is a symptom of larger systemic rot within the criminal justice system as a whole and cannot be effectively addressed without getting at the supporting framework!

But we can all at least agree that it's a terrible thing. And probably that the first step in any solution is awareness of it as an actual problem. I agree w/ Mickey that moving it to the "not okay to make jokes about" list is a good start.

Handgun O. Mendocino (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Every year, the DMail has the usual "Huntley in having Christmas Dinner" outrage, immediately followed by "inmates in not having Christmas Dinner so as not to offend muslim inmates" also outrage....

M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost

Well, Jeffrey Archer was all against prison reform until he was an inmate, and then he was all for it.

M Grout (Mark Grout), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

and where will the impetus for politicians come from?

Well, that's the question. Because I could ask where the impetus for cultural change will come from if the people who are responsible for the actual care of prisoners don't take that responsibility seriously. The two things go hand in hand.

I read a journal article recently that suggested that international pressure could be the answer, but the U.S. doesn't listen to international pressure, so all that can be hoped for is that some politician will make a crusade of it and start the ball rolling.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:46 (seventeen years ago) link

so all that can be hoped for is that some politician will make a crusade of it and start the ball rolling.

This is pretty OTM. Most voters would bring back flogging; the future is certainly not in the proles.

Johnney B's got a system (stigoftdumpilx), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:51 (seventeen years ago) link

what can politicians do about prison rape, really? if you can think of something, i'd love to hear it

-- Mr. Que (pelagi...), February 14th, 2007. (Party with me Punker)

that's kind of like taking the position "and how do we successfully end the iraq war? if you can't figure it out, i guess we have no choice but to stay and do the exact same thing!" as citizens, i don't think it is our position to figure out the solution. that is what our government is for. we need to recognize the urgency and monstrosity of the situation and give them impetus for change.

but here's a few suggestions. first, address prison overcrowding. they're simply too few. there's two parts of that. first, we need more and larger prisons, and second, we need to not be throwing people in prison who have no business being there. american society at large truly doesn't understand the extant of that second part. and then, why not have a lot more oversight of prison administration? from what it sounds like to me, the guards and what they do is largely up to their own doing. there's very little accountability.

as it stands right now, i believe that prison culture perpetuates criminal culture. somebody who is imprisoned is much more likely to be a repeat, and worse, offender, than had they not gone through the prison system of institutionalized rape. so, we've created a giant snowball rolling down a mountain. how we stop the rapid growth will be a huge problem, but the first step is addressing that it must be done. right now, even that is miles away.

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:53 (seventeen years ago) link

you want more prisons but then you want less people to go to prison?

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:56 (seventeen years ago) link

yes and yes

hm (modestmickey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:57 (seventeen years ago) link

my father, who is going to jail

that's terrible, i'm really sorry.

urghonomic (gcannon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:30 (seventeen years ago) link

where it's not AS much of a problem.

rape in prisons shouldn't happen, rape outside of prisons shouldn't happen, etc. i'm not opposed to anyone championing this as their cause, i just think things like there are other things to talk about reforming first (i.e. mandatory minimum sentencing for non-violent criminals)

bell labs (bell_labs), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, sorry.

Back to runningthe world:

ALSO, forget about the "problem" of gays inthe military. THE MILITARY SHOULD BE ALL DRAG QUEENS.
I also have a really great idea about power plants that would be run by stationary-bicycles, pedaled by addicts. To get a dose of their drug/drink of choice, they need only pedal. They would live there. It would be a comfy place.
THERE!!!!
TERRIBLE PROBLEM OF ADDICTION SOLVED
ALSO TERRIBLE PROBLEM OF FOREIGN OIL, NUKE PLANTS, ETC ETC.

This is how I pass my insomniac hours.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link

And with all the addicts busy pedalling, the old grannies on police patrol would have quite an easy time of it.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm not opposed to anyone championing this as their cause, i just think things like there are other things to talk about reforming first (i.e. mandatory minimum sentencing for non-violent criminals)

I don't think it has to be an either/or situation. Those things all go together.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:47 (seventeen years ago) link

seriously i doubt most people around these parts think about such things, except as a punchline for a joke, so if you really think you are going to get serious responses to this, you are barking up the wrong tree.

ILE can still sometimes surprise you.

It's Teatime in Buttercup Land (Maaarghk C), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:08 (seventeen years ago) link

"Anyone who WANTS to carry a gun and boss others around IS AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFIED."

OTM.

And weird. I've been saying this - in more-or-less exactly those words - for years. The whole problem with cops & copping is that the attraction-points for the job (unquestioned authority, ability to cause fear in others, gun carrying, supertuff macho/hetero image, permission to use threats & even violence) pretty much guarantee that most people who will want the job shouldn't be allowed anywhere near it.

But as true as that might seem, it's too simplistic. Law enforment officers sometimes need to to communicate threat (a willingness to do real harm) in order to overcome the belligerence of others without actually resorting to violence. And unfortunately, the best way to communicate threat is to be legitimately threatening - i.e., cops have to mean it when they get tough. Therefore, there's a legitimate need for a "thuggish" tendency in certain police officers. Catch-22.

How do you balance the need for genuinely threatening cops (as a violence deterrent) with the simple fact that most genuinely threatening people can't be trusted to montitor and control their own behavior?

as in 'powdered feet' (pye poudre), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:41 (seventeen years ago) link

The prison system is fundamentally broken. To me, if someone is in prison, it's because they weren't able to work within the rules and need to be shown there are ways to work within the rules and work out a life, or they need to be incarcerated because they've demonstrated that they have no intention of functioning with the rest of society. It should be the adult version of giving someone a "time out," not the equivalent of beating the shit out of them every time they do something bad.

That doesn't even begin to speak to the mentally unwell or mentally incompetent. Yes, having a system of asylums tended toward the "One Flew over the Cuckoos Nest" complex, but many people who would have been there are now either medicated, in jail, or on the street. If you don't have money or the right background, one of the latter two. Finding someone mentally incompetent is seen as letting them off easy, which is ridiculous since being sent to a mental health facility tends on average to result in longer stays than most jail sentences, and it's a form of rehabilitation.

So encapsulating it with "prison rape is bad, huh" and drawing attention by highlighting the anal rape accounts diverts from the real issue -- prisons aren't making anything better, they're just getting more full and destroying lives. Sometimes through inmate-on-inmate violence, sometimes just because it's the wrong place to send people.

mh (mike h.), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 19:01 (seventeen years ago) link

much of this could be prevented if prison cafeterias only served Olestra potato chips

the kwisatz bacharach (sanskrit), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

haha

iiiijjjj (iiiijjjj), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Olestra jokes. Reminds me of watching Letterman in 1997 or something. Good times.

iiiijjjj (iiiijjjj), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:31 (seventeen years ago) link

well, it would reduce tearage

the kwisatz bacharach (sanskrit), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Well yeah, indirectly right? I just thought you meant if everyone's buttholes were inflamed and leaking that the inmates' collective rape-want would be subdued on account of the unsavory circumstances. But you're saying Olestra actually works to toughen anuses up?

iiiijjjj (iiiijjjj), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:36 (seventeen years ago) link

sorry, i signed an NDA.

the kwisatz bacharach (sanskrit), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:43 (seventeen years ago) link

I think mike means lubricate.

dan selzer (dan selzer), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh. Seems like regular-fat potato chips would do a better job of that though. Are there any potato chip eating sodomites here that can help settle this debate?

iiiijjjj (iiiijjjj), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:52 (seventeen years ago) link

I would like to thank the last three posters for making this thread awesome.

Mr. Que (Party with me Punker), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Regular-fat potato chips don't cause leakage. Olestra chips do. I'm leaving this conversation right now.

dan selzer (dan selzer), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 21:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah Olestra chips cause leakage, but does leakage necessarily = lubrication? Diarrhea is mostly a water-based substance! I'm no molecular physicist here, but it seems to me that stool loaded with digested Lay's Sour Cream and Onion potato chips would probably coat the surface of the anus and yield much slicker, smoother physical properties.

iiiijjjj (iiiijjjj), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:01 (seventeen years ago) link

the idea is that olestra is a fat-like substance that is not digestible.

Dethrone the dictaphone, hit it in it's funny bone (kenan), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:04 (seventeen years ago) link

You guys are making me so hungry. Stop it!

PPlains (PPlains), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh OK, I get it then. Olestra will lubricate just as well, but also aids in creating a poopier, less enticing anus, therefore establishing it as an equally delicious rape deterrent superior to regular Lay's Sour Cream and Onion chips.

iiiijjjj (iiiijjjj), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Problem solved!

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:09 (seventeen years ago) link

Pringles® rape

amon (amon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:13 (seventeen years ago) link

"once you pop..."

amon (amon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:13 (seventeen years ago) link

http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/728/3866542623dc0e38155xn0.jpg

(I thieved from you ;___;)

PPlains (PPlains), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:18 (seventeen years ago) link

I could go for some Flamin' Hot Anal Cheetos, Cool Felch Doritos, or Chili Cheese Corn and Peas Fritos

iiiijjjj (iiiijjjj), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:19 (seventeen years ago) link

you should go eat those then

coz larry (bundgee), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:26 (seventeen years ago) link

today my coworker showed me pringles with trivia printed on them

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:29 (seventeen years ago) link

You mean, imprinted on the actual Pringle chip itself?

PPlains (PPlains), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:40 (seventeen years ago) link

i could see doing that in the ridges of ruffles

amon (amon), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:56 (seventeen years ago) link

yes

jw (ex machina), Wednesday, 14 February 2007 22:57 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.ubu.com/film/genet.html

Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 15 February 2007 01:49 (seventeen years ago) link

(i.e. mandatory minimum sentencing for non-violent criminals)

-- bell labs (lindsay...), February 14th, 2007. (bell_labs)

maybe you and i are talking about different things, but the supreme court just recently deemed unconstitutional the mandatory sentencing guidelines. it happened about 6 months before my date. had it not, i was pretty much surely destined for prison. i don't want to make this thread about me, but damn, that fact still astounds me.

hm (modestmickey), Thursday, 15 February 2007 03:56 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't like the idea of prison ape anymore than anyone else. But if Gorilla Grodd continues his crime sprees what choice do we have?

a bulldog fed a cookie shaped like a kitten (austin), Thursday, 15 February 2007 04:20 (seventeen years ago) link

after some googling, i can only find one thing actually being done:
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=1003&year=2007

a proposed bill in washington state to basically test for HIV in prisons.

here's some wa state conservative blog that is outraged by these "felon friendly" bills by democrats:
http://soundpolitics.com/archives/007997.html

hm (modestmickey), Thursday, 15 February 2007 04:32 (seventeen years ago) link

5 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) The legislature finds that there is a
6 disproportionately high rate of HIV and AIDS among incarcerated
7 persons. Approximately twenty-five percent of the HIV-positive
8 population of the United States passes through correctional facilities
9 each year. The bureau of justice statistics has determined that the
10 rate of confirmed AIDS cases is three times hig11 offenders than in the general population.

hm (modestmickey), Thursday, 15 February 2007 04:34 (seventeen years ago) link

Copyright 2006 The Seattle Times Company
The Seattle Times

November 14, 2006 Tuesday
Fourth Edition

SECTION: ROP ZONE; News; Pg. A1

LENGTH: 1390 words

HEADLINE: Rare criminal trial focuses attention on "huge problem" of prison rape

BYLINE: Jennifer Sullivan, Seattle Times staff reporter

BODY:


Tremayne Francis is a cellmate's worst nightmare.

Convicted in 1998 of raping two young men while working as a martial-arts instructor in Pierce County, Francis was sent to prison for nine years. But even behind the razor wire, Francis used extortion and violence to force fellow inmates to have sex with him and raped two men new to prison, according to prison records.

When confronted by prison staff, Francis, 34, claimed he had a multiple-personality disorder and denied the rapes, claiming the sex was consensual, records show. Though found guilty of both rapes in prison hearings, the worst punishment he endured was solitary confinement and victim-awareness classes each time ending up back in the general prison population.

But Francis is facing a criminal trial this week in Snohomish County Superior Court for the 2005 rape of an inmate at the Monroe Correctional Complex, the first such prosecution since the state enacted a new federal policy aimed at reducing prison rape. Because of how unusual it is for prison rapes to become the focus of a criminal prosecution, the case has drawn the attention of the state Department of Corrections, as well as prosecutors and inmate-rights groups nationwide.

"We've never had a prisoner-on-prisoner sexual assault prosecuted in this county before. It just doesn't happen very often," said Matt Baldock, the Snohomish County deputy prosecutor who will try Francis. "I have not heard from anybody who has prosecuted a case like this before."

Baldock says he faces an uphill battle in trying to win a conviction against Francis. He's certain many jurors seated before him this week will wonder why they should even care what happens to prison inmates.

hm (modestmickey), Thursday, 15 February 2007 05:09 (seventeen years ago) link

http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/728/3866542623dc0e38155xn0.jpg
U GONNA GET RAPED

and what (ooo), Thursday, 15 February 2007 05:19 (seventeen years ago) link

(xpost to mickey) most judges still follow the sentencing guidelines. booker is even less of an issue in white collar crime, which is what she's referring to.

coz larry (bundgee), Thursday, 15 February 2007 06:16 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.