― remy bean (bean), Saturday, 30 December 2006 16:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 30 December 2006 16:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 30 December 2006 16:37 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 30 December 2006 16:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― suzy artskooldisko (suzy artskooldisko), Saturday, 30 December 2006 17:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― tipsy mothra (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 30 December 2006 18:05 (seventeen years ago) link
I mean essentially I agree with the more holistic worldview you describe - where all of these elements exist and develop together - but Dawkins' argument attempts to separate religion out of this matrix and blame it for society's ills, which is what I have a problem with. Its like when atheists get all excited about blaming religion as the source of all wars throughout history or some such bullshit, its just myopic and simplistic and innacurate.
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 30 December 2006 20:08 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 30 December 2006 20:13 (seventeen years ago) link
Formerly known as "religion".
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 December 2006 22:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― tipsy mothra (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 30 December 2006 22:15 (seventeen years ago) link
10 myths -- and 10 truths -- about atheism
― kingfish in absentia (kingfish), Sunday, 31 December 2006 08:29 (seventeen years ago) link
for me, it's pretty simple: atheists getting "militant" on everybody's ass is spectacularly unhelpful. what dawkins and others are doing - and they really don't seem to realise the irony - is repositioning "atheism" as not just a lack of belief but as a belief system in itself: ie "i identify myself as a devout non-believer, and will angrily spout the following atheist dogma".
jesus christ bloody hell for god's sake ... er, look, fellow atheists. it's not difficult. we're meant to be the tolerant ones, remember?
― grimly fiendish (simon), Sunday, 31 December 2006 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Sunday, 31 December 2006 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:00 (seventeen years ago) link
"god": a theoretical concept invented by humans in a (pretty flawed) attempt to etc etc.
"the internet": an etc etc etc.
― grimly fiendish (simon), Sunday, 31 December 2006 17:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 31 December 2006 18:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― Maria e (Maria), Sunday, 31 December 2006 19:47 (seventeen years ago) link
maybe you'd like it better in RUSSIA where THEY DON'T HAVE GOD
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 31 December 2006 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link
happy new year you theocrazies
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 31 December 2006 20:03 (seventeen years ago) link
i thought agnostics were the tolerant ones. the perceived dogmatism of atheists is what keeps some of us agnostic.
― tipsy mothra (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 31 December 2006 21:00 (seventeen years ago) link
http://salon.com/books/int/2007/01/02/numbers/print.html
"Q: Now, one thing I find curious is your own position in this debate. Your book "The Creationists" is generally acknowledged to be the history of creationism. You've also been very upfront about your own lack of religious belief. Yet, as far as I can tell, you seem to be held in high regard both by creationists and by scientists, which -- I have to say -- is a neat trick. How have you managed this?
A: Unlike many people, I haven't gone out of my way to attack or ridicule critics of evolution. I know some of the people I've written about. They're good people. I know it's not because they're stupid that they are creationists. I'm talking about all my family, too, who are still creationists. So that easy explanation that so many anti-creationists use -- that they're just illiterate hillbillies -- doesn't have any appeal to me, although I'm quite happy to admit that there are some really stupid creationists. "
― schwantz (schwantz), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 19:05 (seventeen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 19:25 (seventeen years ago) link
The Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God (Hardcover) by Carl Sagan
http://www.amazon.com/Varieties-Scientific-Experience-Personal-Search/dp/1594201072/sr=8-1/qid=1167767176/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-9541001-0413728?ie=UTF8&s=books
― o. nate (o. nate), Tuesday, 2 January 2007 19:49 (seventeen years ago) link